References
- Silva M. T., Sousa J. C. F., Polonia J. J., Macedo P. M. Effects of local anesthetics on bacterial cells. J Bacteriol 1979; 137: 461–8
- Maddi R., Horrow J. C., Mark J. B., Concepcion M., Murray E. Evaluation of a new cutaneous topical anesthesia preparation. Reg Anesth 1990; 15: 109–12
- Thune P., Faerden F., Minor B. G. The analgesic effect of EMLA ointment for skin biopsies. J Dermatol Treat 1990; 1: 239–41
- Vanscheidt W., Sadjadi Z., Lillieborg S. EMLA anaesthetic ointment for sharp leg ulcer debridement: A review of the clinical evidence for analgesic efficacy and tolerability. Eur J Dermatol 2001; 11: 90–6
- Miller M. A., Shelly W. B. Antibacterial properties of lidocaine on bacteria isolated from dermal lesions. Arch Dermatol 1995; 121: 1157–9
- Stratford A. F., Zoutman D. E., Davidson J. S. Effect of lidocaine and epinephrine on Staphylococcus aureus in a guinea pig model of surgical wound infection. Plast Reconst Surg 2002; 110: 1275–9
- Aydin O. N., Eyigor M., Aydin N. Antimicrobial activity of ropivacaine and other local anaesthetics. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18: 687–94
- Kerenyi M., Batai M. R., Juhasz V., Batai I. Lidocaine/prilocaine ointment (EMLA) has an antibacterial effect in vitro. J Hosp Infect 2004; 56: 75–6
- Berg J. O., Mossner B. K., Skov M. N., Lauridsen J., Gottrup F., Kolmos H. J. Antibacterial properties of EMLA and lidocaine in wound tissue biopsies for culturing. Wound Repair Regen 2006; 14: 581–5
- Parr A. M., Zoutman D. E., Davidson J. S. Antimicrobial activity of lidocaine against bacteria associated with nosocomial wound infection. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 43: 239–45