Gamma irradiation to induce beneficial mutants in proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.): an underutilized food crop

References

• Ambavane AR, Sawardekar SV, Sawantdesai SA, Gokhale NB. 2015. Studies on mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency of gamma rays and its effect on quantitative traits in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn). J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 8(1):120–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltensperger DD. 2002. Progress with proso, pearl and other millets. In: Janick J, Whipkey A, editors. Trends in new crops and new uses. Alexandria (VA): ASHS Press; p. 100–103.
   Google Scholar
• Blixt S, Gottschalk W. 1975. Mutation in the Leguminosae. Agri Hort Genet. 33(1–4):33–85.
   Google Scholar
• Borzouei A, Kafi M, Khazaei H, Naseriyan B, Majdabadi A. 2010. Effects of gamma radiation on germination and physiological aspects of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings. Pak J Bot. 42:2281–2290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Khound R, Santra M, Santra DK. 2019. Beyond bird feed: proso millet for human health and environment. Agriculture. 9(3):64.
   Google Scholar
• De Wet JMJ. 1986. Origin, evolution and systematics of minor cereals. In: Seetharam A, Riley KW, Harinarayana G, editors. Small millets in global agriculture. New Delhi, India: Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd.; p. 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• FAO/IAEA. 2018. Manual on mutation breeding. 3rd ed. Spencer-Lopes. Vienna (Austria): FAO/IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• Finney DJ. 1952. Probit analysis: a statistical treatment of the sigmoid response curve. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ganapathy S, Nirmalakumari A, Senthil N, Souframanien J, Raveendran TS. 2008. Isolation of macromutations and mutagenic effectiveness and efficiency in little millet varieties. World J Agric Sci. 4(4):483–486.
   Google Scholar
• Golubinova I, Gecheff K. 2011. M1 cytogenetic and physiological effects of gamma-rays in Sudan grass (Sorghum sudanense (Piper.) Stapf). Bulg J Agric Sci. 17:417–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowthami R, Vanniarajan C, Souframanien J, Veni K, Renganathan VG. 2021. Efficiency of electron beam over gamma rays to induce desirable grain-type mutation in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Int J Radiat Biol. 97(5):727–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo H, Yan Z, Li X, Xie Y, Xiong H, Liu Y, Zhao L, Gu J, Zhao S, Liu L. 2017. Development of a high-efficient mutation resource with phenotypic variation in hexaploid winter wheat and identification of novel alleles in the TaAGP.L-B1 gene. Front Plant Sci. 8:1404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Sood S, Agrawal PK, Bhatt JC. 2011. Floral biology and pollination system in small millets. Eur J Plant Sci Biotechnol. 6:81–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson Å. 1940. The mutation system of the chlorophyll apparatus. Kungliga Fysiografiska Sallskapets i Lund Handlingar. 51(11):1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Habiyaremye C, Matanguihan JB, D'Alpoim Guedes J, Ganjyal GM, Whiteman MR, Kidwell KK, Murphy KM. 2016. Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) and its potential for cultivation in the Pacific Northwest, US: a review. Front Plant Sci. 7:1961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan O, Mukhtar Ali Ghanim A, Ingelbrecht I. 2018. Mutation induction in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and finger millet (Eleusine coracana) for dry lands in Sudan.Vienna (Austria): International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
   Google Scholar
• Haussmann BI, Fred Rattunde H, Weltzien‐Rattunde E, Traoré PS, Vom Brocke K, Parzies HK. 2012. Breeding strategies for adaptation of pearl millet and sorghum to climate variability and change in West Africa. J Agron Crop Sci. 198(5):327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong MJ, Kim DY, Ahn J-W, Kang S-Y, Seo YW, Kim J-B. 2018. Comparison of radiosensitivity response to acute and chronic gamma irradiation in colored wheat. Genet Mol Biol. 41(3):611–623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [IBPGR] Institut International Des Ressources Phytogénétiques. 1985. Descriptors for Panicum miliaceum and P. sumatrense. Rome: International Board for Plant Genetic Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Ittner BC. 1934. The method of probits. Science. 79:38–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jency JP, Ravikesavan R, Sumathi P, Raveendran M. 2016. Determination of lethal dose and effect of physical mutagen on germination percentage and seedling parameters in kodo millet variety CO 3. Electron J Plant Breed. 7(4):1122–1126.
   Google Scholar
• Khatri A, Khan IA, Siddiqui MA. 2005. Evaluation of high yielding mutants of Brassica juncea cv. S-9 developed through gamma rays and EMS. Pak J Bot. 37:279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konzak CF. 1965. Efficient chemical mutagenesis. The use of induced mutations in plant breeding. Report of the FAO/IAEA technical meeting organized by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the International Atomic Energy Agency in cooperation with the European Association for Research on Plant Breeding, Rome, Italy, 25 May 1964. Pergamon Press. p. 49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Krishnaswami R. 1968. The relationship between response to radiations and nature of polyploidy in some crop plants. Caryologia. 21(4):303–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 193(1):265–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maluszynski M, Nichterlein K, Van Zanten L, Ahloowalia BS. 2000. Officially released mutant varieties—the FAO/IAEA Database. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult. 65:175–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mba C, Afza R, Bado S, Jain SM. 2010. Induced mutagenesis in plants using physical and chemical agents. Plant Cell Cult Essent Methods. 20:111–130.
   Google Scholar
• Nirmalakumari A, Subramanian A, ThangaHemavathy A, Kanchanarani R, Manoharan S, Raguchander T, Sivagamy K, Rajesh M, Parasuraman P, Jayachandran M, et al. 2020. National release-A high yielding, short duration, non-lodging and bold seeded prosomillet variety TNPm 230 as ATL1. Electron J Plant Breed. 11:11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Hussin G, Ramli A, Rahim HA, Miah G, Usman M. 2016. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 30(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piri I, Babayan M, Tavassoli A, Javaheri M. 2011. The use of gamma irradiation in agriculture. Afr J Microbiol Res. 5:5806–5811.
   Google Scholar
• PPVFR. 2021. DUS guidelines; [accessed 2021 Jul 12]. http://www.plantauthority.gov.in/crop-guidelines.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Preuss SB, Britt AB. 2003. A DNA-damage-induced cell cycle checkpoint in Arabidopsis. Genetics. 164(1):323–334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajasekaran R, Francis N. 2020. Genetic and genomic resources for improving proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.): a potential crop for food and nutritional security. Nucleus. 64:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh M, Vanniarajan C, Ravikesavan R, Aiyan KEA, Mahendran PP. 2019. Determination of lethal dose and effect of EMS and gamma ray on germination percentage and seedling parameters in barnyard millet variety Co (Kv) 2. Electron J Plant Breed. 10:957–962.
   Google Scholar
• Sato Y, Kudoh H. 2015. Tests of associational defence provided by hairy plants for glabrous plants of Arabidopsis halleri subsp. gemmifera against insect herbivores. Ecol Entomol. 40(3):269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian A, Nirmalakumari A, Suguna V, Muthiah AR. 2009. Induced mutagenesis in kodomillet (Paspalum scrobiculatum). Proceedings of International Conference on Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy-2009. Vol. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Suprasanna P, Mirajkar SJ, Bhagwat SG. 2015. Induced mutations and crop improvement. In: Bahadur B, Venkat Rajam M, Sahijram L, Krishnamurthy K, editors. Plant biology and biotechnology. New Delhi: Springer; p. 593–617.
   Google Scholar
• Vetriventhan M, Upadhyaya HD. 2018. Diversity and trait-specific sources for productivity and nutritional traits in the global proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) germplasm collection. Crop J. 6(5):451–463.
   Google Scholar
• Wanga MA, Shimelis H, Horn LN, Sarsu F. 2020. The effect of single and combined use of gamma radiation and ethylmethane sulfonate on early growth parameters in sorghum. Plants. 9(7):827.
   Google Scholar
• Wi SG, Chung BY, Kim J-S, Kim J-H, Baek M-H, Lee J-W, Kim YS. 2007. Effects of gamma irradiation on morphological changes and biological responses in plants. Micron. 38(6):553–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang G-H, Li S-Y, Wang L, Ye W-J, Zeng D-L, Rao Y-C, Peng Y-L, Hu J, Yang Y-L, Xu J, et al. 2014. LSCHL4 from japonica cultivar, which is allelic to NAL1, increases yield of indica super rice 93-11. Mol Plant. 7(8):1350–1364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar