A pilot study of radiation-induced bystander effect in radio-adapting frogs at a radiologically contaminated site located on the chalk river laboratories property

References

• Audette-Stuart M, Kim SB, McMullin D, Festarini A, Yankovich TL, Carr J, Mulpuru S. 2011. Adaptive response in frogs chronically exposed to low doses of ionizing radiation in the environment. J Environ Radioact. 102(6):566–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audette-Stuart M, Yankovich T. 2011. Bystander effects in bullfrog tadpoles. Radioprotection. 46(6):S497–S502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Vo NTK, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2019. Parallel comparison of pre-conditioning and post-conditioning effects in human cancers and keratinocytes upon acute gamma irradiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(2):170–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui F, Fan R, Chen Q, He Y, Song M, Shang Z, Zhang S, Zhu W, Cao J, Guan H, et al. 2015. The involvement of c-Myc in the DNA double-strand break repair via regulating radiation-induced phosphorylation of ATM and DNA-PKcs activity. Mol Cell Biochem. 406(1–2):43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Palomo C, Schültke E, Bräuer-Krisch E, Laissue JA, Blattmann H, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2016. Investigation of abscopal and bystander effects in immunocompromised mice after exposure to pencilbeam and microbeam synchrotron radiation. Health Phys. 111(2):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez-Palomo C, Schültke E, Smith R, Bräuer-Krisch E, Laissue J, Schroll C, Fazzari J, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2013. Bystander effects in tumor-free and tumor-bearing rat brains following irradiation by synchrotron X-rays. Int J Radiat Biol. 89(6):445–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock S, Vo NTK, Byun SH, Zainullin VG, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2019. Effects of historic radiation dose on the frequency of sex-linked recessive lethals in Drosophila populations following the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Environ Res. 172:333–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IAEA] International Atomic Energy Agency. 2004. Management of Waste Containing Tritium and Carbon-14, Technical Reports Series No. 421, IAEA, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mothersill CE, McNeill FE, Lyng FM, Byun SH, Seymour CB, Prestwich WV. 2006. A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell line. Radiat Res. 166 (1 Pt 1):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng FM, Maguire P, Kilmurray N, Mothersill C, Shao C, Folkard M, Prise KM. 2006. Apoptosis is initiated in human keratinocytes exposed to signalling factors from microbeam irradiated cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 82(6):393–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyng FM, Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2002. Initiation of apoptosis in cells exposed to medium from the progeny of irradiated cells: a possible mechanism for bystander-induced genomic instability. Radiat Res. 157(4):365–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire P, Mothersill C, McClean B, Seymour C, Lyng FM. 2007. Modulation of radiation responses by pre-exposure to irradiated cell conditioned medium. Radiat Res. 167(4):485–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire P, Mothersill C, Seymour C, Lyng FM. 2005. Medium from irradiated cells induces dose-dependent mitochondrial changes and BCL2 responses in unirradiated human keratinocytes. Radiat Res. 163(4):384–390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Bucking C, Smith RW, Agnihotri N, Oneill A, Kilemade M, Seymour CB. 2006. Communication of radiation-induced stress or bystander signals between fish in vivo. Environ Sci Technol. 40(21):6859–6864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Rea D, Wright EG, Lorimore SA, Murphy D, Seymour CB, O'Malley K. 2001. Individual variation in the production of a 'bystander signal' following irradiation of primary cultures of normal human urothelium. Carcinogenesis. 22(9):1465–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Rusin A, Seymour C. 2017. Low doses and non-targeted effects in environmental radiation protection; where are we now and where should we go? Environ Res. 159:484–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Smith RW, Agnihotri N, Seymour CB. 2007. Characterization of a radiation-induced stress response communicated in vivo between zebrafish. Environ Sci Technol. 41(9):3382–3387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Smith RW, Hinton TG, Aizawa K, Seymour CB. 2009. Communication of radiation-induced signals in vivo between DNA repair deficient and proficient medaka (Oryzias latipes). Environ Sci Technol. 43(9):3335–3342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill CE, Oughton DH, Schofield PN, Abend M, Adam- Guillermin C, Ariyoshi K, Beresford NA, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Cohen J, Dubrova Y, et al. 2020. From tangled banks to toxic bunnies; a reflection on the issues involved in developing an ecosystem approach for environmental radiation protection. Int J Radiat Biol. 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirisi L, Yasumoto S, Feller M, Doniger J, DiPaolo JA. 1987. Transformation of human fibroblasts and keratinocytes with human papillomavirus type 16 DNA. J Virol. 61(4):1061–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan LA, Seymour CB, O'Neill-Mehlenbacher A, Mothersill CE. 2008. Radiation-induced adaptive response in fish cell lines. J Environ Radioact. 99(4):739–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2000. Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose–response curve. Radiat Res. 153(5 Pt 1):508–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh H, Saroya R, Smith R, Mantha R, Guindon L, Mitchel RE, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2011. Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo. Dose Response. 9(2):225–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RW, Mothersill C, Hinton T, Seymour CB. 2011. Exposure to low level chronic radiation leads to adaptation to a subsequent acute X-ray dose and communication of modified acute X-ray induced bystander signals in medaka (Japanese rice fish, Oryzias latipes). Int J Radiat Biol. 87(10):1011–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith RW, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2013. Short and long term bystander effect induction by fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas, Rafinesque, 1820) injected with environmentally relevant whole body doses of 226Ra. J Environ Radioact. 126:133–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vines AM, Lyng FM, McClean B, Seymour C, Mothersill CE. 2009. Bystander effect induced changes in apoptosis related proteins and terminal differentiation in in vitro murine bladder cultures. Int J Radiat Biol. 85(1):48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo NTK, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2019. Radiobiological characteristics of descendant progeny of fish and amphibian cells that survive the initial ionizing radiation dose. Environ Res. 169:494–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo NTK, Sokeechand BSH, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2017. Characterizing responses to gamma radiation by a highly clonogenic fish brain endothelial cell line. Environ Res. 156:297–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo NTK. 2021. Environmental radiobiology of amphibians – knowledge gaps to be filled using cell lines. Int J Radiat Biol. 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar