Induced variability and assessment of mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in sorghum genotypes [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]

References

• Akinseye FM, Ajeigbe HA, Pierre CST, Agelee SO, Zemadim B, Whitbread A. 2020. Improving sorghum productivity under changing climatic conditions: a modelling approach. Field Crops Res. 246:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghalian K, Shabani M, Jamshidi AH. 2010. Genetic variation and heritability of agro-morphological and phytochemical traits in Iranian saffron (Crocus sativa L.) populations. Ind Crops Prod. 31(2):401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello D, Kadams AM, Simon SY, Mashi DS. 2007. Studies on genetic variability in cultivated sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) cultivars of Adamawa State Nigeria. Am Eur J Agric Environ Sci. 2 (3):297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Bhala VP, Verma RC. 2018. Gamma rays induced chromosomal aberrations in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Chrom Bot. 12(4):86–90.
   Google Scholar
• Blonstein AD, Gale MD. 1984. Cell size and cell number in dwarf barley and semidwarf cereal mutants and their use in cross breeding II (Teidse 407). FAO/IAEA; Vienna; p. 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dhole VJ. 1999. Studies on effect of mutagens in soybean (Glycine max (L) Merrill) [M.Sc. thesis]. Akola; p. 82.
   Google Scholar
• FAO/IAEA. 2018. Types of mutations. In: Spencer-Lopes MM, Forster BP, Jankuloski L, editors. Manual on mutation breeding – third edition. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Associates Universities; p. 301.
   Google Scholar
• Golubinova IG, Gecheff K. 2011. M1 cytogenetic and physiological effects of gamma-rays in Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense (Piper.) Stapf). Bulgarian J Agric Sci. 17:417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goud JV, Nayar KMD, Rao MG. 1970. Mutagenesis in sorghum. Indian J Genet Pl. Breed. 30(1):81–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal S, Wani MR, Khan S. 2019. Frequency and spectrum of chlorophyll mutations induced by single and combination treatments of gamma rays and EMS in Urdbean. Asian J Biol Sci. 12(2):156–163.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory WC. 1956. Induction of useful mutations in the peanut. In: Smith HH, editor. Genetics in plant breeding. Brookhaven symposia in biology no. 9. Upton (NY): Brookhaven National Laboratory, Associates Universities; p. 177–190.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson A. 1940. The mutation systems of chlorophyll apparatus. Lands Univ Arsska N R Acad. 236:1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Harris HB, Burton GW, Johnson BJ. 1965. Effects of gamma radiation on two varieties of Sorghum vulgare Pers.; p. 362–365.
   Google Scholar
• Human S, Sihono, Indriatama WM. 2020. Sorghum improvement program by using mutation breeding in Indonesia. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci. 484:1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/484/1/012003.
   Google Scholar
• [ICAR-IIMR] ICAR-Indian Institute of Millets Research. 2019. Annual report 2019. Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, India; p. 112.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul MH, Bhan AK. 1977. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of EMS, DES and gamma-rays in rice. Theor Appl Genet. 50(5):241–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebede H, Subudhi PK, Rosenow DT, Nguyen HT. 2001. Quantitative trait loci influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Theor Appl Genet. 103(2–3):266–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MH, Tyagi SD. 2010. Studies on effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays, EMS and their combination in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill.]. J Plant Breed Crop Sci. 2(3):55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Khan S, Wani MR, Bhat M, Parveen K. 2005. Induced chlorophyll mutations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Int J Agric Biol. 7:764–767.
   Google Scholar
• Kodym A, Afza R. 2003. Physical and chemical mutagenesis. Methods Mol Biol. 236:189–204.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konzak CF, Nilan RA, Wagner J, Foster RJ. 1964. Efficient chemical mutagenesis. In: The use of induced mutations in plant breeding. Proceedings of a Symposium, FAO/IAEA; Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Kumawat S, Rana N, Bansal R, Vishwakarma G, Mehetre ST, Das BK, Kumar M, Yadav SK, Sonah H, Sharma TR, et al. 2019. Expanding avenue of fast neutron mediated mutagenesis for crop Improvement. Plants. 8(6):164.
   Google Scholar
• Makeen K, Suresh BG, Lavanya GR, Kumari A. 2013. Study of chlorophyll and macro mutations induced by gamma rays and sodium azide in Urdbean (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Afr J Agric Res. 8(47):5958–5961.
   Google Scholar
• Moh CC, Smith L. 1951. An analysis of seedling mutants (spontaneous, atomic bomb-radiation-, and X ray-induced) in barley and durum wheat. Genet. 36(6):629–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi M, Dehpour AA, Bishekolai R. 2009. Effect of gamma radiation on germination and embryogenic callus in rice (Oryza sativa). Proceedings of 10th International Agricultural-Engineering Conference; Dec 7–10; Thailand. IAEC. p. 232.
   Google Scholar
• Nair R, Mehta AK, Singh KP, Sharma SK. 2014. Mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in cowpea. Adv Appl Res. 6(1):78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Nirula S. 1963. Studies on some nuclear factors controlling radiation sensitivity and the induced mutation rate in Eu and Para sorghum species. Radiat Bot. 3(4):351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Oria MP, Hamaker BR, Axtell JD, Huang CP. 2000. A highly digestible sorghum mutant cultivar exhibits a unique folded structure of endosperm protein bodies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 97(10):5065–5070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panse VG, Sukhatme PV. 1954. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. New Delhi: ICAR; p. 152–165.
   Google Scholar
• Paul A, Singh DP. 2005. Frequency, spectrum and segregation pattern of chlorophyll and macromutations in field pea (Pisum sativum). Legume Res. 28(2):94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Pavadai P, Girija M, Dhanavel D. 2010. Effect of gamma rays on some yield parameters and protein content of soybean in M2, M3 and M4 generation. J Exp Sci. 1(6):8–11.
   Google Scholar
• Prabhakar . 2002. Stability analysis for flowering, maturity and grain yield in rabi sorghum. Ann Agric Res. 23(4):563–566.
   Google Scholar
• Raina A, Laskar RA, Khursheed S, Amin R, Tantray AY, Parveen K, Khan S. 2016. Role of mutation breeding in crop improvement—past, present and future. Asian Res J Agric. 2(2):1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Prasad BK, Singh VP. 2001. Semi dwarf, high yielding and high protein mutants in barley. Mut Breed Newslett. 45:26–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ramulu SK. 1971. Chemical mutagenesis in sorghum. Proc Indian Acad Sci. 74:161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Ramulu SK. 1972. A comparison of mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of NMU and MNG in sorghum. Theor Appl Genet. 42(3):101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramulu SK. 1973. Mutagenic effect of gamma rays, chemical mutagens and combined treatments in sorghum. Z Pflanzenzuchig. 70:223–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy CS, Rao NGP. 1981. Induced mutations in sorghum improvement. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad. B47(3):427–446.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy CS. 1977. Physiological and genetic effects of gamma rays, ethyl methane sulphonate, hydrazine, cysteine and their combinations in Sorghum bicolor (L.) [PhD dissertation]. College Station (TX): Texas A&M University; p. 186.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy CS, Smith JD. 1975. Differential sensitivity of two varieties of Sorghum bicolor (L.) to gamma radiation. Genet. 80:67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley EF. 1954. The effect of X-rays upon growth of Avena seedlings. Radiat Res. 1:227–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts JJ, Warwick GP. 1958. Studies of the mode of action of tumour growth inhibiting alkylating agents. I. The fate of ethyl methane sulphonate in the rat. Biochem Pharmacol. 1(1):60–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salih A, Sabiel I, Noureldin I, Baloch SK, Baloch SU, Bashir W. 2016. Genetic variability and estimates of heritability in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) genotypes grown in a semiarid zone of Sudan. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 62(1):139–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.2 user’s guide. Cary (NC): SAS Institute Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Seetharam K, Ganesamurthy K. 2013. Characterization of sorghum genotypes for yield and other agronomic traits through genetic variability and diversity analysis. Electron J Plant Breed. 4(1):1073–1079.
   Google Scholar
• Shah AB, Ud-Deen S, Naz MM, Sarker A, Kabir JK. 2008. Post-irradiation ageing effect on morphological characters of Crotalaria saltiana. J Biol Sci. 16:89–93.
   Google Scholar
• Singh S, Richharia AK, Joshi AK. 1998. An assessment of gamma ray induced mutations in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed. 58:455–463.
   Google Scholar
• Smith HH. 1972. Comparative genetic effects of different physical mutagens in higher plants. In: Joint FAO/IAEA. Division of Atomic Energy in Food and Agriculture. Induced Mutations and Plant Breeding Improvement. Vienna: IAEA; p. 75–93.
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1994. Statistical methods. 8h ed. Ames (IA): Iowa State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soeranto H, Nakanishi TM, Razzak MT. 2001. Mutation breeding in sorghum in Indonesia. Radioisotopes. 50(5):169–175.
   Google Scholar
• Suprasanna P, Mirjankar SJ, Bhagwat SG. 2015. Induced mutations and crop improvement. In: Bahadur B, editor. Plant biology and biotechnology: volume I: plant diversity, organization, function and improvement.
   Google Scholar
• Suthakar V, Mullainathan L, Elangovan M. 2015. Studies mutagenic effect of gamma rays and EMS on sorghum. Int J Adv Res. 2(9):453–455.
   Google Scholar
• Suthakar V, Mullainathan L, Elangovan M. 2014. Mutagenic effect of gamma rays and EMS on yield attributes of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) in M1 generation. Int J Adv Res. 2:453–455.
   Google Scholar
• Swaminathan MS. 1969. Role of mutation breeding in changing agriculture. In: Induced mutations in plants. Jointly organized by IAEA and FAO. Proceedings of Symposium; Jul 14–18; Pullman, Washington; p. 719–733.
   Google Scholar
• Tesso T, Tirfessa A, Mohammed H. 2011. Association between morphological traits and yield components in the durra sorghums of Ethiopia. Hereditas. 148(3):98–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapa CB. 1970. Effect of acute exposure of gamma rays on seed germination and seedling growth of Pinus kesiya Gord and P. wallichiana A.B. Jacks. Our Nat. 2(1):13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Usharani KS, Kumar A. 2015. Induced viable mutants in Urdbean (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper). Bioscan. 10(3):1103–1108.
   Google Scholar
• Veenakumari K. 1994. Studies on the effect of gamma rays and EMS on yield and yield components in soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) [MSc.(Agri) thesis]. Bangalore, India: University of Agricultural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Wanga MA, Ashok Kumar A, Kangueehi GN, Shimelis H, Horn H, Sarsu F, Andowa JFN. 2018. Breeding sorghum using induced mutations: future prospect for Namibia. Am J Plant Sci. 9(13):2696–2707.
   Google Scholar
• Wani MR. 2017. Induced chlorophyll mutations, comparative mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of chemical mutagens in lentils (Lens culinaris Medik). Asian J Plant Sci. 16(4):221–226.
   Google Scholar