Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) for radiation-induced reproductive effects in environmental species: state of science and identification of a consensus AOP network

References

• Adam-Guillermin C, Hertal-Aas T, Oughton D, Blanchard L, Alonzo F, Armant O, Horemans N. 2018. Radiosensitivity and transgenerational effects in non-human species. Ann ICRP. 47(3–4):327–341.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adam-Guillermin C, Pereira S, Della-Vedova C, Hinton T, Garnier-Laplace J. 2012. Genotoxic and reprotoxic effects of tritium and external gamma irradiation on aquatic animals. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol. 220:67–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TEH, Goodman JM, Gutsell S, Russell PJ. 2014. Defining molecular initiating events in the adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment. Chem Res Toxicol. 27(12):2100–2112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonzo F, Hertel-Aas T, Gilek M, Gilbin R, Oughton DH, Garnier-Laplace J. 2008. Modelling the propagation of effects of chronic exposure to ionising radiation from individuals to populations. J Environ Radioact. 99(9):1464–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alonzo F, Hertel-Aas T, Real A, Lance E, Garcia-Sanchez L, Bradshaw C, Vives i Batlle J, Oughton DH, Garnier-Laplace J. 2016. Population modelling to compare chronic external radiotoxicity between individual and population endpoints in four taxonomic groups. J Environ Radioact. 152:46–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirikhah R, Etemadi N, Sabzalian MR, Nikbakht A, Eskandari A. 2021. Gamma radiation negatively impacted seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidant enzymes activities in tall fescue infected with Epichloë endophyte. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 216:112169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson SL, Wild GC. 1994. Linking genotoxic responses and reproductive success in ecotoxicology. Environ Health Perspect. 102(Suppl 12):9–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankley GT, Bennett RS, Erickson RJ, Hoff DJ, Hornung MW, Johnson RD, Mount DR, Nichols JW, Russom CL, Schmieder PK, et al. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 29(3):730–741.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azzam EI, Jay-Gerin JP, Pain D. 2012. Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury. Cancer Lett. 327(1–2):48–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrat-Segretain MH. 1996. Strategies of reproduction, dispersion, and competition in river plants: a review. Vegetatio. 123(1):13–37.
   Google Scholar
• Becker RA, Ankley GT, Edwards SW, Kennedy SW, Linkov I, Meek B, Sachana M, Segner H, Van Der Burg B, Villeneuve DL, et al. 2015. Increasing scientific confidence in adverse outcome pathways: application of tailored Bradford–Hill considerations for evaluating weight of evidence. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 72(3):514–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford NA, Horemans N, Copplestone D, Raines KE, Orizaola G, Wood MD, Laanen P, Whitehead HC, Burrows JE, Tinsley MC, et al. 2020. Towards solving a scientific controversy – the effects of ionising radiation on the environment. J Environ Radioact. 211:106033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer J, Petersen K, Song Y, Ruus A, Grung M, Bakke T, Tollefsen KE. 2014. Environmental risk assessment of combined effects in aquatic ecotoxicology: a discussion paper. Mar Environ Res. 96:81–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermans G, Horemans N, Vanhoudt N, Vandenhove H, Saenen E, Van Hees M, Wannijn J, Vangronsveld J, Cuypers A. 2015. Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings show an age-dependent response on growth and DNA repair after exposure to chronic γ-radiation. Environ Exp Bot. 109:122–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blagojevic D, Lee Y, Xie L, Brede DA, Nybakken L, Lind OC, Tollefsen KE, Salbu B, Solhaug KA, Olsen JE. 2019. No evidence of a protective or cumulative negative effect of UV-B on growth inhibition induced by gamma radiation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings. Photochem Photobiol Sci. 18(8):1945–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blümel M, Dally N, Jung C. 2015. Flowering time regulation in crops—what did we learn from Arabidopsis? Curr Opin Biotechnol. 32:121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonzom JM, Hättenschwiler S, Lecomte-Pradines C, Chauvet E, Gaschak S, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Della-Vedova C, Dubourg N, Maksimenko A, Garnier-Laplace J, et al. 2016. Effects of radionuclide contamination on leaf litter decomposition in the chernobyl exclusion zone. Sci Total Environ. 562:596–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen HJM, Cawse PA, Smith SR. 1962. The effects of low doses of gamma radiation on plant yields. Int J Appl Radiat Isotopes. 13(9):487–492.
   Google Scholar
• Brechignac F, Oughton D, Mays C, Barnthouse L, Beasley JC, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Bradshaw C, Brown J, Dray S, Geras'kin S, et al. 2016. Addressing ecological effects of radiation on populations and ecosystems to improve protection of the environment against radiation: agreed statements from a Consensus Symposium. J Environ Radioact. 158–159:21–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JE, Alfonso B, Avila R, Beresford NA, Copplestone D, Hosseini A. 2016. A new version of the ERICA tool to facilitate impact assessments of radioactivity on wild plants and animals. J Environ Radioact. 153:141–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buisset-Goussen A, Goussen B, Della-Vedova C, Galas S, Adam-Guillermin C, Lecomte-Pradines C. 2014. Effects of chronic gamma irradiation: a multigenerational study using Caenorhabditis elegans. J Environ Radioact. 137:190–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns CW, Schallenberg M. 1996. Relative impacts of copepods, cladocerans and nutrients on the microbial food web of a mesotrophic lake. J Plankton Res. 18(5):683–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carusi A, Wittwehr C, Whelan M. 2022. Addressing evidence needs in chemicals policy and regulation. In: Union, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Beaton D, Hamada N, Wilkins R, Burtt J, Leblanc J, Cool D, Garnier-Laplace J, Laurier D, Le Y, et al. 2022a. Adverse outcome pathway: a path toward better data consolidation and global co-ordination of radiation research. Int J Radiat Biol. 7:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Hamada N, Garnier-Laplace J, Laurier D, Beaton D, Tollefsen KE, Locke PA. 2022b. Establishing a communication and engagement strategy to facilitate the adoption of the adverse outcome pathways in radiation research and regulation. Int J Rad Biol. 20:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Hamada N, Monceau V, Ebrahimian T, Adam N, Wilkins RC, Sebastian S, Patel ZS, Huff JL, Simonetto C, et al. 2021. Expert consultation is vital for adverse outcome pathway development: a case example of cardiovascular effects of ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(11):1516–1525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Hamada N, Wilkins R, Garnier-Laplace J, Laurier D, Beaton D, Tollefsen KE. 2022c. A high-level overview of the organisation for economic co-operation and development adverse outcome pathway programme. Int J Rad Biol. 8:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Said Z, Daka J, Sadi B, Bijlani D, Marchetti F, Beaton D, Gaw A, Li C, Burtt J, et al. 2019. Is there a role for the adverse outcome pathway framework to support radiation protection? Int J Radiat Biol. 95(2):225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Stricklin D, Cool D. 2021. The integration of the adverse outcome pathway framework to radiation risk assessment. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(1):60–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan V, Wilkins RC, Beaton D, Sachana M, Delrue N, Yauk C, O'Brien J, Marchetti F, Halappanavar S, Boyd M, et al. 2021. Bringing together scientific disciplines for collaborative undertakings: a vision for advancing the adverse outcome pathway framework. Int J Radiat Biol. 97(4):431–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J, Lu H, Li K, Zhu Y, Zhou J. 2018. Enhancing growth-relevant metabolic pathways of Arthrospira platensis (CYA-1) with gamma irradiation from 60 Co. RSC Adv. 8(30):16824–16833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopher DA, Mitchell RJ, Trapnell DW, Smallwood PA, Semski WR, Karron JD. 2019. Hermaphroditism promotes mate diversity in flowering plants. Am J Bot. 106(8):1131–1136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu DS, Shakes DC. 2013. Spermatogenesis. In: Schedl T, editor. Germ cell development in C. elegans. New York (NY): Springer New York; p. 171–203.
   Google Scholar
• Copplestone D, Zinger-Gize I, Woodhead DS. 2003. The FASSET radiation effects database: a demonstration. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); p. 78–86.
   Google Scholar
• Corsi AK, Wightman B, Chalfie M. 2015. A transparent window into biology: a primer on Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 200(2):387–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covich AP, Palmer MA, Crowl TA. 1999. The role of benthic invertebrate species in freshwater ecosystems: zoobenthic species influence energy flows and nutrient cycling. BioScience. 49(2):119–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallas LJ, Keith-Roach M, Lyons BP, Jha AN. 2012. Assessing the impact of ionizing radiation on aquatic invertebrates: a critical review. Radiat Res. 177(5):693–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly MJ. 2009. A new perspective on radiation resistance based on Deinococcus radiodurans. Nat Rev Microbiol. 7(3):237–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois C, Lecomte C, Ruys SP, Kuzmic M, Della-Vedova C, Dubourg N, Galas S, Frelon S. 2018. Precoce and opposite response of proteasome activity after acute or chronic exposure of C. elegans to γ-radiation. Sci Rep. 8:11349.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois C, Pophillat M, Audebert S, Fourquet P, Lecomte C, Dubourg N, Galas S, Camoin L, Frelon S. 2019. Differential modification of the C. elegans proteome in response to acute and chronic gamma radiation: link with reproduction decline. Sci Total Environ. 676:767–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufourcq‐sekatcheff E, Cuiné S, Li‐beisson Y, Quevarec L, Richaud M, Galas S, Frelon S. 2021. Deciphering differential life stage radioinduced reproductive decline in Caenorhabditis elegans through lipid analysis. IJMS. 22(19):10277.
   Google Scholar
• Dutilleul M, Goussen B, Bonzom JM, Galas S, Réale D. 2015. Pollution breaks down the genetic architecture of life history traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One. 10(2):e0116214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebert D. 2005. Ecology, epidemiology, and evolution of parasitism in Daphnia. Bethesda (MD):  National Library of Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. 1996. Biology and ecology of earthworms. 3rd ed. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Environment Agency. 2013. Regulating for people, the environment and growth. Bristol (UK): Environment Agency; p. 38.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller N, Lerebours A, Smith JT, Ford AT. 2015. The biological effects of ionising radiation on Crustaceans: a review. Aquat Toxicol. 167:55–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller N, Smith JT, Nagorskaya LL, Gudkov DI, Ford AT. 2017. Does chernobyl-derived radiation impact the developmental stability of Asellus aquaticus 30years on? Sci Total Environ. 576:242–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnaire B, Arcanjo C, Cavalié I, Camilleri V, Simon O, Dubourg N, Floriani M, Adam-Guillermin C. 2021. Effects of gamma ionizing radiation exposure on Danio rerio embryo-larval stages – comparison with tritium exposure. J Hazard Mater. 408:124866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnaire B, Cavalié I, Pereira S, Floriani M, Dubourg N, Camilleri V, Adam-Guillermin C. 2015. External gamma irradiation-induced effects in early-life stages of zebrafish, Danio rerio. Aquat Toxicol. 169:69–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier-Laplace J, Della-Vedova C, Andersson P, Copplestone D, Cailes C, Beresford NA, Howard BJ, Howe P, Whitehouse P. 2010. A multi-criteria weight of evidence approach for deriving ecological benchmarks for radioactive substances. J Radiol Prot. 30(2):215–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garnier-Laplace J, Geras'kin S, Della-Vedova C, Beaugelin-Seiller K, Hinton TG, Real A, Oudalova A. 2013. Are radiosensitivity data derived from natural field conditions consistent with data from controlled exposures? A case study of chernobyl wildlife chronically exposed to low dose rates. J Environ Radioact. 121:12–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbin R, Alonzo F, Garnier-Laplace J. 2008. Effects of chronic external gamma irradiation on growth and reproductive success of Daphnia magna. J Environ Radioact. 99(1):134–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes T, Xie L, Brede D, Lind OC, Solhaug KA, Salbu B, Tollefsen KE. 2017. Sensitivity of the green algae Chlamydomonas reinhardtii to gamma radiation: photosynthetic performance and ROS formation. Aquat Toxicol. 183:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman J, Copplestone D, Laptev GV, Gashchak S, Auld SKJR. 2019. Variation in chronic radiation exposure does not drive life history divergence among Daphnia populations across the chernobyl exclusion zone. Ecol Evol. 9(5):2640–2650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guédon R, Maremonti E, Armant O, Galas S, Brede DA, Lecomte-Pradines C. 2021. A systems biology analysis of reproductive toxicity effects induced by multigenerational exposure to ionizing radiation in C. elegans. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 225: 112793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guirandy N, Gagnaire B, Camilleri V, Cavalié C, Fabien P, Gonzales P, Simon O. 2022. Multigenerational exposure to gamma radiation affects offspring differently over generations in zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol. 244:106101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guirandy N, Gagnaire B, Frelon S, Munch T, Dubourg N, Camilleri V, Cavalié I, Floriani M, Arcanjo C, Murat El Houdigui S, et al. 2019. Adverse effects induced by chronic gamma irradiation in progeny of adult fish not affecting parental reproductive performance. Environ Toxicol Chem. 38(11):2556–2567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall J, Jeggo PA, West C, Gomolka M, Quintens R, Badie C, Laurent O, Aerts A, Anastasov N, Azimzadeh O, et al. 2017. Ionizing radiation biomarkers in epidemiological studies – an update. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 771:59–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton WD, Axelrod R, Tanese R. 1990. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 87(9):3566–3573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm JS, Rudel RA. 2020. Adverse outcome pathways for ionizing radiation and breast cancer involve direct and indirect DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, genomic instability, and interaction with hormonal regulation of the breast. Arch Toxicol. 94(5):1511–1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel-Aas T, Brunborg G, Jaworska A, Salbu B, Oughton DH. 2011. Effects of different gamma exposure regimes on reproduction in the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Sci Total Environ. 412–413:138–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel-Aas T, Oughton DH, Jaworska A, Bjerke H, Salbu B, Brunborg G. 2007. Effects of chronic gamma irradiation on reproduction in the earthworm Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta). Radiat Res. 168(5):515–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertel-Aas T, Oughton DH, Jaworska A, Brunborg G. 2011. Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks and oxidised bases in somatic and spermatogenic cells from the earthworm Eisenia fetida after exposure to ionising radiation. Mutagenesis. 26(6):783–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton TG, Alexakhin R, Balonov M, Gentner N, Hendry J, Prister B, Strand P, Woodhead D. 2007. Radiation-induced effects on plants and animals: findings of the United Nations chernobyl forum. Health Physics. 93(5):427–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton TG, Coughlin DP, Yi Y, Marsh LC. 2004. Low Dose Rate Irradiation Facility: initial study on chronic exposures to medaka. J Environ Radioact. 74(1–3):43–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurem S, Gomes T, Brede DA, Lindbo Hansen E, Mutoloki S, Fernandez C, Mothersill C, Salbu B, Kassaye YA, Olsen AK, et al. 2017. Parental gamma irradiation induces reprotoxic effects accompanied by genomic instability in zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos. Environ Res. 159:564–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurem S, Gomes T, Brede DA, Mayer I, Lobert VH, Mutoloki S, Gutzkow KB, Teien HC, Oughton D, Alestrom P, et al. 2018. Gamma irradiation during gametogenesis in young adult zebrafish causes persistent genotoxicity and adverse reproductive effects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 154:19–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurem S, Martín LM, Brede DA, Skjerve E, Nourizadeh-Lillabadi R, Lind OC, Christensen T, Berg V, Teien HC, Salbu B, et al. 2017. Dose-dependent effects of gamma radiation on the early zebrafish development and gene expression. PLoS One. 12(6):e0179259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurem S, Martín LM, Lindeman L, Brede DA, Salbu B, Lyche JL, Aleström P, Kamstra JH. 2018. Parental exposure to gamma radiation causes progressively altered transcriptomes linked to adverse effects in zebrafish offspring. Environ Pollut. 234:855–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyodo Taguchi Y, Egami N. 1976. Effect of X irradiation on spermatogonia of the fish, Oryzias latipes. Radiat Res. 67(2):324–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2006. Chernobyl's legacy: health, environmental and socio-economic impacts. Vienna (Austria): International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2014. Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer to wildlife. Vienna: Technical Reports Series IAEA.
   Google Scholar
• ICRP. 2008. Environmental protection – the concept and use of reference animals and plants.
   Google Scholar
• ICRP. 2017. Dose coefficients for non-human biota environmentally exposed to radiation. p. 1–136.
   Google Scholar
• Jalabert B. 2005. Particularities of reproduction and oogenesis in teleost fish compared to mammals. Reprod Nutr Dev. 45(3):261–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jamieson BGM. 1992. Oligochaeta. In: Harrison F, Gardiner S, editors. Microscopic anatomy of invertebrates. New York (N Y): Wiley-Liss; p. 217–322.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson TE, Hartman PS. 1988. Radiation effects on life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Gerontol. 43: B137–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jornod F, Jaylet T, Blaha L, Sarigiannis D, Tamisier L, Audouze K. 2022. AOP-helpFinder webserver: a tool for comprehensive analysis of the literature to support adverse outcome pathways development. Bioinformatics. 38(4):1173–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kariuki J, Horemans N, Saenen E, Van Hees M, Verhoeven M, Nauts R, Van Gompel A, Wannijn J, Cuypers A. 2019. The responses and recovery after gamma irradiation are highly dependent on leaf age at the time of exposure in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environ Exp Bot. 162:157–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapen D, Vergauwen L, Villeneuve DL, Ankley GT. 2015. The potential of AOP networks for reproductive and developmental toxicity assay development. Reprod Toxicol. 56:52–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koç ND, Aytekin Y, Yüce R. 2008. Ovary maturation stages and histological investigation of ovary of the Zebrafish (Danio rerio). Braz Arch Biol Technol. 51(3):513–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooijman SALM. 2010. Dynamic energy budget theory for metabolic organisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krivolutzkii DA, Pokarzhevskii AD, Viktorov AG. 1992. Earthworm populations in soils contaminated by the chernobyl atomic power station accident, 1986–1988. Soil Biol Biochem. 24(12):1729–1731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kryvokhyzha MV, Krutovsky KV, Rashydov NM. 2019. Differential expression of flowering genes in Arabidopsis thaliana under chronic and acute ionizing radiation. Int J Radiat Biol. 95(5):626–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson CM. 2008. An overview of the ERICA integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising contaminants. J Environ Radioact. 99(9):1364–1370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecomte-Pradines C, Hertel-Aas T, Coutris C, Gilbin R, Oughton D, Alonzo F. 2017. A dynamic energy-based model to analyze sublethal effects of chronic gamma irradiation in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 80(16–18):830–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch M. 1992. The life history consequences of resource depression in Ceriodaphnia quadrangula and Daphnia ambigua. Ecology. 73(5):1620–1629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maremonti E, Brede DA, Olsen AK, Eide DM, Berg ES. 2020. Ionizing radiation, genotoxic stress, and mitochondrial DNA copy-number variation in Caenorhabditis elegans: droplet digital PCR analysis. Mutat Res – Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 858–860:503277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maremonti E, Eide DM, Oughton DH, Salbu B, Grammes F, Kassaye YA, Guédon R, Lecomte-Pradines C, Brede DA. 2019. Gamma radiation induces life stage-dependent reprotoxicity in Caenorhabditis elegans via impairment of spermatogenesis. Sci Total Environ. 695:133835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maremonti E, Eide DM, Rossbach LM, Lind OC, Salbu B, Brede DA. 2020. In vivo assessment of reactive oxygen species production and oxidative stress effects induced by chronic exposure to gamma radiation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radic Biol Med. 152:583–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall JS. 1962. The effects of continuous gamma radiation on the intrinsic rate of natural increase of Daphnia Pulex. Ecology. 43(4):598–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall JS. 1966. Population dynamics of Daphnia Pulex as modified by chronic radiation stress. Ecology. 47(4):561–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AP, Shyu JC, Mousseau TA. 2016. Ionizing radiation from chernobyl and the fraction of viable pollen. Int J Plant Sci. 177(9):727–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maack G, Segner H. 2004. Life-stage-dependent sensitivity of zebrafish (Danio rerio) to estrogen exposure. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 139(1–3):47–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Emfietzoglou D, Liamsuwan T, Taleei R, Liljequist D, Uehara S. 2016. Radiation track, DNA damage and response – a review. Rep Prog Phys. 79(11):116601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikjoo H, Uehara S, Wilson WE, Hoshi M, Goodhead DT. 1998. Track structure in radiation biology: theory and applications. Int J Radiat Biol. 73:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson B, Brahme A. 1983. Relation between kerma and absorbed dose in photon beams. Acta Radiol Oncol. 22(1):77–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmansyah, Alghamdi SS, Migdadi HM, Farooq M. 2018. Morphological and chromosomal abnormalities in gamma radiation-induced mutagenized faba bean genotypes. Int J Radiat Biol. 94:174–185.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 1984. Test No. 207: Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Users' handbook supplement to the guidance document for developing and assessing adverse outcome pathways.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. Guidance document for the scientific review of adverse outcome pathways OECD series on adverse outcome pathways, No. 20, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Oladosu Y, Rafii MY, Abdullah N, Hussin G, Ramli A, Rahim HA, Miah G, Usman M. 2016. Principle and application of plant mutagenesis in crop improvement: a review. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 30(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsvik PA, Heier LS, Rosseland BO, Teien HC, Salbu B. 2010. Effects of combined gamma-irradiation and metal (Al + Cd) exposures in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). J Environ Radioact. 101(3):230–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisot F, Bourdineaud JP, Plaire D, Adam-Guillermin C, Alonzo F. 2015. DNA alterations and effects on growth and reproduction in Daphnia magna during chronic exposure to gamma radiation over three successive generations. Aquat Toxicol. 163:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira S, Bourrachot S, Cavalie I, Plaire D, Dutilleul M, Gilbin R, Adam-Guillermin C. 2011. Genotoxicity of acute and chronic gamma-irradiation on zebrafish cells and consequences for embryo development. Environ Toxicol Chem. 30(12):2831–2837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins EJ, Ashauer R, Burgoon L, Conolly R, Landesmann B, Mackay C, Murphy CA, Pollesch N, Wheeler JR, Zupanic A, et al. 2019. Building and applying quantitative adverse outcome pathway models for chemical hazard and risk assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem. 38(9):1850–1865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner HB, Hillman WS. 1960. Effects of X irradiation on Lemna perpusilla. Am J Bot. 47(6):506–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahmanian S, Niklas M, Abdollahi A, Jakel O, Greilich S. 2017. Application of fluorescent nuclear track detectors for cellular dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 62(7):2719–2740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao PN, Rao RN. 1977. Gamma-ray induced meiotic chromosome stickiness in tomato. Theor Appl Genet. 50(5):247–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real A, Garnier-Laplace J. 2020. The importance of deriving adequate wildlife benchmark values to optimize radiological protection in various environmental exposure situations. J Environ Radioact. 211:105902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Real A, Sundell-Bergman S, Knowles JF, Woodhead DS, Zinger I. 2004. Effects of ionising radiation exposure on plants, fish and mammals: relevant data for environmental radiation protection. J Radiol Prot. 24(4A):A123–A137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinecke AJ, Reinecke SA, Maboeta MS. 2001. Cocoon production and viability as endpoints in toxicity testing of heavy metals with three earthworm species. Pedobiologia. 45(1):61–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisz JA, Bansal N, Qian J, Zhao W, Furdui CM. 2014. Effects of ionizing radiation on biological molecules – mechanisms of damage and emerging methods of detection. Antioxid Redox Signal. 21(2):260–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi HH. 1960. Spatial distribution of energy deposition by ionizing radiation. Radiat Res. Suppl 2:290–299.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rusin A, Lapied E, Le M, Seymour C, Oughton D, Haanes H, Mothersill C. 2019. Effect of gamma radiation on the production of bystander signals from three earthworm species irradiated in vivo. Environ Res. 168:211–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbu B, Teien HC, Lind OC, Tollefsen KE. 2019. Why is the multiple stressor concept of relevance to radioecology? Int J Radiat Biol. 95(7):1015–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax K. 1963. The stimulation of plant growth by ionizing radiation. Radiat Bot. 3(3):179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Sazykina TG. 2018. Population sensitivities of animals to chronic ionizing radiation-model predictions from mice to elephant. J Environ Radioact. 182:177–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scaldaferro MA, Prina AR, Moscone EA, Kwasniewska J. 2013. Effects of ionizing radiation on Capsicum baccatum var. pendulum (Solanaceae). Appl Radiat Isot. 79:103–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schartl M. 2004. A comparative view on sex determination in medaka. Mech Dev. 121(7–8):639–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Albrecht E, Helbron H, Palekhov D. 2010. The proportionate impact assessment of the European Commission – towards more formalism to backup “The Environment». In: Bizer K, Lechner S, Führ M, editors. The European impact assessment and the environment. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 85–102.
   Google Scholar
• Sellars MJ, Degnan BM, Carrington LE, Preston NP. 2005. The effects of ionizing radiation on the reproductive capacity of adult Penaeus (Marsupenaeus) japonicus (Bate). Aquaculture. 250(1–2):194–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin H, Lee H, Fejes AP, Baillie DL, Koo H-S, Jones SJM. 2011. Gene expression profiling of oxidative stress response of C. elegans aging defective AMPK mutants using massively parallel transcriptome sequencing. BMC Res Notes. 4:34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuryak I. 2020. Review of resistance to chronic ionizing radiation exposure under environmental conditions in multicellular organisms. J Environ Radioact. 212: 06128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slanchev K, Stebler J, De La Cueva-Méndez G, Raz E. 2005. Development without germ cells: the role of the germ line in zebrafish sex differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102(11):4074–4079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JT, Willey NJ, Hancock JT. 2012. Low dose ionizing radiation produces too few reactive oxygen species to directly affect antioxidant concentrations in cells. Biol Lett. 8(4):594–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Salbu B, Teien HC, Heier LS, Rosseland BO, Tollefsen KE. 2014. Dose-dependent hepatic transcriptional responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) exposed to sublethal doses of gamma radiation. Aquat Toxicol. 156:52–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Xie L, Lee Y, Brede DA, Lyne F, Kassaye Y, Thaulow J, Caldwell G, Salbu B, Tollefsen KE. 2020. Integrative assessment of low-dose gamma radiation effects on Daphnia magna reproduction: toxicity pathway assembly and AOP development. Sci Total Environ. 705:135912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Xie L, Lee Y, Tollefsen KE. 2020. De Novo development of a quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) network for ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation using targeted laboratory tests and automated data mining. Environ Sci Technol. 54(20):13147–13156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowmithra K, Shetty NJ, Harini BP, Jha SK, Chaubey RC. 2015. Effects of acute gamma radiation on the reproductive ability of the earthworm Eisenia fetida. J Environ Radioact. 140:11–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalin A, Suganthi P, Mathivani S, Broos KV, Gokula V, Sadiq Bukhari A, Syed Mohamed HE, Singhal RK, Venu-babu P. 2019. Effect of cobalt-60 gamma radiation on reproductive disturbance in freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879). Toxicol Rep. 6:1143–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns SC. 1992. The evolution of life histories. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svingen T, Villeneuve DL, Knapen D, Panagiotou EM, Draskau MK, Damdimopoulou P, O'Brien JM. 2021. A pragmatic approach to adverse outcome pathway development and evaluation. Toxicol Sci. 184(2):183–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanabe S, Beaton D, Chauhan V, Choi I, Høgh Danielsen P, Delrue N, Esterhuizen M, Filipovska J, FitzGerald R, Fritsche E, et al. 2020a. Report of the 1st and 2nd Mystery of Reactive Oxygen Species Conferences. ALTEX. 39:336–338.
   Google Scholar
• Tanabe S, O'Brien J, Tollefsen KE, Kim Y-J, Chauhan V, Yauk C, Huliganga E, Rudel RA, Kay JE, Helm JS, et al. 2022b. Reactive oxygen species in the adverse outcome pathway framework: towards creation of harmonized consensus key events. Front Toxicol. 4:887135.
   Google Scholar
• Trijau M, Asselman J, Armant O, Adam-Guillermin C, De Schamphelaere KAC, Alonzo F. 2018. Transgenerational DNA methylation changes in Daphnia magna exposed to chronic γ irradiation. Environ Sci Technol. 52(7):4331–4339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchida D, Yamashita M, Kitano T, Iguchi T. 2002. Oocyte apoptosis during the transition from ovary-like tissue to testes during sex differentiation of juvenile zebrafish. J Exp Biol. 205 (Pt 6):711–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNSCEAR. 1996. Sources and effects of Ionizing radiation: effects of radiation on the environment. United Nations Scientific Committee on the effects of atomic radiation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hoeck A, Horemans N, Van Hees M, Nauts R, Knapen D, Vandenhove H, Blust R. 2015a. beta-radiation stress responses on growth and antioxidative defense system in plants: a study with strontium-90 in Lemna minor. Int J Mol Sci. 16(7):15309–15327.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoeck A, Horemans N, Van Hees M, Nauts R, Knapen D, Vandenhove H, Blust R. 2015b. Characterizing dose response relationships: chronic gamma radiation in Lemna minor induces oxidative stress and altered polyploidy level. J Environ Radioact. 150:195–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoudt N, Horemans N, Wannijn J, Nauts R, Van Hees M, Vandenhove H. 2014. Primary stress responses in Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to gamma radiation. J Environ Radioact. 129:1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villeneuve DL, Crump D, Garcia-Reyero N, Hecker M, Hutchinson TH, LaLone CA, Landesmann B, Lettieri T, Munn S, Nepelska M, et al. 2014. Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) development I: strategies and principles. Toxicol Sci. 142(2):312–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinken M, Knapen D, Vergauwen L, Hengstler JG, Angrish M, Whelan M. 2017. Adverse outcome pathways: a concise introduction for toxicologists. Arch Toxicol. 91(11):3697–3707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won E-J, Lee J-S. 2014. Gamma radiation induces growth retardation, impaired egg production, and oxidative stress in the marine copepod Paracyclopina nana. Aquat Toxicol. 150:17–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Solhaug KA, Song Y, Brede DA, Lind OC, Salbu B, Tollefsen KE. 2019. Modes of action and adverse effects of gamma radiation in an aquatic macrophyte Lemna minor. Sci Total Environ. 680:23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie L, Song Y, Petersen K, Solhaug KA, Lind OC, Brede DA, Salbu B, Tollefsen KE. 2020. Ultraviolet B modulates gamma radiation-induced stress responses in Lemna minor at multiple levels of biological organisation. Sci Total Environ. 846:157457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar