Environmental and industrial developments in radiation cataractogenesis

References

• Ahmed EA, Rosemann M, Scherthan H. 2018. NHEJ contributes to the fast repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks at late Prophase I telomeres. Health Phys. 115(1):102–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Barnard S, Bright S, Dalke C, Jarrin M, Kunze S, Tanner R, Dynlacht JR, Quinlan RA, Graw J, et al. 2016. Ionizing radiation induced cataracts: recent biological and mechanistic developments and perspectives for future research. Mutat Res. 770:238–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babizhayev MA, Vishnyakova KS, Yegorov YE. 2011. Telomere-dependent senescent phenotype of lens epithelial cells as a biological marker of aging and cataractogenesis: the role of oxidative stress intensity and specific mechanism of phospholipid hydroperoxide toxicity in lens and aqueous. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 25(2):139–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babizhayev MA, Yegorov YE. 2010. Telomere attrition in lens epithelial cells - a target for N-acetylcarnosine therapy. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 15:934–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai F, Xi JH, Wawrousek EF, Fleming TP, Andley UP. 2003. Hyperproliferation and p53 status of lens epithelial cells derived from alphaB-crystallin knockout mice. J Biol Chem. 278(38):36876–36886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnard SGR, Moquet J, Lloyd S, Ellender M, Ainsbury EA, Quinlan RA. 2018. Dotting the eyes: mouse strain dependency of the lens epithelium to low dose radiation-induced DNA damage. Int J Radiat Biol. 94(12):1116–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely E, Chang P, Lommel L, Bjornstad K, Dixon M, Tobias C, Kumar K, Blakely WF. 1989. Cell-cycle radiation response: role of intracellular factors. Advances in Space Research : The Official Journal of the Committee on Space Research (COSPAR). Adv Space Res. 9(10):177–186.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clutton SM, Townsend KM, Walker C, Ansell JD, Wright EG. 1996. Radiation-induced genomic instability and persisting oxidative stress in primary bone marrow cultures. Carcinogenesis. 17(8):1633–1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen B, Addadi Y, Sapoznik S, Meir G, Kalchenko V, Harmelin A, Ben-Dor S, Neeman M. 2009. Transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor C by oxidative and thermal stress is mediated by lens epithelium-derived growth factor/p75. Neoplasia. 11(9):921–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucinotta FA, Cacao E, Kim MY, Saganti PB. 2019. Non-targeted effects lead to a paridigm shift in risk assessment for a mission to the earth's moon or martian moon phobos. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 183(1–2):213–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalke C, Neff F, Bains SK, Bright S, Lord D, Reitmeir P, Rößler U, Samaga D, Unger K, Braselmann H, et al. 2018. Lifetime study in mice after acute low-dose ionizing radiation: a multifactorial study with special focus on cataract risk. Radiat Environ Biophys. 57(2):99–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Palomo C, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2016. Inter-relationship between low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity and radiation-induced bystander effects in the human t98g glioma and the epithelial HaCaT cell line. Radiat Res. 185(2):124–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenzel M, Ricoul M, Benadjaoud MA, Bellamy M, Lenain A, Haddy N, Diallo I, Mateus C, de Vathaire F, Sabatier L. 2017. Retrospective cohort study and biobanking of patients treated for hemangioma in childhood – telomeres as biomarker of aging and radiation exposure. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(10):1040–1053.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier-Laplace J, Geras’kin S, Della-Vedova C, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Hinton TG, Real A, Oudalova A. 2013. Are radiosensitivity data derived from natural field conditions consistent with data from controlled exposures? A case study of Chernobyl wildlife chronically exposed to low dose rates. J Environ Radioact. 121:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Canada. 2019. Radiation Protection Regulations. Available from Justice Laws; [accessed 2020 May 14]. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/SOR-2000-203.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gow MD, Seymour CB, Byun SH, Mothersill CE. 2008. Effect of dose rate on the radiation-induced bystander response. Phys Med Biol. 53(1):119–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. 2019. Radiobiology for the radiologist, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwers.
   Google Scholar
• Hall EJ, Worgul BV, Smilenov L, Elliston CD, Brenner DJ. 2006. The relative biological effectiveness of densely ionizing heavy-ion radiation for inducing ocular cataracts in wild type versus mice heterozygous for the ATM gene. Radiat Environ Biophys. 45(2):99–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada N. 2017. Ionizing radiation sensitivity of the ocular lens and its dose rate dependence. Int J Radiat Biol. 93(10):1024–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamada N, Fujimichi Y. 2015. Role of carcinogenesis related mechanisms in cataractogenesis and its implications for ionizing radiation cataractogenesis. Cancer Lett. 368(2):262–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurem S, Gomes T, Brede DA, Lindbo Hansen E, Mutoloki S, Fernandez C, Mothersill C, Salbu B, Kassaye YA, Olsen AK, et al. 2017. Parental gamma irradiation induces reprotoxic effects accompanied by genomic instability in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Res. 159:564–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentzsch T, Pietsch CM, Stigler B, Ramseier LE, Seifert B, Werner C. 2015. The compliance with and knowledge about radiation protection in operating room personnel: a cross-sectional study with a questionnaire. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 135(9):1233–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatasakis A, Brilakis HS, Danek BA, Karacsonyi J, Martinez-Parachini JR, Nguyen-Trong P-KJ, Alame AJ, Roesle MK, Rangan BV, Rosenfield K, et al. 2018. Radiation-associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: results from the IC-CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to RAdiation in the CaTh lab) study . Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 91(4):647–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan D, Lacasse M, Khan R, Murphy K. 2017. Radiation cataractogenesis: the progression of our understanding and its clinical consequences. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 28(3):412–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SY, Hackett SF, Lee MC, Pourmand N, Talbot CC, Jr, Riazuddin SA. 2015. Transcriptome profiling of developing murine lens through RNA sequencing. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 56(8):4919–4926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman NJ, David J, Elliston CD, Hopkins KM, Smilenov LB, Brenner DJ, Worgul BV, Hall EJ, Lieberman HB. 2007. Mrad9 and Atm haploinsufficiency enhance spontaneous and X-ray-induced cataractogenesis in mice. Radiat Res. 168(5):567–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiman NJ, Spector A. 1993. DNA single strand breaks in human lens epithelial cells from patients with cataract. Curr Eye Res. 12(5):423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocer I, Taysi S, Ertekin MV, Karslioglu I, Gepdiremen A, Sezen O, Serifoglu K. 2007. The effect of L-carnitine in the prevention of ionizing radiation-induced cataracts: a rat model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 245(4):588–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger SA, Wilson GD, Piasentin E, Joiner MC, Marples B. 2010. The effects of G2-phase enrichment and checkpoint abrogation on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 77(5):1509–1517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubo E, Fatma N, Akagi Y, Beier DR, Singh SP, Singh DP. 2008. TAT-mediated PRDX6 protein transduction protects against eye lens epithelial cell death and delays lens opacity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 294(3):C842–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le M, Fernandez-Palomo C, McNeill FE, Seymour CB, Rainbow AJ, Mothersill CE. 2017. Exosomes are released by bystander cells exposed to radiation-induced biophoton signals: reconciling the mechanisms mediating the bystander effect. PLoS One. 12(3):e0173685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le M, Mothersill CE, Seymour CB, Rainbow AJ, McNeill FE. 2017. An observed effect of p53 status on the bystander response to radiation-induced cellular photon emission. Radiat Res. 187(2):169–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le M, McNeill FE, Seymour CB, Rusin A, Diamond K, Rainbow AJ, Murphy J, Mothersill CE. 2018. Modulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) by radiation- induced biophotons. Environ Res. 163:80–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann P, Boratyński Z, Mappes T, Mousseau TA, Møller AP. 2016. Fitness costs of increased cataract frequency and cumulative radiation dose in natural mammalian populations from Chernobyl. Sci Rep. 6:19974.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lian Y, Xiao J, Ji X, Guan S, Ge H, Li F, Ning L, Liu J. 2015. Protracted low-dose radiation exposure and cataract in a cohort of Chinese industry radiographers. Occup Environ Med. 72(9):640–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipman RM, Tripathi BJ, Tripathi RC. 1988. Cataracts induced by microwave and ionizing radiation. Surv Ophthalmol. 33(3):200–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little MP, Cahoon EK, Kitahara CM, Simon SL, Hamada N, Linet MS. 2020. Occupational radiation exposure and excess additive risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists. Occup Environ Med. 77(1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little MP, Kitahara CM, Cahoon EK, Bernier M, Velazquez-Kronen R, Doody MM, Borrego D, Miller JS, Alexander BH, Simon SL, et al. 2018. Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists. Eur J Epidemiol. 33(12):1179–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu WB, Li Y, Zhang L, Chen HG, Sun S, Liu JP, Liu Y, Li DW. 2008. Differential expression of the catalytic subunits for PP-1 and PP-2A and the regulatory subunits for PP-2A in mouse eye. Mol Vis. 14:762–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mothersill CE, McNeill FE, Lyng FM, Byun SH, Seymour CB, Prestwich WV. 2006. A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell line. Radiat Res. 166(1 Pt 1):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbrich M, Jeggo PA. 2007. The impact of a negligent G2/M checkpoint on genomic instability and cancer induction. Nat Rev Cancer. 7(11):861–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng FM, Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2001. Oxidative stress in cells exposed to low levels of ionizing radiation. Biochem Soc Trans. 29(Pt 2):350–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire P, Mothersill C, McClean B, Seymour C, Lyng FM. 2007. Modulation of radiation responses by pre-exposure to irradiated cell conditioned medium. Radiat Res. 167(4):485–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz E, Barnard S, Haines J, Coster M, van Geel O, Wu W, Richards S, Ainsbury E, Rothkamm K, Bouffler S, et al. 2015. Nonlinear ionizing radiation-induced changes in eye lens cell proliferation, cyclin D1 expression and lens shape. Open Biol. 5(4). DOI:10.1098/rsob.150011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastromonaco C, Balazsi M, Zoroquiain P, Esposito E, Coblentz J, Logan P, Burnier MN. 2018. Removing subjective post-mortem grading from posterior capsular opacification: a new automated detector opacification software, ADOS. Curr Eye Res. 43(11):1362–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsubara K, Lertsuwunseri V, Srimahachota S, Krisanachinda A, Khambhiphant B, Tulvatana W, Sudchai W, Rehani M. 2017. Eye lens dosimetry and the study on radiation cataract in interventional cardiologists. Phys Med. 44:232–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade AD, Howe O, Unterreiner V, Sockalingum GD, Byrne HJ, Lyng FM. 2016. Vibrational spectroscopy in sensing radiobiological effects: analyses of targeted and non-targeted effects in human keratinocytes. Faraday Discuss. 187:213–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael R, Bron AJ. 2011. The ageing lens and cataract: a model of normal and pathological ageing. Phil Trans R Soc B. 366(1568):1278–1292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Rusin A, Seymour C. 2017. Low doses and non-targeted effects in environmental radiation protection; where are we now and where should we go? Environ Res. 159:484–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2018. Old data-new concepts: integrating “indirect effects” into radiation protection. Health Phys. 115(1):170–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill CE, O’Malley KJ, Murphy DM, Seymour CB, Lorimore SA, Wright EG. 1999. Identification and characterization of three subtypes of radiation response in normal human urothelial cultures exposed to ionizing radiation. Carcinogenesis. 20(12):2273–2278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Bristow RG, Harding SM, Smith RW, Mersov A, Seymour CB. 2011. A role for p53 in the response of bystander cells to receipt of medium borne signals from irradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 87(11):1120–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Lyng F, Seymour C, Maguire P, Lorimore S, Wright E. 2005. Genetic factors influencing bystander signaling in murine bladder epithelium after low-dose irradiation in vivo. Radiat Res. 163(4):391–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mousseau TA, Møller AP. 2013. Elevated frequency of cataracts in birds from chernobyl. PLoS One. 8(7):e66939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 2018. Why Space Radiation Matters. Available from NASA; [accessed 2020 May 14]. https://www.nasa.gov/analogs/nsrl/why-space-radiation-matters.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor U, Gallagher A, Malone L, O’Reilly G. 2013. Occupational radiation dose to eyes from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography procedures in light of the revised eye lens dose limit from the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Br J Radiol. 86(1022):20120289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafnsson V, Olafsdottir E, Hrafnkelsson J, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Jonasson F. 2005. Cosmic radiation increases the risk of nuclear cataract in airline pilots: a population-based case-control study. Arch Ophthalmol. (Chicago, IL: 1960). 123(8):1102–1105
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rastegar ZN, Eckart P, Manfred M. 2002. Radiation-induced cataract in astronauts and cosmonauts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 240(7):543–547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruotolo R, Grassi F, Percudani R, Rivetti C, Martorana D, Maraini G, Ottonello S. 2003. Gene expression profiling in human age-related nuclear cataract. Mol Vis. 9:538–548.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short SC, Woodcock M, Marples B, Joiner MC. 2003. Effects of cell cycle phase on low-dose hyper-radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Biol. 79(2):99–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalchi P, Magagna J, Montenegro GM, Beghetto M, Boi L, Dall’Acqua J, Francescon P, Savastano S. 2018. Eye lens dose monitoring in interventional radiology. Physica Medica. 52:83–84.
   Google Scholar
• Schettino G, Folkard M, Michael BD, Prise KM. 2005. Low-dose binary behavior of bystander cell killing after microbeam irradiation of a single cell with focused c(k) x rays. Radiat Res. 163(3):332–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllnberger H, Mebust MR, Crawford-Brown DJ, Eckl PM, Hofmann W. 2001. Significance of cell-cycle delay, multiple initiation pathways, misrepair and replication errors in a model of radiobiological effects. Int J Radiat Biol. 77(4):519–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöllnberger H, Scott BR, Hanson TE. 2001. Application of Bayesian inference to characterize risks associated with low doses of low-LET radiation. Bull Math Biol. 63(5):865–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuryak I. 2019. Enhancing low-dose risk assessment using mechanistic mathematical models of radiation effects. J Radiol Prot. 39(4):S1–S13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tauchi H, Waku H, Matsumoto E, Yara S, Okumura S, Iwata Y, Komatsu K, Furusawa Y, Eguchi-Kasai K, Tachibana A. 2009. Two major factors involved in the reverse dose-rate effect for somatic mutation induction are the cell cycle position and LET value. J Radiat Res. 50(5):441–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor HR, West SK, Rosenthal FS, Muñoz B, Newland HS, Abbey H, Emmett EA. 1988. Effect of ultraviolet radiation on cataract formation. N Engl J Med. 319(22):1429–1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taysi S, Abdulrahman ZK, Okumus S, Demir E, Demir T, Akan M, Saricicek E, Saricicek V, Aksoy A, Tarakcioglu M. 2015. The radioprotective effect of Nigella sativa on nitrosative stress in lens tissue in radiation-induced cataract in rat. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 34(2):101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita M, Maeda M. 2015. Mechanisms and biological importance of photon-induced bystander responses: do they have an impact on low-dose radiation responses. J Radiat Res. 56(2):205–219. Mar.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truscott RJ. 2005. Age-related nuclear cataract-oxidation is the key. Exp Eye Res. 80(5):709–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uwineza A, Kalligeraki AA, Hamada N, Jarrin M, Quinlan RA. 2019. Cataractogenic load – A concept to study the contribution of ionizing radiation to accelerated aging in the eye lens. Mutation research. 779:68–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooijen B, de Haan MW, Das M, Arnoldussen C, de Graaf R, Backes WH, van Zwam WH, Jeukens C. 2014. Efficacy of Radiation Safety Glasses in Interventional Radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 37(5):1149–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhavere F, Carinou E, Domienik J, Donadille L, Ginjaume M, Gualdrini G, Koukorava C, Krim S, Nikodemova D, Ruiz-Lopez N, et al. 2011. Measurements of eye lens doses in interventional radiology and cardiology: final results of the ORAMED project. Radiation Measurements. 46(11):1243–1247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilde G, Sjöstrand J. 1997. A clinical study of radiation cataract formation in adult life following gamma irradiation of the lens in early childhood. Br J Ophthalmol. 81(4):261–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D. (2019, Apr 1). Do rodents in radioactive areas around Chernobyl Ukraine have high prevalence of cataracts? In BSAVA Congress Proceedings (pp. 458–458). BSAVA Library.
   Google Scholar
• Worgul BV, Smilenov L, Brenner DJ, Junk A, Zhou W, Hall EJ. 2002. Atm heterozygous mice are more sensitive to radiation-induced cataracts than are their wild-type counterparts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 99(15):9836–9839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worgul BV, Smilenov L, Brenner DJ, Vazquez M, Hall EJ. 2005. Mice heterozygous for the ATM gene are more sensitive to both X-ray and heavy ion exposure than are wildtypes. Adv Space Res. 35(2):254–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worgul BV, Smilenov L, Brenner DJ, Vazquez M, Hall EJ. 2005. Mice heterozygous for the ATM gene are more sensitive to both X-ray and heavy ion exposure than are wildtypes. Adv Space Res. 35(2):254–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worgul BV, Kundiyev YI, Sergiyenko NM, Chumak VV, Vitte PM, Medvedovsky C, Bakhanova EV, Junk AK, Kyrychenko OY, Musijachenko NV. et al. 2007. Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: implications regarding permissible eye exposures. Radiation Research. Radiat Res. 167(2):233–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zigman S. 1983. The role of sunlight in human cataract formation. Surv Ophthalmol. 27(5):317–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar