An empirical, pragmatic approach applying reflection in interaction approach to manual therapy treatments

References

• Aquino RL, Caires PM, Furtado FC, Loureiro AV, Ferreira PH, Ferreira ML 2009 Applying joint mobilization at different cervical vertebral levels does not influence immediate pain reduction in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 17: 95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Arokoski JP, Surakka J, Ojala T, Kolari P, Jurvelin JS 2005 Feasibility of the use of a novel soft tissue stiffness meter. Physiological Measurement 26: 215–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austrailian Physiotherapy Association 2016 Guidelines for writing clinical notes. https://www.physiotherapy.asn.au/DocumentsFolder/Advocacy/APA_Writing%20Clinical%20Notes%20Guidelines%202018_v4%20FA.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Coronado RA, Penza CW, Simon CB, George SZ 2018 Unraveling the mechanisms of manual therapy: Modeling an approach. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 48: 8–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialosky JE, Simon CB, Bishop MD, George SZ 2012 Basis for spinal manipulative therapy: A physical therapist perspective. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 22: 643–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop MD, Bialosky JE, Penza CW, Beneciuk JM, Alappattu MJ 2017 The influence of clinical equipoise and patient preferences on outcomes of conservative manual interventions for spinal pain: An experimental study. Journal of Pain Research 10: 965–972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogduk N, Mercer S 2000 Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics. Clinical Biomechanics 15: 633–648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt C, Sole G, Krause MW, Nel M 2007 An evidence-based review on the validity of the Kaltenborn rule as applied to the glenohumeral joint. Manual Therapy 12: 3–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irrgang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A 2004 A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: A validation study. Annals of Internal Medicine 141: 920–928.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiradejnant A, Maher CG, Latimer J, Stepkovitch N 2003 Efficacy of “therapist-selected” versus “randomly selected” mobilisation techniques for the treatment of low back pain: A randomised controlled trial. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 49: 233–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Childs JD, Fritz JM, Whitman JM, Eberhart SL 2007 Development of a clinical prediction rule for guiding treatment of a subgroup of patients with neck pain: Use of thoracic spine manipulation, exercise, and patient education. Physical Therapy 87: 9–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Kulig K, Davenport TE, Eberhart S, Magel J, Childs JD 2009 Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: A randomized clinical trial. Spine 34: 2720–2729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C 2011 Immediate effects from manual therapy: Much ado about nothing? Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 19: 3–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook C, Hegedus E, Showalter C, Sizer P 2006 Coupling behavior of the cervical spine: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 29: 570–575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook CE, Showalter C, Kabbaz V, O’Halloran B 2012 Can a within/between-session change in pain during reassessment predict outcome using a manual therapy intervention in patients with mechanical low back pain? Manual Therapy 17: 325–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Oliveira RF, Liebano RE, Costa L, Rissato LL, Costa L 2013 Immediate effects of region-specific and non–Region-specific spinal manipulative therapy in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 93: 748–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, Butler B, Garber M, Allison S 2002 A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 27: 2835–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford JJ, Thompson SL, Hahne AJ 2011 A classification and treatment protocol for low back disorders: Part 1–specific manual therapy. Physical Therapy Reviews 16: 168–177.
   Google Scholar
• Forde R 1998 Competing conceptions of diagnostic reasoning–Is there a way out? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 19: 59–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funabashi M, Nougarou F, Descarreaux M, Prasad N, Kawchuk GN 2018 Does the application site of spinal manipulative therapy alter spinal tissues loading? Spine Journal 18: 1041–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grieve GP 1981 Common Vertebral Joint Problems. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone.
   Google Scholar
• Hahne AJ, Keating JL, Wilson SC 2004 Do within-session changes in pain intensity and range of motion predict between-session changes in patients with low back pain? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 50: 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecksteden A, Kraushaar J, Scharhag-Rosenberger F, Theisen D, Senn S, Meyer T 2015 Individual response to exercise training - A statistical perspective. Journal of Applied Physiology 118: 1450–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hengeveld E, Banks K 2014 Maitland’s vertebral manipulation: Management of neuromusculoskeletal disorders. Vol. 1. Edinburgh: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, McGill SM 2005 Preliminary development of a clinical prediction rule for determining which patients with low back pain will respond to a stabilization exercise program. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 1753–1762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huhn K, Gilliland SJ, Black LL, Wainwright SF, Christensen N 2019 Clinical reasoning in physical therapy: A concept analysis. Physical Therapy 99: 440–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanlayanaphotporn R, Chiradejnant A, Vachalathiti R 2009 The immediate effects of mobilization technique on pain and range of motion in patients presenting with unilateral neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90: 187–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerry R 2017 Expanding our perspectives on research in musculoskeletal science and practice. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 32: 114–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs DE, Harris SR 1990 Elements of theory presentations in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 6: 57–63.
   Google Scholar
• Langridge N, Roberts L, Pope C 2015 The clinical reasoning processes of extended scope physiotherapists assessing patients with low back pain. Manual Therapy 20: 745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland G, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K 2005a Maitland’s peripheral manipulation. Edinburgh, New York: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Maitland GD 1968 Vertebral Manipulation. London: Butterworths.
   Google Scholar
• Maitland GD, Hengeveld E, Banks K, English K 2005b Maitland’s vertebral manipulation. Edinburgh, New York: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Martinec R 2017 Physiotherapy and rehabilitation: New paradigms and challenges. Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation 2: 1035–1045.
   Google Scholar
• May S, Runge N, Aina A 2018 Centralization and directional preference: An updated systematic review with synthesis of previous evidence. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 38: 53–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowell JM, Johnson GM, Hetherington BH 2014 Mulligan concept manual therapy: Standardizing annotation. Manual Therapy 19: 499–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan BR 1993 Mobilisations with movement (mwm’s). Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 1: 154–156.
   Google Scholar
• Nagamoto Y, Ishii T, Sakaura H, Iwasaki M, Moritomo H, Kashii M, Hattori T, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K 2011 In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine during head rotation in patients with cervical spondylosis. Spine 36: 778–783.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øberg GK, Normann B, Gallagher S 2015 Embodied-enactive clinical reasoning in physical therapy. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 31: 244–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Friede T, Froud R, Evans DW, Underwood M 2013 Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of clinical prediction rules for physical therapy in low back pain. Spine 38: 762–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Póvoa LC, Ferreira AP, Zanier JF, Silva JG 2018 Accuracy of motion palpation flexion-extension test in identifying the seventh cervical spinal process. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 17: 22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puentedura EJ, Landers MR, Cleland JA, Mintken PE, Huijbregts P, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C 2011 Thoracic spine thrust manipulation versus cervical spine thrust manipulation in patients with acute neck pain: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 41: 208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney NH, Petersen EJ, Smith TA, Cowan JE, Rendeiro DG, Deyle GD, Childs JD 2009 Development of a clinical prediction rule to identify patients with neck pain likely to benefit from cervical traction and exercise. European Spine Journal 18: 382–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roots SA, Niven E, Moran RW 2016 Osteopaths’ clinical reasoning during consultation with patients experiencing acute low back pain: A qualitative case study approach. International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 19: 20–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarvell JM, Hribar N, Galvin CR, Pickering MR, Perriman DM, Lynch JT, Smith PN 2019 Analysis of kneeling by medical imaging shows the femur moves back to the posterior rim of the tibial plateau, prompting review of the concave-convex rule. Physical Therapy 99: 311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schomacher J 2009a The convex-concave rule and the lever law. Manual Therapy 14: 579–582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schomacher J 2009b The effect of an analgesic mobilization technique when applied at symptomatic or asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine in subjects with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 17: 101–108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schon DA 1987 Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Seffinger MA, Najm WI, Mishra SI, Adams A, Dickerson VM, Murphy LS, Reinsch S 2004 Reliability of spinal palpation for diagnosis of back and neck pain: A systematic review of the literature. Spine 29: E413–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senn S 2001 Individual therapy: New dawn or false dawn? Drug Information Journal 35: 1479–1494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer PS, Brismee JM, Cook C 2007 Coupling behavior of the thoracic spine: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 30: 390–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizer PS, Mauri MV, Learman K, Jones C, Gill N, Showalter CR, Brismee JM 2016 Should evidence or sound clinical reasoning dictate patient care? Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 24: 117–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ 2006 Manual forces applied during posterior-to-anterior spinal mobilization: A review of the evidence. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 29: 316–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ 2007 Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 30: 17–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E 2009 Forces applied to the cervical spine during posteroanterior mobilization. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32: 72–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass SJ, Rivett DA, Robertson VJ, Stojanovski E 2010 A comparison of cervical spine mobilization forces applied by experienced and novice physiotherapists. Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy 40: 392–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N 2005 Do changes within a manual therapy treatment session predict between-session changes for patients with cervical spine pain? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 51: 43–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N 2009 Is it reasonable to use an individual patient’s progress after treatment as a guide to ongoing clinical reasoning? Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 32: 396–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N, Barrett R, Laakso L 2008 Relation between changes in posteroanterior stiffness and active range of movement of the cervical spine following manual therapy treatment. Spine 33: E673–E679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N, Bialocerkowski A 2017 Developing student skills to actively engage in feedback conversations: A pilot study. Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice 15: 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N, Evans K, Bialocerkowski A 2015 Integrating science, technology, and human interaction in teaching musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Presented at World Confederation of Physical Therapy, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Tuttle N, Hazle C 2018 Spinal PA movements behave ‘as if’ there are limitations of local segmental mobility and are large enough to be perceivable by manual palpation: A synthesis of the literature. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 36: 25–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuttle N, Laakso L, Barrett R 2006 Change in impairments in the first two treatments predicts outcome in impairments, but not in activity limitations, in subacute neck pain: An observational study. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 52: 281–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicenzino B 2004 Foot orthotics in the treatment of lower limb conditions: A musculoskeletal physiotherapy perspective. Manual Therapy 9: 185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Boninger ML, Delitto A, Allison S 2003 Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the clinical examination and patient self-report measures for cervical radiculopathy. Spine 28: 52–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainner RS, Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ, Delitto A, Allison S, Boninger ML 2005 Development of a clinical prediction rule for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 86: 609–618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainwright SF, Shepard KF, Harman LB, Stephens J 2010 Novice and experienced physical therapist clinicians: A comparison of how reflection is used to inform the clinical decision-making process. Physical Therapy 90: 75–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise CH 2015 Orthopaedic manual physical therapy from art to evidence. Philadelphia: FA Davis.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2005 Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: International classification of functioning, disability and health 2002. www.who.int/icf/beginners/bg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yarznbowicz R, Tao M, Owens A, Wlodarski M, Dolutan J 2018 Pain pattern classification and directional preference are associated with clinical outcomes for patients with low back pain. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 26: 18–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar