Evaluation of messenger plant activator as a preharvest and postharvest treatment of sweet cherry fruit under a controlled atmosphere

References

• Adaskaveg JE, Ogawa JM. Penetration of iprodione into mesocarp fruit tissue and suppression of gray mold and brown rot of sweet cherries. Plant Dis 1994; 78: 293–296
   Google Scholar
• Akbudak B, Akbudak N, Seniz V, Eris A. The effect of harpin treatment on storage of cherry tomato cv. ‘Naomi’. Acta Hortic 2006a; 712: 237–243
   Google Scholar
• Akbudak N, Akbudak B, Seniz V, Eris A. Preharvest application of harpin on the cool storage life of pepper. Acta Hortic 2006b; 712: 517–522
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2000. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The messenger; a promising risk biopesticide. Pesticide Environ Stewardship Program Update. 3:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Bernalte MJ, Sabio E, Herna′ndez MT, Gervasini C. Influence of storage delay on quality of ‘Van’ sweet cherry. Postharvest Biol Technol 2003; 28: 303–312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capdeville G, Beer SV, Watkins BC, Wilson C, Tedeschi OL, Aist JR. Pre- and Post- alternative disease control agents induce resistance to blue mold in harvested ‘Red Delicious’ apple fruit. Plant Dis 2003; 87: 39–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Capdeville G, Wilson C, Beer SV, Aist JR. Alternative disease control agents in harvest Harpin treatments of apples induce resistance to blue mold. J Phytopathol 2002; 92: 900–908
   Google Scholar
• Chapon JF, Bony P. Cherries. The importance of modified atmosphere in maintaining quality. Infos (Paris) 1990; 62: 11–14
   Google Scholar
• Chen PM, Mellenthin WM, Kelly SB, Facteau TJ. Effects of low oxygen and temperature on quality retention of ‘Bing’ cherries during prolonged storage. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1981; 106: 533–535
   Google Scholar
• Claypool LL, Keefer RH. A colorimetric method for CO2 determination in respiratory studies. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1942; 40: 170
   Google Scholar
• De Vries-Paterson RM, Jones AL, Cameron AC. Fungistatic effects of carbon dioxide in a package environment on the decay of Michigan sweet cherries by Monilinia fructicola. Plant Dis 1991; 75: 943–946
   Google Scholar
• Drake SR, Kupferman EM, Fellman JK. Bing’ sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) quality as influenced by wax coatings and storage temperature. J Food Sci 1988; 53: 124–126
   Google Scholar
• El-Ghauth A, Wilson CL, Wisniewski ME. Sugar analogs as potential fungicides for the control of postharvest pathogens of apple and peach. Plant Dis 1995; 79: 254
   Google Scholar
• Eris A, Tezcan H, Akbudak B, Karabulut OA. Effect of calcium and fungicide treatments on post harvest fungal disorders in sweet cherries stored under normal and modified atmosphere packaging conditions. Ital J Food Sci 2004; 16: 295–304
   Google Scholar
• Eris, A, Turk, R, Ozer, MH, Celik, E. 1993. Changes of some quality factors of sweet cherries after the storage in CA condition. Proceedings from the Sixth International Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference, Cornell University Ithaca, New York. 542.
   Google Scholar
• Esti M, Cinquanta L, Sinesio F, Moneta E, Di Matteo M. Physicochemical and sensory fruit characteristics of two sweet cherry cultivars after cool storage. Food Chem 2002; 76: 399–405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gang LR, Liu FY. Reduction of lession growth rate of late blight plant disease in transgenic potato expressing harpin protein. Sci China C Life Sci Biol 1999; 42: 96–101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao L, Mazza G. Characterization, quantification, and distribution of anthocyanins and colorless phenolic in sweet cherries. J Agric Food Chem 1995; 43: 343–346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner MA, Beyer R, Melton A. Sugar and anthocyanidin content of two processing-grade sweet cherry cultivars and cherry products. NZ J Crop Hortic Sci 1993; 21: 213–218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes GJ, Eckert JW. Sensitivity of Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum to postharvest citrus fungicides in California. J Phytopathol 1999; 89: 716–721
   Google Scholar
• Hunt M, Ryals J. Systemic acquired resistance signal transduction. Crit Rev Plant Sci 1996; 15: 583–606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ippolito A, Schena L, Pentimone I, Nigro F. Control of postharvest rots of sweet cherries by pre- and postharvest applications of Aureobasidium pullulans in combination with calcium chloride or sodium bicarbonate. Postharvest Biol Technol 2005; 36: 245–252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang AL, Tian SP, Xu Y. Effects of controlled atmospheres with high O2 or high CO2 concentrations on postharvest physiology and storability of Napoleon sweet cherry. Acta Bot Sin 2002; 44: 925
   Google Scholar
• Jones AL, Ehret GR. Isolation and characterization of benomy-tolerant strains of Monilinia fructicola. Plant Dis 1976; 60: 765–769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalt W, Forney CF, Martin A, Prior RL. Antioxidant capacity, vitamin C, phenolics, and anthocyanins after fresh storage of small fruits. J Agric Food Chem 1999; 47: 4638–4644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappel K, Toivonen P, McKenzie DL, Stan S. Storage characteristics of new sweet cherry cultivars. HortScience 2002; 37: 139–143
   Google Scholar
• Kilic, O, Copur, OU, Gortay, S. 1991. Fruit and vegetable processing technology guide of practice. Faculty of Agriculture, Uludag University, BursaTurkey. 143.
   Google Scholar
• Mattheis JP, Roberts RG. Fumigation of sweet cherry (Prunus avium ‘Bing’) fruit with low molecular weight aldehydes for postharvest decay control. Plant Dis 1993; 77: 810–814
   Google Scholar
• Mattheis JP, Buchanan DA, Feliman JK. Volatile constituents of ‘Bing’ sweet cherry fruit following controlled atmosphere storage. J Agric Food Chem 1997; 45: 212–216
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R, Weathersbee, A, Moshe, I, Hamed, D. 2001. In vivo modulation of a citrus B-1, 3-endoglucanase by benzo (1,2,3 thiadiazole-7-carbothioic acid s-metyl ester (actigard). Available online at: http://www.ars.usda.gov/, , accessed 15 May 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Meheriuk M, Girard B, Moyls AL, Beveridge HJT, McKenzie DL, Harrison J, Weintrub S, Hocking R. Modified atmosphere packaging of ‘Lapins’ cherry. Food Res Int 1995; 28: 238–244
   Google Scholar
• Panova R, Popov S. Morphological and biochemical changes in the fruit of some sweet cherry varieties during ripening and storage under cold conditions. Vasil Kolarov (1983) 28(2) 87–95. Hortic Abstr 1987; 57: 159
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, ME. 1982. CA storage of cherries. In: DG Richardson, Meheriuk, M, Proceedings of the Third National Controlled Atmosphere Research Conference, Oregon State University Symposium Series No. 1, Timber Press, Beaverton, OR, 149–154.
   Google Scholar
• Qin G, Tian S, Xu Y. Biocontrol of postharvest diseases on sweet cherries by four antagonistic yeasts in different storage conditions. Postharvest Biol Technol 2004; 31: 51–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryals JA, Neuenschwander UH, Willits MG, Molina A, Steiner HY, Hunt MD. Systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell 1996; 8: 1809–1819
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick JL, Toivonen PMA. Reflective tarps at harvest reduce peduncle browning and improve fruit quality of cherries during subsequent storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2002; 25: 117–121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekse L. Storage and storage potential of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.) as related to respiration rate. Acta Agric Scand 1988; 38: 59–66
   Google Scholar
• Shulman Y, Lavee S. The effect of kinetin on anthocyanin formation in green harvested olive fruits. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 1971; 96: 808–810
   Google Scholar
• Spotts RA, Cervantes LA. Populations, pathogenicity, and benomyl resistance of Botrytis spp., Penicillium spp., and Mucor piriformis in packing houses. Plant Dis 1986; 70: 106–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, AK. 2001. Controlled atmosphere storage of fruits and vegetables. WallingfordOxon: CABI Publishing CAB International. 267.
   Google Scholar
• Tian SP, Fan Q, Xu Y, Wang Y, Jiang AL. Evalution of the use of high CO2 concentrations and cold storage to control Monilinia fructicola on sweet cherries. Postharvest Biol Technol 2001; 22: 53–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian SP, Jiang A, Xu Y, Wang Y. Responses of physiology and quality of sweet cherry fruit to different atmospheres in storage. Food Chem 2004; 87: 43–49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidrih, R, Zavrtanik, M, Hribar, J. 1998. Effect of low O2, high CO2 or added acetaldehyde and ethanol on postharvest physiology of cherries. Proc Third Int Cherry Symp Acta Hortic. 468:695–703.
   Google Scholar
• Wang SY, Stretch AW. Antioxidant capacity in cranberry is influenced by cultivar and storage temperature. J Agric Food Chem 2001; 49: 969–974
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Vestrheim S. Controlled atmosphere storage of sweet cherries (Prunus avium L.). Acta Agric Scand B Plant Soil Sci 2002; 52: 136–142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner G. Loss of flavour in cherries linked to drop in acidity. Good Fruit Grower 1995; 46: 21
   Google Scholar
• Wei Z, Laby R, Zumoff C, Bauer D, Ho SY, Collmer A, Beer S. Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Science 1992; 257: 85–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao H, Tian S. Effects of pre- and post-harvest application of salicylic acid or methyl jasmonate on inducing disease resistance of sweet cherry fruit in storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 2005; 35: 253–262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar