References
- Alberti K. G. M. M. Multi-centre research ethics committees: Has the cure been worse than the disease?. British Medical Journal 2000; 320: 1157–1158
- Bently C., Enderby P. Academic medicine: Who is it for?. British Medical Journal 2005; 330: 361
- Boshier A., Shakir S. A. W., Telfer P., Behr E., Pakrashi T., Camm A. J. The negative effect of red tape on research. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2005; 14: 373–376
- Brody B. A., McCullough L. B., Sharp R. R. Consensus and controversy in clinical research ethics. Journal of American Medical Association 2005; 294: 1411–1414
- Burgess M. M., Brunger F. Negotiating collective acceptability of health research. The governance of health research involving human subjects. Law Commission of Canada, Ottawa 2000; 117–151
- Department of Health. Research governance in health and social care. Department of Health, London 2001
- Department of Health. Research governance in health and social care – NHS permission for R&D involving NHS patients. Department of Health, London 2004, http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/07/58/22/04075822.doc
- Department of Health. Report of the Ad-hoc Advisory Group on the operation of NHS research ethics committees. Department of Health, London 2005a, http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/11/24/17/04112416.pdf
- Department of Health. Best research for best health: A new national health research strategy. Department of Health, London 2005b
- Doll R. What are the effects of the fifth revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: Research will be impeded. British Medical Journal 2001; 323: 1417–1423
- Elwyn G., Seagrove A., Thorne K., Cheung W. Y. Ethics and research governance in a multicentre study: Add 150 days to your study protocol. British Medical Journal 2005; 330: 847
- Galbraith N., Hawley C., De-Souza V. Research governance approval is putting people off research. British Medical Journal 2006; 332: 238
- Glasziou P. Ethics review roulette: what can we learn. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 121–122
- Hearnshaw H. Comparison of requirements of research ethics committees in 11 European countries for a non-invasive interventional study. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 140–141
- House of Commons. The Report of The Royal Liverpool Children's Inquiry. The Stationery Office, London 2001, http://www.rlcinquiry.org.uk/index.htm
- Jamrozik K. Research ethics paperwork: What is the plot we seem to have lost?. British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 286–287
- McDonald M. Canadian governance of health research involving human subjects: Is anybody minding the store?. Health Law Journal 2001; 9: 1–21
- National Patient Safety Agency. Standard operating procedures for research ethics committees. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees, London 2005, http://www.corec.org.uk/recs/guidance/docs/SOPs_(v3).doc
- National Patient Safety Agency. Implementing the recommendations of the Ad Hoc Advisory Group: Consultation. Central Office for Research Ethics Committees, London 2006
- Newman J. Modernising governance: New Labour, policy and society. Sage, London 2001
- Roberts L. M., Bowyer L., Homer C. S., Brown M. A. National ethics committee urgently needed. Medical Journal of Australia 2004; 178: 187
- Wald D. S. Bureaucracy of ethics applications. British Medical Journal 2004; 329: 282–284
- Walsh M. K., McNeil J. J., Breen K. J. Improving the governance of health research. Medical Journal of Australia 2005; 182: 468–471