RENEB – Running the European Network of biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry

References

• Abend M, Badie C, Quintens R, Kriehuber R, Manning G, Macaeva E, Njima M, Oskamp D, Strunz S, Moertl S, et al. 2016. Examining radiation-induced in vivo and in vitro gene expression changes of the peripheral blood in different laboratories for biodosimetry. Purposes: First RENEB Gene Expression Study. Rad Res. 185:109–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Bakhanova E, Barquinero JF, Brai M, Chumak V, Correcher V, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, Gruel G, Guclu E, et al. 2011. Retrospective dosimetry techniques for external radiation exposures. Rad Prot Dos. 147:573–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Higueras M, Puig P, Einbeck J, Samaga D, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Brzozowska B, Fattibene P, Gregoire E, et al. 2016a. Uncertainty of fast biological radiation dose assessment for emergency response scenarios. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1227106.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Badie C, Barnard S, Manning G, Moquet J, Abend M, Bassinet C, Bortolin E, Bossin L, Bricknell C, et al. 2016b. Integration of new biological and physical retrospective dosimetry methods into EU emergency response plans – joint RENEB and EURADOS inter-laboratory comparisons. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206233.
   Google Scholar
• Baker D, Watson S, Holmes S, Mobbs S, Murray V. 2010. MASH – Mass casualties and health care following the release of toxic chemicals or radioactive material – WP9 Final Report: foresight into needs, possibilities and information requirements for the future. EU Project 2007/209. Available at: http://www.mashproject.com/pdf/mash-d9-wp9-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barnard S, Ainsbury EA, Al-Hafidh J, Hadjidekova V, Hristova R, Lindholm C, Monteiro Gil O, Moquet J, Moreno M, Rößler U, et al. 2014. The first gamma-H2AX biodosimetry intercomparison exercise of the developing European biodosimetry network RENEB. Rad Prot Dos. 164:265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barquinero JB, Beinke C, Borràs M, Darroudi F, Gregoire E, Hristova R, Lindholm C, Moreno M, Moquet J, et al. 2016. RENEB biodosimetry intercomparison analysing translocations by FISH. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1222092.
   Google Scholar
• Bassinet C, Woda C, Bortolin E, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini MC, Bulanek B, Ekendahl D, Burbidge CI, Cauwels V, et al. 2014. Retrospective radiation dosimetry using OSL of electronic components: results of an inter-laboratory comparison. Radiat Meas. 71: 475–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinke C, Barnard S, Boulay-Greene H, De Amicis A, De Sanctis S, Herodin F, Jones A, Kulka U, Lista F, Lloyd D, et al. 2013. NATO dosimetry study – laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis. Radiat Res. 180:129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Carr Z, Chu MC-M, Dayal-Drager R, Fujimoto K, Hopmeir M, Kulka U, Lillis-Hearne P, Livingston GK, Lloyd DC, et al. 2009. WHO 1st consultation on the development of a global biodosimetry laboratories network for radiation emergencies (BioDoseNet). Rad Res. 171:127–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Salter CA, Prasanna PG. 2005. Early-response biological dosimetry –recommended countermeasure enhancements for mass-casualty radiological incidents and terrorism. Health Phys. 89:494–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromet EJ. 2012. Mental health consequences of the Chernobyl disaster. J Rad Prot. 32:71–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromet EJ, Havenaar JM, Guey LT. 2011. A 25-year retrospective review of the psychological consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Clin Oncol. 23:297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzozowska B, Ainsbury E, Baert A, Beaton-Green L, Barrios L, Barquinero JF, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Benedek A, Beukes P, et al. 2016. RENEB accident simulation exercise. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206230.
   Google Scholar
• Carr Z. 2010. WHO-REMPAN for global health security and strengthening preparedness and response to radiation emergencies. Health Phys. 98:773–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency Directorate of Intelligence. 2003. Terrorist CBRN: Materials and Effects (U). CTC 2003-40058.
   Google Scholar
• Collins DL, de Carvalho AB. 1993. Chronic stress from the Goiania 137Cs radiation accident. Behav Med. 18:149–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depuydt J, Baeyens A, Barnard S, Beinke C, Benedek A, Beukes P, Buraczewska I, Darroudi F, De Sanctis S, Dominguez I, et al. 2016. RENEB intercomparison exercises analysing micronuclei (Cytokinesis-block Micronucleus Assay). Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206231.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and the Belarus, Russian and Ukrainian Ministries on Chernobyl Affairs, Emergency Situations and Health. 1996. III D: Methods and techniques for dose reconstruction. In: Karaoglou A, Desmet G, Kelly GN, Menzel HG, editors. The radiological consequences of the Chernobyl accident. Official publication of the European Communities, ISBN 92-827-5248-8, ECSC-EC-EAEC, 937-985
   Google Scholar
• Fattibene P, Wojcik A, editors. 2009. Biodosimetric tools for a fast triage of people accidentally exposed to ionising radiation. Annali dell’Instituto Superiore di Sanita, Roma 45:231–312.
   Google Scholar
• Fattibene P, Trompier F, Wieser A, Brai M, Ciesielski B, De Angelis C, Della Monaca S, Garcia T, Gustafsson H, Hole EO, et al. 2014. EPR dosimetry intercomparison using smart phone touch screen glass. Rad Environ Biophys. 53:311–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregoire E, Kulka U, Barrios L, Ainsbury E, Bassinet C, Fattibene P, Oestreicher U, Pantelias G, Terzoudi G, Trompier F, et al. 2016. The harmonization process to set up and maintain an operational biological dosimetry and physical retrospective dosimetry network: QA QM applied to the RENEB network. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1206232.
   Google Scholar
• Horn S, Barnard S, Rothkamm K. 2011. Gamma-H2AX-based dose estimation for whole and partial body radiation exposure. PLoS One. 6:e25113b.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 1988. The radiological accident in Goiania. Part IV. Observations and recommendations. Vienna, Austria. STI/PUB/815, ISBN:92-0-129088-8, p. 89.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2002. Use of electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry with tooth enamel for retrospective dose assessment. Vienna, Austria. Report IAEA-TECDOC-1331.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2011. Cytogenetic dosimetry: applications in preparedness for and response to radiation emergencies. EPR-Biodosimetry. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2013. IAEA response and assistance network: EPR-RANET 2013. Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardisation (ISO) 13304-1. 2013. Radiological protection – minimum criteria for electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy for retrospective dosimetry of ionizing radiation – Part 1: General principles. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardisation (ISO) 19238. 2004. Radiation protection performance criteria for service laboratories performing biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardisation (ISO) 21243. 2008. Radiation protection –performance criteria for laboratories performing cytogenetic triage for assessment of mass casualties in radiological or nuclear emergencies – general principles and application to dicentric assay. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardisation (ISO) 17099. 2014. Radiological protection performance criteria for laboratories using the cytokinesis block micronucleus (CBMN) assay in peripheral blood lymphocytes for biological dosimetry. Geneva: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworska A, Ainsbury EA, Fattibene P, Lindholm C, Oestreicher U, Rothkamm K, Romm H, Thierens H, Trompier F, Voisin P, et al. 2015. Operational guidance for radiation emergency response organisations in Europe for using biodosimetric tools developed in EU MULTIBIODOSE project. Radiat Protect Dosim. 164:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Karachristou I, Karakosta M, Pantelias A, HatziI, Karaiskos P, Dimitriou P, Pantelias G, Terzoudi GI. 2015. Triage biodosimetry using centromeric/telomeric PNA probes and Giemsa staining to score dicentrics or excess fragments in non-stimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes. Mut Res – Gen Tox Environ Mut. 793:107–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Beinke C, Bognar G, Cucu A, Darroudi F, Fattibene P, et al. 2012. Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry (RENEB). Rad Prot Dos. 151:621–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulka U, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barnard S, Smith R, Barquinero JF, Barrios L, Bassinet C, Beinke C, Cucu A, et al. 2015. Realising the European Network of Biodosimetry: RENEB – Status Quo. Rad Prot Dos. 164:42–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JK, Han EA, Lee SS, Ha WH, Barquinero JF, Lee HR, Cho MS. 2012. Cytogenetic biodosimetry for Fukushima travellers after the nuclear power plant accident: no evidence of enhanced yield of dicentrics. J Rad Res. 53:876–881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd DC, Edwards AA, Moquet JE, Guerrero-Carbajal YC. 2000. The role of cytogenetics in early triage of radiation casualties. Appl Rad Isot. 52:1107–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd D, Turai I, Voisin P. 2016. RENEB – concluding remarks. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1178866.
   Google Scholar
• Maznik NA, Vinnikov VA, Lloyd DC, Edwards AA. 1997. Chromosomal dosimetry from some groups of evacuees from Prypiat and Ukrainian liquidators at Chernobyl. Rad Prot Dos. 74:5–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning G, Macaeva E, Majewski M, Kriehuber R, Brzoska K, Abend M, Doucha-Senf, Oskamp D, Strunz S, Quintens R, et al. 2016. Comparable dose estimates of blinded whole blood samples are obtained independently of culture conditions and analytical approaches – second RENEB gene expression study. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1227105.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Ferrarotto CL, Vlahovich S, Wilkins R C, Boreham DR, Dolling JA. 2007. Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency Network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents. Int J Rad Biol. 83:471–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitsuaki AY, Isamu H, Hiroyuki T, Kimio T, Shinichi SSK, Yoshiaki K, Masao SS. 2007. The Chromosome Network for biodosimetry in Japan. Radiat Meas. 42:1125–1127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’kacher R, El Maalouf E, Ricoul M, Heidingsfelder L, Laplagne E, Cuceu C, Hempel WM, Colicchio B, Dieterlen A, Sabatier L. 2014. New tool for biological dosimetry: reevaluation and automation of the gold standard method following telomere and centromere staining. Mut Res. 770:45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M’kacher R, El Maalouf E, Terzoudi G, Ricoul M, Heidingsfelder L, Karachristou I, Laplagne E, Hempel WM, Colicchio B, Dieterlen A, et al. 2015. Detection and automated scoring of dicentric chromosomes in nonstimulated lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes after telomere and centromere staining. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 91:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro Gil O, Vaz P, Romm H, Antunes AC, Barquinero JF, Beinke C, Burbidge CI, Cucu A, Moreno Domene M, Fattibene P, et al. 2016. Capabilities of the RENEB network for research and large scale radiological and nuclear emergency situations. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1227107.
   Google Scholar
• Moquet J, Barnard S, Staynova A, Lindholm C, Monteiro Gil O, Martins V, Rößler U, Vral A, Vandevoorde C, Wojewódzka M, Rothkamm K. 2016. The second gamma-H2AX assay intercomparison exercise carried out in the framework of the European biodosimetry network (RENEB). Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1207822.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Security Summit 2016. Washington, http://www.nss2016.org, Communiqué 1. April 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Oestreicher U, Samaga D, Ainsbury E, Antunes AC, Baeyens A, Barrios L, Beinke C, Beukes P, Blakely W, Cucu A, De Amicis A, et al. 2016. RENEB intercomparisons applying the conventional Dicentric Chromosome Assay (DCA). Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1233370.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Palma C, Liland A, Jerstad AN, Etherington G, del Rosario Perez M, Rahola T, Smith K, editors. 2009. TMT Handbook. Triage monitoring and treatment of people exposed to ionising radiation following a malevolent act. Osteräs, Norway: NRPA, 2009. 556 p. ISBN 978-82-90362-27-5.
   Google Scholar
• Romm H, Oestreicher U, Kulka U. 2009. Cytogenetic damage analysed by the dicentric assay. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 45:251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romm H, Wilkins RC, Coleman CN, Lillis-Hearne PK, Pellmar TC, Livingston GK, Awa AA, Jenkins MS, Yoshida MA, Oestreicher U, Prasanna PG. 2011. Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay: potential implications for treatment of acute radiation syndrome in radiological mass casualties. Rad Res. 175:397–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Roch-Lefevre S, Vaurijoux A, Voisin PA, Voisin P. 2007. Optimization of cytogenetic procedures for population triage in case of radiological emergency. Rad Meas. 42:1143–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy L, Gregoire E, Gruel G, Roch-Lefevre S, Voisin PA, Busset A, Martin C, Voisin PH. 2012. Effect of lymphocytes culture variations on the mitotic index and on the dicentric yield following gamma radiation exposure. Rad Prot Dos. 151:135–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Fantuzzi E, Harrison R, Schuhmacher H, Vanhavere F, Alves J, Bottollier-Depois J F, Fattibene P, Knežević Ž, Lopez MA, et al. 2014. Visions for radiation dosimetry over the next two decades - strategic research agenda of the European Radiation Dosimetry Group. EURADOS Report 2014 – 01, ISSN 2226-8057, ISBN 978-3-943701-06-7.
   Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Fantuzzi E, Harrison R, Schuhmacher H, Vanhavere F, Alves J, Bottollier-Depois J F, Fattibene P, Knežević Ž, Lopez MA, et al. 2016. EURADOS strategic research agenda: vision for dosimetry of ionising radiation. Rad Prot Dosim. 168:223–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salomaa S, Prise KM, Atkinson MJ, Wojcik A, Auvinen A, Grosche B, Sabatier L, Jourdain JR, Salminen E, Baatout S, Kulka U, et al. 2013. State of the art in research into the risk of low dose radiation exposure – findings of the fourth MELODI workshop. J Radiol Prot. 33:589–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silini G, Gouskova A. 1991. Biological dosimetry at Chernobyl. In: Gledhill BL, Mauro F, editors. New horizons in biological dosimetry. New York: Wiley Liss. pp. 129–144.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan G, Oestreicher U. 1989. An increased frequency of structural chromosome aberrations in persons present in the vicinity of Chernobyl during and after the reactor accident. Is this effect caused by radiation exposure? Mut Res. 223:7–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan G, Oestreicher U. 1993. Chromosome investigation of individuals living in areas of Southern Germany contaminated by fallout from Chernobyl reactor accident. Mut Res. 319:189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto Y, Hirai M, Akiyama M, Kobashi G, Itokawa M, Akashi M, Sugiura N. 2013. Biodosimetry of restoration workers for the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) Fukushima Daiiche Nuclear power station accident. Health Phys. 105:366–373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzoudi G, Pantelias GE. 1997. Conversion of DNA damage into chromosome damage in response to cell cycle regulation of chromatin condensation after irradiation. Mutagenesis. 12:271–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzoudi G, Hadjidekova V, Hatzi V, Karachristou I, Karakosta M, M’kacher R, Montoro A, Palitti F, Pantelias G, Sebastià Fabregat N, et al. 2016. Dose assessment intercomparisons within the RENEB network using G0-lymphocyte prematurely condensed chromosomes (PCC assay). Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1234725.
   Google Scholar
• Trompier F, Bassinet C, Della Monaca S, Romanyukha A, Reyes R, Clairand I. 2010. Overview of physical and biophysical techniques for accident dosimetry. Rad Prot Dos. 144:571–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trompier F, Baumann M, Grégoire E, Barnard S, Barquineiro JF, Brzozowska B, Perez-Calatayud J, Dominguez I, Fattibene P, Montero Gil O, et al. 2016a. Investigation of the influence of calibration practices on cytogenetic laboratory performance for dose estimation within RENEB. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1213455.
   Google Scholar
• Trompier F, Bassinet C, Baumann M, Bortolin E, Burbidge C, De Angelis C, Eakins J, Della Monaca S, Fattibene P, Quattrini MC, et al. 2016b. Overview of physical dosimetry methods for triage application integrated in the new European network RENEB. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1221545.
   Google Scholar
• Turai I. 2000. The IAEA’s coordinated research project on biodosimetry, 1998–2000. Appl Rad Isot. 52:1113–1116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turai I, Darroudi F, Lloyd D. 2001. The new IAEA manual on cytogenetic biodosimetry. In: Ricks RC, Berger ME, O’Hara FM, editors. The medical basis for radiation-accident preparedness. Washington DC: Parthenon Publishing Group. pp. 346–347.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaeve L, Domracheva EV, Kuznetsov SA, Nechai VV. 1993. Chromosome aberrations in inhabitants of Byelorussia: consequence of the Chernobyl accident. Mut Res. 287:253–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P, Benderitter M, Claraz M, Chambrette V, Sorokine-Durm I, Delbos M, Durand V, Leroy A, Paillole N. 2001. The cytogenetic dosimetry of recent accidental overexposure. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-Grand). 47:557–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P, Barquinero JF, Blakely B, Lindholm C, Lloyd D, Luccioni C, Miller S, Palitti F, Prasanna PG, Stephan G, et al. 2002. Towards a standardization of biological dosimetry by cytogenetics. Cellular Molec Biol. 48:501–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin P, Ainsbury L, Atkinson M, Barquinero J, Barrios L, Beinke C, Darroudi F, Fattibene, P, Gil O, Hadjidekova V, et al. 2012. RENEB – Realising the European Network in Biological Dosimetry. STO-MP-HFM-22: 19.1–19.10.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Romm H, Kao TC, Awa AA, Yoshida MA, Livingston GK, Jenkins MS, Oestreicher U, Pellmar TC, Prasanna PG. 2008. Interlaboratory comparison of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biodosimetry in mass casualty events. Radiat Res. 169:551–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins RC, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Marro L, Yoshida MA, Suto Y, Prasanna PG. 2011. Biological dosimetry by the triage dicentric chromosome assay – further validation of international networking. Radiat Measure. 46:923–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems P, August L, Slabbert J, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Thierens H, Vral A. 2010. Automated micronucleus (MN) scoring for population triage in case of large scale radiation events. Int J Radiat Biol. 86:2–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woda C, Bassinet C, Trompier F, Wieser A, de Angelis C, Viscomi D, Fattibene P. 2009. Radiation-induced damage analysed by luminescence methods in retrospective dosimetry and emergency response. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 45:287–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Lloyd D, Romm H, Roy L. 2010. Biological dosimetry for triage of casualties in a large-scale radiological emergency: capacity of the EU member states. Rad Prot Dos. 138:397–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Bajinskis A, Romm H, Oestreicher U, Thierens H, Vral A, Rothkamm K, Ainsbury E, Benderitter M, Voisin P, et al. 2014. Multidisciplinary biodosimetric tools for a large-scale radiological emergency – the MULTIBIODOSE project. Rad Emerg Med. 3:19–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wojcik A, Oestreicher U, Barrios L, Vral A, Terzoudi G, Ainsburry E, Rothkamm K, Trompier F, Kulka U. 2016. The RENEB operational basis: complement of established biodosimetric assays. Int J Rad Biol, in this issue. Doi: 10.1080/09553002.2016.1235296.
   Google Scholar