Acknowledging and overcoming barriers to entry into radiation science for women

References

• Aps I. 2020. Degrees Earned by Women, by Field.
   Google Scholar
• Banda RM. 2020. From the inside looking out: Latinas intersectionality and their engineering departments. Int J Qual Stud Educ. 33(8):824–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter AJ, Croft A, Lukas D, Sandstrom GM. 2018. Women's visibility in academic seminars: women ask fewer questions than men. PLoS One. 13(9):e0202743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman CH, Gabeau D, Pinnix CC, Deville C, Jr., Gibbs IC, Winkfield KM. 2020. Why racial justice matters in radiation oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol. 5(5):783–790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapman CH, Hwang WT, Deville C. 2013. Diversity based on race, ethnicity, and sex, of the US radiation oncology physician workforce. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 85(4):912–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charleston L, Adserias RP, Lang NM, Jackson JF. 2014. Intersectionality and STEM: the role of race and gender in the academic pursuits of African American women in STEM. J Progress Policy Pract. 2(3):273–293.
   Google Scholar
• Coury S, Huang J, Kumar A, Prince S, Krivkovich A, Yee L. 2020. Women in the workplace 2020. New York (NY): McKinsey and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Covington EL, Moran JM, Paradis KC. 2020. The state of gender diversity in medical physics. Med Phys. 47(4):2038–2043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport C. 2019. At NASA, 2019 was the year of the woman, yet women still are a big minority at the space agency. The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Davis L, Fry R. 2019. College faculty have become more racially and ethnically diverse, but remain far less so than students. Pew Research Center. 31. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/07/31/us-college-faculty-student-diversity/
   Google Scholar
• Dovidio JF, Gaertner SL, Pearson AR. 2016. Aversive Racism and Contemporary Bias. In: Sibley CG, Barlow FK, editors. The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 267–294.
   Google Scholar
• Duma N, Durani U, Woods CB, Kankeu Fonkoua LA, Cook JM, Wee C, Fuentes HE, Gonzalez-Velez M, Murphy MC, Jain S, et al. 2019. Evaluating unconscious bias: speaker introductions at an International Oncology Conference. JCO. 37(36):3538–3545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis J, Fosdick BK, Rasmussen C. 2016. Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PLoS One. 11(7):e0157447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FitzGerald C, Hurst S. 2017. Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review. BMC Med Ethics. 18(1):19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman JB. 2020. Measuring and resolving LGBTQ disparities in STEM. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci. 7(2):141–148.
   Google Scholar
• Gewin V. 2020. The career cost of COVID-19 to female researchers, and how science should respond. Nature. 583(7818):867–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman L, Stuart-Fox D, Hauser CE. 2018. The gender gap in science: how long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biol. 16(4):e2004956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland DT, Freeman KE, Winston-Proctor CE, DeLaine KD, McDonald Lowe S, Woodson KM. 2018. (Un) hidden figures: a synthesis of research examining the intersectional experiences of Black women and girls in STEM education. Rev Res Educ. 42(1):226–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang S, Allen TD, Regina J. 2020. Office housework, burnout, and promotion: does gender matter? J Business Psychol. 1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly S, Griffith KA, DeCastro R, Stewart A, Ubel P, Jagsi R. 2014. Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers. Ann Intern Med. 160(5):344–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, McDonnell M-H, Stephens N. 2016. Does gender raise the ethical bar? Exploring the punishment of ethical violations at work. Exploring the Punishment of Ethical Violations at Work (April 25, 2016) Vanderbilt Owen Graduate School of Management Research Paper.(2770012).
   Google Scholar
• Lee A. 2008. How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision. Stud High Educ. 33(3):267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerchenmueller MJ, Sorenson O, Jena AB. 2019. Gender differences in how scientists present the importance of their research: observational study. BMJ. 367:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoote JB, Fielding JR, Deville C, Gunderman RB, Morgan GN, Pandharipande PV, Duerinckx AJ, Wynn RB, Macura KJ. 2014. Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: why these matter. J Am Coll Radiol. 11(7):673–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova E, Aeschlimann B, Herzog W. 2016. Why is the pipeline leaking? Experiences of young women in STEM vocational education and training and their adjustment strategies. Empirical Res Voc Ed Train. 8(1):1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J. 2012. Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 109(41):16474–16479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakae S, Subica AM. 2021. Academic redlining in medicine. J Natl Med Assoc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnma.2021.05.008
   Google Scholar
• NASA 2019. NASA Equal Employment Opportunity Strategic Plan: FY 2017-19.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh S. 2020. AAAS CEO Statement on #ShutDownSTEM and Black Lives Matter.
   Google Scholar
• Porter AM. 2019. Physics PhDs ten years later: success factors and barriers in career paths. Results from the PhD plus 10 study. AIP Statistical Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Porter AM, Ivie R. 2019. Women in Physics and Astronomy, 2019. Report. AIP Statistical Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey LR. 2017. Agentic traits are associated with success in science more than communal traits. Pers Individ Diff. 106:6–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stella UM, Abdu K, Kulthum N, Neema-Abooki P. 2017. Gender issues in project planning and management. PM World J. 6(4):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Swartz TH, Palermo AS, Masur SK, Aberg JA. 2019. The science and value of diversity: closing the gaps in our understanding of inclusion and diversity. J Infect Dis. 220(220 Suppl 2):S33–S41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker W. n.d. The ideology of racism: misusing science to justify racial discrimination. UN Chronicle. https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/ideology-racism-misusing-science-justify-racial-discrimination
   Google Scholar
• Viglione G. 2020. Are women publishing less during the pandemic? Here's what the data say. Nature. 581(7809):365–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widnall SE. 1988. AAAS presidential lecture: voices from the pipeline. Science. 241(4874):1740–1745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windsor LC, Thies CG. 2021. Mentorship: “Men in the Middle” and their role as allies in addressing gender bias. APSC. 54(3):502–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2019. 2019. National Science Foundation, National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Special Report NSF 19-304.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW. 2010. Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science. 330(6004):686–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysseldyk R, Greenaway KH, Hassinger E, Zutrauen S, Lintz J, Bhatia MP, Frye M, Starkenburg E, Tai V. 2019. A leak in the academic pipeline: identity and health among postdoctoral women. Front Psychol. 10:1297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L. 2020. An institutional approach to gender diversity and firm performance. Organ Sci. 31(2):439–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar