Web based scoring is useful for validation and harmonisation of scoring criteria within RENEB

References

• Ainsbury EA, Livingston GK, Abbott MG, Moquet JE, Hone PA, Jenkins MS, Christensen DM, Lloyd DC, Rothkamm K. 2009. Interlaboratory variation in scoring dicentric chromosomes in a case of partial-body x-ray exposure: implications for biodosimetry networking and cytogenetic ‘triage mode’ scoring. Radiat Res. 172:746–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Lloyd DC. 2010. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys. 98:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinke C, Barnard S, Boulay-Greene H, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Herodin F, Jones A, Kulka U, Lista F, Lloyd D, Martigne P, et al. 2013. Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay. Radiat Res. 180:129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Carr Z, Chu MC, Dayal-Drager R, Fujimoto K, Hopmeir M, Kulka U, Lillis-Hearne P, Livingston GK, Lloyd DC, et al. 2009. WHO 1st consultation on the development of a global biodosimetry laboratories network for radiation emergencies (BioDoseNet). Radiat Res. 171:127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deperas J, Szluinska M, Deperas-Kaminska M, Edwards A, Lloyd D, Lindholm C, Romm H, Roy L, Moss R, Morand J, Wojcik A. 2007. CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry. Radiat Prot Dosim. 124:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giorgio M, Barquinero JF, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja AR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Oliveira MS, Valdivia P, Lima OG, Lamadrid A, Mesa JG, et al. 2000. Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods. Radiat Res. 175:638–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia O, Di Giorgio M, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja MR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Stuck Oliveira M, Valdivia P, Lamadrid AI, Gonzalez JE, Romero I, et al. 2013. Interlaboratory comparison of dicentric chromosome assay using electronically transmitted images. Radiat Prot Dosim. 154:18–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2001. IAEA Technical Report Series No. 405, Cytogenetic Analysis for Radiation Dose Assessment, Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies EPR Biodosimetry 2011. Vienna, Austria: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2008. ISO 21243: Radiation protection-performance criteria for laboratories performing cytogenetic triage for assessment of mass casualties in radiological or nuclear emergencies.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2014. ISO 19238: Radiation protection - performance criteria for service laboratories performing biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. Geneva, Suisse: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• JAlbum. Stockholm, Sweden. Available from: http://jalbum.net. Accessed 16 July 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworska A, Ainsbury EA, Fattibene P, Lindholm C, Oestreicher U, Rothkamm K, Romm H, Thierens H, Trompier F, Voisin P, et al. 2015. Operational guidance for radiation emergency response organizations in Europe for using biodosimetric tools developed in EU MULTIBIODOSE project. Radiat Prot Dosim. 164:165–169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barnard S, Smith R, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Cucu A, et al. 2015. Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB-status quo. Radiat Prot Dosim. 164:42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bognar G, Cucu A, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, et al. 2012. Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB). Radiat Prot Dosim. 151:621–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston GK, Wilkins RC, Ainsbury EA. 2011. Pilot website to support international collaboration for dose assessments in a radiation emergency. Radiat Meas. 46:912–915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Moquet JE, Guerrero-Carbajal YC. 2000. The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. Appl Radiat Isot. 52:1107–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MULTIBIODOSE. Multi-disciplinary biodosimetric tools to manage high scale radiological casualties (MULTIBIODOSE), project funded within the 7th EU Framework Programme. Available from: http://www.multibiodose.eu/index.htm. Accessed 29 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• RENEB. Realizing the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB), founded within the 7th EU framework EURATOM Fission Programme as Coordination Action (CSA-CA) project. Available from: http://www.reneb.eu/index.htm. Accessed 29 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rohmer A. 2010. Emergency Response in Large-Scale Disasters: Lessons Learned and Implications for National Security. Government Honors Papers. Paper 9. Available from: http://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/govhp/9. Accessed 19 April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Oestreicher U, Kulka U. 2009. Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 45:251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Bajinskis A, Barnard S, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Puig-Casanovas R, Deperas-Kaminska M, Gregoire E, Kulka U, et al. 2012. The dicentric assay in triage mode as a reliable biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents. Glasgow: IRPA13. Available from: http://www.irpa.net/page.asp?id = 54606 TS2.C3. Accessed 29 February 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Bajinskis A, Barnard S, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Puig-Casanovas R, Deperas-Kaminska M, Gregoire E, et al. 2014. Web-based scoring of the dicentric assay, a collaborative biodosimetric scoring strategy for population triage in large scale radiation accidents. Radiat Environ Biophys. 53:241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Grégoire E, Gruel G, Roch-Lefevre S, Voisin P, Busset A, Martin C, Voisin P. 2012. Effect of lymphocytes culture variations on the mitotic index and on the dicentric yield following gamma radiation exposure. Radiat Prot Dosim. 151:135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugarman SL, Livingston GK, Stricklin DL, Abbott MG, Wilkins RC, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Yoshida MA, Miura T, Moquet JE, et al. 2014. The internet’s role in a biodosimetric response to a radiation mass casualty event. Health Phys. 106:S65–S70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Romm H, Kao TC, Awa AA, Yoshida MA, Livingston GK, Jenkins MS, Oestreicher U, Pellmar TC, Prasanna PG. 2008. Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events. Radiat Res. 169:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Beaton-Green LA, Lachapelle S, Kutzner BC, Ferrarotto C, Chauhan V, Marro L, Livingston GK, Boulay Greene H, Flegal FN. 2015. Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons. Int J Radiat Biol. 91:443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Lloyd D, Romm H, Roy L. 2010. Biological dosimetry for triage of casualties in a large-scale radiological emergency: capacity of the EU member states. Radiat Prot Dosim. 138:397–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoshida MA, Hayata I, Tateno H, Tanaka K, Sonta S, Kodama S, Kodama Y, Sasaki MS. 2007. The chromosome network for biodosimetry in Japan. Radiat Meas. 42:1125–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar