Live birth following a single oocyte fertilized with ICSI and embryo biopsy at blastocyst stage: a case report

References

• Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2(8085):366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet. 1992;340(8810):17–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Carvalho JF, Martinhago CD, et al. Estimation of age-dependent decrease in blastocyst euploidy by next generation sequencing: development of a novel prediction model. Panminerva Med. 2019;61(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach EE, Shoham Z, Schachter M, et al. The luteinizing hormone surge– the final stage in ovulation induction: modern aspects of ovulation triggering. Fertil Steril. 1995;64(2):237–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voronina E, Wessel G. The regulation of oocyte maturation. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2003;58:53–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palomba S, Santagni S, La Sala GB. Progesterone administration for luteal phase deficiency in human reproduction: an old or new issue? J Ovarian Res. 2015;8(1):77–92.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu Y, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, et al. Maximizing pregnancy ratesand limiting higher-order multiple conceptions by determining the optimal number of embryos to transfer based on quality. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(4):650–657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Yarali H, Ubaldi FM, et al. Validation of ART calculator for predicting the number of metaphase II oocytes required for obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasi MG, Colasante A, Riccio T, et al. Correlation between aneuploidy, standard morphology evaluation and morphokinetic development in 1730 biopsied blastocysts: a consecutive case series study. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(10):2245–2254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RH. Meiotic errors in human oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Reprod BioMed Online. 2008;16(4):523–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carp H, Toder V, Aviram A, et al. Karyotype of the abortuses in recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(4):678–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, et al. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature. 1990;344(6268):768–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciorio R, Dattilo M. PGT-A preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and embryo selection in routine ART cycles: time to step back? Clin Genet. 2020. doi: 10.1111/cge.13732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertil Steril. 2018 ;110(5):896–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne H, Edgar DH, Baker H. Sperm preparation techniques. In: Gardner DK, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z, editors. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques 2004: laboratory and clinical perspectives. 2nd ed. USA: Informa Healthcare; 2004. p. 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sciorio R, Thong KJ, Pickering SJ. Single blastocyst transfer (SET) and pregnancy outcome of day 5 and day 6 human blastocysts vitrified using a closed device. Cryobiology. 2018;84:40–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciorio R, Thong KJ, Pickering SJ. Increased pregnancy outcome after day 5 versus day 6 transfers of human vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Zygote. 2019;27(05):279–284.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. Culture and transfer of human blastocysts. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1999;11(3):307–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner DK. The impact of physiological oxygen during culture, and vitrification for cryopreservation, on the outcome of extended culture in human IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2016;32(2):137–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciorio S, Smith GD. Embryo culture at a reduced oxygen concentration of 5%: a mini review. Zygote. 2019;27(6):351–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Ubaldi N, et al. What is new in the management of poor ovarian response in IVF? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018;30(3):155–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldi FM, Cimadomo D, Vaiarelli A, et al. Advanced maternal age in IVF: still a challenge? The present and the future of its treatment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, García-Velasco J, Domingo J, et al. Elective and onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(12):2222–2231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves SC, Carvalho JF, Bento FC, et al. A novel predicitive model to estimate the number of mature oocytes required for obtaining at least one euploid blastocyst for transfer in couples undergoing in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the ART calculator. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy and translocations using array comparative genomic hybridization. Curr Genomics. 2012;13(6):463–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar