The meaning and experience of being a stroke survivor: an interpretative phenomenological analysis

References

• Health Survey for England. Population from Office for National Statistics (ONS), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Evans P, Whitney W. The Role of Medical Conditions and Depression in the Functional Outcome of Stroke Survivors: A Review and Pilot Study. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 1998; 5(3): 30– 50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sneeuw KCA, Aaronson NK, de Haan RJ, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 1541– 1549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd T. Neuropsychotherapy and Community Integration Brain Illness, Emotions and Behaviour. London: Kluwer Academic/ Plenum Publishers, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Westcott P. Stroke: Questions an answers. London: The Stroke Association, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Wagenaar, RC, Koelman, TW, Lankhorst,GJ, Koetsier, JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke: a research synthesis. Stroke 1997; 28: 1550– 1556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm JW, Dewey HM, Donnan GA, Macdonnell RA, McNeil JJ, Thrift AG. Handicap after Stroke: How does it relate to disability, perception of recovery, and stroke subtype? The North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke 2002; 33: 762– 768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresham GE, Alexander D, Bishop DS, Giuliani C, Goldberg G, Holland A, Kelly-Hayes M, Linn, RT, Roth, EJ, Stason WB, Trombly CA. Rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 1522– 1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall RS, Lazar RM, Pile-Spellman J, Young, WL, Hoang Duong D, Joshi S, Ostapkovich N. Recovery of brain function during induced cerebral hypoperfusion. Brain 2001; 124: 1208– 1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JA. Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J Smith, R Harre, LV Langenhove (eds) Rethinking methods in psychology. London: Sage, 1996; 9–26.
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Jarman M, Osborn M. Doing interpretative phenom- enological analysis. In M Murray and K Chamberlain (eds) Qualitative Health Psychology: Theories and Methods. London: Sage, 1999; 218–240.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Sixsmith J. E-mail – A qualitative research medium for interviewing. International Journal of Social Research Metho- dology Theory and Practice 1998; 1(2): 103– 121.
   Google Scholar
• Harre R. Physical Being. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Powell G. Brain and Personality. London: Saxon House, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Aben I, Denollet J, Lousberg R, Verhey F, Wojciechowski F, Honig A. Personality and vulnerability to depression in stroke patients: a 1-year prospective follow-up study. Stroke 2002; 33: 2391– 2395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M. Self, Identity and radical surgery. Sociology of Health and Illness 1992; 14(3); 390–415.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider JW, Conrad P. In the closet with illness: epilepsy, stigma potential and information control. Social Problems 1980; 28(1): 32– 44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner C. Public aid. Urban Life 1986; 15: 37– 69.
   Google Scholar
• Martin R The Cerebral Cortex: A Review of Emotional Results of Frontal Lesions Neuropsychology FIRST TEAM PROJECT Page last edited by Morgan M J. March 17, 1997. 1 – 8 http://www.humboldt.edu/*morgan/front.htm
   Google Scholar
• Monga TN, Lawson JS, Inglis J. Sexual dysfunction in stroke patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1986; 67: 19– 22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldrini P, Basaglia N, Calanca MC. Sexual changes in hemi- paretic patients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1991; 72: 202– 207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Power and prejudice: issues of gender, sexuality and disability. In L Barton (ed) Disability and Society: Emerging Issues and Insights. London: Longman, 1996; 191–214.
   Google Scholar
• Levitin TA. Deviants as active participants in the labelling process: the visibly Handicapped. Social Problems 1975; 24: 548– 557.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite DO. From majority to minority: An analysis of cultural change from ablebodied to disabled. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 1990; 14(4): 465– 483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greveson GC, Gray CS, French, JM, James CFW. Long-term outcome for patients and carers following hospital admission for a stroke. Age and Ageing 1991; 29: 337– 344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemerinski E, Robinson RG, Kosier JT. Improved recovery in activities of daily living associated with remission of poststroke depression. Stroke 2001; 32: 113– 117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monga TN, Ostermann HY. Sexuality and sexual adjustment in stroke patients. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: State of the Art Reviews 1995; 9: 345– 359.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz R, Tompkins CA, Raut MT. A longitudinal study of the psychosocial impact of stroke on primary support persons. Psychology and Aging 1988; 3: 131– 141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans RL, Connis RT, Bishop DS, Hendricks RD, Haselkorn JK. Stroke: a family dilemma. Disability and Rehabilitation 1994; 16: 110– 118.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Evans RL, Matlock A, Bishop DS, Stranahan S, Pederson C. Family intervention after stroke: does counselling or education help? Stroke 1988; 19: 1243– 1249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis M, O’Rourke S, Slattery J, Staniforth T, Warlow C. Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1997; 314: 1071– 1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson GS, Linto J, Stewart-Wynne E.G, A population-based assessment of the impact and burden of caregiving for long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 1995; 26: 843– 849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlotte op Reimer WJM, de Haan RJ, Rijinders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos, GAM. The burden of caregiving in partners of long- term stroke survivors. Stroke 1998; 29: 1605– 1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar