Different responses of Drosophila subobscura isofemale lines to extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT): fitness components and locomotor activity

References

• Abril S, Oliveras J, Gómez C. 2010. Effect of temperature on the development and survival of the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile. J Insect Sci. 10:97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adey WR. 1993. Biological effects of electromagnetic fields. J Cell Biochem. 51:410–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso JM, Volz A, Hernandez M, Ruttkay H, Gonzalez M, Larruga JM, Cabrera VM, Sperlich D. 1990. Mitochondrial DNA variation and genetic structure in Old-World populations of Drosophila subobscura. Mol Biol Evol. 7:123–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argue KJ, Neckameyer WS. 2013. Sexually dimorphic recruitment of dopamine neurons into the stress response circuitry. Behav Neurosci. 127:734–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauréus Koch CL, Sommarin M, Persson BR, Salford LG, Eberhardt JL. 2003. Interaction between weak low frequency magnetic fields and cell membranes. Bioelectromagnetics. 24:395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgacem YH, Martin JR. 2002. Neuroendocrine control of a sexually dimorphic behavior by a few neurons of the pars intercerebralis in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99:15154–15158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgacem YH, Martin JR. 2006. Disruption of insulin pathways alters trehalose level and abolishes sexual dimorphism in locomotor activity in Drosophila. J Neurobiol. 66:19–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bersani F, Marinelli F, Ognibene A, Matteucci A, Cecchi S, Santi S, Squarzoni S, Maraldi NM. 1997. Intramembrane protein distribution in cell cultures is affected by 50 Hz pulsed magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 18:463–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro JA, Ramon M, Picornell A, Moya A. 1999. The genetic structure of Drosophila subobscura populations from the islands of Majorca and Minorca (Balearic Islands, Spain) based on allozymes and mitochondrial DNA. Heredity (Edinb). 83:271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen A, Ng F, Lebestky T, Grygoruk A, Djapri C, Lawal HO, Zaveri HA, Mehanzel F, Najibi R, Seidman G, et al. 2013. Dispensable, redundant, complementary, and cooperative roles of dopamine, octopamine, and serotonin in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 193:159–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević D, Janać B, Savić T. 2013. Temporal pattern of Drosophila subobscura locomotor activity after exposure to extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT). Dros Inf Serv. 96:84–90.
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrijević D, Savić T, Anđelković M, Prolić Z, Janać B. 2014. Extremely low frequency magnetic field (50 Hz, 0.5 mT) modifies fitness components and locomotor activity of Drosophila subobscura. Int J Radiat Biol. 90:337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele G, Edwards MD, Bhutani S, Hares JM, Murbach M, Green EW, Dissel S, Hastings MH, Rosato E, Kyriacou CP. 2014. Genetic analysis of circadian responses to low frequency electromagnetic fields in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genet. 10:e1004804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson CT, O’Neill TL, Audsley N, Isaac RE. 2015. The sexually dimorphic behaviour of adult Drosophila suzukii: elevated female locomotor activity and loss of siesta is a post-mating response. J Exp Biol. 218:3855–3861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegear RJ, Casselman A, Waddell S, Reppert SM. 2008. Cryptochrome mediates light-dependent magnetosensitivity in Drosophila. Nature. 454:1014–1018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gegear RJ, Foley LE, Casselman A, Reppert SM. 2010. Animal cryptochromes mediate magnetoreception by an unconventional photochemical mechanism. Nature. 463:804–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonet B, Kosik-Bogacka DI, Kuźna-Grygiel W. 2009. Effects of extremely low-frequency magnetic fields on the oviposition of Drosophila melanogaster over three generations. Bioelectromagnetics. 30:687–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman R, Weisbrot D, Uluc A, Henderson A. 1992. Transcription in Drosophila melanogaster salivary gland cells is altered following exposure to low-frequency electromagnetic fields: analysis of chromosome 3R. Bioelectromagnetics. 13:111–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham JH, Fletcher D, Tigue J, McDonald M. 2000. Growth and developmental stability of Drosophila melanogaster in low frequency magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 21:465–472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jandacka P, Kasparova B, Jiraskova Y, Dedkova K, Mamulova-Kutlakova K, Kukutschova J. 2015. Iron-based granules in body of bumblebees. Biometals. 28:89–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowska M, Pawlowska-Mainville A, Stankiewicz M, Rogalska J, Wyszkowska J. 2015. Exposure to 50 Hz electromagnetic field changes the efficiency of the scorpion alpha toxin. J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis. 21:38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi T, Ogawa M, Otaka Y, Furuta M. 1998. Multigeneration exposure test of Drosophila melanogaster to ELF magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 19:335–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koana T, Okada MO, Takashima Y, Ikehata M, Miyakoshi J. 2001. Involvement of eddy currents in the mutagenicity of ELF magnetic fields. Mutat Res. 476:55–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolokytha PD, Fantinou AA, Papadoulis GT. 2011. Temperature and diet effects on immature development of predatory mite Typhlodromus athenas Swirski and Ragusa (Acari: Phyotseiidae). Environ Entomol. 40:1577–1584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorre A, Hernandez C, Martinez D, Castro JA, Ramon MM, Moya A. 1992. Population structure and mitochondrial DNA gene flow in Old World populations of Drosophila subobscura. Heredity (Edinb). 68:15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latorre A, Moya A, Ayala FJ. 1986. Evolution of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila subobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 83:8649–8653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal S, Neckameyer W. 2002. Pharmacological evidence for GABAergic regulation of specific behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurobiol. 50:245–261.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li SS, Zhang ZY, Yang CJ, Lian HY, Cai P. 2013. Gene expression and reproductive abilities of male Drosophila melanogaster subjected to ELF-EMF exposure. Mutat Res. 758:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima SQ, Miesenböck G. 2005. Remote control of behavior through genetically targeted photostimulation of neurons. Cell. 121:141–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma TH, Chu KC. 1993. Effect of the extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic field (EMF) on developing embryos of the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster L.). Mutat Res. 303:35–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed ZR, Abdeljaber E, Soveland R, Cornwell K, Bankemper A, Koch F, Cooper RL. 2016. Modulatory action by the serotonergic system: behavior and neurophysiology in Drosophila melanogaster. Neural Plast. 2016:7291438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marley R, Giachello CN, Scrutton NS, Baines RA, Jones AR. 2014. Cryptochrome-dependent magnetic field effect on seizure response in Drosophila larvae. Sci Rep. 4:5799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JR, Ernst R, Heisenberg M. 1998. Mushroom bodies suppress locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. Learn Mem. 5:179–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JR, Raabe T, Heisenberg M. 1999. Central complex substructures are required for the maintenance of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster. J Comp Physiol A. 185:277–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez D, Moya A, Latorre A, Fereres A. 1992. Mitochondrial DNA variation in Rhopalosiphum padi (Homoptera: Aphididae) populations from four Spanish localities. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 85:241–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzotta G, Rossi A, Leonardi E, Mason M, Bertolucci C, Caccin L, Spolaore B, Martin AJ, Schlichting M, Grebler R, et al. 2013. Fly cryptochrome and the visual system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:6163–6168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGurk L, Berson A, Bonini NM. 2015. Drosophila as an in vivo model for human neurodegenerative disease. Genetics. 201:377–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirabolghasemi G, Azarnia M. 2002. Developmental changes in Drosophila melanogaster following exposure to alternating electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 23:416–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne RH. 1996. Insect neurotransmission: neurotransmitters and their receptors. Pharmacol Ther. 69:117–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan W, Wan G, Xu J, Li X, Liu Y, Qi L, Chen F. 2016. Evidence for the presence of biogenic magnetic particles in the nocturnal migratory brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens. Sci Rep. 6:18771.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panagopoulos DJ, Karabarbounis A, Lioliousis C. 2013. ELF alternating magnetic field decreases reproduction by DNA damage induction. Cell Biochem Biophys. 67:703–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partch CL, Sancar A. 2005. Photochemistry and photobiology of cryptochrome blue-light photopigments: the search for a photocycle. Photochem Photobiol. 81:1291–1304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patenković A, Savić T, Kenig B, Kurbalija Novičić Z, Anđelković M. 2015. The impact of extremely low frequency electromagnetic field (50 Hz, 0.25 mT) on fitness components and wing traits of Drosophila subobscura. Genetika. 47:967–982.
   Google Scholar
• Pendleton RG, Rasheed A, Sardina T, Tully T, Hillman R. 2002. Effects of tyrosine hydroxylase mutants on locomotor activity in Drosophila: a study in functional genomics. Behav Genet. 32:89–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JB, Jorge PE, Muheim R. 2010a. Light-dependent magnetic compass orientation in amphibians and insects: candidate receptors and candidate molecular mechanisms. J R Soc Interface. 7:S241–S256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JB, Muheim R, Jorge PE. 2010b. A behavioral perspective on the biophysics of the light-dependent magnetic compass: a link between directional and spatial perception? J Exp Biol. 213:3247–3255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez E, Monteagudo JL, García-Gracia M, Delgado JM. 1983. Oviposition and development of Drosophila modified by magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 4:315–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz T, Ahmad M, Mouritsen H, Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. 2010. Photoreceptor-based magnetoreception: optimal design of receptor molecules, cells, and neuronal processing. J R Soc Interface. 7:S135–S146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spasić S, Kesić S, Stojadinović G, Petković B, Todorović D. 2015. Effects of the static and ELF magnetic fields on the neuronal population activity in Morimus funereus (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) antennal lobe revealed by wavelet analysis. Comp Biochem Physiol, Part A Mol Integr Physiol. 181:27–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss R, Hanesch U, Kinkelin M, Wolf R, Heisenberg M. 1992. No-bridge of Drosophila melanogaster: portrait of a structural brain mutant of the central complex. J Neurogenet. 8:125–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss R. 2002. The central complex and the genetic dissection of locomotor behaviour. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 12:633–638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorović D, Mirčić D, Ilijin L, Mrdaković M, Vlahović M, Prolić Z, Perić Mataruga V. 2012. Effect of magnetic fields on antioxidative defense and fitness-related traits of Baculum extradentatum (Insecta, Phasmatodea). Bioelectromagnetics. 33:265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todorović D, Prolić Z, Petković B, Kalauzi A. 2015. Effects of two different waveforms of ELF MF on bioelectrical activity of antennal lobe neurons of Morimus funereus (Insecta, Coleoptera). Int J Radiat Biol. 91:435–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trawiński T, Szczygieł M, Wyszkowska J, Kluszczyński K. 2010. Analysis of magnetic field distribution and mechanical vibration of magnetic field exciter under different voltage supply. In: Pietka E, Kawa J, editors. Information technologies in biomedicine. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; pp 613–622. [Series: Advances in intelligent and soft computing].
   Google Scholar
• Vácha M, Půzová T, Drstková D. 2008. Effect of light wavelength spectrum on magnetic compass orientation in Tenebrio molitor. J Comp Physiol a Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 194:853–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2002. Establishing a dialogue on risks from electromagnetic fields. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Wiltschko R, Wiltschko W. 2012. Magnetoreception. Adv Exp Med Biol. 739:126–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winklhofer M, Kirschvink JL. 2010. A quantitative assessment of torque-transducer models for magnetoreception. J R Soc Interface. 7:S273–S289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yellman C, Tao H, He B, Hirsh J. 1997. Conserved and sexually dimorphic behavioral responses to biogenic amines in decapitated Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 94:4131–4136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; p. 662.
   Google Scholar