Publication Cover
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
An International Journal of Physical Therapy
Volume 35, 2019 - Issue 9
314
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Descriptive Report

Global rating of change: perspectives of patients with lumbar impairments and of their physical therapists

, OTR/L, PhD, , OTR/L, PhD, , PhD ORCID Icon, , PhD & , OTR/L, PhD
Pages 851-859 | Received 22 May 2017, Accepted 26 Feb 2018, Published online: 02 Apr 2018

References

  • American Medical Association 2006 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), Professional Edition. Chicago, IL, American Medical Association.
  • Beninato M, Fernandes A, Plummer LS 2014 Minimal clinically important difference of the functional gait assessment in older adults. Physical Therapy 94: 1594–1603.
  • Beninato M, Gill-Body KM, Salles S, Stark PC, Black-Schaffer RM, Stein J 2006 Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 87: 32–39.
  • Brubaker PH 2008 Do not be statistically cenophobic time to ROC and roll! Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention 28: 420–421.
  • Clemens JQ, Calhoun EA, Litwin MS, McNaughton-Collins M, Kusek JW, Crowley EM, Landis JR Urologic pelvic pain collaborative research network 2009 validation of a modified national institutes of health chronic prostatitis symptom index to assess genitourinary pain in both men and women. Urology 2009 74: 983–987.
  • Copay AG, Subach BR, Glassman SD, Polly DW, Schuler TC 2007 Understanding the minimum clinically important difference: a review of concepts and methods. Spine Journal 7: 541–546.
  • Da Cunha RA, Hazime FA, Da Silva Martins MC, Ferreira M, De Castro Pochini A, Ejnisman B 2016 Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and clinimetric testing of instruments used to assess patients with ankle sprain in the Brazilian population. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 46: 1042–1050.
  • Deutscher D, Hart DL, Horn SD, Dickstein R, Gutvirtz M 2008 Implementing an integrated electronic outcomes and electronic health record process to create a foundation for clinical practice improvement. Physical Therapy 88: 270–285.
  • Deutscher D, Horn SD, Dickstein R, Hart DL, Smout RJ, Gutvirtz M, Ariel I 2009 Associations between treatment processes, patient characteristics and outcomes in outpatient physical therapy practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90: 1349–1363.
  • Efron B 1979 Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Annals of Statistics 7: 1–26.
  • Friscia LA, Morgan MT, Sparto PJ, Furman JM, Whitney SL 2014 Responsiveness of self-report measures in individuals with vertigo, dizziness, and unsteadiness. Otology and Neurotology 35: 884–888.
  • Fulk GD, Ludwig M, Dunning K, Golden S, Boyne P, West T 2011 Estimating clinically important change in gait speed in people with stroke undergoing outpatient rehabilitation. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy 35: 82–89.
  • Gorman SL, Harro CC, Platko C, Greenwald C 2014 Examining the function in sitting test for validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference in inpatient rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 95: 2304–2311.
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ 1982 The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29–36.
  • Hart AC, Stegman MS 2007 ICD-9-CM 2008 Expert, 6th edn. Salt Lake City, UT, Ingenix.
  • Hart DL, Mioduski JE, Werneke MW, Stratford PW 2006 Simulated computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments was efficient and produced valid measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 59: 947–956.
  • Hart DL, Stratford PW, Werneke MW, Deutscher D, Wang YC 2012 Lumbar computerized adaptive test and modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire: relative validity and important change. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 42: 541–551.
  • Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2008a Computerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Quality of Life Research 17: 1081–1091.
  • Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2008b A computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 89: 2129–2139.
  • Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2008c Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61: 1113–1124.
  • Hart DL, Werneke MW, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2010 Computerized adaptive test for patients with lumbar spine impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Spine 35: 2157–2164.
  • Hsieh YW, Wang CH, Wu SC, Chen PC, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL 2007 Establishing the minimal clinically important difference of the Barthel Index in stroke patients. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 21: 233–238.
  • Institute of Medicine 2001 Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC, National Academy Press.
  • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH 1989 Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference. Controlled Clinical Trials 10: 407–415.
  • Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G 2009 Global rating of change scales: A review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 17: 163–170.
  • Kwoh CK, O’Connor GT, Regan-Smith MG, Olmstead EM, Brown LA, Burnett JB, Hochman RF, King K, Morgan GJ 1992 Concordance between clinician and patient assessment of physical and mental health status. Journal of Rheumatology 19: 1031–1037.
  • Lord FM 1980 Applications of Item Response to Theory to Practical Testing Problems. Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum Associates.
  • McCormack J, Underwood F, Slaven E, Cappaert T 2015 The minimum clinically important difference on the VISA-A and LEFS for patients with insertional Achilles tendinopathy. International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy 10: 639–644.
  • Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G 1997 Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50: 869–879.
  • Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M, Kroczek G, Mehrholz J, Wingendorf I, Hoölig G Koch R Hesse S 2007 Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: A single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS). Clinical Rehabilitation 2007 21: 17–27.
  • Schmitt J, Di Fabio RP 2005 The validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measures. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 2270–2276.
  • Schwartz CE, Powell VE, Rapkin BD 2017 When global rating of change contradicts observed change: examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over time. Quality of Life Research 26: 847–857.
  • Slevin ML, Plant H, Lynch D, Drinkwater J, Gregory WM 1988 Who should measure quality of life. The Doctor or the Patient? British Journal of Cancer 57: 109–112.
  • Smith-Forbes EV, Howell DM, Willoughby J, Pitts DG, Uhl TL 2016 Specificity of the minimal clinically important difference of the quick disabilities of the arm shoulder and hand (QDASH) for distal upper extremity conditions. Journal of Hand Therapy 29: 81–88.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM 2000 A comparison study of the back pain functional scale and roland morris questionnaire. Journal of Rheumatology 27: 1928–1936.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL 2000 Development and initial validation of the back pain functional scale. Spine 25: 2095–2102.
  • Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Riddle DL, Guyatt GH 1998 Sensitivity to change of the roland-morris back pain questionnaire: part 1. Physical Therapy 78: 1186–1196.
  • Swinkels IC, Hart DL, Deutscher D, van den Bosch WJ, Dekker J, de Bakker DH, van den Ende CH 2008 Comparing patient characteristics and treatment processes in patients receiving physical therapy in the United States, Israel and the Netherlands: cross sectional analyses of data from three clinical databases. BMC Health Services Research 8: 163.
  • Swinkels IC, van den Ende CH, de Bakker D, van der Wees PJ, Hart DL, Deutscher D, van den Bosch WJ, Dekker J 2007 Clinical databases in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 23: 153–167.
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2009 Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/drugs/guidances/ucm193282.pdf, Access date: April 06, 2017.
  • van der Leeuw S, van der Molen T, Dekhuijzen PN, Fonseca JA, van Gemert FA, Gerth van Wijk R, Jw K, Oosterom H, Ra R, Ig T, et al 2015 The minimal clinically important difference of the control of allergic rhinitis and asthma test (CARAT): cross-cultural validation and relation with pollen counts. NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine 25: 14107.
  • Wang YC, Hart DL, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2011 Baseline dependency of minimal clinically important improvement. Physical Therapy 91: 675–688.
  • Wang YC, Hart DL, Werneke M, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE 2010 Clinical interpretation of outcome measures generated from a lumbar computerized adaptive test. Physical Therapy 90: 1323–1335.
  • Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD 1992 The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30: 473–483.
  • World Health Organization 2001 International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva :World Health Organization.
  • Wyrwich KW, Metz SM, Kroenke K, Tierney WM, Babu AN, Wolinsky FD 2007 Measuring patient and clinician perspectives to evaluate change in health-related quality of life among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal of General Internal Medicine 22: 161–170.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.