Study of mutation from DNA to biological evolution

References

• APS Meeting Abstracts. 2016. Session R55: “The War on Cancer: Physics Enters the Fray”.
   Google Scholar
• Bando Masako MY, Wada T. 2017. From DDREF to EDR–What the history of LNT indicates—, Oral talk, session 7 at 2017 ERPW Conference in Paris, France, Oct 9–13.
   Google Scholar
• Flindt R. 2006. Amazing numbers in biology. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone PA, Enderling H. 2015. Mathematical modeling of acupuncture as cancer symptom therapy: first steps. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 8(3):113–114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorgensen TJ. 2016. Strange glow: the story of radiation. Princeton (NJ):Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature. 217:624–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimura M. 1983. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge (UK):Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S1, Subramanian S. 2002. Mutation rates in mammalian genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 22;99(2):803–808.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar S. 2005. Molecular clocks: four decades of evolution. Nat Rev Genet. 6:654–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lea DE. 1946. The inactivation of viruses by radiations. Br J Radiol. 19:205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabuchi T, Matsumura S. 1964. Dose rate dependence of mutation rates from γ irradiated pollen grains of maize. Jpn J Genet. 39:131–135.
   Google Scholar
• Maki H, Amu R. 2002. Origins of spontaneous mutations: specificity and directionality of base-substitution, frameshift and sequence-substitution mutagenesis. Annu Rev Genet. 36:279–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manabe Y, Bando M. 2013. Comparison of data on mutation frequencies of mice caused by radiation with low dose model. J Phys Soc Jpn. 82:094004.
   Google Scholar
• Manabe Y, Ichikawa K, Bando M. 2012. A mathematical model for estimating biological damage caused by radiation. J Phys Soc Jpn. 81: 104004.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1927. Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science. 66:84–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muller HJ. 1932. Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations. Proceedings of the 6th International Congress of Genetics, 213–255.
   Google Scholar
• Muller HJ, Mott-Smith LM. 1930. Evidence that natural radioactivity is inadequate to explain the frequency of “natural” mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 16:277–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura I, Manabe Y, Bando M. 2014. Reaction rate theory of radiation exposure and scaling hypothesis in mutation frequency. J Phys Soc Jpn. 83:114003.
   Google Scholar
• Neel JV. 1998. Reappraisal of studies concerning the genetic effects of the radiation of humans, mice, and Drosophila. Environ Mol Mutagen. 314:4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Neel JV, Lewis SE. 1990. The comparative radiation genetics of humans and mice. Annu Rev Genet. 24:327–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauman CH, Underbrink AG, Sparrow AH. 1975. Influence of radiation dose rate on somatic mutation induction in tradescantia stamen hairs. Radiat Res. 62:79–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtake M, Schull WJ, Neel JV. 1990. Congenital malformations, stillbirths, and early mortality among the children of atomic bomb survivors: a reanalysis. Radiat Res. 122(1):1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollycove M, Feindegen L. 2003. Radiation-induced versus endogenous DNA damage: possible effect of inducible protective responses in mitigating endogenous damage. Hum Exp Toxicol. 22:290–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdom CE, McSheehy TW. 1961. Radiation intensity and the induction of mutation in Drosophila. Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 3:579–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Azizova TV, Bouffler SD, Little MP, Shore RE, Walsh L, Woloshak GE. 2015. Dose-rate effects in radiation biology and radiation protection, Annals of ICRP, ICRP 2015 Proceedings, Sage Publishing. p. 262–279.
   Google Scholar
• Rühm W, Woloshak GE, Shore RE, Azizova TV, Grosche B, Niwa O, Akiba S, Ono T, Suzuki K, Clement H, et al. 2015. Dose and dose-rate effects of ionizing radiation: a discussion in the light of radiological protection. Radiat Environ Biophys. 54:379–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WL. 1951. X-ray-induced mutations in mice. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 16:327–336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russell WL. 1963. The effect of radiation dose rate and fractionation on mutation in mice. Proceedings of an International Symposium; 1962 Aug 15–19; University of Leiden, the Netherlands. Symposium Publications divisions. Oxford, London, New York, Paris: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell WL. 1965. Studies in mammalian radiation genetics. Nucleonics. 23:53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Russell WL, Kelly EM. 1982a. Mutation frequencies in male mice and the estimation of genetic hazards of radiation in men. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 79:542–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WL, Kelly EM. 1982b. Specific-locus mutation frequencies in mouse stem-cell spermatogonia at very low radiation dose rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 79:539–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell WL, Russell LB, Kelly EM. 1958. Radiation dose rate and mutation frequency: the frequency of radiation-induced mutations is not, as the classical view holds, independent of dose rate. Science. 128:1546–1550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell LB. 2013. The mouse house: a brief history of the ORNL mouse-genetics program, 1947-2009. Mutat Res. 753:69–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell LB, Hunsicker PR. 2012. The effect of dose rate on the frequency of specific-locus mutations induced in mouse spermatogonia is restricted to larger lesions; a retrospective analysis of historical data. Radiat Res. 177:555–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloan PR, Fogel B, editors. 2011. Creating a physical biology: the three-man paper and early molecular biology. In: Sloan PR, Fogel B, editors. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparrow AH, Underbrink AG, Rossi HH. 1972. Mutations induced in tradescantia by small doses of X-rays and neutrons: analysis of dose-response curves. Science. 176:916–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer WP, Stern C. 1948. Experiments to test the validity of the linear R-dose/mutation frequency relation in drosophila at low dosage. Genetics. 33:43–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadler LJ. 1928. Mutations in barley induced by X-rays and radium. Science. 68:186–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ström Daniel J. 1998. Uses and abuses of models in radiation risk management. Radiat Protect Manag. 17–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tsunoyama Y, Suzuki K, Masugi-Tokita M, Nakajima H, Manabe Y, Wada T, Bando M. 2019. Verification of a dose rate-responsive dynamic equilibrium model on radiation-induced mutation frequencies in mice. Int J Radiat Biol. 1–7. DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2019.1569772.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomasetti C, Li L, Vogelstein B. 2017. Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention. Science. 355:1330–1334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kaminski JM. 2009. The linear no-threshold relationship is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology. 251:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada T, Tsunoyama Y, Nakajima H, Nakamura I, Bando M. 2015. Whack-a-mole model: towards a unified description of biological effects caused by radiation exposure. J Phys Soc Jpn. 84:044002–104004.
   Google Scholar
• Waddington CH. 1957. The strategy of the genes. A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology. With an appendix by H. Kacser. New York (NY) and London (UK): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ward JF. 1988. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 35: 95–122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamaguchi H, Shimizu A, Degi K, Morishita T. 2008. Effect of dose and dose rate of gamma ray irradiation on mutation induction and nuclear DNA content in chrysanthemum. Breed Sci. 58:331–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar