151
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Physical performance tests for people with spinal pain--sensitivity to change

, , &
Pages 856-866 | Published online: 07 Jul 2009

  • Merskey H, Bogduk N (eds). Classification of Chronic Pain. Description of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definitions of Pain Terms. 2nd edn. Seattle, USA: IASP Press; 1994.
  • Deyo RA, Battié M, Beurskens AJ, Bombaidior C, Croft P, Koes B. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardised use. Spine 1998; 23: 2003-2013. (Published erratum appears in Spine 1999; 15: 418).
  • Strand LI, Wie SL. The Sock Test for evaluating activity limitation in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Physical Therapy 1999; 79: 136-146.
  • Mayer TO, Oatchel RJ, Kishino N, Keeley J, Capra P, Mayer H. Objective assessment of spine function following industrial injury. A prospective study with comparison group and one-year followup. Spine 1985; 10: 482-493.
  • Harding VR, de C Williams AC, Richardson PH, Nicholas MK, Jackson JL, Richardson IH, et al. The development of a battery of measures for assessing physical functioning of chronic pain patients. Pain 1994; 58(3): 367-375.
  • Simmonds MJ, Olson SL, Jones S, Hussein T, Lee CE, Novy D, Radwan H. Psychometric characteristics and clinical usefulness of physical performance tests in patients with low back pain. Spine 1998; 23: 2412-2421.
  • World Health Organisation, WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Final Draft 2001, http:// www.who.int/icidh.
  • Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Controlled Clinical Trials 1991; 12: 142S-158S.
  • Stratford PW, Spadoni G, Kennedy D, Westaway MD, Alcock GK. Seven points to consider when investigating a measure's ability to detect change. Physiotherapy Canada 2002; Winter: 16-24.
  • Deyo RA, Center RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change. An analogy to diagnostic test performance. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1986; 39: 897-906.
  • Poitras S, Loisel P, Prince F, Lemaire J. Disability measurement in persons with back pain: A validity study of spinal range of motion and velocity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 1394-1400.
  • Bland M. An Introduction to Medical Statistics. 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, 2000.
  • Dionne CE, von Korff M, Koepsell TD, Deyo RA, Barlow WE, Checkoway H. A comparison of pain, functional limitations, and work status indices as outcome measures in back pain research. Spine 1999; 24: 2339-2345.
  • Hoeymans N, Feskens E, van de Bos G, Kromhout D. Measuring functional status: Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between performance and self-report (Zuthpen Elderly Study 1990-1993). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1996; 49: 1103-1110.
  • Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM, Femicci I, Glynn RJ, Berkman LT, Blazer DG. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: associations with self-reported disability prediction of mortality nursing home admission. Journal of Gerontology and Medical Science 1994; 49: M85-M94.
  • Mellin G, Härkäpää K, Hurri H, Järvikoski A. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part IV. Long-term effects on physical measurements. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1990; 22:189-194.
  • Ljungquist T, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nygren A, Jensen I. Intra- and inter-rater reliability of an 11-test package for assessing dysfunction due to back or neck pain. Physiotherapy Research International 1999; 4: 214-232.
  • Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interepreting changes in health status. Medical Care 1989; 27: S178-S189.
  • Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. New York: Academic Press; 1977.
  • Jensen I, Bergström G, Ljungquist T, Bodin L, Nygren AL. A randomized controlled component analysis of a behavioral medicine program for chronic spinal pain: are the effects dependent on gender? Pain 2001; 91: 65-78.35.
  • McHomey CA, Ware JE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care 1994; 32: 40-66.
  • Spangfort E. Clinical aspects of neck-and-shoulder pain. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1995; 32 (suppl): 43-46.
  • Ljungquist T, Fransson B, Harms-Ringdahl K, Björnham Å, Nygren Å. A physiotherapy test package for assessing back and neck dysfunction--discriminative ability for patients versus healthy control subjects. Physiotherapy Research International 1999; 4: 123-140.
  • Ljungquist T, Jensen I, Nygren Å, Harms-Ringdahl K. Physical performance tests for people with long-term spinal pain -- aspects of construct validity. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2002; 34: 1 --7.
  • Mayer T, Barnes D, Kishino N, Nizhols D, Gatchel RJ, Mayer H. Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation-I. A Standardized Protocol and Normative Database (published erratum appears in Spine. 1990; 15: 5)Spme 1988; 13(9): 993-997.
  • Jensen IB, Bodin L, Ljungquist T, Bergström KG, Nygren Å. Assessing the needs of patients in pain: a matter of opinion? Spine 2000; 25: 2816-2823.
  • Deyo RA, Andersson G, Bombardier C, Gherkin DC, Keller RB, Lee CK, et al. Outcome measures for studying patients with low back pain. Spine 1994; 19(18 suppl): S2032-S2036.
  • Lomi C. Evaluation of a Swedish version of the Arthritis Selfefficacy Scale. Scandinavian Journal for Caring Sciences 1992; 6: 131-138.
  • Lomi C, Nordholm LA. Validation of a Swedish version of the Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale. Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology 1992; 21: 231 -237.
  • Stenström CH. Home exercise in rheumatoid arthritis functional class II: Goal setting versus pain attention. Journal of Rheumatology 1994; 21: 627-634.
  • Lin C-C. Comparison of the effects of perceived self-efficacy on coping with chronic cancer pain and coping with chronic low back pain. Clinical Journal of Pain 1998; 14: 303-310.
  • SPSS Base 9.0. User's Guide. 1999, SPSS Inc., USA, ISBN 0-13-020390-4,.
  • Altman D. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991; Chapter 15, 456-459.
  • Kuukkanen T, Mälkiä E. Muscular performance after a 3 month progressive physical exercise program and 9 month follow-up in subjects with low back pain. A controlled study. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports 1996; 6: 112-121.
  • Lindström I, Öhlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson L-E, Nachemsson A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine 1992; 17: 641-652.
  • Mellin G, Hurri H, Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part II. Effects on physical measurements three months after treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1989; 21:91-95.
  • Sluijs EM, Kok GJ, van der Zee J. Correlates of exercise compliance in physical therapy. Physical Therapy 1993; 73: 771-786.
  • Di Fabio RP, Mackey G, Holte JB. Disability and functional status in patients with low back pain receiving workers compensation: A descriptive study with implications for the efficacy of physical therapy. Physical Therapy 1995; 75: 180-193.
  • Bendix AF, Bendix T, Haestrup C. Can it be predicted which patients with chronic low back pain should be offered tertiary rehabilitation in a functional restoration program? A search for demographic, socioeconomic, and physical predictors. Spine 1998; 23: 1775-1784.
  • Manniche C, Hesselsöe G, Bentzen L, Christensen I, Lundberg E. Clinical trial of intensive muscle training for chronic low back pain. The Lancet 1988; 2: 1473-1476.
  • Randlöv A, Östergaard M, Manniche C, Kryger P, Jordan A, Heegard S, Holm B. Intensive dynamic training for females with chronic neck/shoulder pain. A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 1998; 12: 200-210.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.