Models of the electrically stimulated binaural system: A review

References

• Agapiou JP, McAlpine D. 2008. Low-frequency envelope sensitivity produces asymmetric binaural tuning curves. J Neurophysiol. 100:2381–2396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T. 2011. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 32:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronoff J, Hughes M. 2016. Binaural hearing with cochlear implants for bilateral, bimodal, and single-sided deafness patients. Ear Hear. 37(3):247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashida G, Kretzberg J, Tollin DJ. 2016. Roles for coincidence detection in coding amplitude-modulated sounds. PLoS Comput Biol. 12(6):e1004997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes-Davies M, Barker MC, Osmani F, Forsythe ID. 2004. Kv1 currents mediate a gradient of principal neuron excitability across the tonotopic axis in the rat lateral superior olive. Eur J Neurosci. 19:325–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann VJ, Lehnert S, Leibold C, Koch U. 2013. Tonotopic organization of the hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the mammalian medial superior olive. Front Neural Circuits. 11:117.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgaertel RM, Hu H, Krawczyk-Becker M, Marquardt D, Herzke T, Coleman G, Adiloğlu K, Bomke K, Plotz K, Gerkmann T, Doclo S, Kollmeier B, Hohmann V, Dietz M. 2015. Comparing binaural pre-processing strategies II: Speech intelligibility of bilateral cochlear implant users. Trends Hearing. 19:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenstein CK, Mens LHM, Mulder JJS, Vanpouke FJ. 2008. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar, tripolar, and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear Hear. 29:250–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein JG, Goupell MJ, Schuchman GI, Rivera AL, Brungart DS. 2016. Having two ears facilitates the perceptual separation of concurrent talkers for bilateral and single-sided deaf cochlear implantees. Ear Hear. 37(3):289–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. 1996. On the use of the normalized correlation as an index of interaural envelope correlation. J Acoust Soc Am. 100:1754–1763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C. 2002. Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using “transposed stimuli”. J Acoust Soc Am. 112:1026–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutelmann R, Brand T. 2006. Prediction of speech intelligibility in spatial noise and reverberation for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 120:331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierer JA, Faulkner KF. 2010. Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode to neuron interface; partial-tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hear. 31(2):247–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand A, Behrend O, Marquardt T, McAlpine D, Grothe B. 2002. Precise inhibition is essential for microsecond interaural time difference coding. Nature 417:543–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, White MW, Irlich LS, O’Leary SJ, Dynes S, Javel E, Clark GM. 1999a. A Stochastic Model of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve: Single-Pulse Response. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46:617–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, Irlich LS, White MW, O’Leary SJ, Dynes S, Javel E, Clark GM. 1999b. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 46:630–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brughera A, Dunai L, Hartmann WM. 2013. Human interaural time difference thresholds for sine tones: The high-frequency limit. J Acoust Soc Am. 133(5):2839–2855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler BE, Lomber SG. 2013. Functional and structural changes throughout the auditory system following congenital and early-onset deafness: implications for hearing restoration. Front Syst Neurosci 7:92.
   Google Scholar
• Cao XJ, Oertel D. 2010. Auditory nerve fibers excite targets through synapses that vary in convergence, strength, and short-term plasticity. J Neurophysiol. 104(5):2308–2320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney LH. 1990. Sensitivities of cells in the anteroventral cochlear nucleus of cat to spatio-temporal discharge patterns across primary afferents. J Neurophysiol. 64:437–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr CE, Konishi MA. 1990. A circuit for detection of interaural time differences in the brain stem of the barn owl. J Neurosci. 10:3227–3246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherry EC. 1953. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am. 25:975–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y, Delgutte B, Colburn HS. 2015. Modeling binaural responses in the auditory brainstem to electric stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 16:135–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung Y, Hancock KE, Delgutte B. 2016. Neural coding of ITD with bilateral cochlear implants in unanesthetized rabbits. J Neurosci. 36(20):5520–5531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn HS, Chung Y, Zhou Y, Brughera A. 2009. Models of brainstem responses to bilateral electrical stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 10(1):91–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn HS, Esquissaud P. 1976. An auditory‐nerve model for interaural time discrimination of high‐frequency complex stimuli. J Acoust Soc Am. 59(S1):S23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day ML, Delgutte B. 2013. Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns. J Neurosci. 33:15837–15847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Backus B. 2015. Sound processing for a bilateral cochlear implant system. European patent application, application number EP 15173203.9.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Ewert SD, Hohmann V. 2009. Lateralization of stimuli with independent fine-structure and envelope-based temporal disparities. J Acoust Soc Am. 125:1622–1635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Ewert SD, Hohmann V. 2011. Auditory model based direction estimation of concurrent speakers from binaural signals. Speech Commun. 53(5):592–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Marquardt T, Salminen NH, McAlpine D. 2013. Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:15151–15156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Marquardt T, Stange A, Pecka M, Grothe B, McAlpine D. 2014. Emphasis of spatial cues in the temporal fine structure during the rising segments of amplitude-modulated sounds II: single-neuron recordings. J Neurophysiol. 111:1973–1985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, McAlpine D. 2015. Advancing Binaural Cochlear Implant Technology. Trends Hearing. 19:1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz M, Wang L, Greenberg D, McAlpine D. 2016. Sensitivity to interaural time differences conveyed in the stimulus envelope: estimating inputs of binaural neurons through the temporal analysis of spike trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 17:313–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman MF, Loiselle L, Stohl JS, Yost WA, Spahr A, Brown C, Cook S. 2014. Interaural level differences and sound source localization for bilateral cochlear implant patients. Ear Hear 35(6):633–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durlach NI. 1963. Equalization and cancellation theory of binaural masking-level differences. J Acoust Soc Am. 35:1206–1218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faller C, Merimaa J. 2004. Source localization in complex listening situations: selection of binaural cues based on interaural coherence. J Acoust Soc Am. 116(5):3075–3089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart T, Lenssen A, Wouters J. 2014. Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 15(4):633–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart T, MacDermott H. 2012. Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: A loudness normalization strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation. PLoS One 7:e45385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredelake S, Hohmann V. 2012. Factors affecting predicted speech intelligibility with cochlear implants in an auditory model for electrical stimulation. Hearing Res. 287:76–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken TP, Bremen P, Joris PX. 2014. Coincidence detection in the medial superior olive: mechanistic implications of an analysis of input spiking patterns. Front Neural Circuits. 8:42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franken TP, Roberts MT, Wei L, Golding NL, Joris PX. 2015. In vivo coincidence detection in mammalian sound localization generates phase delays. Nat Neurosci. 18:444–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaik W. 1993. Combined evaluation of interaural time and intensity differences: Psychoacoustic results and computer modeling. J Acoust Soc Am. 94(1):98–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldwyn J, McLaughlin M, Verschooten E, Joris P, Rinzel J. 2014. A model of the medial superior olive explains spatio-temporal features of local field potentials. J Neurosci. 34:11705–11722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KA, Deighton MR, Abbasalipour P, Papsin BC. 2014. Perception of binaural cues develops in children who are deaf through bilateral cochlear implantation. PLoS ONE. 9:e114841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV. 2006. An evoked potential study of the developmental time course of the auditory nerve and brainstem in children using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol. 11:7–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon KA, Salloum C, Toor GS, van Hoesel R, Papsin BC. 2012. Binaural interactions develop in the auditory brainstem of children who are deaf: Effects of place and level of bilateral electrical stimulation. J Neurosci. 32(12):4212–4223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goupell MJ. 2015. Interaural envelope correlation change discrimination in bilateral cochlear implantees: Effects of mismatch, centering, and onset of deafness. J Acoust Soc Am. 137(3):1282–1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goupell MJ, Stoelb C, Kan A, Litovsky RY. 2013. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on the salience of binaural cues in conditions that simulate bilateral cochlear-implant listening. J Acoust Soc Am. 133(4):2272–2287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grothe B. 2003. New roles for synaptic inhibition in sound localization. Nat Rev Neurosci. 4:540–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas H. 1951. Über den Einfluss eines Einfachechos auf die Hörsamkeit von Sprache (On the influence of a single echo on the intelligibility of speech). Acustica 1(2):49–58, German.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock KE, Delgutte B. 2004. A physiologically based model of interaural time difference discrimination. J Neurosci. 24(32):7110–7117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock KE, Noel V, Ryugo DK, Delgutte B. 2010. Neural coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants: effects of congenital deafness. J Neurosci. 30(42):14068–14079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock KE, Chung Y, Delgutte B. 2012. Neural ITD coding with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of binaurally coherent jitter. J Neurophysiol. 108:714–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper NS, McAlpine D. 2004. Optimal neural population coding of an auditory spatial cue. Nature 430:682–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He S, Brown CJ, Abbas PJ. 2010. Effects of stimulation level and electrode pairing on the binaural interaction component of the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response. Ear Hear. 31(4):457–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh I. 1948. The influence of interaural phase on summation and inhibition. J Acoust Soc Am. 20:536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain WA, Antic SD, Yang Y, Rasband MN, Morest DK. 2005. Where is the spike generator of the cochlear nerve? Voltage-gated sodium channels in the mouse cochlea. J Neurosci. 25(29):6857–6868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu H, Dietz M. 2015. Comparison of interaural electrode pairing methods for bilateral cochlear implantation. Trends in Hearing. 19:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ihlefeld A, Carlyon RP, Kan A, Churchill TH, Litovsky RY. 2015. Limitations on monaural and binaural temporal processing in bilateral cochlear implant listeners. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 16(5):641–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javel E, Shepherd RK. 2000. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res. 140:45–76.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffress LA. 1948. A place theory of sound localization. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 41(1):35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joris PX. 1996. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. II. characteristic delays and comparison with responses in the medial superior olive. J Neurosci. 76(4):2137–2156.
   Google Scholar
• Joris PX, Van de Sande B, Louage DH, van der Heijden M. 2006. Binaural and cochlear disparities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 103:12917–12922.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joris PX, Verschooten E. 2013. On the limit of neural phase locking to fine structure in humans. Adv Exp Med Biol. 787:101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joris PX, Yin TC. 1995. Envelope coding in the lateral superior olive. I. Sensitivity to interaural time differences. J Neurophysiol. 73:1043–1062.
   Google Scholar
• Kan A, Stoelb C, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ. 2013. Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users. J Acoust Soc Am. 134:2923–2936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapfer C, Seidl AH, Schweizer H, Grothe B. 2002. Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons. Nat Neurosci. 5:247–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelvasa JD, Dietz M. 2015. Auditory model-based sound direction estimation with bilateral cochlear implants. Trends in Hearing 19:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerber S, Seeber BU. 2013. Localization in reverberation with cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 14(3):379–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang N, Moxon E. 1972. Physiological considerations in artificial stimulation of the inner ear. Ann. Otology Rhinology Laryngology 81(5):714–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral A, Tillein J, Heid S, Hartmann R, Klinke R. 2005. Postnatal cortical development in congenital auditory deprivation. Cereb. Cortex 15:552–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laback B, Zimmermann I, Majdak P, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM. 2011. Effects of envelope shape on interaural envelope delay sensitivity in acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am. 130:1515–1529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laback B, Egger K, Majdak P. 2015. Perception and coding of interaural time differences with bilateral cochlear implants. Hearing Res. 322:138–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland Jr JT, Svirsky M. 2015. The relationship between insertion angles, default frequency allocations, and spiral ganglion place pitch in cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 36:e207–e213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavandier MN, Culling JF. 2010. Prediction of binaural speech intelligibility against noise in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 127(1):387–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold C, Grothe B. 2015. Sound localization with microsecond precision in mammals: what is it we do not understand? e-Neuroforum. 6:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Licklider JCR. 1948. The influence of interaural phase relations upon the masking of speech by white noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 20(2):150–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann W. 1986. Extension of a binaural cross-correlation model by contralateral inhibition. I. Simulation of lateralization for stationary signals. J Acoust Soc Am. 80: 1608–1622.
   Google Scholar
• Litovsky RY, Gordon K. 2016 in press. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception. Hearing Res.
   Google Scholar
• Long CJ, Holden TA, McClelland GH, Parkinson WS, Shelton C, Kelsall DC, Smith ZM. 2014. Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 15(2):293–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda EA, Eustaquio-Martín A, Stohl JS, Wolford RD, Schatzer R, Wilson BS. 2016. A binaural cochlear implant sound coding strategy inspired by the contralateral medial olivocochlear reflex. Ear Hear. 37:e138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May BJ. 2000. Role of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the sound localization behavior of cats. Hearing Res. 148:74–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAlpine D, Jiang D, Palmer AR. 2001. A neural code for low-frequency sound localization in mammals. Nat Neurosci. 4:396–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinrenken CJ, Borst JGG, Sakmann B. 2003. Local routes revisited: the space and time dependence of the Ca2+ signal for phasic transmitter release at the rat calyx of Held. J Physiol 547(3):665–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks JC, Snyder RL. 2010. Selective electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve activates a pathway specialized for high temporal acuity. J Neurosci. 30:1937–1946.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller CA, Hu N, Zhang F, Robinson BK, Abbas PJ. 2008. Changes across time in the temporal responses of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 9:122–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills AW. 1958. On the minimum audible angle. J Acoust Soc Am. 30(4):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monaghan JJM, Bleeck S, McAlpine D. 2015. Sensitivity to envelope ITDs at high modulation rates. Trends Hearing. 19:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti, M., Wirtz, C., Hemmert, W. (2013). Modeling sound localization with cochlear implants. In J. Blauert (Ed.), The technology of binaural listening (pp. 309–331). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien GE, Rubinstein JT. 2016 in press. The development of biophysical models of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: Single-node and cable models. Network: Computation in Neural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla M, Landsberger DM. 2016. Reduction in spread of excitation from current focusing at multiple cochlear locations in cochlear implant users. Hearing Res. 333:98–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pecka M, Brand A, Behrend O, Grothe B. 2008. Interaural time difference processing in the mammalian medial superior olive: the role of glycinergic inhibition. J Neurosci. 28:6914–6925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon BB, Eddington DK, Noel V, Colburn HS. 2009. Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: Development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing. J Acoust Soc Am. 126:806–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed D, Dietz M, Josupeit A, van de Par S. 2016. Lateralization of a purely binaural modulation percept. J Acoust Soc Am. 139:30–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remme MW, Donato R, Mikiel-Hunter J, Ballestero JA, Foster S, Rinzel J, McAlpine D. 2014. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 111:E2339–2348.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman JS, Manis PB. 2003. Kinetic analyses of three distinct potassium conductances in ventral cochlear nucleus neurons. J Neurophysiol 89:3083–3096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaette R, McAlpine D. 2011. Tinnitus with a normal audiogram: physiological evidence for hidden hearing loss and computational model. J Neurosci. 31(38):13452–13457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayers BM, Cherry EC. 1957. Mechanism of binaural fusion in the hearing of speech. J Acoust Soc Am. 29(9):973–987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder MR, Hall JL. 1974 Model for mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. J Acoust Soc Am. 55:1055–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder MR. 1977. New viewpoints in binaural interactions. In: Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, eds. Evans, E. F. & Wilson, J. P. (Academic, New York). 455–467.
   Google Scholar
• Shamma SA, Shen NM, Gopalaswamy P. 1989. Stereausis: binaural processing without neural delays J Acoust Soc Am. 86:989–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd RK, Javel E. 1999. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties. Hearing Res. 130(1–2):171–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith PH, Joris PX, Yin TC. 1993. Projections of physiologically characterized spherical bushy cell axons from the cochlear nucleus of the cat: evidence for delay lines to the medial superior olive. J Comp Neurol. 331(2):245–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ZM. 2014. Stimulus timing for a stimulating medical device. Patent US 8688222 B2
   Google Scholar
• Smith ZM, Delgutte B. 2007. Sensitivity to interaural time differences in the inferior colliculus with bilateral cochlear implants. J Neurosci. 27(25):6740–6750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith ZM, Parkinson WS, Long CJ. 2013. Multipolar current focusing increases spectral resolution in cochlear implants. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2796–2799.
   Google Scholar
• Søndergaard P, Majdak P. 2013. The auditory-modeling toolbox. In J. Blauert, editor, The technology of binaural listening, chapter 2. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York NY.
   Google Scholar
• Stern RM, Colburn HS. 1978. Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory-nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position. J Acoust Soc Am. 64(1):127–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotler WA. 1953. An experimental study of the cells and connections of the superior olivary complex of the cat. J Comp Neurol. 98:401–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strutt JW. 1907. On our perception of sound direction. Phil Mag Ser. 6(13):214–232.
   Google Scholar
• Takanen M, Bruce IC, Seeber BU. 2016 in press. Phenomenological modelling of electrically stimulated auditory nerve fibers: A review. Network: Computation in Neural Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Takanen M, Santala O, Pulkki V. 2014. Visualization of functional count-comparison-based binaural auditory model output. Hearing Res. 309:147–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillein J, Hubka P, Kral A. 2016. Monaural congenital deafness affects aural dominance and degrades binaural processing. Cereb Cortex. 26(4):1762–1777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SK, von Kriegstein K, Deane-Pratt A, Marquardt T, Deichmann R, Griffiths TD, McAlpine D. 2006. Representation of interaural time delay in the human auditory midbrain. Nat Neurosci. 9(9):1096–1098.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SP. 1877. On binaural audition. Phil Mag Ser. 5(4):274–276.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson SP. 1882. On the function of the two ears in the perception of space. Phil Mag Ser. 5(13):406–416.
   Google Scholar
• Tollin DJ. 2003. The lateral superior olive: a functional role in sound source localization. Neuroscientist. 9:127–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JJ, Koka K, Tollin DJ. 2010. Varying overall sound intensity to the two ears impacts interaural level difference discrimination thresholds by single neurons in the lateral superior olive. J Neurophysiol. 103(2):875–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale C, Sanes DH. 2000. Afferent regulation of inhibitory synaptic transmission in the developing auditory midbrain. J Neurosci. 20:1912–1921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. 2003. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hearing Res. 14(3):225–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden M, Lorteije JA, Plauška A, Roberts MT, Golding NL, Borst JG. 2013. Directional hearing by linear summation of binaural inputs at the medial superior olive. Neuron 78:936–948.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel RJ, Clark GM. 1997. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am., 102:495–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voelker C, Warzybok A, Ernst SMA. 2015. Comparing binaural pre-processing strategies III: Speech intelligibility of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Trends Hearing. 19:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Békésy G. 1930. Zur Theorie des Hörens. Über das Richtungshören bei einer Zeitdifferenz oder Lautstärkenungleichheit der beiderseitigen Schalleinwirkungen. Phys Z. 31:824–835.
   Google Scholar
• Vonderschen K, Wagner H. 2015. Detecting interaural time differences and remodeling their representation. Trends Neurosci. 37:289–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Colburn HS. 2012. A modeling study of the responses of the lateral superior olive to ipsilateral sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 13(2):249–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierstorf H, Raake A, Spors S. 2013. Binaural assessment of multichannel reproduction. In J. Blauert (Ed.), The technology of binaural listening (pp. 255–278). Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins IM, Seeber BU. 2012. Effects of dynamic-range compression on the spatial attributes of sounds in normal-hearing listeners. Ear Hear. 33(3):399–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wouters J, Doclo S, Koning R, Francart T. 2013. Sound processing for better coding of monaural and binaural cues in auditory prostheses. Proc IEEE 101(9):1986–1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Carney LH, Colburn HS. 2005. A model for interaural time difference sensitivity in the medial superior olive: interaction of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic inputs, channel dynamics, and cellular morphology. J Neurosci. 25:3046–3058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Colburn HS. 2010. A modeling study of the effects of membrane afterhyperpolarization on spike interval statistics and on ILD encoding in the lateral superior olive. J Neurophysiol 103:2355–2371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar