A composite microdose Adaptive Response (AR) and Bystander Effect (BE) model–application to low LET and high LET AR and BE data

References

• Adelstein S J. Biological responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Adaptive response versus bystander effect. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2003; 44: 125
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Attix F H. Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. John Wiley and Sons, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Azzam S M, DeToledo G P, Raaphorst G P, Mitchell R E. Low-dose ionizing radiation decreases the frequency of neoplastic transformation to a low level below the spontaneous rate in C3H 10T1/2 Cells. Radiation Research 1996; 146: 369–373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEIR VII. National Research Council of the National Academy of Science. Health effects from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2005
   Google Scholar
• Belyaev I Y, Czene S, Harms-Ringdahl M. Changes in chromatin conformation during radiation-induced apoptosis in human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 355–364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonner W M. Low-dose radiation: Thresholds, bystander effects, and adaptive response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2003; 100: 4973–4975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booz J. Symposium. Microdosimetry. 1978, Commission of the European Communities. EU Report No. 5848
   Google Scholar
• Brenner D J, Little J B, Sachs R K. The bystander effect in radiation oncogenesis. II. A quantitative model. Radiation Research 2001; 155: 102–108
   Google Scholar
• Brenner D J, Elliston C D. The potential impact of bystander effects on radiation risks in a Mars mission. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 612–617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks A L, Newton G J, Shyr I J, Seiler F A, Scott B R. The combined effects of α-particle and x-rays on cell killing and micronuclei induction in lung epithelial cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1990; 58: 799–811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks A L, Khan M A, Duncan A, Buschizom R L, Jostes R F, Cross F T. Effectiveness of radon relative to acute 60Co γ-rays for induction of micronuclei in vitro and in vivo. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1994; 66: 801–808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A A, Lloyd D C, Prosser J S. Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes–a radiobiological review. Low dose radiation: Biological bases of risk assessment, J W Stather, K F Baverstock. Taylor and Francis, LondonUK 1989; 423–432
   Google Scholar
• Elmore E, Lao X Y, Ko M, Rightnar S, Redpath J L. Neoplastic transformation in vitro induced by low doses of 232 MeV protons. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2005; 81: 291–297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore E, Lao X Y, Kapadia R, Redpath J L. The effect of dose rate on radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro by low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 2006; 166: 832–838
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmore E, Lao X Y, Kapadia R, Giedzinski E, Limoli C, Redpath J L. Low doses of very low-dose-rate low-LET radiation suppress radiation-induced neoplastic transformation In Vitro and induce an adaptive response. Radiation Research 2008; 169: 311–318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellett W H, Braby L A. The microdosimetry of 250 kVp and 65 kVp x rays, Co60 gamma rays and tritium beta particles. Radiation Research 1972; 51: 229–243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis E G, Ehlers P F. Notes on random chords in convex bodies. Journal of Applied Probability 1993; 30: 889–897
   Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E. Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. British Journal of Radiology 2005; 75: 3–7
   Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Bond V P, Sondhaus C A. The dual response to low-dose irradiation: induction vs. prevention of DNA damage. Biological effects of low dose radiation, T Yamada. Elsevier Sciences B.V., Amsterdam 2000; 3–17
   Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Neumann R D, Bond V P, Sondhaus C A. Absorbed dose and the quantification of physical events at low-dose irradiation in tissue. Military Medicine 2002; 167(Suppl. I)36–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Neumann R D. Physics must join with biology in better assessing risk from low-dose irradiation. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006; 117: 346–356
   Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Polycove M, Neumann R D. Whole body responses to low-level radiation exposure: New concepts in mammalian radiobiology. Experimental Hemotology 2007; 35: 37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinendegen L E, Paretzke H, Neumann R D. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 2008; 169: 247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodhead D T. Energy deposition stochastics and track structure: What about the target?. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2006; 122: 3–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang L, Kim P M, Nickoloff J A, Morgan W F. Targeted and nontargeted effects of low-dose ionizing radiation on delayed genomic instability in human cells. Cancer Research 2007; 67: 1099–1104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall E J. Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, New York 2000
   Google Scholar
• Heyes G J, Mill A J. The neoplastic transformation potential of mammography X rays and atomic bomb spectrum radiation. Radiation Research 2004; 162: 120–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heyes G J, Mill A J, Charles M W. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology 2006; 79: 195–200
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hooker A M, Bhat M, Day T K, Lane J M, Swinburne S J, Morley A A, Sykes P J. The linear no-threshold model does not hold for low-dose ionizing radiation. Radiation Research 2004; 162: 447–452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Cytogenetic analysis for radiation dose assessment. ViennaAustria 2001, Technical Series No. 405
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Protection (ICRP). ICRP Draft report of committee I/Task group. Low dose extrapolation of radiation related cancer risk. LondonUK 2004
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). Microdosimetry ICRU Report 36. Bethesda, Maryland 1983
   Google Scholar
• Iyer R, Lehnert B E. Alpha-particle-induced increases in the radioresistance of normal human bystander cells. Radiation Research 2002; 157: 3–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jostes R F, Hul T E, James A C, Cross F T, Schwartz J I, Rotmensch J, Archer R W, Evans H H, Menci J, Bakale G, Rad P S. In vitro exposure of mammalian cells to radon: Dosimetric considerations. Radiation Research 1991; 127: 211–219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kellerer A M. Chord-length distributions and related quantities for spheroids. Radiation Research 1984; 98: 425–437
   Google Scholar
• Kellerer A M, Rossi H H. The theory of dual radiation action. Current topics in radiation research quarterly. Index Medicus, M Ebert, A Howard. North-Holland Publishers, Amsterdam 1972; 8: 85–158
   Google Scholar
• Ko S J, Liao X-Y, Molloi S, Elmore E, Redpath J L. Neoplastic transformation in vitro after exposure to low doses of mammographic-energy X rays: Qualitative and mechanistic aspects. Radiation Research 2004; 162: 646–654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Nasonova E, Ritter S. Chromosomse aberrations yields and apoptosis in human lymphocytes irradiated with Fe-ions of differing LET. Advances in Space Research 2005; 35: 268–275
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Adaptive response by single cell radiation hits–implications for nuclear workers. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2005; 116: 387–391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Adaptive response and human risks: Part I. A microdosimetry dose dependent model. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2007a; 83: 115–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Adaptive response: Part II. Modeling for dose rate and time influences. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2007b; 83: 395–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard B E. Common sense about the Linear No-Threshold controversy–Give the general public a break. Radiation Research 2008a; 169: 245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leonard B E. Mammogram X-rays–conclusive evidence of protective bystander, adaptive response radio-protection and AR retention at high dose levels. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2008b, In Review
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd D C, Edwards A A, Leonard A, Deknudt G L, Natajan A T, Obe G, Palitti F, Tanzarella C, Tawn E J. Frequencies of chromosomal aberrations induced in human blood lymphocytes by low doses of X-rays. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1988; 53: 49–55
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little M P. The bystander effect model of Brenner and Sachs fitted to lung cancer data in 11 cohorts of underground miners, and equivalence of fit of a linear relative risk model with adjustment for attained age and age at exposure. Journal of Radiological Protection 2004; 24: 243–255
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Little M P, Wakeford R. The bystander effect in C3H 10T1/2 cells and radon induced lung cancer. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 695–699
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller R C, Randers-Pehrson G, Geard C R, Hall E J, Brenner D J. The oncogenic transforming potential of the passage of single α particles through mammalian cell nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 1999; 96: 19–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan W F. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: I Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vitro. Radiation Research 2003a; 159: 567–580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan W F. Non-targeted and delayed effects of exposure to ionizing radiation: II. Radiation-induced genomic instability and bystander effects in vivo, clastogenic factors and transgenerational effects. Radiation Research 2003b; 159: 581–596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan W F. Will radiation-induced bystander effects or adaptive responses impact on the shape of the dose response relationships at low doses of ionizing radiation?. Dose-Response 2006; 4: 257–262
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mossman K L. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate. Radiation Research 2008; 169: 245
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C B. Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1997; 71: 421–427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. Radiation-induced bystander effects: Are they good, bad or both?. Medicine, Conflict and Survival 2005; 21: 101–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagasawa H, Little J B. Unexpected sensitivity to the induction of mutations by very low doses of alpha-particle radiation: Evidence of a bystander effect. Radiation Research 1999; 152: 552–557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J, Fischer P. The dose-effect relationship of chromosome aberrations to α and γ irradiation in a population subjected to an increased burden of natural radioactivity. Radiation Research 1979; 80: 61–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J, Fischer P, Haas O, Obe G, Natarajan A T, Van Buul P PW, Buckton K E, Bianchi N O, Larramendy M, Kucherova M, Polikova Z, Leonard A, Fabry L, Palitti F, Sharma T, Binder W, Muhkerjee R N, Mikherjee U. Effect of low-dose acute x-irradiation on the frequencies of chromosomal aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes in vitro. Mutation Research 1983; 110: 71–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J. Chromosome aberrations in man in areas with elevated natural radioactivity. Bezelius Symposium 1988; XV: 103–111
   Google Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J, Pohl S. Method for α-irradiation of blood cultures with short-lived radon-222 decay products. Mutation Research 1990; 234: 43–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pohl-Rüling J, Lettner H, Hofmann W, Eckl P, Haas O A, Obe G, Grell-Buchtmann I, Van Buul W PP, Schroeder-Kurth T, Atzmuller C H, Sasaki M S, Fischer P, Kublak R, Natarajan A T. Chromosome aberrations of blood lymphocytes induced in vitro by radon-222 daughter α-irradiation. Mutation Research 2000; 449: 7–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polycove M, Feinendegen L E. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: Possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Human & Experimental Toxiciology 2003; 22: 290–306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Portess D J, Bauer G, Hill M A, O'Neill. Low-dose irradiation of non-transformed cells stimulates the selective removal of precancerous cells via intercellular induction of apoptosis. Cancer Research 2007; 67: 1246–1253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purrot R J, Edwards A A, Lloyd D C, Stather J W. The induction of chromosome aberrations by in vitroα-particles from plutonium-239. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1980; 80: 277–284
   Google Scholar
• Randers-Pehrson G, Geard C R, Johnson G, Ellison C D, Brenner D J. The Columbia University single-ion microbeam. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 210–214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Liang D, Taylor T H, Cristie C, Elmore E. The shape of thedose-response curve for radiation-induced neoplastic transformation in vitro: Evidence for an adaptive response against neoplastic transformation at low doses of low-LET radiation. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 700–707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Lu Q, Lao X-Y, Molloi S, Elmore E. Low doses of diagnostic X-rays protect against neoplastic transformation in vitro. International Journal of Radiation Biology 2003; 79: 235–240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redpath J L, Mitchel R EJ. Letter to Editor: Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme. British Journal of Radiology 2006; 79: 854–855
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redpath J L. Health risks of low photon energy imaging. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 2007; 122: 528–533
   Google Scholar
• Sawant S G, Randers-Pehrson G, Metting N F, Hall E J. Adaptive response and bystander effect induced by radiation in C3 10T1/2 cells in culture. Radiation Research 2001; 156: 177–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid E, Hieber L, Heinzmann U, Roos H, Kellerer A M. Analysis of chromosome aberrations in human peripheral lymphocytes induced by α-particle irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 1996; 35: 179–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schollnberger H, Eckl P M. Protective bystander effects simulated with the state-vector odel. Dose-Response Journal 2007; 5: 187–203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schollnberger H, Mitchel R EJ, Redpath J L, Crawford-Brown D J, Hofmann W. Detrimental and protective bystander effects: A model approach. Radiation Research 2007; 168: 614–626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J D, Afzal V, Wolff S. Characterization of the adaptive response to ionizing radiation induced by low doses of x-rays to human lymphocytes. Radiation Research 1987; 111: 511–517
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadley J K, Wiencke J K. Induction of the adaptive response by X-rays is dependent on radiation intensity. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 56: 107–118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao C, Folfard M, Michael B D, Prise K M. Targeted cytoplasmic irradiation induces bystander responses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA 2004; 101: 13495–13500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Bonnin A, Le Guen B, Masse R, Monier R, Valleron A J, de Vathaire F. Dose-effect relationships and the estimation of the carcinogenic effects of low doses of ionizing radiation. Joint Report no. 2, Academie National de Medicine. Institute de France–Academie des Sciences, ParisFrance 2005
   Google Scholar
• Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses. Journal of Radiation Protection 2006; 26: 317–324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R. Low-dose risk assessment: The debate continues. Radiation Research 2008; 169: 246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiencke J K, Afzal V, Oliveri G, Wolff S. Evidence that [3H] thymidine-induced adaptive response of human lymphocytes to subsequent doses of x-rays involves the induction of a chromosomal repair mechanism. Mutagenesis 1986; 1: 375–380
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Randers-Pherson G, Geard C R, Brenner D J, Hall E J, Hei T. Interaction between radiation-induced adaptive response and bystander mutagenesis in mammalian cells. Radiation Research 2003; 160: 512–516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar