A comparison of different cytological stains for biological dosimetry

References

• Amaral A. Trends in biological dosimetry: An overview. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 2002; 45: 119–124
   Google Scholar
• Bauchinger M, Schmid E, Zitzelsberger E, Braselmann H, Nahrstedt U. Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations analysed by two-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization with composite whole chromosome-specific DNA probes and a pancentromeric DNA probe. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1993; 64: 179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender M A. Chromosome aberrations in irradiated human subjects. Annual New York Academy of Science 1964; 114: 249–251
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards A A, Lloyd D C, Purrott R J. Radiation induced chromosome aberrations and the Poisson distribution. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 1979; 16: 89–100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes T S, Amaral A, Cavalcanti M B, Braga L R, Melo R A. Unstable chromosome aberrations and micronuclei analyses in the biomonitoring of workers occupationally exposed to ionizing radiation. International Journal of Low Radiation 2006; 3: 299–309
   Google Scholar
• Finnon P, Lloyd D C, Edwards A A. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes: Applicability to biological dosimetry. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1995; 68: 429–435
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumrich K, Virsik-Peuckert, Harder D. Temperature and the formation of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations. I. The effect of irradiation temperature. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1986; 49: 665–672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henegariu O, Heerema N A, Wright L L, Bray-Ward P, Ward D C, Vance G H. Improvements in cytogenetic slide preparation: Controlled chromosome spreading, chemical aging and gradual denaturing. Cytometry 2001; 43: 101–109
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hone P A, Edwards A A, Lloyd D C, Moquet J E. The yield of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in first division human lymphocytes depends on the culture time. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2005; 81: 523–529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment. A manual. Tech Rept. 405. IAEA, Vienna 2001
   Google Scholar
• Kanda R, Hayata I. Comparison of the yields of translocations and dicentrics measured using conventional Giemsa staining and chromosome painting. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1996; 69: 701–705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd D C, Edwards A A. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes: Effect of radiation quality, dose and dose rate. Radiation-Induced Chromosome Damage in Man 1983; 23–49
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd D C. Chromosomal analysis to assess radiation dose. Stem Cells 1997, Suppl. 2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lloyd D C. New developments in chromosomal analysis for biological dosimetry. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 1998; 77: 33–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd D C, Edwards A A, Moquet J E, Guerrero-Carbajal Y C. The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 2000; 52: 1107–1112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyne J, Littlefield L G, Moysis R K. Labelling of human centromeres using an alphoid DNA consensus sequence: Application to the scoring of chromosome aberrations. Mutation Research 1989; 226: 75–79
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prosser J S. Identification of dicentric chromosomes in irradiated lymphocytes by C-banding. Mutation Research 1975; 27: 131–133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Sorokine-Durm I, Voisin P. Comparison between fluorescence in situ hybridization and conventional cytogenetics for dicentric scoring: A first-step validation for the use of FISH in biological dosimetry. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1996; 70: 665–669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Braselmann H, Nahrstedt U. Comparison of γ-ray induced dicentric yields in human lymphocytes measured by conventional analysis and FISH. Mutation Research 1995; 348: 2934–2938
   Google Scholar
• Terzoudi G I, Pantelias G E. Cytogenetic methods for biodosimetry and risk individualisation after exposure to ionizing radiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006; 122: 513–520
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Voisin P, Benderitter M, Claraz V, Chambrette I, Sorokine-Durm M, Delbos V, Durand A L, Paillole N. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure. Cellular and Molecular Biology 2001; 47: 557–565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P, Barquinero F, Blakely B, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Luccioni C, Miller S, Palitti F, Prasanna P GS, Stephan G, Thierens H, Turai I, Wilkinson D, Wojcik A. Towards a standardization of biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. Cellular and Molecular Biology 2002; 48(5)501–504
   PubMedGoogle Scholar