254
Views
51
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction

, , &
Pages 115-125 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • Harmer J, Bakheit AM. The benefits of environmental control systems as perceived by disabled users and their carers. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 394-398.
  • Hilton T, Orr RD, Perkin RM, Ashwal S. End of life care in Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Pediatrie Neurology 1993; 9: 165177.
  • Schkade JK, Feibelman A, Cook JD. Occupational potential in a population with Duchenne muscular dystrophy. The Occupational Therapy Journal of Research 1987; 4: 289-300.
  • Abresch RT, Seyden NK, Wineinger MA. Quality of life. Issues for persons with neuromuscular diseases. Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Clinics of North America 1998; 9: 233-248.
  • Renwick R, Brown I. The Centre for Health Promotion's conceptual approach to quality of life. In: R Renwick, I Brown I, M Nagler (eds) Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation: Conceptual Approaches, Issues, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996; 75-86.
  • Efthimiou J, Gordon WA, Sell GH, Stratford C. Electronic assistive devices: their impact on the quality of life of high level quadriplegic persons. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1981; 62: 131-134.
  • Holme SA, Kanny EM, Guthrie MR, Johnson KL. The use of environmental control units by occupational therapists in spinal cord injury and disease services. American Journal of Occupational Therapy 1997; 51: 42-48.
  • Andrich R, Perrario M, Moi M. A model of cost-outcome analysis for assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation 1998; 20: 1 24.
  • Oldridge NB. Outcomes measurement: health state preferences and economic evaluation. Assistive Technology 1996; 8: 94-102.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Assistive Technology 1996; 8: 3-13.
  • Kohn JG, Mortola P, LeBlanc M. Clinical trials and quality control: checkpoints in the provision of assistive technology. Assistive Technology 1991; 3(2): 67-74.
  • Scherer MJ. Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 439-448.
  • Phillips B, Zhao H. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive Technology 1993; 5: 36-45.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology: QUEST Version 2.0. Webster, NY: The Institute for Matching Person and Technology Inc., 2000.
  • Batavia AI, Hammer GS. Toward the development of consumerbased criteria for the evaluation of assistive devices. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 1990; 27: 425-436.
  • Demers L, Ska B, Giroux F, Weiss-Lambrou R. Stability and reproducibility of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST). Journal of Rehabilitation Outcomes Measurement 1999; 3: 42-52.
  • Demers L, Wessels RD, Ska B, de Witte L. An international content validation of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology. Occupational Therapy International 1999;6: 159-175.
  • Routhier F, Vincent C, Morissette M J, Desaulniers L. Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, in press.
  • Vincent C. Personal communication, 2001.
  • Angelo J, Trefler E. A survey of persons who use integrated control devices. Assistive Technology 1998; 10: 77-83.
  • Jutai J, Rigby P, Ryan S, Stickel S. Psychosocial impact of electronic aids to daily living. Assistive Technology, 2000; 12: 123131.
  • Rigby P, Renzoni A M, Ryan S, Jutai J, Stickel S. Exploring the impact of electronic aids for daily living upon persons with neuromuscular conditions. Proceedings of the Tri-Join t Congress 2000, The Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, The Canadian Physiotherapy Association. 24-27 May, Toronto, Ontario, 2000.
  • Day H, Jutai J. Measuring the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices: the PIADS. Canadian Journal of Rehabilitation 1980; 9: 159-168.
  • Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation. Guide for the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation (Including the FIM(tm) Instrument). Version 5.0. Buffalo, NY: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1990.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Manual for the administration of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology, unpublished manuscript, University of Montreal, School of Rehabilitation, Montreal, 1997.
  • Lange M. Electronic aids to daily living. Rehab Report 1999; 10: 24-27.
  • McDonald P, St Leger S. Provision of environmental control systems in the North West of England. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1996; 18: 443-448.
  • Cowan D, Turner-Smith A. The user's perspective on the provision of electronic assistive technology: equipped for life? British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62: 2-9.
  • Lane JP, Usiak DJ, Moffatt JA. Consumer criteria for assistive devices: operationalizing generic criteria for specific abledata categories. RESNA '96 Proceedings, 60-64, RESNA, 1996.
  • Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B. Proceedings of RESNA 2000, Orlando, 319-321, 2000.
  • Wessels RD, Witte L Pd, Weiss-Lambrou R, Demers L, Wijlhuizen G. A Dutch version of Quest (D-Quest) applied as a routine followup within the service delivery process. In: IP Porrero, E Ballabio (eds) Improving the Quality of Life for the European Citizen: Technology for Inclusive Design and Equality. Washington, DC: IOS Press, 1998; 420-427.
  • DeRuyter P. Evaluating outcomes in assistive technology: do we understand the commitment? Assistive Technology 1995; 7: 3-8.
  • Weiss-Lambrou R, Tremblay C, Lacoste M, LeBlanc, R, Dansereau J. Consumer criteria for evaluation satisfaction with wheelchair seating. Proceedings of the RESNA '98 Annual Conference, 26-30 June, 1998; 152-154.
  • Smith RO. Measuring the outcomes of assistive technology: challenge and innovation. Assistive Technology 1996; 8: 71-81.
  • Demers, L, Weiss-Lambrou, R, and Ska, B. Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (Quest): a new outcome measure. Proceedings of the RESNA 97 Annual Conference-Let's Tango Partnering People and Technologies, 2024 June, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1997; 94-96.
  • Weiss-Lambrou R, Demers L, Tremblay C, Ska B, Lacoste M, Dansereau J. In QUEST of User Satisfaction with assistive Technology Devices. In: G Anognianakis, C Buhler, M Soede (eds) Advancement of Assistive Technology. Washington, DC: IOS Press, 1997:428-431.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.