1,049
Views
98
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead

, &
Pages 31-37 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • Day H, Jutai J. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1996; 9: 159-168.
  • Day H, Jutai J, Woolrich W, Strong G. The stability of impact of assistive devices. Disability & Rehabilitation 2001; 23: 400-404.
  • Calvin JC, Scherer MJ (eds) Evaluating. Selecting and Using Appropriate Assistive Technology. Gaitherburg: Aspen Publishers Inc., 1996.
  • Jutai J. Quality of life impact of assistive technology. Rehabilitation Engineering 1999; 14: 2-7.
  • Kerrigan AJ. The psychosocial impact of rehabilitation technology. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews 1997; 11:239-252.
  • Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 439-448.
  • Vash CL. The Psychology of Disability. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1981; 43.
  • Day H. Quality of life and leisure. Rehabilitation Digest 1985; 16: 3-5.
  • Day H, Alon E. Work, leisure and quality of life of vocational rehabilitation consumers. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1993; 7:119-125.
  • Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Brennan C, Swach M. Evidence for the validity and reliability of the ALS assessment questionnaire: the ALSAQ-40. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and other Motor Neurone Diseases 1999; 1: 33-40.
  • Powell Lawton M. Measure of quality of life and subjective wellbeing. Generations 1993; 21: 45-48.
  • Campbell A. The Sense of Well-being in America: Recent Patterns and Trends. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1981.
  • Diener E. Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin 1984; 95: 542-575.
  • Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1985; 49: 71-73.
  • Tarn S. Quality of life: theory and methodology in rehabilitation. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1998; 21: 365-374.
  • Dijkers M. Measuring quality of life: methodological issues. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 1999; 78: 286-300.
  • Elliott DB, Patla AE, Furniss M, Adkin A. Improvements in clinical and functional vision and quality of life after second eye cataract surgery. Optometry & Vision Science 2000; 77: 13-24.
  • Mehrabian A, Russell JA. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1974.
  • Day H, Jankey SG. Lessons from the literature:towards a holistic model of quality of life. In: R Renwick, I Brown, M Nagler (eds) Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches. Issues and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications, 1996; 39-50.
  • Renwick R, Brown I, Raphael D. Quality of life: linking a conceptual approach to service provision. Journal of Developmental Disabilities 1994; 3: 32-44.
  • Wortzman M. The psychosocial impact of assistive devices on device users: phase 2, unpublished BA thesis. Toronto, Canada: York University, 1995.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning and Disability (ICIDH-2): Ppre-Final Draft. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2000.
  • Jutai J, Gryfe P. Impacts of assistive technology on clients with ALS. Proceedings of RESNA '98, Minneapolis, 1998; 54-65.
  • Jutai J, Rigby P, Ryan S, Stickel S. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technology 2000; 12: 123131.
  • Jutai J, Woolrich W, Campbell K, Gryfe P, Day H. User-caregwer agreement on perceived psychosocial impact of assistive devices. Proceedings of the RESNA 2000 Annual Conference, 29 June-3 July. Arlington: RESNA Press, 2000; 20: 328-330.
  • Gryfe P, Jutai J. Assistive technology and quality of life for clients with ALS/MND. 10th International Symposium on ALS/MND, November, Vancouver, BC, 1999.
  • Jutai J, Day H, Gryfe P. Psychological factors in the assessment of assistive technologies. RESNA VS, July, Minneapolis, 1998.
  • Fuhrer MJ. Assistive technology outcomes research: impressions of an interested newcomer. International Conference on Outcome Assessment in Assistive Technology, November, Oslo, Norway, 1999.
  • Schulz R, Heckhausen J, O'Brien AT. Control and the disablement process in the elderly. Journal of Social Behaviour and Personality 1994; 9: 139-152.
  • Williamson GM, Schulz R. Physical illness and symptoms of depression among elderly outpatients. Psychology and Ageing 1992; 7:343-351.
  • Scherer MJ. The Matching Person and Technology (MPT) Model and Assessment Instruments. Rochester, NY: In, 1991.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Item analysis of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology 2000; 12: 96-105.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.