Repair of chromosome and DNA breaks versus cell survival in Chinese hamster cells

References

• BILL, C. A., GARRETT, K. C., HARRELL, R., and TOFILON, P. J., 1992, Enhancement of radiation-induced cell killing and DNA double-strand breaks in a human tumor cell line using nanomolar concentrations of Aclacinomycin A. Radiation Research, 129, 315–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLOCHER, D., SIGUT, D., and HANNAN, M. A., 1991, Fibroblasts from ataxia telangiectasia (AT) and AT heterozygotes show an enhanced level of residual DNA double-strand breaks after low dose-rate y-irradiation as assayed by pulsed field gel elecrophoresis. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 60, 791–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUSSINK, J., TERRY, N. H. A., and BROCK, W. A., 1995, Cell cycle analysis of synchronized Chinese hamster cells using bromodeoxyuridine labeling and flow cytometry. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology, 31, 547–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CARRANO, A. V., 1973, Chromosome aberrations and radiation-induced cell death. II. Predicted and observed cell survival. Mutation Research, 17, 355–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CASSONI, A. M., MCMILLAN, T. J., PEACOCK, J. H., and STEEL, G. G., 1992, Differences in the level of DNA double-strand breaks in human tumor cells lines following low dose-rate irradiation. European Journal of Cancer, 28A, 1610–1614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DARROUDI, F., and NATARAJAN, A. T., 1987, Cytological charac-terization of Chinese hamster ovary X-ray-sensitive mutant cells xrs-5 and xrs-6: I. Induction of chromo- somal aberrations by X-irradiation and its modulation with 3-aminobenzamide and caffeine. Mutation Research, 177, 133–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEWEY, W. C., MILLER, H. H., and LEEPER, D. B., 1971, Chromo-somal aberrations and mortality of X-irradiated mam-malian cells: Emphasis on repair. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 68, 667–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DUTRILLAUX, B., HERBAULT-SEUREAU, M., ZAFRANI, B., and PRIEUR, M., 1991, Prolonged G2 phase of breast cancer cells and chromosome damage. European Journal of Cancer, 27, 1307–1312.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ELKIND, M. M., 1985, DNA damage and cell killing: cause and effect? Cancer, 56, 2351–2363.
   Google Scholar
• FISHER, D. E., 1994, Apoptosis in cancer therapy: crossing the threshold. Cell, 78, 539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GIACCIA, A. J., SCHWARTZ, J., SHIEH, J., and BROWN, J. M., 1992, The use of asymmetric-field inversion gel electro-phoresis to predict tumor cell radiosensitivity. Radio-therapy and Oncology, 24, 231–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HITTELMAN, W. N., and POLLARD, M., 1982, A comparison of the DNA and chromosome repair kinetics after gamma irradiation. Radiation Research, 92, 497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IFIAKIS, G., PANTELIAS, G. E., and SEANE RR., 1988, Effect of ara-binofuranosyladenine on radiation-induced chromo-some damage in plateau-phase CHO cells measured by premature chromosome condensation: implications for repair and fixation of a -PLD. Radiation Research, 114, 361–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JAYANTH, R. V., and HITTELMAN, W. N., 1991, 9-fl-D-Arabino-furanosy1-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A) inhibits both the fast and slow components of chromosome repair. In Radiation Research: A Twentieth-Century Perspective, vol. 1, edited by J. D. Chapman, W. C. Dewey and G. F. Whitmore (San Francisco: Academic), p. 411.
   Google Scholar
• JOINER, M. C., MARBLES, B., and JOHNS, H., 1993, The response of tissues to very low doses per fraction: a reflection of induced repair? In Acute and Long-Term Side-Effects of Radiotherapy. Biological Basis and Clinical Relevance, edited by W. Hinkelbein (Berlin: Springer), vol. 130, pp. 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Josm, G. P., NELSON, W. J., REVELL, S. H., and SHAW, C. A., 1982, X-ray induced chromosome damage in live mam-malian cells, and improved measurements of its effects on their colony-forming ability. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 41, 161–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELLAND, L. R., BURGESS, L., and STEEL, G. G., 1987, Characteri-zation of four new cell lines derived from human squamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix. Cancer Research, 47, 4947–4952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KELLAND, L. R., EDWARDS, S. M., and STEEL, G. G., 1988, Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in human cervix carcinoma celllines of differing radiosensitivity. Radiation Research, 116, 526–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MCILWRATH, A. J., VASEY, P. A., Ross, G. M., and BROWN, R., 1994, Cell cycle arrests and radiosensitivity of human tumor cell lines: dependence on wild-type p53 for radio-sensitivity. Cancer Research, 54, 3718–3722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEISTRICH, M. L., 1977, Separation of spermatogenic cells and nuclei from rodent testes. In Methods in Cell Biology, vol. 15, edited by D. M. Prescott (New York: Academic), p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• MEISTRICH, M. L., MEYN, R. E., and BARGOGIE, B., 1977, Synchro- nization of mouse L-P59 cells by centrifugal elutriation separation. Experimental Cell Research, 105, 169-177. METZGER, M. L., and Rums, G., 1991, Kinetics of DNA double- strand break repair throughout the cell cycle as assayed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis in CHO cells. Inter-national Journal of Radiation Biology, 59, 1325–1339.
   Google Scholar
• MIDANDER, J., and REVESZ, L., 1980, The frequency of micro-nuclei as a measure of cell survival in irradiated cell populations. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 38, 237–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RADFORD, R. R., 1991, Mouse lymphoma cells that undergo interphase dealth show markedly increased sensitivity to radiation-induced DNA double-strand breakage as compared with cells that undergo mitotic death. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 59, 1353–1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROWLEY, R., 1992, Reduction of radiation-induced G2 arrest by caffeine. Radiation Research, 129, 224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCHWARTZ, J. L., ROTMENSCH, J., GIOVANAZZI, S., COHEN, M. B., and WEICHSELBAUM, R. R., 1988, Faster repair of DNA double-strand breaks in radioresistant human tumor cells. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 15, 907–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHADLEY, J. D., and WOLFF, S., 1987, Very low doses of X-rays can cause human lymphocytes to become less susceptible to ionizing radiation. Mutagenesis, 2, 95–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMEETS, M. F. M. A., MOOREN, E. H. M., and BEGG, A. C., 1993, Radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in radiosensitive and radioresistant human tumour cells measured by field inversion gel electrophoresis. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 63, 703–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, L.-N., and LITTLE, J. B., 1993, Prolonged cell cycle delay in radioresistant human cell lines transfected with acti-vated ras oncogene and/or Simian virus 40 T-antigen. Radiation Research, 133, 73–79.
   Google Scholar
• TERRY, N. H. A., WHITE, R. A., MEISTRICH, M. L., and CALKINS, D. P., 1991, Evaluation of flow cytometric methods for determining population potential doubling times using cultured cells. Cytometry, 12, 234–241.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UTSUMI, H., and ELKIND, M. M., 1991, Caffeine and D20 medium interact in affecting the expresion of radia-tion-induced potentially lethal damage. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 60, 647–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WARD, J. F., 1986, Mechanisms of DNA repair and their potential modification for radiotherapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 12, 1027–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WOLFF, S., AFZAL, V., WIENCKE, J. K., OLIVIERI, G., and MICHAELI, A., 1988, Human lymphocytes exposed to low doses of ionizing radiations become refractory to high doses of radiation as well as to chemical mutagens that induce double-strand breaks in DNA. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 53, 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar