Can radiation research impact the estimation of risk?

References

• Adewoye AB, Lindsay SJ, Dubrova YE, Hurles ME. 2015. The genome-wide effects of ionizing radiation on mutation induction in the mammalian germline. Nat Commun. 6:6684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, et al. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 29:730–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asakawa J, Kodaira M, Miura A, Tsuji T, Nakamoto Y, Imanaka M, Kitamura J, Cullings H, Nishimura M, Shimada Y, et al. 2016. Genome-wide deletion screening with the array CGH method in mouse offspring derived from irradiated spermatogonia indicates that mutagenic responses are highly variable among genes. Radiat Res. 186:568–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behjati S, Gundem G, Wedge DC, Roberts ND, Tarpey PS, Cooke SL, Van Loo P, Alexandrov LB, Ramakrishna M, Davies H, et al. 2015. Mutational signatures of ionizing radiation in second malignancies. Nature Comm. 10:1038.
   Google Scholar
• Boss MK, Bristow R, Dewhirst MW. 2014. Linking the history of radiation biology to the hallmarks of cancer. Radiat Res. 181:561–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouville A, Toohey RE, Boice JD Jr, Beck HL, Dauer LT, Eckerman KF, Hagermeyer D, Leggett RW, Mumma MT, Napier B, et al. 2015. Dose reconstruction for the Million Worker Study: status and guidelines. Health Phys. 108:206–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AL. 2015. A commentary on: ‘A History of the United States Department of Energy (DOE) Low Dose Radiation Research Program: 1998–2008’. Radiat Res. 183:375–381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks AL, Hoel DG, Preston RJ. 2016. The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 92:405–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucinotta FA, Kim MHY, Chappell LJ. 2013. Space Radiation Cancer Risk Projections and Uncertainties-2012, NASA/TP-2013-217375. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.csc.caltech.edu/references/SpaceRadiationCancerRiskProjectionsandUncertainties.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Edwards SW, Tan YM, Villeneuve DL, Meek ME, McQueen CA. 2016. Adverse outcome pathways – organizing toxicological information to improve decision making. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 356:170–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. 2011. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 144:646–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich WF, Rosemann M. 2012. Genetic background and 227Thorium as risk factors in biologically based models for induction of bone cancer in mice. Radiat Environ Biophys. 51:179–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich WF, Saran A, Atkinson M, Pazzaglia S. 2013. A mechanistic model for medulloblastoma induction in mice. Radiat Res. 179:610–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidenreich WF, Tomasek L, Rogel A, Laurier D, Tirmarche M. 2004. Studies of radon-exposed miner cohorts using a biologically based model: comparison of current Czech and French data with historic data from China and Colorado. Radiat Environ Biophys. 43:247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2005. Low-Dose Extrapolation of Radiation-Related Cancer Risk, ICRP Report No. 99, Annals of ICRP. 35(4). New York, NY: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2007. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, ICRP Publication 103, Annals of ICRP 37 (2–4). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser JC, Meckbach R, Eidemuller M, Selmansberger M, Unger K, Shpak V, Blettner M, Zittzelsberger H, Jacob P. 2016. Integration of a radiation biomarker into modeling of thyroid carcinogenesis and post-Chernobyl risk assessment. Carcinogenesis. 37:1152–1160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski D, Zielinski JM, Hazleton WD, Garner MJ, Moolgavkar SH. 2003. The use of biologically based cancer risk models in radiation epidemiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 104:367–376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurier D, Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, Gillies M, O’Hagan J, Hamra GB, Haylock R, Leuraud K, Moissonnier M, et al. 2016. The International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS): a collaborative epidemiological study to improve knowledge about health effects of protracted low-dose exposure. Radiat Prot Dosim. [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncw314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little MP, Haylock RGE, Muirhead CR. 2002. Modelling lung tumour risk in radon-exposed uranium miners using generalizations of the two-mutation model of Moolgavkar, Venzon and Knudson. Int J Radiat Biol. 78:49–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meek ME, Boobis A, Cote I, Dellarco V, Fotakis G, Munn S, Seed J, Vickers C. 2014. New developments in the evolution and application of the WHO/IPCS framework on mode of action/species concordance analysis. J Appl Toxicol. 34:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolgavkar SH, Knudson AGJR. 1981. Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 66:1037–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moolgavkar SH, Venzon DJ. 1979. Two-event models for carcinogenesis: incidence curves for childhood and adult tumors. Math Biosci. 47:55–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). 1993. Risk Estimates for Radiation Protection, NCRP Report No. 115. Bethesda, MD: NCRP.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). 2012. Uncertainties in the Estimation of Radiation Risks and Probability of Disease Causation, NCRP Report No. 171. Bethesda, MD: NCRP.
   Google Scholar
• National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP). 2015. Health Effects of Low Doses of Radiation: Perspectives on Integrating Radiation Biology and Epidemiology, NCRP Commentary No. 24. Bethesda, MD: NCRP.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council/National Academy of Sciences (NRC/NAS). 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, BEIR VII, Phase 2. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2013. Guidance document on developing and assessing adverse outcome pathways, in Environment Directorate Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Pernot E, Hall J, Baatout S, Benotmane MA, Blanchardon E, Bouffler S, El Saghire H, Gomolka M, Harms-Ringdahl M, Jeggo P, et al. 2012. Ionizing radiation biomarkers for potential use in epidemiological studies. Mutat Res. 751:258–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ. 2003. The LNT model is the best we can do – today. J Radiol Prot. 23:263–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ. 2005. Extrapolations are the Achilles heel of risk assessment. Mutat Res. 589:153–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ. 2015. Integrating basic radiobiological science and epidemiological studies: why and how. Health Phys. 108:125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston RJ, Williams GM. 2005. DNA-reactive carcinogens: mode of action and human cancer hazard. Crit Rev Toxicol. 35:673–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). 2008. Annex A. Epidemiological studies of radiation and cancer, in effects of ionizing radiation, UNSCEAR 2006 report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. Volume I: report to the general assembly, scientific annexes A and B. New York, NY: United Nations Publications.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2005. Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/cancerguidelines/
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2011. EPA Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the US Population, EPA 402-R-11-001. Washington, DC: US EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Verbiest T, Bouffler S, Nutt SL, Badie C. 2015. PU.1 downregulation in murine radiation-induced acute myeloid leukaemia (AML): from molecular mechanism to human AML. Carcinogenesis. 36:413–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar