Islamic Headscarves: The Other-Religion Effect and Religious Literacy at the European Court of Human Rights

References

• Abu Lughod, Lila. ‘Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others’. American Anthropologist 104, no. 3 (2002): 783–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Odeh, Lama. ‘Post-Colonial Feminism and the Veil: Thinking the Difference’. Feminist Review 43, no. 1 (1993): 26–37.
   Google Scholar
• Albayrak, H. Şule. ‘A Compressed Identity: Self-Identification of Intellectual Muslim Women in Turkey’. Comparative Islamic Studies 12, no. 1–2 (2019): 13–35.
   Google Scholar
• Almila, Anna-Mari. Veiling in Fashion: Space and the Hijab in Minority Communities. London: I.B. Tauris, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Almila, Anna-Mari, and David Inglis. The Routledge International Handbook to Veils and Veiling. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Al Wazni, A. B. ‘Muslim Women in America and Hijab: A Study of Empowerment, Feminist Identity, and Body Image’. Social Work 60, no. 1 (2015): 325–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amer, Saher. What Is Veiling? Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Argıt, Betül İpşirli. ‘Clothing Habits, Regulations and Non-Muslims in the Ottoman Empire’. Akademik Araştirmalar Dergisi 24, no. 6 (2005): 79–96.
   Google Scholar
• Asad, Talal. ‘Trying to Understand French Secularism’, in Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, ed. Hent de Vries, and Lawrence E. Sullivan, 494–526. New York: Fordham University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgarten, Elishiva. ‘Minority Dress Codes and the Law: A Jewish–Christian Comparison’, in Religious Minorities in Christian, Jewish and Muslim Law (5th–15th Centuries), ed. Nora Berend, Youna Hameau-Masset, Capucine Nemo-Pekelman, and John Victor Tolan, 289–301. Turnhout: Brepols, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Bhowon, Uma, and Harshalini Bundhoo. ‘Perceptions and Reasons for Veiling: A Qualitative Study’. Psychology and Developing Societies 28, no. 1 (2016): 29–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bleiberg, Benjamin. ‘Unveiling the Real Issue: Evaluating the European Court of Human Rights’ Decision to Enforce the Turkish Headscarf Ban in Leyla Sahin v. Turkey’. Cornell Law Review 91, no. 1 (2005): 129–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brems, Eva. ‘Hidden under Headscarves? Women and Religion in the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights’. Religion & Human Rights 16, no. 2–3 (2021): 173–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casanova, Jose. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Chaib, Saila Ouad. ‘Religious Accommodation in the Workplace: Improving the Legal Reasoning in the European Court of Human Rights’, in A Test of Faith: Religious Diversity and Accommodation in the European Workplace, ed. Marie-Claire Foblets, and Katayoun Alidadi, 33–58. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Çınar, Alev. Modernity, Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places, Time. Minneapolis: Univerity of Minnesota Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cranmer, Frank, Mark Hill, Celia Kenny, and Russell Sandberg. The Confluence of Law and Religion: Interdisciplinary Reflections on the Work of Norman Doe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• ECtHR. Guide on Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: ECtHR, 2022. Accessed 14 October 2023. https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/d/echr/guide_art_9_eng.
   Google Scholar
• El Guindi, Fadwa. Veil: Modesty, Privacy and Resistance. Oxford: Berg, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Elver, Hilal. The Headscarf Controversy: Secularism and Freedom of Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ertit, Volkan. Endişeli muhafazakarlar çağı. Ankara: Orient, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Carolyn. Freedom of Religion under the European Convention on Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Carolyn. ‘The Islamic Scarf in the European Court of Human Rights’. Melbourne International Journal of Law 7, no. 1 (2004): 52–73.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Malcolm D. Manual on the Wearing of Religious Symbols in Public Areas. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Malcolm, and Peter Petkoff. ‘A Separation of Convenience: The Concept of Neutrality in the Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights1’. Religion, State and Society 36, no. 3 (2008): 205–23. doi:10.1080/09637490802260153.
   Google Scholar
• Fernando, Mayanthi L. The Republic Unsettled: Muslim French and the Contradictions of Secularism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, Silvio, Kerstin Wonisch, and Roberta Medda-Windischer. ‘Tying the Knot: A Holistic Approach to the Enhancement of Religious Minority Rights and Freedom of Religion’. Religions 12, no. 9 (2021): 689. doi:10.3390/rel12090689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furseth, Inger. ‘The Hijab: Boundary Work and Identity Negotiations among Immigrant Muslim Women in the Los Angeles Area’. Review of Religious Research 52, no. 4 (2011): 365–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganley, Elaine. ‘Racial Profiling by French Police Challenged in Class Action’, Associated Press, 27 January 2021. Accessed 21 August 2021. https://apnews.com/article/france-police-racial-profiling-lawsuit-9a262c2df8874b793e99233d9fbb2ae9.
   Google Scholar
• Garahan, Sabina. ‘A Right to Discriminate? Widening the Scope for Interference with Religious Rights in Ebrahimian v France’. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 5, no. 1 (2016): 352–58.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski, Philip S., and Ateş Altınordu. ‘After Secularization?’. Annual Review of Sociology 34, no. 1 (2009): 55–85.
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, Jeremy. ‘Religious Symbols in Public Schools: The Islamic Headscarf and the European Court of Human Rights in Şahin v Turkey’, in Islam, Europe and Emerging Legal Issues, ed. David M. Kirkham, W. Cole Durham, and Rik Torfs, 111–47. Farnham: Ashgate, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Gürsel, Esra Demir. ‘The Distinction between the Freedom of Religion and the Right to Manifest Religion: A Legal Medium to Regulate Subjectivities’. Social and Legal Studies 22, no. 3 (2013): 377–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidayatullah, Aisha. ‘Veil’, in Encylopedia of Islam, ed. Juan E. Campo, 702. New York: Checkmark Books, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, Daniel, and Daniel Whistler. The Right to Wear Religious Symbols. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hoodfar, Homa. ‘The Veil in Their Minds and on Our Heads: Veiling Practices and Muslim Women’, in Women, Gender, Religion: A Reader, ed. Elizabeth A. Castelli, 420–46. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Hoopes, Talvakki. ‘The Leyla Şahin v. Turkey Case before the European Court of Human Rights’. Chinese Journal of International Law 5, no. 3 (2006): 719–22.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, Erica. Law and the Wearing of Religious Symbols. London: Routledge, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, Paul. ‘Lachiri v Belgium and Bans on Wearing Islamic Dress in the Courtroom: An Emerging Trend’. Ecclesiastical Law Society 21, no. 1 (2019): 48–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keaton, Trica Danielle. Muslims Girls and the Other France: Race, Identity Politics, Social Exclusion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Lanfranchi, Sania Shahrawi. Casting off the Veil: The Life of Huda Sharawi, Egypt’s First Feminist. New York: I.B Tauris, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Saba. ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment and Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’. Cultural Anthropology 16, no. 2 (2001): 202–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Saba. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Mahmood, Saba, and Peter Danchin. ‘Immunity or Regulation?: Antinomies of Religious Freedom’. South Atlantic Quarterly 113, no. 1 (2014): 129–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malik, Meliha. ‘Complex Equality: Muslim Women and the “Headscarf”’. Droit et Société 68, no. 1 (2008): 127–52.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Jill. ‘Conditions for Freedom? European Human Rights Law and the Islamic Headscarf Debate’. Human Rights Quarterly 30, no. 3 (2008): 631–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, Dominic. Human Rights and Religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe. London: Hart, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• McGoldrick, Dominic. ‘Muslim Veiling Controversies in Europe’, in Yearbook of Muslims in Europe 1, ed. Samim Akgönül, Ahmet Alibašić, Brigitte Maréchal, and Christian Moe, 427–74. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mernisi, Fatima. The Veil and the Male Elite: Feminist Interpretation of Women’s Rights in Islam, trans. Mary Jo Lakeland. New York: Perseus Books, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza, Heidi Safia. ‘“A Second Skin”: Embodied Intersectionality, Transnationalism and Narratives of Identity and Belonging among Muslim Women in Britain’. Women’s Studies International Forum 36, no. 5 (2013): 5–15.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Kathleen M. ‘Visible through the Veil: The Regulation of Islam in American Law’. Murdock, Graeme. ‘Dressed to Repress?: Protestant Clerical Dress and the Regulation of Morality in Early Modern Europe’. Fashion Theory: The Journal of Dress, Body and Culture 4, no. 2 (2000): 79–199.
   Google Scholar
• Okutan, Birsen Banu. Türkiye’de popüler kültür din ve kadın. Istanbul: Düşün Yayıncılık, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Öztığ, Laçin İdil. ‘The Turkish Constitutional Court, Laicism and the Headscarf Issue’. Third World Quarterly 39, no. 3 (2018): 594–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peresin, Anita, and Alberto Cervone. ‘The Western Muhajirat of ISIS’. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 38, no. 7 (2015): 495–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quataert, Donald. ‘Clothing Laws, State, and Society in the Ottoman Empire, 1720–1829’. International Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 29, no. 3 (1997): 403–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, Jennan Ghazal, and John Bartkowski. ‘To Veil or Not to Veil? A Case Study of Identity Negotiation among Muslim Women in Austin, Texas’. Gender and Society 14, no. 3 (2000): 395–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldo, Rachel. Mobilizing Piety: Islam and Feminism in Indonesia. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ringelheim, Julie. ‘State Religious Neutrality as a Common European Standard: Reappraising the European Court of Human Rights Approach’. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 6, no. 1 (2017): 24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringelheim, Julie. ‘Lachiri v. Belgium: Headscarf Ban Imposed on a Civil Party in a Courtroom Is Violation of Religious Freedom’. Strasbourg Observers, 23 November 2028. Accessed 21 August 2021. https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/11/23/lachiri-v-belgium-headscarf-ban-imposed-on-a-civil-party-in-a-courtroom-in-violation-of-religious-freedom.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, Russell, Norman Doe, Bronach Kane, and Caroline Roberts. Research Handbook on Interdisciplinary Approaches to Law and Religion. London: Edward Elgar, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers, Elizabeth Hurd Shakman, Saba Mahmood, and Peter G. Danchin, eds. Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vakulenko, Anastasia. ‘Islamic Headscarves and the European Convention on Human Rights’. Social & Legal Studies 16, no. 2 (2007): 183–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whistler, Daniel, and Daniel Hill. ‘Philosophy, Law, and Religion’, in Research Handbook on Interdisciplinary Approaches to Law and Religion, ed. Russell Sandberg, Norman Doe, Bronach Kane, and Caroline Roberts, 111–27. London: Edward Elgar, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Cases
   Google Scholar
• Aktas, Bayrak, Gamaleddyn, and Ghazal v. France, App. no. 43563/08, 14308/08, 18527/08, 29134/08 (ECtHR, 30 June 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Morsli v France, App. No. 15585/06 (4 March 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Arrowsmith v UK, App. No. 7050/75 (European Commission on Human Rights, 12 October 1978).
   Google Scholar
• Belcacemi and Oussar v. Belgium (ECtHR, 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlab v Switzerland, App.No.42393/98, (ECtHR, 15 February 2001).
   Google Scholar
• Dakir v Belgium, App. No 4619/12 (ECtHR, 11 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Doğru and Kervanci v France App. no. 27058/05 and 31645/04 (ECtHR, 4 December, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ebrahimian v France, App. no. 64846/11 (ECtHR, 26 November 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Eweida and Others v United Kingdom, App. No: 59842/10 (ECtHR, 15 January 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Jakobski v Poland, App. No. 18429/06 (ECtHR, 7 December 2010).
   Google Scholar
• Köse and Others v Turkey App. no.26625/02 (ECtHR, 24 January 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtulmuş v Turkey App. no. 65500/01 (ECtHR, 24 January 2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lachiri v Belgium, App. no. 3413/09 (ECtHR, 18 September 2018).
   Google Scholar
• Lautsi and Others v Italy, App no. 30814/06 (ECtHR, 18 March 2011).
   Google Scholar
• Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v Moldova, App. No. 45701/99 (ECtHR, 13 December 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Pretty v UK, App. No. 2346/02 (ECtHR, 29 April 2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sahin v. Turkey, App. No. 44774/98 (ECtHR Chamber judgement 29 June 2004, Grand Chamber judgement 10 November 2005).
   Google Scholar
• S.A.S v France, App. no. 43835/11 (ECtHR, 1 July 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Constitutional Court, D. 7/3/1989 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Tuba Arslan, Turkish Constitutional Court, 2014/256, 25/6/2014.
   Google Scholar
• X and Church of Scientology v Sweden (European Commission on Human Rights, 5 May 1979).
   Google Scholar