24
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

From harm reduction to human rights: bringing liberalism back into drug reform debates

Pages 397-404 | Published online: 12 Jul 2009

  • Erickson PG. Harm reduction: what it is and is not. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995;14:283-5.
  • Single E. Defining harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev 1995; 14:287-90.
  • Nadelmann EA. Progressive legalizers, progressive prohibitionists and the reduction of drug-related harm. In: Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, O'Hare P, eds. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: from faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers, 1993;34-45.
  • Lenton S, Single E. The definition of harm reduction. Drug Alcohol Rev 1998;17:213-20.
  • Strang J. Drug use and harm reduction: responding to the challenge. In: Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, O'Hare P, eds. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: from faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers, 1993;3-20.
  • Erickson PG. Past, current, and future directions in Canadian drug policy. Int J Addict 1991;25:247-66.
  • Fischer B. Prohibition as the art of political diplomacy: the benign guises of the 'war on drugs' in Canada. In: Jensen EL, Gerber J, eds. The new war on drugs: symbolic politics and criminal justice policy. Cincinnati, OH: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences/Anderson Publishing Co., 1998.
  • Erickson PG. Recent trends in Canadian drug policy: the decline and resurgence of prohibitionism. Daedalus 1992; 121:239-67.
  • Single E, Erickson PG, Skirrow J, Solomon R. Drugs and public policy in Canada. Washington: Rand Institute Drug Policy Research Center, 1992.
  • Erickson PG. The harm minimization option for cannabis: history and prospects in Canadian drug policy. In: Harrison L, Inciardi J, eds. Harm Reduction. London: Sage, 2000.
  • Fischer B. The battle for a Canadian drug law: a legal basis for harm reduction or a new basis for prohibition? In: Erickson PG, Riley DM, Cheung YW, O'Hare PA, eds. Harm reduction: a new direction for drug policies and programmes. University of Toronto Press, 1997.
  • Health Canada. Canada's drug strategy. Ottawa: Ministry of Public Works, 1998.
  • Gusfield JR. The (f)utility of knowledge?: the relation of social science to public policy toward drugs. Ann Am Acad Political Soc Sci 1975;417:1-15.
  • Mitchell CN. The drug solution. Carleton University Press, 1990.
  • Hathaway AD. Charter rights of Canadian drug users: a constitutional assessment of the Clay trial and ruling. Can J Law Soc 2001;16:29-43.
  • Hathaway AD. Shortcomings of harm reduction: toward a morally invested drug reform strategy. Int J Drug Pol 2001; 12:125-37.
  • Richards DAJ. Sex, Drugs, death and the law: an essay on human rights and overcriminalization. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield, 1982.
  • Hawks D. Impediments to the global adoption of harm-reduction policies. In: Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, O'Hare P, eds. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: from faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers, 1993; 93-102.
  • Mugford S. Harm reduction: does it lead where its proponents imagine? In: Heather N, Wodak A, Nadelmann E, O'Hare P, eds. Psychoactive drugs and harm reduction: from faith to science. London: Whurr Publishers, 1993; 21-33.
  • Ibarra PR, Kitsuse JI. Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: an interactionist proposal for the study of social problems. In: Miller G, Holstein JA, eds. Constructionalist Controversies. NJ: Aldine, 1993;21-54.
  • Specter M, Kitsuse JI. Constructing social problems, 2nd edn. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter, 1987.
  • Best J. Rhetoric in claims-making: constructing the missing children problem. Soc Probl 1987;34:101-21.
  • Sjoberg G, Gill EA, Williams N. A sociology of human rights. Soc Probl 2001;48:11-47.
  • Putnam, H. Objectivity and the science-ethics distinction. In: Nussbaum MC, Sen A, eds. The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993;143-57.
  • Mitchell CN. A justice-based argument for the uniform regulation of psychoactive drugs. In: Blackwell JC, Erickson PG, eds. Illicit drugs in Canada: a risky business. Toronto: Nelson, 1988;407-43.
  • Ignatieff M. Human rights as politics and idolatry. Princeton University Press, 2001.
  • Erickson PG, Hathaway AD. Can harm reduction guide a rights-based approach to reform? The example of Canadian drug policy. In: Scheerer S, ed. exploring global prohibition regimes: the case of dangerous drugs. Onati, Spain: International Institute for the Sociology of Law, 2003, in press.
  • Cunningham F. Democratic theory and socialism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
  • Lukes S. Moral conflict and politics. Toronto: Oxford University Press, 1991.
  • Etzioni A. The spirit of community: rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers, 1993.
  • Etzioni A. Rights and the common good: the communitarian perspective. New York: St Martins Press, 1995.
  • Etzioni A. The new golden rule: community and morality in a democratic society. New York: Basic Books, 1996.
  • Hirst PQ. Law, socialism, and democracy. Boston: Allen and Unwin, 1986.
  • Bakan J. Just words: constitutional rights and social wrongs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1997.
  • Valverde M. 'Despotism' and ethical liberal governance. Econ Soc 1996;25:357-72.
  • Gallic WB. Essentially contested concepts. In: Black M, ed. The importance of language. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1962; 121-46.
  • Gouldner AW. The sociologist as partisan: sociology and the welfare state.? Am Sociol 1968:103-16.
  • MacIntyre A. Whose justice? Which rationality? Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988.
  • Wong DB. Moral relativity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984.
  • Erickson PG. The law in addictions: principles, practicalities and prospects. In: Erickson PG, Kalant H, eds. Windows on science: 40th Anniversary Scientific Lecture Series. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1992; 125-60.
  • Kant I. Foundations of the metaphysics of morals, 1785 (trans. Beck LW). Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1959.
  • Richards DAJ. Human rights and moral ideals: an essay on the moral theory of liberalism. Soc Theory Practice 1979;5: 461-88.
  • Mill JS. On liberty. London: W. Scott Pub Co, 1901.
  • Zinberg NE. Drug, set, and setting: the basis for controlled intoxicant use. New Haven, CT:Yale University Press, 1984.
  • Hathaway AD. Marijuana and lifestyle: exploring tolerable deviance. Deviant Behav 1997; 18:213-32.
  • Parker HJ, Aldridge J, Measham F. Illegal leisure: the normalization of adolescent recreational drug use. London: Roudedge, 1998.
  • Decorte T. The taming of cocaine: cocaine use in European and American cities. Brussels: VUB University Press, 2000.
  • Williams L, Parker H. Alcohol, cannabis, ecstasy and cocaine: drugs of reasoned choice amongst young adult recreational drug users in England. Int J Drug Pol 2001;12: 397-413.
  • Hathaway AD. Cannabis effects and dependency concerns in long-term frequent users: a missing piece of the public health puzzle. Addict Res Theory 2003;11: in press.
  • Alexander BK. Peaceful measures: Canada's way out of the 'war on drugs'. University of Toronto Press, 1990.
  • Roberts MJ, Reich MR. Ethical analysis in public health. Lancet 2002;359:1055-9.
  • Gruskin S, Plafker K, Smith-Estelle A. Understanding and responding to youth substance use: the contribution of a health and human rights framework. Am J Public Health 2001;91:1954-63.
  • Ezard N. Public health, human rights and the harm reduction paradigm: from risk reduction to vulnerability reduction. Int J Drug Pol 2001;12:207-19.
  • Stengers I, Ralet O. Drugs: ethical choice or moral consensus. In: Stengers I, ed. Power and invention: situating science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
  • Sybylla R. Hearing whose voice? The ethics of care and the practices of liberty: a critique. Econ Soc 2001;30:66-84.
  • Foucault M. The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom. In: Bernauer J, Rasmussen D, eds. The final Foucault Cambridge: MIT Press, 1988.
  • Miller P. A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia. Grit Pub Health 2001;11:166-78.
  • Schaler JA. Moral hygiene. Society 2002;39:63-9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.