Adaptive response: Part II. Further modeling for dose rate and time influences

References

• Azzam S M, Detoledo G P, Raaphorst G P, Mitchell R E. Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a low level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 Cells. Radiation Research 1996; 146: 369–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender M A, Preston R J, Leonard R C, Pyatt B E, Gooch P C. On the distributions of spontaneous chromosome aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes in culture. Mutation Research 1990; 244: 215–220
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Curtis S. Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation – a unified repair model. Radiation Research 1986; 106: 252–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellett W H, Brady L A. The microdosimetry of 250 kVp and 65 kVp x rays 60 gamma rays and tritium beta particles. Radiation Research 1972; 51: 229–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore E, Lao X Y, Kapadia R, Redpath J L. The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 2006; 166: 832–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Bond V P, Sondhaus C A. The dual response to low-dose irradiation: Induction vs. prevention of DNA damage. Biological effects of low dose radiation, T Yamada, et al. Elsevier Sciences B.V., Amsterdam 2000; 3–17
   Google Scholar
• Hei T K, Wu L J, Liu X Z, Vannais D, Waldren C A, Randers-Pehrson G. Mutagenic effects of a single and an exact number of ∝ particles in mammalian cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 1997; 94: 3765–3770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holley W R, Main I S, Park S J, Rydberg B, Chatterjee A. A model for interphase chromosomes and evaluation of radiation induced aberrations. Radiation Research 2002; 158: 568–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker A M, Bhat M, Day T K, Lane J M, Swinburne S J, Morley A A, Sykes P J. The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 2004; 162: 447–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellerer A M. Fundamentals of microdosimetry. The dosimetry of ionizing radiation, K R Kase, B E Bjarngard, F H Attix. Academic Press, Inc. 1985; I: 45–59
   Google Scholar
• Klokov D Y, Zaichkina S I, Rozanova O M, Aptikaeva G F, Akhmadieva A K, Smirnova E N, Balakin V Y. The duration of radioadaptive response in mouse bone marrow in vivo. Biological Effects of Low Dose Radiation, T Yamada, et al. Elsevier Science B.V., AmsterdamThe Netherlands 2000; 87–91
   Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Repair of multiple break chromosomal damage – its impact on the use of the linear-quadratic model for low dose and dose rates. The effects of low and very low doses of ionizing radiation on human health. University of Versailles. Edited by: WONUC, World Council of Nuclear Workers. Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam 2000; 449–462
   Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Adaptive response and human benefit: Part I – a microdosimetry dose dependent model. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2007; 83: 115–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J, Fischer P, Haas O, Obe G, Natarajan A T, Van Buul P PW, Buckton K E, Bianchi N O, Larramendy M, Kucherova M, Polikova Z, Leonard A, Fabry L, Palitti F, Sharma T, Binder W, Mukherjee R N, Mikherjee U. Effect of low-dose acute x-irradiation on the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research 1983; 110: 71–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Antoniono R J. Induction of an adaptive response against spontaneous neoplastic transformation in vitro by low-dose gamma radiation. Radiation Research 1998; 149: 517–520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Liang D, Taylor T H, Christie C, Elmore B. The shape of the dose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro, evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 700–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Lu Q, Lao X, Molloi S, Elmore E. Low doses of diagnostic energy X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2003; 79: 235–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi H H. Risks from less than 1.0 millisievert. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1999; 83: 277–279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz C J, Geard C R. Radioresistance of human astrocytic tumors across grade as a function of acute and chronic dose rate irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1990; 19: 1397–1403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J D, Wiencke J K. Induction of the adaptive response by x-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 56: 107–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J H, Wolff S. Very low doses of x-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis 1987; 2: 95–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J D, Afzal V, Wolfe S. Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of x rays to human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 1987; 111: 511–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart R. Two-lesion kinetic model of double-strand break rejoining and cell killing. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 365–378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H D. An ‘incomplete-repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1985; 47: 319–339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilenchik M M, Knudson A G. Inverse radiation dose-rate effects on somatic and germ-line mutations and DNA damage rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2000; 97: 5381–5386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells R L, Bedford J S. Dose-rate effects of very low radiation doses in mammalian cells IV repairable and non-repairable damage in non-cycling C3H 10T1/2 cells. Radiation Research 1983; 94: 105–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiencke J K, Afzal V, Oliveri G, Wolfe S. Evidence That [3H] Thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of x-ray involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1986; 1: 375–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youngblom J H, Wiencke J K, Wolff S. Inhibition of the adaptive response of human lymphocytes to very low doses of ionizing radiation by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. Mutation Research 1989; 227: 257–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar