Evaluation of the inter-person variability of hazards to the users of BAHA hearing implants caused by exposure to a low frequency magnetic field

References

• Cochlear.com. Cochlear [accessed 2017 Nov 20]. http://www.cochlear.com/
   Google Scholar
• Computer Simulation Technology (CST). 2017. CST EM studio [company’s materials]. Darmstadt: CST.
   Google Scholar
• Cray JW, Allen RL, Stuart A, Hudson S, Leyman E, Givens GD. 2004. An investigation of telephone use among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol. 13:200–212.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Miguel-Bilbao S, Aguirre E, Lopez Iturri P, Azpilicueta L, Roldan J, Falcone F, Ramos V. 2015. Evaluation of electromagnetic interference and exposure assessment from s-health solutions based on Wi-Fi devices. Biomed Res Int. 2015:784362. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/784362
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Santis V, Douglas M, Nadakuduti J, Bankler S, Chen XL, Kuster N. 2015. Human exposure from pulsed magnetic field therapy mats: a numerical case study with three commercial product. Bioelectromagnetics. 36:149–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimbylow PJ. 2005. Development of the female voxel phantom, NAOMI, and its application to calculations of induced current densities and electric fields from applied low frequency magnetic and electric fields. Phys Med Biol. 50:1047–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Directive 2013/35/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the minimum health and safety requirements regarding the exposure of workers to the risks arising from physical agents (electromagnetic fields) (20th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) and repealing Directive 2004/40/EC. Off J Eur Union L 179/1.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardization (CENELEC). 2008. Basic standard on measurement and calculation procedures for human exposure to electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (0 Hz–300 GHz) (EN 50413:2008). [Standard] Brussels: CENELEC.
   Google Scholar
• Feitsch MH, Naumann IC, Mosier KM. 2008. BAHA devices and magnetic resonance imaging scanners. Otol Neurotol. 29:1095–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S, Lau RW, Gabriel C. 1996. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: II. Measurements in the frequency range 10 Hz to 20 GHz. Phys Med Biol. 41:2251–2269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedliczka A. 2001. Atlas miar człowieka – dane do projektowania i oceny ergonomicznej [Atlas of human body measures – data sheets for ergonomic and evaluation]. Warszawa (Poland): Central Institute for Labour Protection. Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson Mild K, Hocking B. 2008. Guidance note: risk management of workers with medical electronic devices and metallic implants in electromagnetic fields. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 14:217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2010. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz–100 kHz). Health Phys. 99:818–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpowicz J. 2015. Environmental and safety aspects of the use of EMF in medical environment. In: Markov MS, editor. Electromagnetic fields in biology and medicine. Boca Raton (FL): Taylor & Francis Group; p. 343–364.
   Google Scholar
• Korpinen L, Kuitsi H, Elovaara J, Virtanen V. 2012. Cardiac pacemakers in electric and magnetic fields of 40 kV powerlines. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 35:422–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manekar G. 2014. Implantable hearing devices other than cochlear implants. New Delhi (India): Springer India.
   Google Scholar
• Medel.com. MED-EL [accessed 2015 Nov 20]. http://www.medel.com/
   Google Scholar
• Modijarrad K, Ebnesaijad S. 2013. Handbook of polymer applications in medicine and medical devices. San Diego (CA): Elsevier Science & Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Nevoux J, Ayache D, Coudert C, Czajka C, Meller R, Rossetto S, Daval M, Bobin S, Lavieille J, Tavernier L, et al. 2014. A new transcutaneous bone-conducting auditory implant: a multicenter preliminary experience. 13th International Conference on Cochlear Implants and Other Implantable Auditory Technologies, Book of Abstracts; Jul 18–21, Munich, Germany. p. 452.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts S, West LA, Liewehr FR, Rueggeberg FA, Sharpe DE, Potter BJ. 2002. Impact of dental devices on cochlear implants. J Endod. 28:40–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rtiintl.com. RTI International Metals Inc. [accessed 2017 Nov 20]. http://www.rtiintl.com
   Google Scholar
• Ruan J, Prasad P. 2001. The effects of skull thickness variations on human head dynamic impact responses. Stapp Car Crash J. 45:395–414.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tagnola G, Parazzini M, Sibella F, Paglialonga A, Ravazzani P. 2007. Electromagnetic interference and cochlear implants. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 43:241–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tiikkaja M, Aro AL, Alanko T, Lindholm H, Sistonen H, Hartikainen JE, Toivonen L, Juutilainen J, Hietanen M. 2013. Electromagnetic interference with cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators from low-frequency electromagnetic fields in vivo. Europace. 15:388–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valic B, Gajsek P, Miklavcic D. 2009. Current density in a model of a human body with a conductive implant exposed to ELF electric and magnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics. 30:591–599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zradziński P. 2015. Difficulties in applying numerical simulations to an evaluation of occupational hazards caused by electromagnetic fields. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 21:213–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zradziński P, Karpowicz J, Gryz K, Leszko W. 2017. Ocena zagrożeń wynikających z oddziaływania pola magnetycznego emitowanego przez aplikator magnetoterapeutyczny dla użytkowników protez słuchu wykorzystujących przewodnictwo kostne [Evaluation of hazards caused by magnetic field emitted from magnetotherapy applicator to the users of bone conduction hearing prostheses]. Med Pr. 68:469–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar