Optogenetic stimulation of the cochlea—A review of mechanisms, measurements, and first models

References

• Abilez OJ, Wong J, Prakash R, Deisseroth K, Zarins CK, Kuhl E. 2011. Multiscale computational models for optogenetic control of cardiac function. Biophys J. 101(6):1326–1334. doi:10.1016/j.bpj.2011.08.004
   Google Scholar
• Albert ES, Bec JM, Desmadryl G, Chekroud K, Travo C, Gaboyard S, Bardin F, Marc I, Dumas M, Lenaers G, Hamel C, Muller A, Chabbert C. 2012. TRPV4 channels mediate the infrared laser-evoked response in sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol. 107(12):3227–3234. doi:10.1152/jn.00424.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aravanis AM, Wang L-P, Zhang F, Meltzer LA, Mogri MZ, Bret Schneider M, Deisseroth K. 2007. An optical neural interface: in vivo control of rodent motor cortex with integrated fiberoptic and optogenetic technology. J Neur Eng. 4(3):S143–S156. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/S02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlow RL, Foutz TJ, McIntyre CC. 2013. Theoretical principles underlying optical stimulation of myelinated axons expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuroscience. 248(0):541–551. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.06.031.
   Google Scholar
• Arora K. 2012. Cochlear implant stimulation rates and speech perception. In: Ramakrishnan S, editor. Modern speech recognition approaches with case studies. InTech. doi: 10.5772/49992.
   Google Scholar
• Bamann C, Nagel G, Bamberg E. 2010. Microbial rhodopsins in the spotlight. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 20(5):610–616. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2010.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyden ES, Zhang F, Bamberg E, Nagel G, Deisseroth K. 2005. Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nat Neurosci. 8(9):1263–1268. doi: 10.1038/nn1525. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1525.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, Irlicht LS, White MW, O’Leary SJ, Dynes S, Javel E, Clark GM. 1999b. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans. 46(6):630–637. doi: 10.1109/10.764939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce IC, White MW, Irlicht LS, O’Leary SJ, Dynes S, Javel E, Clark GM. 1999a. A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: single-pulse response. Biomed. Eng. IEEE Trans. 46(6):617–629. doi: 10.1109/10.764938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchegger W, Rosenauer M, Vellekoop MJ. 2009. Microfluidic measurement system for fluorescent particles with three-dimensional sheath flow and a self-aligned adjustable microlens. Proc Chem. 1(1):1123–1126. doi: 10.1016/j.proche.2009.07.280.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway EM, Yuste R. 2002. Stimulating neurons with light. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 12(5):587–592. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4388(02)00364-1. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438802003641.
   Google Scholar
• Cardin JA, Carlén M, Meletis K, Knoblich U, Zhang F, Deisseroth K, Tsai L-H, Moore CI. 2010. Targeted optogenetic stimulation and recording of neurons in vivo using cell-type-specific expression of channelrhodopsin-2. Nat Protoc. 5(2):247–254. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2009.228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deisseroth K, Feng G, Majewska AK, Miesenböck G, Ting A, Schnitzer MJ. 2006. Next-generation optical technologies for illuminating genetically targeted brain circuits. J Neurosci. 26(41):10380–10386. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3863-06.2006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst OP, Lodowski DT, Elstner M, Hegemann P, Brown LS, Kandori H. 2014. Microbial and animal rhodopsins: structures, functions, and molecular mechanisms. Chem Rev. 114 (1):126–163. doi: 10.1021/cr4003769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flock ST, Wilson BC, Patterson MS. 1989. Monte Carlo modeling of light propagation in highly scattering tissues. II. Comparison with measurements in phantoms. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 36(12):1169–1173. doi: 10.1109/10.42107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fork RL. 1971. Laser stimulation of nerve cells in aplysia. Science. 171(3974): 907–908. doi: 10.1126/science.171.3974.907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foutz TJ, Arlow RL, McIntyre CC. 2012. Theoretical principles underlying optical stimulation of a channelrhodopsin-2 positive pyramidal neuron. J Neurophysiol. 107(12):3235–3245. doi: 10.1152/jn.00501.2011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X. 2001. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am. 110(2):1150. doi: 10.1121/1.1381538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns JHM, de Snoo SL, and Schoonhoven R. 1995. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res. 87(1–2):170–186. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00090-Q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu QJ, Shannon RV. 2000. Effect of stimulation rate on phoneme recognition by nucleus-22 cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am. 107(1):589–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goßler C, Bierbrauer C, Moser R, Kunzer M, Holc K, Pletschen W, Köhler K, Wagner J, Schwaerzle M, Ruther P, Paul O, Neef J, Keppeler D, Hoch G, Moser T, Schwarz UT. 2014. GaN-based micro-LED arrays on flexible substrates for optical cochlear implants. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 47(20):05401. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/20/205401.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman DFM, Brette R. 2009. The brian simulator. Front Neurosci. 3(2):192–197. doi: 10.3389/neuro.01.026.2009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gradinaru V, Mogri M, Thompson KR, Henderson JM, Deisseroth K. 2009. Optical deconstruction of Parkinsonian neural circuitry. Science. 324(5925):354–359. doi: 10.1126/science.1167093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman N, Nikolic K, Toumazou C, Degenaar P. 2011. Modeling study of the light stimulation of a neuron cell with channelrhodopsin-2 mutants. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans. 58(6):1742–1751. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2114883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunaydin LA, Yizhar O, Berndt A, Sohal VS, Deisseroth K, Hegemann P. 2010. Ultrafast optogenetic control. Nat Neurosci. 13(3):387–392. doi: 10.1038/nn.2495. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.2495.
   Google Scholar
• Guo W, Hight AE, Chen JX, Klapoetke NC, Hancock KE, Shinn-Cunningham BG, Boyden ES, Lee DJ, Polley DB. 2015. Hearing the light: neural and perceptual encoding of optogenetic stimulation in the central auditory pathway. Sci Rep. 5:10319. doi: 10.1038/srep10319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegemann P, Ehlenbeck S, Gradmann D. 2005. Multiple photocycles of channelrhodopsin. Biophys J. 89(6):3911–3918. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.069716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez VH, Gehrt A, Jing Z, Hoch G, Jeschke MC, Strenzke N, Moser T. 2014a. Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory nerve. J Visual Exp. (92):e52069. doi: 10.3791/52069.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez VH, Gehrt A, Reuter K, Jing Z, Jeschke M, Mendoza Schulz A, Hoch G, Bartels M, Vogt G, Garnham CW, Yawo H, Fukazawa Y, Augustine GJ, Bamberg E, Kügler S, Salditt T, de Hoz L, Strenzke N, Moser T. 2014b. Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway. J Clin Invest. 124(3):1114–1129. doi: 10.1172/JCI69050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hight AE, Kozin ED, Darrow K, Lehmann A, Boyden E, Brown MC, Lee DJ. 2015. Superior temporal resolution of Chronos versus channelrhodopsin-2 in an optogenetic model of the auditory brainstem implant. Hear Res. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.004.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF. 1952. A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol. 117(4):500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber D, Petreanu L, Ghitani N, Ranade S, Hromádka T, Mainen Z, Svoboda K. 2008. Sparse optical microstimulation in barrel cortex drives learned behaviour in freely moving mice. Nature 451(7174):61–64. doi: 10.1038/nature06445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova E, Pan Z-H. 2009. Evaluation of the adeno-associated virus mediated long-term expression of channelrhodopsin-2 in the mouse retina. Mol Vision 15:1680–1689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova E, Roberts R, Bissig D, Pan Z-H, Berkowitz BA. 2010. Retinal channelrhodopsin-2-mediated activity in vivo evaluated with manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Vision. 16:1059–1067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Izzo AD, Richter C-P, Jansen ED, Walsh JT. 2006. Laser stimulation of the auditory nerve. Lasers Surg Med. 38(8):745–753. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeschke M, Moser T. 2015. Considering optogenetic stimulation for cochlear implants. Hear Res. 322:224–234. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne W, Foster M. 1878. On the photochemistry of the retina and on visual purple. London: Macmillan and Co.
   Google Scholar
• Kasahara D, Morita D, Kosugi T, Nakagawa K, Kawamata J, Higuchi Y, Matsumura H, and Mukai T. 2011. Demonstration of blue and green GaN-based vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers by current injection at room temperature. Appl Phys Exp. 4(7):072103. doi: 10.1143/APEX.4.072103.
   Google Scholar
• Kato HE, Zhang F, Yizhar O, Ramakrishnan C, Nishizawa T, Hirata K, Ito J, Aita Y, Tsukazaki T, Hayashi S, Hegemann P, Maturana AD, Ishitani R, Deisseroth K, Nureki O. 2012. Crystal structure of the channelrhodopsin light-gated cation channel. Nature. 482(7385):369–374. doi: 10.1038/nature10870.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiang NY-S. 1965. Stimulus coding in the auditory nerve and cochlear nucleus. Acta oto-laryngologica. 59(2–6):186–200. doi: 10.3109/00016486509124552.
   Google Scholar
• Klapoetke NC, Murata Y, Kim SS, Pulver SR, Birdsey-Benson A, Cho YK, Morimoto TK, Chuong AS, Carpenter EJ, Tian Z, Wang J, Xie Y, Yan Z, Zhang Y, Chow BY, Surek B, Melkonian M, Jayaraman V, Constantine-Paton M, Wong GK-S, Boyden ES. 2014. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat Methods. 11(3):338–346. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinlogel S, Feldbauer F, Dempski RE, Fotis H, Wood PG, Bamann C, Bamberg E. 2011. Ultra light-sensitive and fast neuronal activation with the Ca2+-permeable channelrhodopsin CatCh. Nat Neurosci. 14(4):513–518. doi: 10.1038/nn.2776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubelka P, Munk F. 1931. Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche. Z. Tech. Phys. Leipzig(12):593–601.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhne J, Eisenhauer K, Ritter E, Hegemann P, Gerwert K, Bartl F. 2015. Early formation of the ion-conducting pore in channelrhodopsin-2. Ange Chem (International ed. in English). 54(16):4953–4957. doi: 10.1002/anie.201410180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon KY, Khomenko A, Haq M, and Li W. 2013. Integrated slanted microneedle-LED array for optogenetics. Conf Proc. Ann Int Conf IEEE Eng Med and Biol Soc. IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. Ann Conf. 249–252. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2013.6609484.
   Google Scholar
• Lagali PS, Balya D, Awatramani GB, Munch TA, Kim DS, Busskamp V, Cepko CL, Roska B. 2008. Light-activated channels targeted to ON bipolar cells restore visual function in retinal degeneration. Nat Neurosci. 11(6):667–675. doi: 10.1038/nn.2117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawlor PA, Bland RJ, Mouravlev A, Young D, During MJ. 2009. Efficient gene delivery and selective transduction of glial cells in the mammalian brain by AAV serotypes isolated from nonhuman primates. Mol Ther: J Am Soc Gene Ther. 17(10):1692–1702. doi: 10.1038/mt.2009.170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Durand R, Gradinaru V, Zhang F, Goshen I, Kim D-S, Fenno LE, Ramakrishnan C, Deisseroth K. 2010. Global and local fMRI signals driven by neurons defined optogenetically by type and wiring. Nature. 465(7299):788–792. doi: 10.1038/nature09108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liewald JF, Brauner M, Stephens GJ, Bouhours M, Schultheis C, Zhen M, Gottschalk A. 2008. Optogenetic analysis of synaptic function. Nat Meth. 5(10):895–902. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin JY, Lin MZ, Steinbach P, Tsien RY. 2009. Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with improved properties and kinetics. Biophys J. 96(5):1803–1814. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.11.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu T-C, Chen J-R, Chen S-W, Kuo H-C, Kuo C-C, Lee C-C, Wang S-C. 2009. Development of GaN-based vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers. IEEE J Select Topics Quant Electr. 15(3):850–860. doi: 10.1109/JSTQE.2009.2013181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller M, Bamann C, Bamberg E, Kühlbrandt W. 2011. Projection structure of channelrhodopsin-2 at 6 Å resolution by electron crystallography. J Mol Biol. 414(1):86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.09.049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahn M, Prigge M, Ron S, Levy R, Yizhar O. 2016. Biophysical constraints of optogenetic inhibition at presynaptic terminals. Nat neurosci. 19(4):554–556. doi: 10.1038/nn.4266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattis J, Tye KM, Ferenczi EA, Ramakrishnan C, O’Shea DJ, Prakash R, Gunaydin LA, Hyun M, Fenno LE, Gradinaru V, Yizhar O, Deisseroth K. 2012. Principles for applying optogenetic tools derived from direct comparative analysis of microbial opsins. Nat Methods. 9(2):159–172. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott HJ. 2004. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trend Amplification. 8(2):49–82. doi: 10.1177/108471380400800203.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McNeal DR. 1976. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve: biomedical engineering, IEEE transactions on. Biomed Eng IEEE Trans. BME-23(4):329–337. doi: 10.1109/TBME.1976.324593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng X, Kozin E, Li GQ, Anne Eatock R, Lee DJ, Edge A. 2014. Adeno-associated virus vector delivery of channelrhodopsin-2 into spiral ganglion neurons. In: Rubinstein JT, editor. Proceedings of the 37th annual midwinter meeting. Association For Research In Otolaryngology. p. 169.
   Google Scholar
• Mingozzi F, High KA. 2013. Immune responses to AAV vectors: overcoming barriers to successful gene therapy. Blood. 122(1):23–36. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-01-306647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser T. 2015. Optogenetic stimulation of the auditory pathway for research and future prosthetics. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 34:29–36. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadol Jr. JB, Eddington DK. 2004. Histologic evaluation of the tissue seal and biologic response around cochlear implant electrodes in the human. Otol Neurotol. 25(3). URL http://journals.lww.com/otology-neurotology/Fulltext/2004/05000/Histologic_Evaluation_of_the_Tissue_Seal_and.10.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Nagel G, Brauner M, Liewald JF, Adeishvili N, Bamberg E, Gottschalk A. 2005. Light activation of channelrhodopsin-2 in excitable cells of caenorhabditis elegans triggers rapid behavioral responses. Curr Biol. 15(24):2279–2284. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel G, Ollig D, Fuhrmann M, Kateriya S, Musti AM, Bamberg E, Hegemann P. 2002. Channelrhodopsin-1: a light-gated proton channel in green algae. Sci (New York, N.Y.). 296(5577):2395–2398. doi: 10.1126/science.1072068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel G, Szellas T, Huhn W, Kateriya S, Adeishvili N, Berthold P, Ollig D, Hegemann P, Bamberg E. 2003. Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100(24): 13940–13945. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1936192100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoletti M, Wirtz C, Hemmert W. 2013. Modeling sound localization with cochlear implants. In: Blauert J, editor. The technology of binaural listening. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, p. 309–331. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-37762-4_12.
   Google Scholar
• Nikolenko V, Watson BO, Araya R, Woodruff A, Peterka DS, Yuste R. 2008. SLM microscopy: scanless two-photon imaging and photostimulation with spatial light modulators. Front Neural Circ. 2:5. doi: 10.3389/neuro.04.005.2008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolic K, Grossman N, Grubb MS, Burrone J, Toumazou C, Degenaar P. 2009. Photocycles of Channelrhodopsin-2. Photochem and Photobiol. 85(1):400–411. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00460.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashaie R, Baumgartner R, Richner TJ, Brodnick SK, Azimipour M, Eliceiri KW, Williams JC. 2015. Closed-loop optogenetic brain interface. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 62(10):2327–2337. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2436817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisanello F, Sileo L, Oldenburg IA, Pisanello M, Martiradonna L, Assad JA, Sabatini BL, de Vittorio M. 2014. Multipoint-emitting optical fibers for spatially addressable in vivo optogenetics. Neuron. 82(6):1245–1254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.04.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rattay F, Lutter P, Felix H. 2001. A model of the electrically excited human cochlear neuron: I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes. Hear Res. 153(1–2):43–63. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5955(00)00256-2.
   Google Scholar
• Rudnicki M, Schoppe O, Isik M, Völk F, Hemmert W. 2015. Modeling auditory coding: from sound to spikes. Cell Tissue Res. 361(1):159–175. doi: 10.1007/s00441-015-2202-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharf R, Tsunematsu T, McAlinden N, Dawson MD, Sakata S, Mathieson K. 2016. Depth-specific optogenetic control in vivo with a scalable, high-density muLED neural probe. Sci Rep. 6:28381. doi: 10.1038/srep28381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenenberger P, Grunditz Å, Rose T, Oertner TG. 2008. Optimizing the spatial resolution of channelrhodopsin-2 activation. Brain Cell Bio. 36(1–4):119–127. doi: 10.1007/s11068-008-9025-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon RV, Zeng F-G, Kamath V, Wygonski J, Ekelid M. 1995. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science. 270(5234):303–304. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5234.303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro MG, Homma K, Villarreal S, Richter C-P, Bezanilla F. 2012. Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance. Nat Commun. 3:736. doi:10.1038/ncomms1742.
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd J, Wicke P. 1997. Music and cultural theory. Cambridge, UK, and Malden, MA: Polity Press, and Published in the USA by Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanescu RA, Shivakeshavan RG, Khargonekar PP, Talathi SS. 2013. Computational modeling of channelrhodopsin-2 photocurrent characteristics in relation to neural signaling: bulletin of mathematical biology. Bull Math Biol. 75(11):2208–2240. doi: 10.1007/s11538-013-9888-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehfest K, Hegemann P. 2010. Evolution of the channelrhodopsin photocycle model. Chemphyschem: Eur J Chem Phys Phys Chem. 11(6):1120–1126. doi: 10.1002/cphc.200900980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teudt IU, Maier H, Richter C-P, Kral A. 2011. Acoustic events and “optophonic”cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser. IEEE Trans Bio-med Eng. 58(6): 1648–1655. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2011.2108297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AC, Fallon JB, Wise AK, Wade SA, Shepherd RK, Stoddart PR. 2015. Infrared neural stimulation fails to evoke neural activity in the deaf guinea pig cochlea. Hear Res. 324:46–53. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.03.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye KM, Deisseroth K. 2012. Optogenetic investigation of neural circuits underlying brain disease in animal models. Nat Rev Neurosci. 13(4):251–266. doi: 10.1038/nrn3171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo-Dinh T. 2003. Biomedical photonics handbook. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Q, Yang H, Agrawal A, Wang NS, and Pfefer TJ. 2008. Measurement of internal tissue optical properties at ultraviolet and visible wavelengths: Development and implementation of a fiberoptic-based system. Opt Exp. 16(12):8685. doi: 10.1364/OE.16.008685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams JC, Xu J, Lu Z, Klimas A, Chen X, Ambrosi CM, Cohen IS, Entcheva E, Alber MS. 2013. Computational optogenetics: empirically-derived voltage- and light-sensitive channelrhodopsin-2 model. PLoS Comput Biol. 9(9): e1003220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003220.
   Google Scholar
• Yates GK. 1990. Basilar membrane nonlinearity and its influence on auditory nerve rate-intensity functions. Hear Res. 50(1–2):145–162. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(90)90041-M.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yizhar O, Fenno LE, Davidson TJ, Mogri M, Deisseroth K. 2011. Optogenetics in neural systems. Neuron. 71(1):9–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F-G, Grant G, Niparko J, Galvin J, Shannon R, Opie J, Segel P. 2002. Speech dynamic range and its effect on cochlear implant performance. J Acoust Soc Am. 111(1):377. doi: 10.1121/1.1423926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Wang L-P, Boyden ES, Deisseroth K. 2006. Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells. Nat Methods. 3(10):785–792. doi: 10.1038/NMETH936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn S, Polterauer D, Keller S, Hemmert W. 2016. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users. Int J Audiol. 55(5):295–304. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1128124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar