Demanding treatment processes in Norwegian psychomotor physiotherapy: From the physiotherapists’ perspectives

References

• Aabakken L, Aabakken B, Øfsti L, Schröder R, Wilhelmsen T 1991 Psykomotorisk fysioterapi – pasientens utgangspunkt og deres vurdering av behandlingsresultatet [Norwegian psychomotor physiotherapy – demographic factors of the patients and their experiences of the treatment outcome]. Tidsskrift for Den Norske Legeforening 111: 1619–1623.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braatøy T 1947 De Nervøse Sinn (The Nervous Mind). Oslo, Cappelen.
   Google Scholar
• Breitve MH, Hynninen M, Kvåle A 2008 Emosjonelle symptomer og helseplager hos pasienter som oppsøker psykomotorisk fysioterapi [Emotional symptoms and health complaints among patients referred for Norwegian psychomotor physiotherapy]. Fysioterapeuten 75: 19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dragesund T, Raheim M 2008 Norwegian psychomotor physiotherapy and patients with chronic pain: Patients’ perspective on body awareness. Physiotheraphy Theory and Practice 24: 243–254.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Latimer J, Adams RD 2013 The therapeutic alliance between clinicians and patients predicts outcome in chronic low back pain. Physical Therapy 93: 470–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher S 2000 Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Science 4: 14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher S, Zahavi D 2012 The Phenomenological Mind. London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gard G 2007 Factors important for good interaction in physiotherapy treatment of persons who have undergone torture: A qualitative study. Physiotheraphy Theory and Practice 23: 47–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giorgi A 2009 The Descriptive Phenomenological Method in Psychology: A Modified Husserlian Approach. Pittsburgh, PA, Duquesne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllensten AL, Gard G, Salford E, Ekdahl C 1999 Interaction between patient and physiotherapist: A qualitative study reflecting the physiotherapist’s perspective. Physiotherapy Research International 4: 89–109.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hummelvoll JK 2008 The multistage focus group interview – a relevant and fruitful method in action research based on a co-operative inquiry perspective. Norsk Tidsskrift for Sykepleieforskning 10: 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E 1993/1913 Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, p 41. London, Kluwer Academic Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Gwyer J, Shepard KF 2000 Expert practice in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 80: 28–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen GM, Shepard KF, Hack LM 1990 The novice versus the experienced clinician: Insights into the work of the physical therapist. Physical Therapy 70: 314–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA 2000 Focus Groups. A Practical Guide for Applied Research. London, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale S, Brinkmann S 2015 Det Kvalitative Forskningsintervju [The Qualitative Research Interview]. Oslo, Gyldendal Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Leder D 1990 The Absent Body. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malterud K 2001 Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet 358: 483–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merleau-Ponty M 2012 Phenomenology of Perception, p 299. London, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moltu C, Binder PE, Nielsen GH 2010 Commitment under pressure: Experienced therapists’ inner work during difficult therapeutic impasses. Psychotherapy Research International 20: 309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan DL 1997 Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Norlyk A, Harder I 2010 What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research 20: 420–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øien AM, Iversen S, Stensland P 2007 Narratives of embodied experiences – Therapy processes in Norwegian psychomotor physiotherapy. Advances in Physiotherapy 9: 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Øien AM, Råheim M, Iversen S, Steihaug S 2009 Self perception as embodied knowledge – Changing processes for patients with chronic pain. Advances in Physiotherapy 11: 121–129.
   Google Scholar
• Øien AM, Steihaug S, Iversen S, Råheim M 2011 Communication as negotiation processes in long-term physiotherapy: A qualitative study. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 25: 53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets-Johnstone M 2016 Kinesthetic experience: Understanding movement inside and out. Body, Movement and Dance in Psychotherapy 5: 111–127.
   Google Scholar
• Skjaerven LH, Kristoffersen K, Gard G 2010 How can movement quality be promoted in clinical practice? A phenomenological study of physical therapist experts. Physical Therapy 90: 1479–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouen JS, Kvåle A 2006 Different outcomes in subgroups of patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain. Norsk Epidemiologi 16: 127–135.
   Google Scholar
• Steihaug S 2005 How can women with chronic muscular pain change their bodily habits? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 125: 2804–2806.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern DN 2004 The Present Moment. In: Psychotherapy and Everyday Life, p 76. New York, W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sviland R, Råheim M, Martinsen K 2012 Touched in sensation – Moved by respiration. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 26: 811–819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornquist E, Bunkan BH 1991 What Is Psychomotor Physiotherapy? Oslo, Norwegian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Manen M 2014 Phenomenology of Practice: Meaning-Giving Methods in Phenomenological Research and Writing. London and New York, Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waddell G 2004 The Back Pain Revolution. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar