Disability management practices in Ontario workplaces: Employees' perceptions

References

• Habeck RV, Hunt HA. Disability management perspectives, Am Rehab 1999;25:18–25.
   Google Scholar
• International Labor Organization. Code of Practice on managing disability in the workplace. Geneva: International Labor Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly A. The right to decent work of persons with disabilities. IFP/Skills Working Paper No.14. Geneva: Inter- national Labor Organization; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Akabas SH, Gates LB, Galvin DE. Disability management: A complete system to reduce cost, increase productivity, meet employee needs and ensure legal compliance. New York: AMACOM; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Shrey DE. Disability management in industry. Dis Rehab 1996;18:408–414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeck RV. Differentiating disability management and rehabilitation. A distinction worth making. Nat Ass Reh Pract Priv Sect J 1996;11:8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Friesen MV, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: The importance of human interactions and organizational struc- tures. Work 2001;17:11–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michie S, Williams S. Reducing work-related psychological ill health and sickness absence: A systematic literature review. Occup Environ Med 2002;60:3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute of Disability Management and Research. Code of Practice for disability management: Describing effective benchmarks for the creation of workplace disability management programs. Port Alberni, BC: National Institute of Disability Management; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. A Guide for the Joint Health and Safety Committees and Representatives in the Workplace. Available at www.gov.on.ca/lab/ohs/g_jhsce.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Storrer S. An IDM shopping list. Risk Management 2000;47:56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Burton W, Cont DJ. Disability management: Corporate medical department management of employee health and productivity. J Occup Environ Med 2000;42:1006–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeck RV, Leachy MJ, Hunt HA, Chan R, Welch EM. Employee factors related to workers’ compensation claims and disability management. Rehab Counsel Bull 1991;34:210–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habeck RV, Hunt RA, Van Tol B. Workplace factors associated with preventing and managing work disability. Rehab Counsel Bull 1999;42:98–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick listed. J Occup Rehab 2003;13(1):11–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amick B, Habeck RV, Hunt A, Fossel AH, Chapin RB, Keller H, Katz JN. Measuring the impact of organizational beha- viours on work disability prevention and management. J Occup Rehab 2000;10:21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truchon M, Fillion L, Gelinas C. Validitation of a French Canadian version of the Organizational Policies and Practices (OPP) questionnaire. Work 2003;20:111–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams R, Westmorland M, Shannon H, Rasheed F, Amick B. Disability management practices in education, hotel/motel and health care workplaces. Am J Indust Med 2004 (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Entering the field of qualitative research. In Denzin NK, Lincoln YS. Handbook of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Needleman C, Needleman ML. Qualitative methods for intervention research. Am J Ind Med 29(4):329–337.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. Qualitative inquiry and research design, choos- ing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Huberman AM, Miles MB. Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publica- tions; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Burnard P. The telephone interview as a data collection method. Nurse Ed Today 1994;14:67–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards L. QSR NUD*IST 4. Qualitative Solutions & Research, Pty Ltd. Melbourne Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL. A checklist for evaluating the usefulness of rating scales. Can J Psychiatry 1993;39:140–148.
   Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE, Lu JFR, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36):III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994;32(1):40–66.
   Google Scholar
• Krause N, Frank JW, Dasinger LK, Sullivan TJ, Sinclair SJ. Determinants of return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: Challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 2001;40:464–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison K, Allen S. Features of occupational rehabilitation systems in Australia: A map through the maze. Work 2003; 21:141–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strunin L, Boden LI. Paths of re-entry: Employment experiences of injured workers. Am J Ind Med 2000;38:373–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D, the Work-Ready group. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2101–2114.
   Google Scholar
• Work Ready Collaborative Group. Facilitation of return to work after a soft tissue injury: Synthesizing evidence and experience: Report of Work Ready Phase 1 to HealNet. Hamilton: McMaster University; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke J, Cole D, Ferrier S. Return to work after a soft tissue injury: A qualitative exploration (Working Paper # 127). Institute for Work and Health, unpublished manuscript, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Franche RL, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehab 2002;12(4):233–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley BV. Health and savings: Integrated disability manage- ment risk management. 1999;46:23–25.
   Google Scholar
• Brooker A-S, Cole D, Hogg-Johnson S, Smith J, Frank J. Effective disability management and return-to-work practices. In T. Sullivan, editor. Injury and the new world of work. Vancouver: UBC Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tarusek V, Eakin JM. Back problems are for life: Perceived vulnerability and its implication for chronic disability. J Occup Rehab 1994;4(1):55–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarusek V, Eakin JM. The problem of legitimacy in the experience of work-related back injury. Qual Health Res 1995;5(2):204–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JM, Tarasuk V, Shannon H, Ferrier S, ECC Modelling Group. Prognosis of musculoskeletal: Effects of legitimacy and job vulnerability. (IWH Working Paper #67 ed). Toronto, Canada: Institute for Work and Health; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Labour. Workplace Safety and Insurance Act. 1997. Available at www.gov.on.ca/DBLaws/ Statutes.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, et al. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 1997;22(24):2911–2918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar