Educational dialogue on public perception of nuclear radiation

References

• Brumfiel G, Fuyuno I. 2012. Japan's nuclear crisis: Fukushima's legacy of fear. Nature. 483(7388):138–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant PA. 2021. Communicating radiation risk: the role of public engagement in reaching ALARA. J Radiol Prot. 41(2):S1–S8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abd348.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant PA, Yoshida H, Butlin M, Wood MD, Raines K, Bannon A, Hunak S. 2020. SRP workshop on 'communication of radiation risk in the modern world'. J Radiol Prot. 40(1):319–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwin RL, Charpak G. 2002. Megawatts and megatons: a turning point in the nuclear age? New York: Alfred A. Knopf and Chicago: University of Chicago Press. ISBN:0226-28427-1.
   Google Scholar
• Chhem RK. 2014. Chapter 1, physicians’ early response to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident: challenges and lessons learned. In: Tanigawa K, Chhem R, editors. Radiation disaster medicine Switzerland: Springer; p. 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Chhem RK, Aziz AZ, Clancey GK. 2014. Chapter 7, radiation disaster medicine curriculum revisited in a post-Fukushima context. In: Tanigawa K, Chhem R, editors. Radiation disaster medicine. Switzerland: Springer; p. 109–119.
   Google Scholar
• Church BW, Brooks AL. 2020. Cost of fear and radiation protection actions: Washington County, Utah and Fukushima, Japan {Comparing case histories}. Int J Radiat Biol. 96(4):520–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancey GK, Chhem RK. Forthcoming 2022. Radiation risk communication in Fukushima from a STS perspective (in preparation and personal communication).
   Google Scholar
• Coleman CN, Stone HB, Alexander GA, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Bedford JS, Bristow RG, Dynlacht JR, Fuks Z, Gorelic LS, Hill RP, et al. 2003. Education and training for radiation scientists: radiation research program and American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Workshop, Bethesda, Maryland, May 12–14, 2003. Radiat Res. 160(6):729–737.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Combs SE, Kessel C, Berberat PO, Atkinson MJ. 2019. Students' expectations in an international Master of Science course in radiation biology. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(2):233–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combs SE, Kessel C, Wilkens JJ, Multhoff G, Schmid TE, Vaupel P, Trott KR, Berberat P, Atkinson MJ. 2017. Master of Science (MSc) program in radiation biology: an interdepartmental course bridging the gap between radiation-related preclinical and clinical disciplines to prepare next-generation medical scientists. Front Oncol. 7:226. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00226.
   Google Scholar
• Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N. 2011. Experiment earth? Reflections on a public dialogue on geoengineering. Understanding risk Working Paper 11-02, Cardiff, School of Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Crick MJ. 2021. The importance of trustworthy sources of scientific information in risk communication with the public. J Radiat Res. 62(Supplement_1):i1–i6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Della Monaca S, Dini V, Grande S, Palma A, Tkaczyk AH, Koch R, Murakas R, Perko T, Duranova T, Salomaa S, et al. 2021. Assessing radiation risk perception by means of a European stakeholder survey. J Radiol Prot. 41(4):1145–1165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abf75a.
   Google Scholar
• DiCarlo AL, Homer MJ, Coleman CN. 2021. United States medical preparedness for nuclear and radiological emergencies. J Radiol Prot. (accepted manuscript). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac0d3f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dynlacht JR, Zeman EM, Held KD, Deye J, Vikram B, Joiner MC. 2015. Education and training needs in the radiation sciences: problems and potential solutions. Radiat Res. 184(5):449–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortun K, Frickel S. 2012. Making a case for disaster science and technology studies (online forum). https://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/online-forum/making-a-case-for-disaster-science-and-technology-studies/
   Google Scholar
• Lee RP, Gloaguen S. 2015. Path-dependence, lock-in, and student perceptions of nuclear energy in France: Implications from a pilot study. Energy Res Social Sci. 8:86–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeal KS, Hammerman JKL, Christiansen JA, Carroll FJ. 2014. Climate change education in the Southeastern U.S. through public dialogue: not just preaching to the choir. J Geosci Educ. 62(4):631–644.
   Google Scholar
• Muller R. 2008. Physics for future presidents: the science behind the headlines. First edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nippa M, Lee RP. 2015. Another case of 'same bed, different dreams'? Assessing divergence and multidimensionality in energy evaluations and implications for interdisciplinary research and energy management. IJRAM. 18(2):199–220.
   Google Scholar
• Poikolainen K, Aalto-Setälä T, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Marttunen M, Lönnqvist J. 2004. Fear of nuclear war increases the risk of common mental disorders among young adults: a five-year follow-up study. BMC Public Health. 4:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer D, Benighaus C, Benighaus L, Renn O, Gold S, Röder B, Böl GF. 2014. The distinction between risk and hazard: understanding and use in stakeholder communication. Risk Anal. 34(7):1270–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheer D, Renn O. 2014. Public perception of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Clim Change. 125(3–4):305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spelt EJH, Biemans HJA, Tobi H, Luning PA, Mulder M. 2009. Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: a systematic review. Educ Psychol Rev. 21(4):365–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takamura N, Taira Y, Yoshida K, Nakashima-Hashiguchi K, Orita M, Yamashita S. 2016. Communicating radiation risk to the population of Fukushima. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 171(1):23–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo M. 2015. GEM2910 radiation and society module visit to Nuklear Malaysia. Treehouse. 2011 ed. Singapore: Tembusu College. https://tembusu.nus.edu.sg/treehouse/2015/2003/gem2910-radiation-and-society-module-visit-to-nuklear-malaysia/.
   Google Scholar
• Vinod Kumar A. 2014. India’s nuclear energy renaissance: stuck in the middle? J Risk Res. 17(1):43–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss W, Salomaa S, di Giorgio M, Boyd M, Thurston J, Takala J, Tokonami S, Vaillant L, Coates R, Kim JK. 2021. Key outcome summaries of the scientific programme of the IRPA15 congress. J Radiol Prot. 41(4):S490–S505. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac0802.
   Google Scholar
• Wellington JJ. 1982. Teaching the unteachable – physics education and nuclear weapons. Phys Educ. 17(3):106–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne B. 1992. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science. Public Underst Sci. 1(3):281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Yasui K, Takebayashi Y, Motoya R, Aoki S, Horiuchi T, Hatsuzawa T, Nakano K, Ohba T, Yoshida K, Midorikawa S, et al. 2021. Trajectory and factors of radiation risk perception of students aged 10 to 12 years at the time of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. J Radiol Prot. 41(4):1166–1183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac04b7.
   Google Scholar
• Yoshida H, Coates R. 2021. IRPA practical guidance for engagement with the public on radiation and risk. J Radiol Prot. 41(3):S181–S188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac14d6.
   Google Scholar