Luteal phase support for natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a meta-analysis

References

• GeS J. Some new aspects of management of infertility. JAMA. 1949;141:1123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards RG, Steptoe PC, Purdy JM. Establishing full-term human pregnancies using cleaving embryos grown in vitro. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980;87(9):737–756.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, Papanikolaou E, et al. An update of luteal phase support in stimulated IVF cycles. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(6):581–590.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Csapo AI, Pulkkinen MO, Wiest WG. Effects of luteectomy and progesterone replacement therapy in early pregnant patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973;115(6):759–765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounson A, Mohr L. Human pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305(5936):707–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madani T, Ramezanali F, Yahyaei A, et al. Live birth rates after different endometrial preparation methods in frozen cleavage-stage embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299(4):1185–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peigne M, Devouche E, Ferraretto X, et al. Higher live birth rate with stimulated rather than artificial cycle for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;243:144–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, et al. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11(3):300–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Xiao X, Zhang J, et al. Clinical outcomes of frozen embryo versus fresh embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018;298(2):259–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewoud ER, Cantineau AEP, Kollen BJ, et al. What is the optimal means of preparing the endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(5):458–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobara T, Gelbaya TA, Ayeleke RO. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7:CD003414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roque M, Valle M, Sampaio M, et al. Obstetric outcomes after fresh versus frozen-thawed embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assisted Reprod. 2018;22(2):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cardenas Armas DF, Peñarrubia J, Goday A, et al. Frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle increase implantation rates compared artificial cycle. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(10):873–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jing S, Li XF, Zhang S, et al. Increased pregnancy complications following frozen-thawed embryo transfer during an artificial cycle. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(5):925–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saito K, Kuwahara A, Ishikawa T, et al. Endometrial preparation methods for frozen-thawed embryo transfer are associated with altered risks of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Hum Reprod. 2019;34(8):1567–1575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauser BCJM, Devroey P. Reproductive biology and IVF: ovarian stimulation and luteal phase consequences. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2003;14(5):236–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smitz J, Bourgain C, Van Waesberghe L, et al. A prospective randomized study on oestradiol valerate supplementation in addition to intravaginal micronized progesterone in buserelin and HMG induced superovulation. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(1):40–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nosarka S, Kruger T, Siebert I, et al. Luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;60(2):67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linden MVD, Buckingham K, Farquhar C, et al. Luteal phase support for assisted reproduction cycles. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(7):CD009154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kyrou D, Fatemi HM, Popovic-Todorovic B, et al. Vaginal progesterone supplementation has no effect on ongoing pregnancy rate in hCG-induced natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;150(2):175–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjuresten K, Landgren B-M, Hovatta O, et al. Luteal phase progesterone increases live birth rate after frozen embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(2):534–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmani E, Rahsepar M, Eftekhar M. Effect of progesterone supplementation on natural Frozen-Thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Fertil Steril. 2013;7(1):13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee VCY, Li RHW, Ng EHY, et al. Luteal phase support does not improve the clinical pregnancy rate of natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;169(1):50–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park IH, Lee KH, Sun HG, et al. Luteal phase support has a beneficial effect on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Human Reprod. 2013;28:i209.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C-H, Lee Y-J, Lee K-H, et al. The effect of luteal phase progesterone supplementation on natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57(4):291–296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ortega I, Velasco JAG. Progesterone supplementation in the frozen embryo transfer cycle. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(4):253–257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee VCY, Li RHW, Yeung WSB, et al. A randomized double-blinded controlled trial of hCG as luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2017;32(5):1130–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun H, Lee K, Park I, et al. Does luteal phase support improve pregnancy outcome in natural frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles? Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):e357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz E, Bernard L, Ohl J, et al. Luteal phase progesterone supplementation following induced natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(2):95–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orvieto R, Feldman N, Lantsberg D, et al. Natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer-can we improve cycle outcome? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(5):611–615.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yarali H, Polat M, Mumusoglu S, et al. Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016;33(10):1287–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Aono T, Kawamura Y, et al. Suppression of plasma luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone by administration of human chorionic gonadotropin in castrated women. Fertil Steril. 1982;38(2):251–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavaniotou A, Devroey P. Effect of human chorionic gonadotropin on luteal luteinizing hormone concentrations in natural cycles. Fertil Steril. 2003;80(3):654–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montagut M, Santos-Ribeiro S, De Vos M, et al. Frozen-thawed embryo transfers in natural cycles with spontaneous or induced ovulation: the search for the best protocol continues. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2803–2810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarei A, Sohail P, Parsanezhad ME, et al. Comparison of four protocols for luteal phase support in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: a randomized clinical trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(1):239–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatemi HM. Simplifying luteal phase support in stimulated assisted reproduction cycles. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1035–1036.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu X-R, Mu H-Q, Shi Q, et al. The optimal duration of progesterone supplementation in pregnant women after IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2012;10:107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penzias AS. Luteal phase support. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77(2):318–323.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar