Advanced search
Publication Cover
Network: Computation in Neural Systems Volume 29, 2018 - Issue 1-4
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,089
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A speed-accurate self-sustaining head direction cell path integration model without recurrent excitation

Hector J. I. PageOxford Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK;Institute of Behavioural Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK
,
Daniel WaltersOxford Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
&
Simon M. StringerOxford Center for Theoretical Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence, Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UKCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 37-69 | Received 12 May 2018, Accepted 13 Dec 2018, Published online: 25 Mar 2019

References

  • Bassett JP, Taube JS. 2001. Neural correlates for angular head velocity in the rat dorsal tegmental nucleus. J Neurosci. 21:5740–5751.
  • Boucheny C, Brunel N, Arleo A. 2005. A continuous attractor network model without recurrent excitation: maintenance and integration in the head direction cell system. J Comput Neurosci. 18:205–227.
  • Eguchi A, Isbister JB, Ahmad N, Stringer SM. 2018. The emergence of polychronization and feature binding in a spiking neural network model of the primate ventral visual system. Psychol Rev. 125 (4): 545–571..
  • Etienne AS, Jeffery KJ. 2004. Path integration in mammals. Hippocampus. 14:180–192.
  • Georgopoulos AP, Schwartz AB, Kettner RE. 1986. Neuronal population coding of movement direction. Science. 233:1416–1419.
  • Goodridge JP, Dudchenko PA, Worboys KA, Golob EJ, Taube JS. 1998. Cue control and head direction cells. Behav Neurosci. 112:749–761.
  • Isbister JB, Eguchi A, Ahmad N, Galeazzi JM, Buckley MJ, Stringer S. 2018. A new approach to solving the feature-binding problem in primate vision. Interface Focus. 2018(8):20180021.
  • Knight R, Piette CE, Page HJI, Walters D, Marozzi E, Nardini M. 2014. Weighted cue integration in the rodent head direction system. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 369(1635):20120512.
  • Koch G, Ponzo V, Di Lorenzo F, Caltagirone C, Veniero D. 2013. Hebbian and anti-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections. J Neurosci. 33(23):9725–9733.
  • Mittelstaedt ML, Mittelstaedt H. 1980. Homing by path integration in a mammal. Naturwissenschaften. 67:566–567.
  • Page HJI, Walters D, Stringer SM. 2015. Architectural constraints are a major factor reducing path integration accuracy in the rat head direction cell system. Front Comput Neurosci. 9:10.
  • Page HJI, Walters D, Stringer SM, Theoretical A. 2014. Account of cue averaging in the rodent head direction cell system. Philos Trans RSoc B Biol Sci. 369:20130283.
  • Rubin J, Terman D, Chow C. 2001. Localized bumps of activity sustained by inhibition in a two-layer thalamic network. J Comput Neurosci. 10:313–331.
  • Skaggs WE, Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL. 1995. A model of the neural basis of the rat’s sense of direction. In: Tesauro G, Touretzky DS, Leen TK, editors. Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 7). Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; p. 173–180.
  • Song P, Wang XJ. 2005. Angular path integration by moving “hill of activity”: A spiking neuron model without recurrent excitation of the head-direction system. J Neurosci. 25:1002–1014.
  • Stackman RW, Golob EJ, Bassett JP, Taube JS. 2003. Passive transport disrupts directional path integration by rat head direction cells. J Neurophysiol. 90(5):2862–2874.
  • Stringer SM, Perry G, Rolls ET, Proske JH. 2006. Learning invariant object recognition in the visual system with continuous transformations. Biol Cybern. 94:128–142.
  • Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck Jr. JB. 1990a. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. I. Description and quantitative analysis. J Neurosci. 10:420–435.
  • Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck Jr JB. 1990b. Head-direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II. Effects of environmental manipulations. J Neurosci. 10:436–447.
  • Valerio S, Taube J. 2016. Head direction cell activity is absent in mice without horizontal semicircular canals. J Neurosci. 36(3):741–754.
  • Vogels TP, Froemke RC, Doyon N, Gilson M, Haas JS, Liu R, et al. 2013. Inhibitory synaptic plasticity: spike timing-dependence and putative network function. Front Neural Circuits. 7 (119).
  • Wallace DG, Choudhry S, Martin MM. 2006. Comparative analysis of movement characteristics during dead-reckoning-based navigation in humans and rats. J Comp Psychol. 120(4):331.
  • Wallace DG, Köppen JR, Jones JL, Winter SS, Wagner SJ. 2010. Navigating with fingers and feet: analysis of human (Homo sapiens) and rat (Rattus norvegicus) movement organization during nonvisual spatial tasks. J Comp Psychol. 124(4):381.
  • Walters DM. 2011. The computational neuroscience of head direction cells. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford.
  • Walters DM, Stringer SM. 2010. Path integration of head direction: updating a packet of neural activity at the correct speed using neuronal time constants. Biol Cybern. 103:21–41.
  • Walters DM, Stringer SM, Rolls ET. 2013. Path integration of head direction: updating a packet of neural activity at the correct speed using axonal conduction delays. PLoS One. 8(3):e58330.
  • Zugaro MB, Berthoz A, Wiener SI. 2001. Background, but not foreground, spatial cues are taken as references for head direction responses by rat anterodorsal thalamus neurons. J Neurosci. 21(RC154):1–5.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.