Attitudes of mental health staff to routine outcome measurement

References

• Aoun S., Pennebaker D., Janca A. Outcome measurement in rural mental health: A field trial of rooming-in models. Australian Journal of Rural Health 2002; 10: 302–307
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network. Adult National Outcomes and Casemix Standard Reports1st edn. Version 1.1. Brisbane, Queensland 2005
   Google Scholar
• Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network. Rater and Clinical Utility Training Manual. Institute of Psychiatry, Sydney 2006
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham W., Burgess P., Solomon S., Pirkis J., Eagar K. Developing a Casemix Classification for Mental Health Services. Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra 1998
   Google Scholar
• Callaly T., Hallebone E. L. Introducing the routine use of outcomes measurement to mental health services. Australian Health Review 2001; 24: 43–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Callaly T., Hyland M., Coombs T., Trauer T. Routine outcome measurement in public mental health – results of a clinician survey. Australian Health Review 2006; 30: 164–173
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Close-Goedjen J. L., Saunders S. M. The effect of technical support on clinician attitudes toward an outcome assessment instrument. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2002; 29: 99–108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs T., Trauer T., Eagar K. Training in mental health outcome measurement: Evaluation of the Victorian experience. Australian Health Review 2002; 25: 74–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crocker T., Rissel C. Knowledge of and attitudes to the health outcomes approach among community mental health professionals. Australian Health Review 1998; 21: 111–126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisen S. V., Dickey B. Mental health outcome assessment: The new agenda. Psychotherapy 1996; 33: 181–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaines P., Bower A., Buckingham W., Eagar K., Burgess P., Green J. New Zealand Mental Health Classification and Outcomes Study: Final Report. Health Research Council of New Zealand, Auckland 2003
   Google Scholar
• Garland A. F., Kruse M., Aarons G. A. Clinicians and Outcome Measurement: What's the Use?. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2003; 30: 393–405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbody S. M., House A. O., Sheldon T. A. Psychiatrists in the UK do not use outcome measures. British Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 180: 101–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman L. C., Martin J., Botcheva L., Williams S. E., Dyer-Friedman J. P. Practitioners' attitudes toward the use of treatment progress and outcomes data in child mental health services. Evaluation & the Health Professions 2004; 27: 165–188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkovitz P. M. Beyond outcomes: Benchmarking in behavioral healthcare. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow 2004; 32–37
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meadows K. A., Rogers D., Greene T. Attitudes to the use of health outcome questionnaires in the routine care of patients with diabetes: A survey of general practitioners and practice nurses. British Journal of General Practice 1998; 48: 1555–1559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prochaska J. O., DiClemente C. C. Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Progress in behavior modification, M. Hersen, R. M. Eisler, P. M. Miller. Sycamore Press, Sycamore, Illinois 1992; 184–214
   Google Scholar
• Rock D., Preston N. HoNOS: Is there any point in training clinicians?. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 2001; 8: 405–409
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen A., Hadzi-Pavlovic D., Parker G. The Life Skills Profile: A measure assessing function and disability in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 1989; 15: 325–337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stedman T., Yellowlees P., Mellsop G., Clarke R., Drake S. Measuring consumer outcomes in mental health. Department of Health and Family Services, Canberra, ACT 1997
   Google Scholar
• Stein G. S. Usefulness of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 375–377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauer T. Analysis of outcome measurement data from the four Victorian “Round One” agencies: Unpublished report. 2004
   Google Scholar
• Trauer T., Callaly T., Little J., Shields R., Smith J. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS): Results of the Victorian field trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 1999; 174: 380–388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauer T., Coombs T., Eagar K. Training in routine mental health outcome assessment: The Victorian experience. Australian Health Review 2002; 25: 122–128
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trauer T., Gill L., Pedwell G., Slattery P. Routine outcome measurement in public mental health – what do clinicians think?. Australian Health Review 2006; 30: 144–147
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walter G., Cleary M., Rey J. M. Attitudes of mental health personnel toward rating outcome. Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice 1998; 18: 109–115
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wing J. K., Beevor A. S., Curtis R. H., Park S. B. G., Hadden S., Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). British Journal of Psychiatry 1998; 172: 11–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc R. B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1968; 9: 1–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar