1,085
Views
172
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors

, &
Pages 5-20 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning. Disability and Health. Pre-final Draft. World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/icidh), 2000; 5-24.
  • Seelman K. Ageing with a disability; views from the national institute on disability and rehabilitation research. Assistive Technology 1999; 11: 84-87.
  • Kemp B. Quality of life while ageing with a disability. Assistive Technology 1999; 11: 158-163.
  • Scherer M. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability & Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 439-448.
  • Gray D. Development and description of participation and environment surveys for SCI, 14th Annual American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists and Social Workers, Las Vegas, Nevada 2001; abstract no. 305.
  • Mann W, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Changes in health, functional and psychosocial status and coping strategies of homebased older persons with arthritis over three years. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1999; 19: 126-146.
  • Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita M, Charvat, B. Use of assistive devices for bathing by elderly who are not institutionalized. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1996; 16: 261-286.
  • Hartke R, Prohaska T, Furner S. Older adults and assistive devices: use, multiple-device use and need. Journal of Ageing and Health 1998:10:99-116.
  • Watts J, Erickson A, Houde L, Wilson E, Maynard M. Assistive device use among the elderly: a national data-based study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 1996; 14: 1-18.
  • Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita, M. Comparison of assistive device use and needs of home-based older persons with different impairments. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1993; 47: 980-987.
  • Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita M, Charvat B. A 2-year study of coping strategies of home based frail elder persons with vision impairment. Technology and Disability 1997; 6: 177-189.
  • Nochajiski S, Tomita M, Mann W. The use and satisfaction with assistive devices by older persons with cognitive impairments: a pilot intervention study. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 1996; 12: 40-53.
  • Manton K, Corder L, Stallard E. Changes in the use of personal assistance and special Equipment from 1982 and 1989 NLTCS. The Gerontologist 1993; 33: 168-76.
  • Mann W, Hurren D, Tomita M, Charvat B. The relationship of functional independence to assistive device use of elderly persons living at home. The Journal of Applied Gerontology 1995; 14: 225247.
  • Dittuno J, Stover S, Freed M. Motor recovery of the upper extremities in traumatic quadriplegia: a multicentre study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 431 -435.
  • Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology 1993; 5: 36-45.
  • Cushman L, Scherer M. Measuring the relationship of assistive technology use functional status over time and consumer-therapist perceptions of ATs. Assistive Technology 1996; 8: 103-109.
  • Thompson T. Functional changes in persons ageing with spinal cord injury. Assistive Technology 1999; 11: 123-129.
  • Weingarden S, Martin C. Independent dressing after spinal cord injury: a functional time evaluation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1989; 70: 518-519.
  • Heinemann A, Magiera-Planey R, Schiro-Geist C, Grimes G. Mobility for persons with spinal cord injury: an evaluation of two systems. Rehabilitation Psychology 1987; 68: 90-93.
  • Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise MC, Potvin D. Predisposing factors related to prosthetic use by people with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1998; 10: 99109.
  • Gauthier-Gagnon C, Grise M-C, Potvin D. Prosthetic profile of the amputee questionnaire: validity and reliability. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1309-1314.
  • Sohlberg M, Mateer C. Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation Theory and Practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press, 1989.
  • Kim H, Burke D, Dowds M, George J. Utility of a microcomputer as an external memory aid for a memory impaired head injury patient during in-patient rehabilitation. Brain Injury 1999; 13: 147-150.
  • Scherer M. Assistive device utilization and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injuries or cerebral palsy. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counselling 1988; 19: 21-30.
  • Scherer M. Assistive device utilization and quality of life in adults with spinal cord injuries or cerebral palsy two years later. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counselling 1990; 21: 36-44.
  • Stewart H, Noble G, Seeger B. Isometric joystick: a study of control by adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy. The Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 1992; 39: 33-39.
  • Balandin S, Morgan J. Adults with cerebral palsy: what's happening? Journal of Intellectual Developmental Disability 1997; 22: 109-124.
  • McCaIl F, Markova I, Murphy J, Moodie E, Collins S. Perspectives on AAC systems by the users and by their communication partners. European Journal of Disorders of Communication 1997; 32: 235-256.
  • Light J. Interaction involving individuals using augmentative and alternative communications systems: state of the art and future directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1988; 4: 66-82.
  • Murphy K, Molnar G, Lankasky K. Employment and social issues in adults with cerebral palsy. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 807-811.
  • Buzolich M, Lunger J. Empowering system users in peer training. Augmentative and Alternative Communication 1995; 11: 37-48.
  • Schaller J, Garza D. 'It's about relationships': perspectives of people with cerebral palsy on belonging in their famiUes schools and rehabilitation counselling Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling 1999:30:7-18.
  • Peace G. Living With Parkinson's disease. Nursing Times 1995; 91: 40-41.
  • Jonsson A, Moller A, Grimby G. Managing occupations in everyday life to achieve adaptation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 53: 353-362.
  • Li T, Alberman E, Swash M. Differential diagnosis of MND from other neurological conditions. Lancet 1986; 2: 731-733.
  • Oliver D. Motor Neuron Disease. London: Royal College of General Practitioners, 1989.
  • Dunne J, Hankey G, Edis R. Parkinsonism: upturned walking stick as an aid to locomotion. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1987; 68: 380-381.
  • Hornsey J. Empowering patient and career through terminal MND. Nursing Times 1994; 90: 37-39.
  • Gitlin LN. The role of social science research in understanding technology use among older adults. In: Ory and Defriese (eds) SelfCare in Later Life Research Program Policy Issues. New York, NY Publishing Company, 1999; 142-169.
  • Wallhagen M, Brod M. Perceived control and well-being in Parkinson's disease. Western Journal of Nursing Research 1997; 19: 11-31.
  • Gray D, Quatrano L, Lieberman M. Designing and using Assistive Technology: the Human Perspective. Baltimore: Brooks Publishing, 1998.
  • Rogers J, Holm M. Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a, literature review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1992; 46: 120-127.
  • Coelho G, Hamburg D, Adams J. Coping and Adaptation. New York: Basic, 1974.
  • Wright B. Physical Disability: A Psychological Approach. New York: Harper,1960.
  • Thoren-Jonsson A, Moller A. How the conception of occupational self influences everyday life strategies of people with poliomyelitis sequela. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 6: 71-83.
  • Lupton D, Seymour W. Technology selfhood and physical disability. Social Science Medicine 2000; SO: 1851-1862.
  • Armstrong MJ, Fitzgerald MH. Culture and disability studies: an anthropological perspective. Rehabilitation Education 1996; 10: 247-304
  • Lysack JT, Wyss UP, Packer TL, Mulholland SJ, Panchal V. Designing appropriate rehabilitation technology: a mobility device for women with ambulatory disabilities in India. International Journal of Rehabilitation 1999; 22: 1-9.
  • Clay JA. Native American independent living. Rural Special Education Quarterly 1992; 11: 41 -50.
  • Luborsky M. Sociocultural factors shaping technology usage: fulfilling the promise. Technology and Disability 1993; 2: 71-78.
  • Boone S, Roessler R, Cooper P. Hope and manifest anxiety: motivational dynamics of acceptance of disability. Journal of Counselling Psychology 1978; 25: 551 -556.
  • Small LM, Grose J. A cultural perspective on rehabilitation and modality use with elder persons-a pilot study. Physical and Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics 1993; 11: 71 -80.
  • Scherer MJ. What we know about women's technology use avoidance and abandonment. Women and Therapy 1993; 14: 117-132.
  • Linkowski D, Dunn M. Self-concept and acceptance of disability. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 1974; 18: 28-32.
  • Anderson JM. Ethnicity and illness experience: Ideological structures and the health care delivery system. Social Science and Medicine 1986; 22: 1277-1283.
  • Brown D. Erratum to personal implications of functional electrical stimulation for older adolescents with spinal cord injuries. Technology and Disability 1997; 6: 199-216.
  • Livneh H, Antonak R, Gerhardt J. Psychosocial adaptation to amputation: the role of sociodemographic variables disabilityrelated factors and coping strategies. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1999; 22(1): 21-31.
  • Hill A, Niven C, Knussen C. The role of coping in adjustment to phantom limb pain. Pain 1995; 62: 79-86.
  • Dunn DS. Well-being following amputation: salutary effects of positive meaning optimism and control. Rehabilitation Psychology 1996; 41: 282-302.
  • Uhlig G, Stevic R. Client expectations and the rehabilitation process. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin 1967; 10: 112-117.
  • McDaniel J. Physical Disability and Human Behaviour. New York: Pergamon Press, 1969.
  • Stotland E. The Psychology of Hope. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1969.
  • Sullivan H. The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry. New York: Norton, 1953.
  • Barney K. From Ellis Island to assisted living: meeting the needs of older adults from diverse cultures. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1991; 45: 586-593.
  • Carrasquillo O, Lantigua R, Shea S. Differences in functional status of Hispanic versus non-Hispanic White elders: data from the medical expenditure panel survey. Journal of Aging and Health 2000; 12: 342-361.
  • Penning M, Strain L. Gender differences in disability, assistance, and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Gerontology 1994; 49: S202-S208.
  • Phinney, J. When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist 1996; 51: 918-930.
  • Tomita M, Mann W, Fraas F, Burns L. Racial differences of frail elders in assistive technology. Assistive Technology 1997; 9: 140151.
  • Weaver F, Hammond M, Guihan M, Hendricks R. The Department of Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative for Spinal Cord Injury. Medical Care 2000; 38: 182-191 (supplement).
  • Sackett D. Rules of evidence and clinical recommendation on the use of anti-thrombotic agents. CHEST 1989; 95 (2 suppl): 25-45.
  • Heinemann A, Pape T. Coping and Adjustment In: Scherer M (cd) Assistive Technology: Matching Device and Consumer for Successful Rehabilitation. American Psychological Assoc., 2001, Chapter 9.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.