Integration of new biological and physical retrospective dosimetry methods into EU emergency response plans – joint RENEB and EURADOS inter-laboratory comparisons

References

• Abend M, Badie C, Quintens R, Kriehuber R, Manning G, Macaeva E, Njima M, Oskamp D, Strunz S, Moertl S, et al. 2016. Examining radiation-induced in vivo and in vitro gene expression changes of the peripheral blood in different laboratories for biodosimetry purposes: first RENEB gene expression study. Radiat Res. 185:109–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Al-Hafidh J, Bajinskis A, Barnard S, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, de Gelder V, Gregoire E, Jaworska A, Lindholm C, et al. 2014. Inter- and intra-laboratory comparison of a multibiodosimetric approach to triage in a simulated, large scale radiation emergency. Int J Radiat Biol. 90:193–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badie C, Kabacik S, Balagurunathan Y, Bernard N, Brengues M, Faggioni G, Greither R, Lista F, Peinnequin A, Poyot T, et al. 2013. Laboratory intercomparison of gene expression assays. Radiat Res. 180:138–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassinet C, Woda C, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini MC, Bulanek B, Ekendahl D, Burbidge CI, Cauwels V, et al. 2014. Retrospective radiation dosimetry using OSL of electronic components: results of an inter-laboratory comparison. Radiat Measure. 71:475–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deperas J, Szluinska M, Deperas-Kaminska M, Edwards A, Lloyd D, Lindholm C, Romm H, Roy L, Moss R, Morand J, et al. 2007. CABAS: a freely available PC program for fitting calibration curves in chromosome aberration dosimetry. Radiat Protect Dosim. 124:115–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giorgio M, Barquinero JF, Vallerga MB, Radl A, Taja MR, Seoane A, De Luca J, Stuck Oliveira M, Valdivia P, García Lima O, et al. 2011. Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods. Radiat Res. 175:638–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Discher M, Woda C, 2013. Thermoluminescence of glass display from mobile phones for retrospective and accident dosimetry. Radiat Measure. 53–54:12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Discher M, Woda C, Fiedler I. 2013. Improvement of dose determination using glass display of mobile phones for accident dosimetry. Radiat Measure. 56:240–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druzhinin V, Bakanova M, Fucic A, Golovina T, Savchenko Y, Sinitsky M, Volobaev V. 2016. Lymphocytes with multiple chromosomal damages in a large cohort of West Siberia residents: results of long-term monitoring. Mutat Res. 784–785:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire E, Ainsbury E, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Fattibene P, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Pantelias G, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, et al. 2016. The harmonization process to set up and maintain an operational biological and physical retrospective dosimetry network: QA QM applied to the RENEB network. Int J Radiat Biol, in this issue. doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206232.
   Google Scholar
• Gruel G, Grégoire E, Lecas S, Martin C, Roch-Lefevre S, Vaurijoux A, Voisin P, Voisin P, Barquinero JF. 2013. Biological dosimetry by automated dicentric scoring in a simulated emergency. Radiat Res. 179:557–569.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. Vienna: IAEA EPR-Biodosimetry Series. Available at: http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/EPR-Biodosimetry%202011_web.pdf [Accessed 15 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 13528:2005: Statistical Methods for use in Proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. 2005. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn M. 2008. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J Statistical Software 28:5. Available at: https://www.jstatsoft.org/article/view/v028i05/v28i05.pdf [Accessed 29 March 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Abend M, Ainsbury E, Badie C, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bortolin E, Cucu A, De Amicis A, et al. 2016. RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol., this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1230239.
   Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barnard S, Smith R, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Cucu A, et al. 2015. Realising the European network of biodosimetry: RENEB – status quo. Radiat Prot Dosim. 164(1–2):42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire A, Vegacarrascal I, White L, McClean B, Howe O, Lyng FM, Meade AD. 2015. Analyses of ionizing radiation effects in vitro in peripheral blood lymphocytes with Raman spectroscopy. Radiat Res. 183:407–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maznyk NA, Wilkins RC, Carr Z, Lloyd DC. 2012. The capacity, capabilities and needs of the WHO BioDoseNet member laboratories. Radiat Prot Dosim. 151:611–620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning G, Macaeva E, Majewski M, Kriehuber R, Brzóska K, Abend M, Doucha-Senf D, Oskamp D, Strunz S, Quintens R, et al. 2016. Comparable dose estimates of blinded whole blood samples are obtained independently of culture conditions and analytical approaches – second RENEB gene expression study. Int J Radiat Biol., this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1227105.
   Google Scholar
• Meade AD, Howe O, Unterreiner V, Sockalingum GD, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM. 2016. Vibrational spectroscopy in sensing radiobiological effects: analyses of targeted and non-targeted effects in human keratinocytes. Faraday Discuss. 187:213–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade AD, Clarke C, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM. 2010. Fourier Transform Infrared microspectroscopy and multivariate methods for biological dosimetry. Radiat Res. 173:225–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’kacher R, Andreoletti L, Flamant S, Milliat F, Girinsky T, Dossou J, Violot D, Assaf E, Clausse B, Koscielny S, et al. 2010. JC human polyomavirus is associated to chromosomal instability in peripheral blood lymphocytes of Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients and poor clinical outcome. Ann Oncol. 21:826–832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’kacher R, Maalouf EE, Ricoul M, Heidingsfelder L, Laplagne E, Cuceu C, Hempel WM, Colicchio B, Dieterlen A, Sabatier L. 2014. New tool for biological dosimetry: reevaluation and automation of the gold standard method following telomere and centromere staining. Mutat Res. 770:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’kacher R, El Maalouf EE, Terzoudi G, Ricoul M, Heidingsfelder L, Karachristou I, Laplagne E, Hempel WM, Colicchio B, Dieterlen A, et al. 2015. Detection and automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes in nonstimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after telomere and centromere staining. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 91:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oestreicher U, Samaga D, Ainsbury E, Antunes AC, Baeyens A, Barrios L, Beinke C, Beukes P, Blakely WF, Cucu A, et al. 2016. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA). Int J Radiat Biol., this issue.
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, et al. 2014. Validation of semi-automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes after simulation of three different irradiation scenarios. Health Phys. 2014;106:764–771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Ainsbury E, Barnard S, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Deperas M, Gregoire E, Koivistoinen A, Lindholm C, et al. 2013. Automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes as a tool in large scale radiation accidents. Mutat Res. 756:174–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozgaj R, Kasuba V, Simić D. 2002. The frequency of dicentrics and acentrics and the incidence of rogue cells in radiation workers. Mutagenesis. 17:135–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Fantuzzi E, Harrison R, Schuhmacher H, Vanhavere F, Alves J, Bottollier Depois JF, Fattibene P, Knežević Ž, Lopez MA, et al.. 2016. EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation. Radiat Prot Dosim. 168:223–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompier F, Burbidge C, Bassinet C, Baumann M, Bortolin E, De Angelis C, Eakins J, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini MC, et al. 2016. Overview of physical dosimetry methods for triage application integrated in the new European network RENEB. Int J Radiat Biol., this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1221545.
   Google Scholar
• Vaurijoux A, Gruel G, Pouzoulet F, Grégoire E, Martin C, Roch-Lefèvre S, Voisin P, Voisin P, Roy L. 2009. Strategy for population triage based on dicentric analysis. Radiat Res. 171:541–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaurijoux A, Gruel G, Gregoire E, Sandrine Roch-Lefevre, Voisin P, Martin C, Voisin P, Roy L, Barquinero JF. 2015. Automatic dicentric scoring a real option to be used in biological dosimetry. Radiat Emerg Med. 4:16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Beaton-Green LA, Lachapelle S, Kutzner BC, Ferrarotto C, Chauhan V, Marro L, Livingston GK, Boulay Greene H, Flegal FN. 2015. Evaluation of the annual Canadian biodosimetry network intercomparisons. Int J Radiat Biol. 91:443–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woda C, Bassinet C, Discher M, Della Monaca S, Bortolin E, Fattibene P, Quattrini MC, Sholom S, McKeever SWS, Čemusová Z, et al. A joint EURADOS and RENEB TL inter-comparison of display glass from mobile phones for retrospective dosimetry. In preparation.
   Google Scholar