RENEB biodosimetry intercomparison analyzing translocations by FISH

References

• Ainsbury EA, Lloyd DC. 2010. Dose estimation software for radiation biodosimetry. Health Phys. 98:290–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darroudi F, Natarajan AT. 1996. Biological dosimetric studies in the Chernobyl radiation accident, on populations living in the contaminated areas (Gomel regions) and in Estonian clean-up workers, using FISH technique, The Radiological Consequences of the Chernobyl Accident (Proc. Mtg Minsk, 1996). Eur 16544 EN:1067–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Darroudi F, Natarajan AT. 2000. Application of FISH chromosome painting assay for dose reconstruction: state of the art and current views. Radiat Prot Dosim. 88:51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran A, Barquinero JF, Caballín MR, Ribas M, Barrios L. 2009. Persistence of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in a long-term cell culture. Radiat Res. 171:425–437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran A, Barquinero JF, Caballín MR, Ribas M, Puig P, Egozcue J, Barrios L. 2002. Suitability of FISH painting techniques for the detection of partial-body irradiations for biological dosimetry. Radiat Res. 157:461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnon P, Lloyd DC, Edwards AA. 1995. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detection of chromosomal aberrations in human lymphocytes: applicability to biological dosimetry. Int J Radiat Biol. 68:429–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner SN, Tucker J D. 2002. The cellular lethality of radiation radiation-induced chromosome translocations in human lymphocytes. Radiat Res. 157:539–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero-Carbajal YC, Moquet JE, Edwards, AA, Lloyd DC. 1998. The persistence of FISH translocations for retrospective biological dosimetry after simulated whole or partial body irradiation. Radiat Prot Dosim. 76:159–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hande MP, Natarajan AT. 1998. Induction and persistence of cytogenetic damage in mouse splenocytes following whole-body X irradiation analysed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. IV. Dose response. Int J Radiat Biol. 74:441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. Vienna: IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Knehr S, Zitzelsberger H, Bauchinger M. 1998. FISH-based analysis of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations using different nomenclature systems. Int J Radiat Biol. 73:135–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, Tekkel M, Veidebaum T, Ilus T, Salomaa S. 1998. Persistence of translocations after accidental exposure to ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 74:565–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindholm C, H. Romm, G. Stephan, E. Schmid, J. Moquet, A. Edwards. 2002. Intercomparison of translocation and dicentric frequencies between laboratories in a follow-up of the radiological accident in Estonia. Int J Radiat Biol. 78:883–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JN, Awa A, Straume T, Poggensee M, Kodama Y, Nakano M, Ohtaki K, Weier HU, Pinkel D, Gray J, Littlefield G. 1992. Rapid translocation frequency analysis in humans decades after exposure to ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 62:53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas JN, Deng W. 2000. Views on issues in radiation biodosimetry based on chromosome translocations measured by FISH. Radiat Protect Dosim. 88:77–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoro A, Rodríguez P, Almonacid M, Villaescusa JI, Verdú G, Caballín MR, Barrios L, Barquinero JF. 2005. Biological dosimetry in a group of radiologists by the analysis of dicentrics and translocations. Radiat Res. 164:612–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muller I, Geinitz H, Braselmann H, Baumgartner A, Fasan A, Thamm R, Molls M, Meinke V, Zitzelsberger H. 2005. Time-course of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in tumor patients after radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 63:1214–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pala FS, Moquet JE, Edwards AA, Lloyd DC. 2001. In vitro transmission of chromosomal aberrations through mitosis in human lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 474:139–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao CR, Chakravarti IM. 1956. Some small sample tests of significance for a Poisson distribution. Biometrics. 12:264–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez P, Montoro A, Barquinero JF, Caballin MR, Villaescusa I, Barrios L. 2004. Analysis of translocations in stable cells and their implications in retrospective biological dosimetry. Radiat Res. 162:31–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Stephan G. 2004. Dose dependency of FISH-detected translocations in stable and unstable cells after Cs gamma irradiation of human lymphocytes in vitro. Cytogenet Genome Res. 104:162–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salassidis K, Schmid E, Peter RU, Braselmann H, Bauchinger M. 1994. Dicentric and translocation analysis for retrospective dose estimation in humans exposed to ionising radiation during the Chernobyl power plant accident. Mutat Res. 311:39–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salassidis K, Georgiadou-Schumacher V, Braselmann H, Müller P, Peter RU, Bauchinger M. 1995. Chromosome painting in highly irradiated Chernobyl victims: a follow-up study to evaluate the stability of symmetrical translocations and the influence of clonal aberrations for retrospective dose estimation. Int J Radiat Biol. 68:257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salassidis K, Braselmann H, Okladnikova ND, Pressl S, Stephan G, Snigiryova G, Bauchinger M. 1998. Analysis of symmetrical translocations for retrospective biodosimetry in radiation workers of the Mayak nuclear-industrial complex (Southern Urals) using FISH-chromosome painting. Int J Radiat Biol. 74:431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage JRK. 1970. Sites of radiation induced chromosome exchanges. Curr Top Radiat Res. 6:129–194.
   Google Scholar
• Sevan’kaev AV, Lloyd D, Edwards AA, Khvostunov IK, Mikhailova GF, Golub EV, Shepel NN, Nadejina NM, Galstian IA, Barrios L, et al. 2005. A cytogenetic follow-up of some highly irradiated victims of the Chernobyl accident. Radiat Prot Dosim. 113:152–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snigiryova G, Braselmann H, Salassidis K, Shevchenko V, Bauchinger M. 1997. Retrospective biodosimetry of Chernobyl clean-up workers using chromosome painting and conventional chromosome analysis. Int J Radiat Biol. 71:119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker JD, Morgan WF, Awa AA, Bauchinger M, Blakely D, Cornforth MN, Littlefield LG, Natarajan AT, Shaserre CA. 1995. Proposed system for scoring structural aberrations detected by chromosome painting. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 68:211–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xiao Y, Darroudi F, Grigorova M, Natarajan AT. 1999. Induction and persistence of chromosomal exchanges in mouse bone marrow cells following whole-body exposure to X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 75:1119–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xunclà M, Barquinero JF, Caballín MR, Craven-Bartle J, Ribas M, De Vega JM, Barrios L. 2008. Cytogenetic damage induced by radiotherapy. Evaluation of protection by amifostine and analysis of chromosome aberrations persistence. Int J Radiat Biol. 84:243–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar