24
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Implementation evaluation of the Blueprint multi-component drug prevention programme: fidelity of school component delivery

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 653-664 | Received 28 May 2007, Accepted 02 Aug 2007, Published online: 12 Jul 2009

References

  • Mihalic S. The importance of implementation fidelity. Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Colorado University, Boulder, CO 2000
  • Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen W B. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 237–256
  • Botvin G J, Baker E, Filazzola A D, Botvin E M. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990; 15: 47–63
  • Battistich V, Schaps E, Watson M, Solomon D. Prevention effects of the child development project early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. J Adolesc Res 1996; 11: 12–35
  • Hansen W B, Graham J W, Wokenstein B H, Rohrbach L A. Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: results for fifth-grade students in the Adolescent Alcohol Prevention Trial. J Stud Alcohol 1991; 52: 568–579
  • Dane A V, Schneider B H. Program integrity in primary and early secondary intervention: are implementation effects out of control?. Clin Psychol Rev 1998; 18: 23–24
  • Gottfredson G D, Gottfredson D C, Czeh E R. National study of delinquency prevention in schools. Gottfredson Associates, MarylandUSA 2000
  • Domitrovich C E, Greenberg M T. The study of implementation: current findings from effective programs for school aged children. J Educ Psychol Consult 2000; 11: 193–222
  • Dent C W, Sussman S, Hennesy M, et al. Implementation and process evaluation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: project towards no drug abuse. J Drug Educ 1998; 28: 361–375
  • Basen-Engquist K, O'Hara-Tompkins N, Lovato C Y, Lewis M J, Parcel G S, Gingiss P. The effect of two types of teacher training on implementation of Smart Choices: a tobacco prevention curriculum. J School Health 1994; 64: 334–339
  • Giles S M, Harrington N G, Fearnow-Kenney M. Evaluation of the All Stars Program: student and teacher factors that influence mediators of substance use. J Drug Educ 2001; 31: 385–397
  • Pentz M A, Trebow E A, Hansen W B, et al. Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: the Midwestern Prevention Project. Adolesc Drug Use Behav 1990; 14: 264–289
  • Harachi T W, Abbott R D, Catalano R F, Haggerty K P, Fleming C B. Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Commun Psychol 1999; 27: 711–731
  • Baker P J. Developing a Blueprint for evidence-based drug prevention in England. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2006; 13: 17–32
  • Flynn B S, Worden J K, Secker-Walker R H, Badger G J, Geller B M, Costanza M C. Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 827–834
  • Johnson C A, Pentz M A, Weber M D, et al. Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high risk and low risk adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990; 58: 447–456
  • Pentz M A, Dwyer J H, MacKinnon D P, et al. A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. JAMA 1989; 261: 3259–3266
  • Perry C L, Kelder S H, Murray D M, Klepp K-I. Community-wide smoking prevention: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. Am J Public Health 1992; 82: 1210–1216
  • UNDCP. A participatory youth handbook for drug abuse prevention programmes. United Nations, New York 2002
  • White D, Pitts M. Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. Addiction 1998; 93: 1475–1487
  • Tobler N, Stratton H. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Prim Prev 1997; 18: 71–128
  • Tobler N S, Roona M R, Ochshorn P, Marshall D G, Streke A V, Stackpole K M. School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Prim Prev 2000; 20: 275–336
  • Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addict Behav 2002; 27: 1009–1023
  • Midford R, Munro G, McBride N, Snow P, Ladzinski U. Principles that underpin effective school-based drug education. J Drug Educ 2002; 32: 363–386
  • Gottfredson D C, Wilson D B. Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prev Sci 2003; 4: 27–38
  • MacKinnon D P, Johnson C A, Pentz M A, et al. Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: first-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychol 1991; 10: 164–172
  • Botvin G J, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin E M. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioural approach: results of a 3-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990b; 58: 437–446
  • Botvin G J, Griffin K W, Diaz T, Scheier L M, Williams C, Epstein J A. Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addict Behav 2000; 25: 769–774
  • Botvin G J, Griffin K W, Diaz R, Ifill-Williams M. Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prev Sci 2001; 2: 1–13
  • Dusenbury L, Falco M. Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. J School Health 1995; 65: 420–425
  • Botvin G J. Preventing drug abuse in schools: social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addict Behav 2000; 25: 887–897
  • Hansen W B. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum. Health Educ Res 1992; 7: 403–430
  • Hansen W B, Graham J W. Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Prev Med 1991; 20: 414–430
  • Stead M, Angus K. A review of the content and implementation of selected ‘normative’ prevention curricula, prepared for the Home Office and COI. Centre for Social Marketing, Strathclyde University, Glasgow 2002
  • Donaldson S I, Graham J W, Hansen W B. Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. J Behav Med 1994; 17: 195–216
  • Donaldson S I, Graham J W, Piccinin A M, Hansen W B. Resistance skills training and the onset of alcohol use: evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools as in private Catholic schools. Health Psychol 1995; 14: 291–300
  • Front Line Research. Blueprint resources: styles of illustration. COI Ref: 257367. Central Office of Information, London 2003
  • Front Line Research. Blueprint lessons 2 and 3. Report on qualitative research with year 8 pupils. COI Ref: 261146. Central Office of Information, London 2004
  • Botvin G J, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin E M, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 1995; 273: 1106–1112
  • Velleman R, Mistral W, Sanderling L. Taking the message home: involving parents in drugs prevention. Home Office, London 2000
  • Dishion T J, Andrews D W, Kavanagh K, Soberman L H. Preventive interventions for high-risk youth: the adolescent transitions program. Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency, R DeV Peters, R J McMahon. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA 1996; 184–214
  • Kumpfer K L. Selective prevention interventions: the Strengthening Families program. Drug abuse prevention through family interventions, R S Ashery, E Robertson, K L Kumpfer. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1998; 160–207
  • Kumpfer K L. Identification of drug abuse prevention programs – literature review. Parts A and B. NIDA Resource Center for Health Services Research, Bethesda, MD 1997
  • Abbey A, Pilgrim C, Hendrickson P, Buresh S. Evaluation of a family-based substance abuse prevention program targeted for the middle school years. J Drug Educ 2000; 30: 213–228
  • Perry C L, Williams C L, Forster J L, et al. Background, conceptualization and design of a community-wide research-program on adolescent alcohol-use Project Northland. Health Educ Res 1993; 8: 125–136
  • Perry C L, Williams C L, Veblen-Mortenson S, et al. Project Northland: outcomes of a community-wide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am J Public Health 1996; 86: 956–965
  • Liddle H A, Hogue A. A family-based, developmental-ecological preventive intervention for high-risk adolescents. J Marital Fam Ther 2000; 26: 265–279
  • Devlin E, McDermott L, Stead M, Angus K. A review of the effectiveness of youth access interventions. Prepared for Home Office and COI to inform the development of the Blueprint Programme. Centre for Social Marketing, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow 2002
  • Dorn N, Murji K. Drug prevention; a review of the English language literature. ISDD, London 1992
  • Edwards R W, Jumper-Thurman P,Plested B A, Oetting E R, Swanson L. Community readiness: research to practice. J Commun Psychol 2000; 28: 291–307
  • Medical Research Council (MRC). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. MRC, London 2000
  • Department for Education and Skills and Department of Health (DfES and DoH). National healthy school status. A guide for schools. DfES and DoH, London 2005
  • Yeaton W H, Sechrest L. Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981; 49: 156–167
  • McBride N, Farrington F, Midford R. Implementing a school drug education programme: reflections on fidelity. Int J Health Prom Educ 2002; 40: 40–50
  • Parcel G S, O'Hara-Tompkins N M, Harrist R B, et al. Diffusion of an effective tobacco prevention program. Part II: evaluation of the adoption phase. Health Educ Res 1995; 10: 297–307
  • Nutley S, Davies H TO. Making a reality of evidence-based practice: some lessons from the diffusion of innovations. Public Money Manage 2000; 20: 35–42
  • MacDonald M, Green L W. Reconciling concept and context: the dilemma of implementation in school-based health promotion. Health Educ Behav 2001; 28: 749–768
  • Parcel G S, Ross J G, Lavin A T, Portnoy B, Nelson G D, Winters F. Enhancing implementation of the teenage health teaching modules. J School Health 1991; 61: 35–38
  • Gottfredson G D. The Hawthorne misunderstanding (and how to get the Hawthorne effect in action research). J Res Crime Delinq 1996; 33: 28–48
  • Buston K, Wight D, Hart G, Scott S. Implementation of a teacher-delivered sex education programme: obstacles and facilitating factors. Health Educ Res 2002; 17: 59–72
  • Sellers C S, Taylor T J, Esbensen F A. Reality check. Evaluating a school-based gang prevention model. Eval Rev 1998; 22: 590–608
  • Hansen W B, McNeal R B. Drug education practice: results of an observational study. Health Educ Res 1999; 14: 85–97
  • Rohrbach L A, Graham J W, Hansen W B. Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. Prev Med 1993; 22: 237–260

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.