The chief human resource officer in the C-suite: peer prevalence and environmental uncertainty

References

• Abt, M., & Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. Z (2017). Chief human resources officers on top management teams: An empirical analysis of contingency, institutional, and homophily antecedents. Business Research, 10(1), 49–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-016-0039-2
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, P., Dietz, G., Clark, T., & Hamilton, P. (2015). Establishing HR professionals’ influence and credibility: Lessons from the capital markets and investment banking sector. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Spicer, A. (2019). Neo-institutional theory and organization studies: A mid-life crisis? Organization Studies, 40(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadegan, A., Patel, P. C., Zangoueinezhad, A., & Linderman, K. (2013). The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices. Journal of Operations Management, 31(4), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2013.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballinger, G. A. (2004). Using generalized estimating equations for longitudinal data analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banton, C. (2020). An introduction to U.S. stock market indexes. https://www.investopedia.com/insights/introduction-to-stock-market-indices
   Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026. https://doi.org/10.1086/261849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman, I., & Gooderham, P. N. (2012). International human resource management research and institutional theory. In G. K. Stahl & I. Björkman (Eds.), Handbook of research in international human resource management (pp. 463–474). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781849809191.00029
   Google Scholar
• Boada-Cuerva, M., Trullen, J., & Valverde, M. (2019). Top management: The missing stakeholder in the HRM literature. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(1), 63–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1479878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borooah, V. K. (2002). Logit and probit: Ordered and multinomial models. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bottger, P., & Vanderbroeck, P. (2008). The chief human resources officer—Delivering people who can deliver. In P. Bottger (Ed.), Leading in the top team: The CXO challenge (pp. 223–246). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busenbark, J. R., Graffin, S. D., Campbell, R. J., & Lee, E. Y. (2022). A marginal effects approach to interpreting main effects and moderation. Organizational Research Methods, 25(1), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120976838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, R. (2003). The changing roles of personnel managers: Old ambiguities, new uncertainties. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 983–1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, M. A., Geletkanycz, M. A., & Sanders, W. G. (2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, G. (2015). Innovation and imitation as entry wedges that lead to firm growth. In A. C. Corbett, J. A. Katz, & A. McKelvie (Eds.), Entrepreneurial growth: Individual, firm, and region (Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence and growth (Vol. 17, pp. 1–25). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1074-754020150000017008
   Google Scholar
• Charan, R., Barton, D., & Carey, D. (2015). People before strategy: A new role for the CHRO. Harvard Business Review, 93(4), 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, T. S., & Low, A. (2017). The impact of investor impatience and environmental turbulence on myopic marketing management and stock performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 34(3), 660–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2017.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collings, D. G., McMackin, J., Nyberg, A. J., & Wright, P. M. (2021). Strategic human resource management and COVID-19: Emerging challenges and research opportunities. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1378–1382. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, J. (2007). QIC program and model selection in GEE analyses. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 7(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700205
   Google Scholar
• Cyert, R. M., & March, J. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm (2nd ed.). Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G. G., & Beard, D. W. (1984). Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17011-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engels, N., Fischer-Kreer, D., & Brettel, M. (2022). CHRO firm dinosaur versus CHRO role gorilla: The effect of CHRO company and role tenure on firms’ social performance. Journal of Business Economics, 92(6), 929–954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-021-01073-6
   Google Scholar
• Eroglu, C., & Hofer, C. (2014). The effect of environmental dynamism on returns to inventory leanness. Journal of Operations Management, 32(6), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2014.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernhaber, S. A., & Li, D. (2010). The impact of interorganizational imitation on new venture international entry and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00365.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firk, S., Hanelt, A., Oehmichen, J., & Wolff, M. (2021). Chief digital officers: An analysis of the presence of a centralized digital transformation role. Journal of Management Studies, 58(7), 1800–1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine, S. (2018). Why your company needs a CHRO. CIO. https://www.cio.com/article/3256005/why-your-company-needs-a-chro.html
   Google Scholar
• Gamache, D. L., Neville, F., Bundy, J., & Short, C. E. (2020). Serving differently: CEO regulatory focus and firm stakeholder strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 41(7), 1305–1335. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Germann, F., Ebbes, P., & Grewal, R. (2015). The chief marketing officer matters!. Journal of Marketing, 79(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.14.0244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, D., & Olsen, L. (2009). Environmental uncertainty and managers’ use of discretionary accruals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2), 188–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groysberg, B., Kelly, L. K., & MacDonald, B. (2011). The new path to the C-suite. Harvard Business Review, 89(3), 60–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Misangyi, V. F. (2018). Follow the leader (or not): The influence of peer CEOs’ characteristics on interorganizational imitation. Strategic Management Journal, 39(5), 1437–1472. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. (2022). The evolution of HR leaders: Advice for the future of work that is now. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbeshumanresourcescouncil/2022/12/27/the-evolution-of-hr-leaders-advice-for-the-future-of-work-that-is-now/
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, V. K., Mortal, S., Chakrabarty, B., Guo, X., & Turban, D. B. (2020). CFO gender and financial statement irregularities. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 802–831. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamori, M., & Koyuncu, B. (2015). Experience matters? The impact of prior CEO experience on firm performance. Human Resource Management, 54(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, K., Mittal, V., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Relative strategic emphasis and firm-idiosyncratic risk: The moderating role of relative performance and demand instability. Journal of Marketing, 81(4), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.15.0509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haunschild, P. R., & Miner, A. S. (1997). Modes of interorganizational imitation: The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 472–500. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haveman, H. A. (1993). Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 593. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, S. M., Nason, E. M., & Saguchi, K. (2005). The role of the senior HR executive in Japan and the United States: Employment relations, corporate governance, and values. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 44(2), 207–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0019-8676.2005.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabst, R., & Giardini, A. (2009). Die deutsche Cranet-Erhebung 2005: Empirische Befunde und Ergebnisbericht. In R. Kabst, A. Giardini, & M. C. Wehner (Eds.), International komparatives Personalmanagement (pp. 11–57). Rainer Hampp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kalnins, A. (2018). Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2362–2385. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalnins, A., & Praitis Hill, K. (2023). The VIF score. What is it good for? Absolutely nothing. Organizational Research Methods, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281231216381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 570–598. https://doi.org/10.5465/256460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., & Gennard, J. (2007). Business strategic decision making: The role and influence of directors. Human Resource Management Journal, 17(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2007.00038.x
   Google Scholar
• Ketokivi, M. A., & Schroeder, R. G. (2004). Strategic, structural contingency and institutional explanations in the adoption of innovative manufacturing practices. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1), 63–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kor, Y. Y., Mahoney, J. T., & Watson, S. (2008). The effects of demand, competitive, and technological uncertainty on board monitoring and institutional ownership of IPO firms. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(3), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-008-9047-8
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Wang, L. (2019). Strategic choices of exploration and exploitation alliances under market uncertainty. Management Decision, 57(11), 3112–3133. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, T. A., & Deckop, J. R. (1986). Evolution of concept and practice in personnel administration/human resource management (PA/HRM). Journal of Management, 12(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ferrero, J., & García-Sánchez, I.-M. (2017). Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. International Business Review, 26(1), 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, P., & Bharadwaj, N. (2020). Chief marketing officer presence and firm performance: Assessing conditions under which the presence of other C-level functional executives matters. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 670–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00714-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2008). Chief marketing officers: A study of their presence in firms’top management teams. Journal of Marketing, 72(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.72.1.65
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath, P., & Mahajan, V. (2017). Shedding light on the CMO revolving door: A study of the antecedents of chief marketing officer turnover. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-016-0478-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, B. B., & Nielsen, S. (2013). Top management team nationality diversity and firm performance: A multilevel study. Strategic Management Journal, 34(3), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozer, M. (2010). Top management teams and corporate political activity: Do top management teams have influence on corporate political activity?. Journal of Business Research, 63(11), 1196–1201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.10.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2003). Challenging “strategic HRM” and the relevance of the institutional setting. Human Resource Management Journal, 13(3), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2003.tb00098.x
   Google Scholar
• Pagell, M., & Krause, D. R. (2004). Re-exploring the relationship between flexibility and the external environment. Journal of Operations Management, 21(6), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peteraf, M., & Shanley, M. (1997). Getting to know you: A theory of strategic group identity. Strategic Management Journal, 18(S1), 165–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<165::AID-SMJ914>3.0.CO;2-%23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian, C., Cao, Q., & Takeuchi, R. (2013). Top management team functional diversity and organizational innovation in China: The moderating effects of environment. Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana-García, C., & Benavides-Velasco, C. A. (2008). Innovative competence, exploration and exploitation: The influence of technological diversification. Research Policy, 37(3), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajagopalan, N., & Datfa, D. K. (1996). CEO characteristics: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.5465/256636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh, J., Krause, R., & Swink, M. (2016). The appointment of chief supply chain officers to top management teams: A contingency model of firm-level antecedents and consequences. Journal of Operations Management, 44(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.05.001
   Google Scholar
• Saridakis, G., Lai, Y., & Cooper, C. L. (2017). Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Human Resource Management Review, 27(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: The nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(2), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1982). Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. The Review of Economic Studies, 49(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, W., Zhang, Y., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2019). Examination of CEO–CFO social interaction through language style matching: Outcomes for the CFO and the organization. Academy of Management Journal, 62(2), 383–414. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simerly, R. L., & Li, M. (2000). Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: A theoretical integration and an empirical test. Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200001)21:1<31::AID-SMJ76>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R. R. (2015). Human capital in the human resource function: The positioning and impact of the chief human resource officer. Singapore Management University. https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/etd_coll/136/
   Google Scholar
• Society for Human Resource Management. (2021). Chief human resource officer. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/tools-and-samples/job-descriptions/pages/chief-human-resource-officer.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, D. S., Ellen, B. P., Wang, G., & Ferris, G. R. (2019). Putting the “management” back in human resource management: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2387–2418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318816179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swamidass, P. M., & Newell, W. T. (1987). Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: A path analytic model. Management Science, 33(4), 509–524. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.4.509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, H., Aldag, R., & Storey, R. (1973). On the measurement of the environment: An assessment of the Lawrence and Lorsch environmental uncertainty subscale. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, D. E., & Jensen, E. J. (2016). Industrial Organization, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315510538
   Google Scholar
• Welbourne, T. M., & Cyr, L. A. (1999). The human resource executive effect in initial public offering firms. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 616–629. https://doi.org/10.5465/256983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedeck, C., & Engelen, A. (2018). The copycat CMO: Firms’ imitative behavior as an explanation for CMO presence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), 632–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-017-0533-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, I. O., & Cable, D. M. (2003). Organizational hiring patterns, interfirm network ties, and interorganizational imitation. Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, P. M., McKinnon, P., Antoine, R., Sartain, L., Boudreau, J. W., & Pace, D. (2011). The evolving chief human resource officer role. In P. M. Wright, J. W. Boudreau, D. Pace, L. Sartain, P. McKinnon, & R. Antoine (Eds.), The chief HR officer: Defining the new role of human resource leaders (pp. 1–11). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, JIE., Richard, O. C., Triana, M. D C., & Zhang, X. (2022). The performance impact of gender diversity in the top management team and board of directors: A multiteam systems approach. Human Resource Management, 61(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1989). Effects of environmental scarcity and munificence on the relationship of context to organizational structure. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.5465/256423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn, C. J. W. (2001). Generalized estimating equation models for correlated data: A review with applications. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 470–490. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar