Radiobiological and social considerations following a radiological terrorist attack; mechanisms, detection and mitigation: review of new research developments

References

• Abend M, Blakely WF, Ostheim P, Schüle S, Port M. 2021. Early molecular markers for retrospective biodosimetry and prediction of acute health effects. J Radiol Prot. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac2434.
   Google Scholar
• Ainsbury EA, Moquet J, Sun M, Barnard S, Ellender M, Lloyd D. 2021. The future of biological dosimetry in mass casualty radiation emergency response, personalised radiation risk estimation and space radiation protection. Int J Radiat Biol. :1–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsbeih GA, Al-Hadyan KS, Al-Harbi NM, Bin Judia SS, Moftah BA. 2020. Establishing a reference dose-response calibration curve for dicentric chromosome aberrations to assess accidental radiation exposure in Saudi Arabia. Front Public Health. 8:599194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson PD, Bokor G. 2013. Nuclear and radiological terrorism: continuing education article. J Pharm Pract. 26(3):171–182.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Averbeck D, Salomaa S, Bouffler S, Ottolenghi A, Smyth V, Sabatier L. 2018. Progress in low dose health risk research: novel effects and new concepts in low dose radiobiology. Mutat Res. 776:46–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blakely WF, Port M, Abend M. 2021. Early-response multiple-parameter biodosimetry and dosimetry: risk predictions. J Radiol Prot. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac15df.
   Google Scholar
• Boloor KK, Kamat JP, Devasagayam TP. 2000. Chlorophyllin as a protector of mitochondrial membranes against gamma-radiation and photosensitization. Toxicology. 155(1–3):63–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonora M, Missiroli S, Perrone M, Fiorica F, Pinton P, Giorgi C. 2021. Mitochondrial control of genomic instability in cancer. Cancers. 13(8):1914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougai A, et al. 2002. Use of electron paramagnetic resonance dosimetry with tooth enamel for retrospective dose assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Calabrese EJ, Kozumbo WJ. 2021. The hormetic dose-response mechanism: Nrf2 activation. Pharmacol Res. 167:105526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter BS, Leung CN, Fritton JC, Bäck T, Rajon D, Azzam EI, Howell RW. 2021. Radium-223-induced bystander effects cause DNA damage and apoptosis in disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow. Mol Cancer Res.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaurasia RK, Bhat NN, Gaur N, Shirsath KB, Desai UN, Sapra BK. 2021. Establishment and multiparametric-cytogenetic validation of 60Co-gamma-ray induced, phospho-gamma-H2AX calibration curve for rapid biodosimetry and triage management during radiological emergencies. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 866:503354. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021.503354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman CN, Pomper MA, Chao N, Dalnoki-Veress F, Pistenmaa DA. 2017. Treatment, not terror: time for unique problem-solving partnerships for cancer care in resource-challenged environments. J Glob Oncol. 3(6):687–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis JJ, Vo N, Seymour CB, Mothersill CE. 2020. 5-HT2A and 5-HT3 receptors contribute to the exacerbation of targeted and non-targeted effects of ionizing radiation-induced cell death in human colon carcinoma cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 96(4):482–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawood, A., Mothersill, C., & Seymour, C. (2021). Low dose ionizing radiation and the immune response: what is the role of non-targeted effects?. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(10):1368–1382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2021.1962572
   Google Scholar
• DiCarlo AL, Homer MJ, Coleman CN. 2021. United States medical preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergencies. J Radiol Prot. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac0d3f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gale RP, Armitage JO. 2018. Are we prepared for nuclear terrorism? N Engl J Med. 378(13):1246–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ. 2014. Radiobiology for the radiologist. 7th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Heeran AB, Berrigan HP, Buckley CE, Bottu HM, Prendiville O, Buckley AM, Clarke N, Donlon NE, Nugent TS, Durand M, et al. 2021. Radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) alters mitochondrial metabolism using a human rectal cancer ex vivo explant model. Transl Oncol. 14(1):100882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horemans N, Spurgeon DJ, Lecomte-Pradines C, Saenen E, Bradshaw C, Oughton D, Rasnaca I, Kamstra JH, Adam-Guillermin C. 2019. Current evidence for a role of epigenetic mechanisms in response to ionizing radiation in an ecotoxicological context. Environ Pollut. 251:469–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudzietzová J, Sabol J, Šesták B. 2016. Radiation protection aspects relevant to radiological terrorism. RadJ. 1(1):69–75.
   Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency. 2014. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards. Vienna (Austria): IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Krstić MM. 2017. Tendency of using chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons for terrorist purposes. Vojnotehnički Glasnik. 65:481–498.
   Google Scholar
• Le M, McNeill FE, Seymour C, Rainbow AJ, Mothersill CE. 2015. An observed effect of ultraviolet radiation emitted from beta-irradiated HaCaT cells upon non-beta-irradiated bystander cells. Radiat Res. 183(3):279–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Mothersill CE, McNeill FE, Lyng FM, Byun SH, Seymour CB, Prestwich WV. 2006. A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell line. Radiat Res. 166(1):19–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markiewicz E, Idowu OC. 2019. DNA damage in human skin and the capacities of natural compounds to modulate the bystander signalling. Open Biol. 9(12):190208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2004a. Radiation-induced bystander effects and adaptive responses–the Yin and Yang of low dose radiobiology? Mutat Res. 568(1):121–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2004b. Radiation-induced bystander effects-implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 4(2):158–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2015. Radiation-induced non-targeted effects: some open questions. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 166(1–4):125–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Seymour C. 2019. Targets, pools, shoulders, and communication - a reflection on the evolution of low-dose radiobiology. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(7):851–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Rusin A, Seymour C. 2019. Towards a new concept of low dose. Health Phys. 117(3):330–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mothersill C, Stamato TD, Perez ML, Cummins R, Mooney R, Seymour CB. 2000. Involvement of energy metabolism in the production of ‘bystander effects’ by radiation. Br J Cancer. 82(10):1740–1746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulder JE. 2014. The 2013 Dade W. Moeller lecture: medical countermeasures against radiological terrorism. Health Phys. 107(2):164–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustonen V, Kesäniemi J, Lavrinienko A, Tukalenko E, Mappes T, Watts PC, Jurvansuu J. 2018. Fibroblasts from bank voles inhabiting Chernobyl have increased resistance against oxidative and DNA stresses. BMC Cell Biol. 19(1):17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Neill SB, Gibney B, O’Keeffe ME, Barrett S, Louis L. 2020. Mass casualty imaging—policy, planning, and radiology response to mass casualty incidents. Can Assoc Radiol J. 71(3):388–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce JM, Rubin GJ, Selke P, Amlôt R, Mowbray F, Rogers MB. 2013. Communicating with the public following radiological terrorism: results from a series of focus groups and national surveys in Britain and Germany. Prehosp Disaster Med. 28(2):110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radiation Emergency Medical Management. 2021. Nuclear detonation: weapons, improvised nuclear devices. March 24). Washington (DC): US department of health and human services; [cited 2021 April 04]; https://www.remm.nlm.gov/nuclearexplosion.htm#ind
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero A, Vos M. 2015. Communication challenges in CBRN terrorism crises: expert perceptions. J Contingencies & Crisis Man. 23(3):138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rump A, Ostheim P, Eder S, Hermann C, Abend M, Port M. 2021. Preparing for a “dirty bomb” attack: the optimum mix of medical countermeasure resources. Mil Med Res. 8(1):3–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RxList. 2018. ca-dtpa (pentetate calcium trisodium inj) drug [Internet]. [cited 2021 August 01]. https://www.rxlist.com/ca-dtpa-drug.htm
   Google Scholar
• Sabol J, Šesták B. 2017. Assessing the real threat and mitigating the impact of a terrorist use of radiological weapons. RadJ. 2(2):134–138.
   Google Scholar
• Sakthivel KM, Hariharan S. 2017. Regulatory players of DNA damage repair mechanisms: role in cancer chemoresistance. Biomed Pharmacother. 93:1238–1245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroya R, Smith R, Seymour C, Mothersill C. 2009. Injection of resperpine into zebrafish, prevents fish to fish communication of radiation-induced bystander signals: confirmation in vivo of a role for serotonin in the mechanism. Dose Response. 8(3):317–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satyamitra MM, Cassatt DR, Hollingsworth BA, Price PW, Rios CI, Taliaferro LP, Winters TA, DiCarlo AL. 2020. Metabolomics in radiation biodosimetry: current approaches and advances. Metabolites. 10(8):328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satyamitra M, Reyes Turcu FE, Pantoja-Galicia N, Wathen L. 2021. Challenges and strategies in the development of radiation biodosimetry tests for patient management. Radiat Res. doi:https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-21-00072.1.
   Google Scholar
• Schettino G, Folkard M, Michael BD, Prise KM. 2005. Low-dose binary behavior of bystander cell killing after microbeam irradiation of a single cell with focused c(k) x rays. Radiat Res. 163(3):332–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schettino G, Folkard M, Prise KM, Vojnovic B, Held KD, Michael BD. 2003. Low-dose studies of bystander cell killing with targeted soft X rays. Radiat Res. 160(5):505–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield PN, Kondratowicz M. 2018. Evolving paradigms for the biological response to low dose ionizing radiation; the role of epigenetics. Int J Radiat Biol. 94(8):769–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour CB, Mothersill C. 2000. Relative contribution of bystander and targeted cell killing to the low-dose region of the radiation dose-response curve. Radiat Res. 153(5):508–511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socol Y, Gofman Y, Yanovskiy M, Brosh B. 2020. Assessment of probable scenarios of radiological emergency and their consequences. Int J Radiat Biol. 96(11):1390–1399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vukmirovic D, Vo N, Seymour C, Rollo D, Mothersill C. 2021. Influence of common dietary supplements (curcumin, andrographolide, and d-limonene) on the radiobiological responses of p53-competent colonic cancer epithelial cells. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(3):341–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathen LK, Eder PS, Horwith G, Wallace RL. 2020. Using biodosimetry to enhance the public health response to a nuclear incident. Int J Radiat Biol. 29:1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1820605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright EG, Coates PJ. 2006. Untargeted effects of ionizing radiation: implications for radiation pathology. Mutat Res. 597(1–2):119–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariev VS, Hristov NM. 2013. The psychological effects of radiological terrorism—a challenge to the family physician. Medical Health Sci J. 14:71–77.
   Google Scholar