Focusing on what you know will narrow your horizon? The role of knowledge base cohesion in learning from brokering

References

• Ahuja, G. 2000. “Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 425–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja, G., and R. Katila. 2001. “Technological Acquisitions and the Innovation Performance of Acquiring Firms: A Longitudinal Study.” Strategic Management Journal 22 (3): 197–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral, S., and M. Van Alstyne. 2011. “The Diversity-Bandwidth Trade-off.” American Journal of Sociology 117 (1): 90–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartnik, R., M. Wilhelm, and T. Fujimoto. 2018. “Introduction to Innovation in the East Asian Automotive Industry: Exploring the Interplay Between Product Architectures, Firm Strategies, and National Innovation Systems.” Technovation 70–71: 1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., E. Kuh, and R. E. Welsch. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bizzi, L. 2013. “The Dark Side of Structural Holes: A Multilevel Investigation.” Journal of Management 39 (6): 1554–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blundell, R., R. Griffith, and J. V. Reenen. 1995. “Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation.” Economic Journal 105 (429): 333–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennecke, J., and O. Rank. 2017. “The Firm’s Knowledge Network and the Transfer of Advice among Corporate Inventors—A Multilevel Network Study.” Research Policy 46 (4): 768–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusoni, S., A. Prencipe, and K. Pavitt. 2001. “Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know More Than They Make?” Administrative Science Quarterly 46 (4): 597–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. 2004. “Structural Holes and Good Ideas.” American Journal of Sociology 110 (2): 349–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buskens, V., and A. van de Rijt. 2008. “Dynamics of Networks if Everyone Strives for Structural Holes.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (2): 371–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnabuci, G., and B. DiÓSzegi. 2015. “Social Networks, Cognitive Style, and Innovative Performance: A Contingency Perspective.” Academy of Management Journal 58 (3): 881–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnabuci, G., and E. Operti. 2013. “Where do Firms’ Recombinant Capabilities Come from? Intraorganizational Networks, Knowledge, and Firms’ Ability to Innovate Through Technological Recombination.” Strategic Management Journal 34 (13): 1591–1613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassiman, B., and R. Veugelers. 2006. “In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition.” Management Science 52 (1): 68–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, S. B., S. H. Lee, and C. Williams. 2011. “Ownership and Firm Innovation in a Transition Economy: Evidence from China.” Research Policy 40 (3): 441–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, M. S. 2018. “Inventing by Combining pre-Existing Technologies: Patent Evidence on Learning and Fishing out.” Research Policy 47 (1): 252–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. M. H. K. B. 1990. “Architectural Innovation:The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, W. M., and D. A. Levinthal. 1989. “Innovation and Learning: The two Faces of R&D.” The Economic Journal 99: 569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., O. Alexy, D. Sharapov, and A. Salter. 2019. “Lifting the Veil: Using a Quasi-Replication Approach to Assess Sample Selection Bias in Patent-Based Studies.” Strategic Management Journal 40 (2): 230–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Este, P. 2005. “How do Firms’ Knowledge Bases Affect Intra-Industry Heterogeneity?: An Analysis of the Spanish Pharmaceutical Industry.” Research Policy 34 (1): 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibiaggio, L., M. Nasiriyar, and L. Nesta. 2014. “Substitutability and Complementarity of Technological Knowledge and the Inventive Performance of Semiconductor Companies.” Research Policy 43 (9): 1582–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. H., and K. Nobeoka. 2000. “Creating and Managing a High-Performance Knowledge-Sharing Network: The Toyota Case.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 345–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., R. Kotha, and Y. Zheng. 2008. “Entry Into Insular Domains: A Longitudinal Study of Knowledge Structuration and Innovation in Biotechnology Firms.” Journal of Management Studies 45 (8): 1448–1474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilsing, V., B. Nooteboom, W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters, and A. V. D. Oord. 2008. “Network Embeddedness and the Exploration of Novel Technologies: Technological Distance, Betweenness Centrality and Density.” Research Policy 37 (10): 1717–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, W. 2003. Econometric Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, H. R. 2007. “Exploration and Exploitation in Product Innovation.” Industrial and Corporate Change 16: 945–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griliches, Z., A. Pakes, and B. Hall. 1986. “The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity.” In Economic Policy and Technical Performance, edited by P. Dasgupta, and P. Stoneman, 97–124. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, J., and N. Liu. 2016. “Exploitative and Exploratory Innovations in Knowledge Network and Collaboration Network: A Patent Analysis in the Technological Field of Nano-Energy.” Research Policy 45 (1): 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guler, I., and A. Nerkar. 2012. “The Impact of Global and Local Cohesion on Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry.” Strategic Management Journal 33 (5): 535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., and M. Riddle. 2005. Introduction of Social Network Methods. Rivreside, CA: University of California at Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• He, Z.-L., and P.-K. Wong. 2004. “Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis.” Organization Science 15 (4): 481–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, R. J., Q. T. Tao, and M. D. Santoro. 2010. “Alliance Portfolio Diversity and Firm Performance.” Strategic Management Journal 31 (10): 1136–1144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamanos, A. G. 2016. “Effects of a Firm's and Their Partners’ Alliance ego–Network Structure on its Innovation Output in an era of Ferment.” R&D Management 46 (S1): 261–276.
   Google Scholar
• Kauppila, O.-P., L. Bizzi, and D. Obstfeld. 2018. “Connecting and Creating: Tertius Iungens, Individual Creativity, and Strategic Decision Processes.” Strategic Management Journal, 39(3): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilduff, M., and D. J. Brass. 2010. “Organizational Social Network Research: Core Ideas and Key Debates.” Academy of Management Annals 4 (1): 317–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kogut, B. 2000. “The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of Structure.” Strategic Management Journal 21 (3): 405–425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinthal, D. A., and J. G. March. 1993. “The Myopia of Learning.” Strategic Management Journal 14 (S2): 95–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, J., and Y. Yu. 2021. “From Collaborative Research to new Product Development: Why a Central or Brokered Network Position is not Enough.” Journal of Knowledge Management 26 (3): 615–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., Y.-C. Huang, and O. Shenkar. 2011. “Social Networks and Opportunity Recognition: A Cultural Comparison Between Taiwan and the United States.” Strategic Management Journal 32 (11): 1183–1205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malerba, F. 2005. “Sectoral Systems of Innovation: A Framework for Linking Innovation to the Knowledge Base, Structure and Dynamics of Sectors.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 14 (1–2): 63–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ning, L., F. Wang, and J. Li. 2016. “Urban Innovation, Regional Externalities of Foreign Direct Investment and Industrial Agglomeration: Evidence from Chinese Cities.” Research Policy 45 (4): 830–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. 2009. A Cognitive Theory of the Firm: Learning, Governance and Dynamic Capabilities. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D. 2005. “Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50 (1): 100–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstfeld, D., S. P. B. And, and J. Davis. 2014. Brokerage as a Process: Decoupling Third Party Action from Social Network Structure. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited: Emerald Group Publishing, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, P., and K. Pavitt. 1997. “The Technological Competencies of the World's Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, but not Much Variety.” Research Policy 26 (2): 141–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintane, E., and G. Carnabuci. 2016. “How Do Brokers Broker? Tertius Gaudens, Tertius Iungens, and the Temporality of Structural Holes.” Organization Science 27 (6): 1343–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling, M. A., and C. C. Phelps. 2007. “Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation.” Management Science 53 (7): 1113–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipilov, A. V. 2009. “Firm Scope Experience, Historic Multimarket Contact with Partners, Centrality, and the Relationship Between Structural Holes and Performance.” Organization Science 20 (1): 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shipilov, A. V., and S. X. Li. 2008. “Can You Have Your Cake and Eat It Too? Structural Holes’ Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (1): 73–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soda, G., M. Tortoriello, and A. Iorio. 2018. “Harvesting Value from Brokerage: Individual Strategic Orientation, Structural Holes, and Performance.” Academy of Management Journal 61 (3): 896–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, J. B., and T. E. Stuart. 2000. “Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (1): 81–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, J. C., and R. M. Grant. 1996. “Knowledge and the Firm: Overview.” Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 5–9.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, A. M., W. Bo, and C. Kah-Hin. 2018. “The Role of Knowledge Base Homogeneity in Learning from Strategic Alliances.” Research Policy 47 (1): 158–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A. 2008. “Do Bridging Ties Complement Strong Ties? An Empirical Examination of Alliance Ambidexterity.” Strategic Management Journal 29 (3): 251–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., J. Li, L. Ning, D. Zeng, and X. Gu. 2014b. “Dynamic Patterns of Technology Collaboration: A Case Study of the Chinese Automobile Industry, 1985–2010.” Scientometrics 101 (1): 663–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., S. Rodan, M. Fruin, and X. Xu. 2014a. “Knowledge Networks, Collaboration Networks, and Exploratory Innovation.” Academy of Management Journal 57 (2): 484–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge, ENG and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, J., W. J. Qualls, and D. Zeng. 2020. “Standardization Alliance Networks, Standard-Setting Influence, and New Product Outcomes*.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 37 (2): 138–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, M. F., and H. P. Bowen. 2009. “The use of Limited Dependent Variable Techniques in Strategy Research: Issues and Methods.” Strategic Management Journal 30 (6): 679–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, T., M. Makhija, and S. Karim. 2021. “A Knowledge Recombination Perspective of Innovation: Review and New Research Directions.” Journal of Management, 01492063211055982.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, Z., and A. S. Tsui. 2007. “When Brokers May Not Work: The Cultural Contingency of Social Capital in Chinese High-Tech Firms.” Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, L., J. Li, and X. Zhou. 2019. “Exploring new Knowledge Through Research Collaboration: The Moderation of the Global and Local Cohesion of Knowledge Networks.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 44: 822–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yayavaram, S., and G. Ahuja. 2008. “Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-Base Malleability.” Administrative Science Quarterly 53 (2): 333–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yayavaram, S., and W.-R. Chen. 2015. “Changes in Firm Knowledge Couplings and Firm Innovation Performance: The Moderating Role of Technological Complexity.” Strategic Management Journal 36 (3): 377–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yayavaram, S., K. Srivastava Manish, and M. B. Sarkar. 2018. “Role of Search for Domain Knowledge and Architectural Knowledge in Alliance Partner Selection.” Strategic Management Journal 39 (8): 2277–2302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahra, S. A., and G. George. 2002. “Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension.” Academy of Management Review 27 (2): 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., and C. Baden-Fuller. 2010. “The Influence of Technological Knowledge Base and Organizational Structure on Technology Collaboration.” Journal of Management Studies 47 (4): 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar