The Influence of Experimental Design and Data Analysis on the Determination of Recovery Kinetics of Radiation Damage between Acute Dose-rate Treatments in Vivo

References

• Alper T. Cellular Radiobiology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1979
   Google Scholar
• Curtis S.B. Lethal and potentially lethal lesions induced by radiation: a unified repair model. Radiation Research 1986; 106: 252–270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dale R.G. The application of the linear-quadratic model to fractionated radio-therapy when there is incomplete normal tissue recovery between fractions, and possible implications for treatments involving multiple fractions per day. British Journal of Radiology 1986; 59: 919–927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas B.G., Fowler J.F. The effect of multiple small doses of X-rays on skin reactions in the mouse foot and a basic interpretation. Radiation Research 1976; 66: 401–426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler J.F. What next in fractionated radiotherapy?. British Journal of Cancer 1984; 49: 285–300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler J.F., Denekamp J., Thames H.D., Travis E.L. Repair factors for multifraction irradiations. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1984; 1: 281–286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fowler J.F., Whitsed C.A., Joiner M.C. Repair kinetics in mouse lung: a fast component at 1·1 Gy per fraction. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989, in press
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg-Schwager M. Review of repair kinetics for DNA damage induced in eukaryotic cells in vitro by ionising radiation. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1989; 14: 307–320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner M.C. The design and interpretation of top up experiments to investigate the effects of low radiation doses. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1987; 51: 115–130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiner M.C. The dependence of radiation response on the dose per fraction. The Scientific Basis for Modern Radiotherapy (BIR Report 19), N.J. McNally. British Institute of Radiology, London 1989; 20–26
   Google Scholar
• Joiner M.C., Rojas A., Johns H. Does the repair capacity of skin change with repeated exposure to X-rays?. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 55: 993–1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelland L.R., Steel G.G. Recovery from radiation damage in human squamous carcinoma of the cervix. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989; 55: 119–127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lajtha L.G., Oliver R. Some radiobiological considerations in radiotherapy. British Journal of Radiology 1961; 34: 252–257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael B.D. Modelling of multiple fractions per day schedules: two or three fractions per day versus equally spaced fractions. British Journal of Radiology 1987; 60: 605–606
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michael B.D. Some considerations of repair in the design of multiple-fractions-per-day treatment schedules. The Scientific Basis for Modern Radiotherapy (BIR Report 19), N.J. McNally. British Institute of Radiology, London 1989; 5–9
   Google Scholar
• Oliver R. Comparisons of the effects of acute and protracted gamma-radiation on the growth of seedlings of Vicia faba. II. Theoretical calculations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1964; 8: 475–488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock J.H., Cassoni A.M., McMillan T.J., Steel G.G. Radiosensitive human tumour cell lines may not be recovery deficient. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1988; 54: 945–953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas A., Joiner M.C. The influence of dose per fraction on repair kinetics. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1989; 14: 329–336
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas A., Joiner M.C., Johns H. Recovery kinetics in mouse skin and CaNT tumours. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1989a, In press
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas A., Joiner M.C., Johns H. Recovery kinetics of X-ray damage in mouse skin: the influence of dose per fraction. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1989b, (Submitted)
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stephens T.C., Eady J.J., Peacock J.H., Steel G.G. Split-dose and low dose-rate recovery in four experimental tumour systems. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1987; 52: 157–170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D. Effect-independent measures of tissue responses to fractionated irradiation. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1984; 45: 1–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D. An ‘incomplete repair’ model for survival after fractionated and continuous irradiations. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1985; 47: 319–339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D. Repair kinetics in tissues: alternative models. Radiotherapy and Oncology 1989; 14: 321–327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D., Hendry J.H. Fractionation in Radiotherapy. Taylor & Francis, London 1987
   Google Scholar
• Thames H.D., Mason K.A., Bentzen S.M., Ang K.K., Cundiff J.H. Split-dose recovery in mouse jejunal crypt cells: characterization of repair kinetics. The Scientific Basis for Modern Radiotherapy (BIR Report 19), N.J. McNally. British Institute of Radiology, London 1989; 37–42
   Google Scholar
• Thames H.D., Peters L.J., Withers H.R., Fletcher G.H. Accelerated fractionation vs hyperfractionation: rationales for several treatments per day. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology and Physics 1983; 9: 127–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thames H.D., Rozell M.E., Tucker S.L., Ang K.K., Fisher D.R., Travis E.L. Direct analysis of quantal radiation response data. International Journal of Radiation Biology 1986; 49: 999–1009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar