Undetectable basal ovarian stromal blood flow in infertile women is related to low ovarian reserve

References

• Faddy M J, Gosden R G. A mathematical model of follicle dynamics in the human. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 770–775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson S J, Senikas V, Nelson J F. Follicular depletion during the menopausal transition: evidence for accelerated loss and ultimate exhaustion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1987; 65: 1231–1237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott R T, Hofmann G E. Prognostic assessment of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 1995; 63: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speroff L, Glass R H, Kase N G. Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility5th ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, (MD) 1994; 183–230
   Google Scholar
• Faddy M J, Gosden R G. A model conforming the decline in follicle numbers to the age of menopause in women. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1484–1486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younis J S, Haddad S, Matilsky M, Ben-Ami M. Premature luteinization: could it be an early manifestation of low ovarian reserve?. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 461–465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muasher S J, Oehninger S, Simonetti S, Matta J, Ellis L M, Liu H-C, Jones G S, Rosenwaks Z. The value of basal and/or stimulated serum gonadotropin levels in prediction of stimulation response and in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 1988; 50: 298–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licciardi F L, Liu H-C, Rosenwaks Z. Day 3 estradiol serum concentrations as prognosticators of ovarian stimulation response and pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 991–994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifer D B, Lambert-Messerlian G, Hogan J W, Gardiner A C, Blazar A S, Berk C A. Day 3 serum inhibin-B is predictive of assisted reproductive technologies outcome. Fertil Steril 1997; 67: 110–114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navot D, Rosenwaks Z, Margalioth E J. Prognostic assessment of female fecundity. Lancet 1987; 2: 645–647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanchin R, de Ziegler D, Olivennes F, Taieb J, Dzik A, Frydman R. Exogenous follicle stimulating hormone ovarian reserve test (EFORT): a simple and reliable test for detecting ‘poor responders’ in in-vitro-fertilization. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1607–1611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla S L, Bayati J, Garcia J E. Prognostic value of the early serum estradiol response to leuprolide acetate in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990; 53: 288–294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott R T, Jr, Hofmann G E, Oehninger S, Muasher S J. Intercycle variability of day 3 follicle-stimulating hormone levels and its effect on stimulation quality in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 297–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Zalud I, Jurkovic D, Alfirevic Z, Miljan M. Transvaginal color Doppler for the assessment of the pelvic circulation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989; 68: 131–135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell S, Bourne T H, Waterstone J, Reynolds K, Crayford T JB, Jurkovic D, Okokon E V, Collins W P. Transvaginal color blood flow imaging of the peri-ovulatory follicle. Fertil Steril 1993; 60: 433–438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steer C V, Campbell S, Tan S L, Crayford T, Mills C, Mason B A, Collins W P. The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 1992; 57: 372–376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Favre R, Bettahar K, Grange G, Ohl J, Arbogast E, Moreau L, Dellenbach P. Predictive value of transvaginal uterine Doppler assessment in an in-vitro fertilization program. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993; 3: 350–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner Z, Thaler I, Levron J, Lewit N, Itskovitz-Eldor J. Assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler in ovarian-stimulated women: correlation with the number of follicles and steroid hormone levels. Fertil Steril 1993; 59: 743–749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir J S, Campbell S, Tan S L. Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 22–29
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng E HY, Tang O S, Chan C CW, Ho P C. Ovarian stromal blood flow in the prediction of ovarian response during in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 3147–3151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Blood flow changes in uterine and ovarian vasculature, and predictive value of transvaginal pulsed color Doppler ultrasonography in an in-vitro fertilization program. Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 688–693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunenfeld E, Schwartz I, Meizner I, Potashnik G, Glezerman M. Intraovarian blood flow during spontaneous and stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 2481–2483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassil S, Wyns C, Toussaint-Demylle D, Nisolle M, Gordts S, Donnez J. The relationship between ovarian vascularity and the duration of stimulated in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1240–1245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chui D KC, Pugh N D, Walker S M, Gregory L, Shaw R W. Follicular vascularity – the predictive value of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography in an in-vitro fertilization program: a preliminary report. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 191–196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan S L. Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular response in an in vitro fertilization program. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 779–784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Lindhard A, Bangsboll S, Andersson A M, Andersen A N. A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in ‘standard’ IVF/ICSI patients treated with recombinant FSH. A suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogram. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 781–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvela I Y, Sladkevicius P, Kelly S, Ojha K, Campbell S, Nargund G. Quantification of ovarian power Doppler signal with tree-dimensional ultrasonography to predict response during in vitro fertilization. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 816–822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan H A, Wu M H, Cheng Y C, Wu L H, Chang F M. Quantification of ovarian stromal Doppler signals in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization with three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 338–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laufer N, Grunfeld L, Garrisi G J. In-vitro fertilization. Infertility – a comprehensive text, M M Seibel. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, (CT) 1990; 481–511
   Google Scholar
• Younis J S, Skournik A, Radin O, Haddad S, Bar-Ami S, Ben-Ami M. Poor oocyte retrieval is a manifestation of low ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2005; 83: 504–507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syrop C H, Wilhoite A, Van-Voorhis B J. Ovarian volume: a novel outcome predictor for assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 1167–1171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lass A, Skull J, McVeigh E, Margara R, Winston R. Measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography before ovulation induction with human menopausal gonadotrophins for in-vitro fertilization can predict poor response. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 294–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Martikainen H. Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reproduc 1997; 12: 220–223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar