Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers—current models and opportunities for improvement

References

• Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S. Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 2001; 40(4): 464– 484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baril R, Clarke J, Friesen M, Stock S, Cole D. Management of return-to-work programs for workers with musculoskeletal dis- orders: A qualitative study in three Canadian provinces. Social Science and Medicine 2003; 57(11): 2101– 2114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franche R, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: Conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace and insurance factors. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2002; 12(4): 233– 256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand M, Diallo B, Vachon B, Charpentier N, Labelle J. From evidence to community practice in work rehabilitation: The Quebec experience. Clinical Journal of Pain 2003; 19(2): 105– 115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schonstein E, Kenny D, Maher C. WorkCover’s physiotherapy forms: Purpose beyond paperwork? Australian Journal of Phy- siotherapy 2002; 48(3): 221– 225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haig A, Penha S. Worker rehabilitation programs. Separating fact from fiction. Western Journal of Medicine 1991; 154(5): 528– 531.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw W, Pransky G, Fitzgerald T. Early prognosis for low back disability: Intervention strategies for health care providers. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23(18): 815– 828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazard R, Haugh L, Reid S, Preble J, MacDonald L. Early prediction of chronic disability after occupational low back injury. Spine 1996; 21(8): 945– 951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipkin N, Putnam S, Lazare A. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education, and Research. New York: Springer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Say R, Thompson R. The importance of patient preferences in treatment-challenges for doctors. British Journal of Medicine 2003; 327: 542– 545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: The importance of human interactions and organization structures. Work 2001; 17(1): 11– 22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merrill R, Pransky G, Hathaway J, Scott D. Illness and the workplace: A study of physicians and employers. The Journal of Family Practice 1990; 31(1): 55– 59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin M, Cedraschi C, Skovron M. Patient-health care provider relationship in patients with non-specific low back pain: A review of some problem situations. Baillieres Clinical Rheumatology 1998; 12(1): 75– 92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasinger L, Krause N, Thompson P, Brand R, Rudolph L. Doctor proactive communication, return-to-work recommendations, and duration of disability after a workers’ compensation low back injury. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2001;
   Google Scholar
• 43(6): 515–525.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp H. Employees’ and occupational physicians’ different perceptions of the work-relatedness of health problems: A critical point in an effective consultation process. Occupational Medicine (London) 1993; 43(Suppl 1): S18– S22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall H, McIntosh G, Melles T, Holowachuk B, Wai E. Effect of discharge recommendations on outcome. Spine 1994; 19(18): 2033– 2037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernacki E, Tsai S. Ten years’ experience using an integrated workers’ compensation management system to control workers’ compensation costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003; 45(5): 508– 516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan C, Miller L, Liewehr S. Rehabilitation of acute and subacute low back and neck pain in the work-injured patient. Orthopedics Clinics of North America 1996; 27(4): 841– 860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazard R, Reid S, Haugh L, McFarlane G. A controlled trial of an educational pamphlet to prevent disability after occupational low back injury. Spine 2000; 25(11): 1419– 1423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar M, Graham K. Evaluation of a case management program: Summary and integration of findings. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 1999; 47: 416– 423.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buchbinder R, Jolley D, Wyatt M. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Effects on a media campaign on back pain beliefs and its potential influence on management of low back pain in general practice. Spine 2001; 26(23): 2535– 2542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vancouver J. Living systems theory as a paradigm for organiza- tional behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Behavioral Science 1996; 43(3): 165– 204.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson L, Duffy B. Health Communication Research: A Guide to Developments and Directions. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Penley L, Hawkins B. Studying interpersonal communication in organizations: A leadership application. The Academy of Manage- ment Review 1985; 28: 309– 326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates J, Orlikowski W. Genres of organizational communication: A structural approach to studying communication and media. The Academy of Management Review 1992; 17: 299– 326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnellon A, Gray B, Bougan M. Communication, meaning, and organized action. Administrative Science Quarterly 1986; 31: 43–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrey D. Disability management in industry: The new paradigm in injured worker rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18(8): 408– 414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong T, Franzblau A, Haig A, Keyserling W, Levine S, Streilein K, Ulin S, Werner R. Developing ergonomic solutions for prevention of musculoskeletal disorder disability. Assistive Tech- nology 2001; 13(2): 78– 87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atlas S, Keller R, Chang Y, Deyo R, Singer D. Surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: Five-year outcomes from the Maie Lumbar Spine Study. Spine 2001; 26(10): 1179– 1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akabas S, Gates L, Galvin D. Disability Management: A Complete System to Reduce Costs, Increase Productivity, meet Employee Needs, and Ensure Legal Compliance. New York: American Management Association, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Wasiak R, Himmelstein J. Disability systems: The physician’s role. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2001; 1: 829– 842.
   Google Scholar
• Harris J. Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines: American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Press, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt D, Zuberbier O, Kozlowski A, Berkowitz J, Schultz I, Milner R, Crook J, Turk D. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability after an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine 2002; 27(23): 2715– 2719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• McGorry R, Webster B, Snook S, Hsiang S. The relation between pain intensity, disability, and the episodic nature of chronic and recurrent low back pain. Spine 2000; 25(7): 834– 841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetzel R, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski R, Wang S. The health and productivity cost burden of the ‘‘top 10’’ physical and mental health conditions affecting six large US employers in 1999. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003; 45(1): 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Guzman J, Yassi A, Cooper J, Khokhar J. Return to work after occupational injury. Canadian Family Physician 2002; 48: 1912 –1919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Katz J, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J. Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: A survey of primary care practitioners. Disability and Rehabilita- tion 2002; 24(16): 867– 874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schers H, Wensing M, Huijsmans Z, van Tulder M, Grol R. Implementation barriers for general practice guidelines on low back pain: A qualitative study. Spine 2001; 26(15): E348– E353.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engelberg A. Disability and workers’ compensation. Primary Care
   Google Scholar
• A theoretical model for rehabilitation counseling 1994:275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Hershenson D. A theoretical model for rehabilitation counseling. Rehabilitation Counselling Bulletin 1990; 33: 268– 278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin R. Vocational rehabilitation. In: P. King (ed) Sourcebook of Occupational Rehabilitation. New York: Plenum Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• American Physical Therapy Association. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice. Alexandria, VA: American Physical Therapy Association, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Lechner D. Work hardening and work conditioning interventions: Do they affect disability? Physical Therapy 1994; 74: 471– 493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Eek C, Wallin L, Peterson L, Nachemson
   Google Scholar
• A. Mobility, strength, and fitness after a graded activity program for patients with subacute low back pain. A randomized prospective clinical study with a behavioral therapy approach. Spine 1992; 17(6): 641– 652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir R, Nielson W. Interventions for disability management. The Clinical Journal of Pain 2001; 17: S128– S132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. A clinician’s guide to work-related assessments: 3 - administration and interpretation problems. Work 1998b; 11(2): 207– 219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hartlage L, Roland P, Taraba D. Perceptions of various tupes of disabilities by employers. Psychological Aspects of Disability 1971; 18(3): 122– 124.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn M. Incapacity, impotence and invisible impairment: Their effects upon interpersonal relations. Journal of Health & Social Behavior 1973; 14(2): 115– 123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel I, Hagen K, Herrin J, Oxman A. A randomized controlled trial of two strategies to implement active sick leave for patients with low back pain. Spine 2002; 27: 561– 566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wassel M. Improving return to work outcomes: Formalizing the process. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 2002; 50(6): 275– 285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gross D, Battie M. Reliability of safe maximum lifting determina- tions of a functional capacity evaluation. Physical Therapy 2002; 82(4): 364– 371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes E, Straker L. Reliability of work-related assessments. Work
   Google Scholar
• 1999; 13: 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Hadler N. Comments on the ‘‘ergonomics Program Standard’’ proposed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2000; 42(10): 951– 969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson L, Strong J. Expert review of an approach to functional capacity evaluation. Work 2002; 19(3): 231– 242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dusik L, Menard M, Cooke C, Fairburn S, Beach G. Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a workers’ compensa- tion population. Journal of Occupational Medicine 1993; 35(8): 759– 767.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindstrom I, Ohlund C, Nachemson A. Validity of patient reporting and predictive value of industrial physical work demands. Spine 1994; 19(8): 888– 893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher T. Perception differences between groups of employees identifying the factors that influence a return to work after a work- related musculoskeletal injury. Work 2003; 21(3): 211– 220.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Work Loss Data Institute. Official Disability Guidelines. Corpus Christi, TX: Work Loss Data Institute, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Reed Group. The Medical Disability Advisor. Boulder, CO: The Reed Group, Ltd., 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bruckman R, Rasmussen H. Healthcare Management Guidelines: Evaluation and Management of Common Health Problems and Functional Recovery in Workers. Beverly Farms, MA: OEM Health Information Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kyes K, Wickizer T, Franklin G, Cain K, Cheadle A, Madden C, Murphy L, Plaeger-Brockway R, Weaver M. Evaluation of the Washington State Workers’ Compensation Managed Care Pilot Project I: Medical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Medical Care 1999; 37(10): 972– 981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechanic D. The functions and limitations of trust in the provision of medical care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1998; 23(4): 661– 686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw W, Feuerstein M, Lincoln A, Miller V, Wood P. Case management services for work-related upper extremity disorders: Integrating workplace accommodation and problem solving. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 2001; 49: 378– 389.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brines J, Salazar M, Graham K, Pergola T. Return to work experience of injured workers in a case management program. American Association of Occupational Health Nurses Journal 1999; 47: 355– 364.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsh B. Organizational culture, climate and person-environment fit: Relationships with employment outcomes for mental health consumers. Work 2000; 14(2): 109– 122.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirsh B, McKee P. The needs and experience of injured workers: A participatory research study. Work 2003; 21(3): 221– 231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lillrank A. Back pain and the resolution of diagnostic uncertainty in illness narratives. Social Science and Medicine 2003; 57(6): 1045– 1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyes K, Wickizer T, Franklin G. Employer satisfaction with workers’ compensation health care: results of the Washington State Workers’ Compensation Managed Care Pilot. Journal of Occupa- tional and Environmental Medicine 2003; 45(3): 234– 240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts-Yates C. The concerns and issues of injured workers in relation to claims/injury management and rehabilitation: The need for new operational frameworks. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(16): 898– 907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler T, Blader S. The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2003; 7(4): 349– 361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler N, Campion P, Cox A. Exploration of doctor and patient agendas in general practice consultations. Social Science and Medicine 1992; 35(9): 1145– 1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll T, Beatty P, Bingham S. Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: The role of patient- provider communication. Managed Care Quarterly 2003; 11: 11– 19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Detmar S, Muller M, Schornagel J, Wever L, Aaronson N. Health- related quality of life assessments and patient-physician commu- nications. JAMA 2002; 288: 3027– 3034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala D. A study of doctors’ and patients’ patterns of information exchange and relational communication during a primary care consultation: Implications for communication skills training. Journal of Health Communication 1997; 2: 169– 174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis C, Pantell R, Sharp L. Increasing patient knowledge, satisfaction, and involvement: Randomized trial of a communica- tion intervention. Pediatrics 1991; 88(2): 351– 358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles H, Mulak A, Bradac J, Johnson P. Speech accommodation theory: The next decade and beyond. Communication Yearbook 1987; 10: 13– 14.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart M. Effective patient-physician communication and health outcomes: A review. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995; 152: 1423– 1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson W, Roter D, Mullooly J, Dull V, Frankel R. Physician- patient communication: The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. JAMA 1997; 27T: 553– 559.
   Google Scholar
• Ong L, Detlaes J, Hoos A, Lammes F. Doctor-patient commu- nication: A review of the literature. Social Science and Medicine 1995; 40: 903– 918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom D, Kravitz R, Bell R, Krupat E, Azari R. Patient trust in the physician: Relationship to patient requests. Family Practice 2002; 19(5): 476– 483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makoul G. The interplay between education and research about patient-provider communication. Patient Education and Counseling 2003; 50: 79– 84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Back A, Block S, Stewart S. Enhancing physician-patient communication. Hematology (American Society of Hematology Education Program) 2002; 464– 483.
   Google Scholar
• Daltroy L, Liang M. Arthritis education: Opportunities and state of the art. Health Education Quarterly 1993; 20(1): 3– 16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware Jr. J. Expanding patient involvement in care: Effects on patient outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine 1985; 102(4): 520– 528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond G, Becker D, Drake R, Rapp C, Meisler N, Lehman A, Bell M, Blyler C. Implementing supported employment as an evidence- based practice. Psychiatric Services 2001; 52(3): 313– 322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala D. Patient communication skills training: A review. Patient Education and Counseling 2003; 50: 91– 94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake R, McHugo G, Becker D, Anthony W, Clarke R. The New Hampshire study of supported employment for people with severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1996; 64(2): 391– 399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akabas S, Gates L. Work Opportunities for Rewarding Careers: A Model to Guide Practice with Mental Health Consumers. 2003, under review.
   Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Gosselin L, Durand P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Abenhaim L. Implementation of a participatory ergonomics program in the rehabilitation of workers suffering from subacute back pain. Applied Ergonomics 2001; 32(1): 53– 60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cline R. At the intersection of micro and macro: Opportunities and challenges for physician-patient communication research. Patient Education and Counselling 2003; 50(1): 13– 16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegala D, Lenzmeier B. Physician communication skills training: A review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Medical Education 2002; 36(11): 1004– 1016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pransky G, Snyder T, Himmelstein J. The Organizational Response: Influence on Cumulative Trauma Disorders. In: S. Moon and S. Sauter (eds) Beyond Biomechanics: Psychosocial Aspects of Musculoskeletal Disorders in Office Workers. London: Taylor & Francis, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Amick III B, Habeck R, Hunt A, Fossel A, Chapin A, Keller R, Katz J. Measuring the impact of organizational behaviors on work disability prevention and management. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2000; 10(1): 21– 38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roter D. Observations on methodological and measurement challenges in the assessment of communication during medical exchanges. Patient Education and Counselling 2003; 50(1): 17– 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire P, Pitceathly C. Key communication skills and how to acquire them. British Journal of Medicine 2002; 325: 697– 700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew H, Nordland D. Absenteeism certification: The physi- cian’s role. Journal of Family Practice 1988; 26(6): 651– 655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps G, Arora N, Nelson D. Consumer/provider communication research: Directions for development. Patient Education and Counseling 2003; 50(1): 3– 4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar