The role of video technology in on-line lectures for the deaf

References

• Leask M. Issues in Teaching using ICT, London: Routledge. Institute Library: Loyx LEA, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Castro M, Lopez-Rey A, Perez-Molina CM, Colmenar A, de Mora C, Yeves F, Carpio J, Peire J. Examples of distance learning projects in the European community. IEEE Transactions on Education 2001; 44(4): 406– 411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloddere D, Verbiest W, Verhille H. Interactive video on demand. IEEE Communication Magazine 1994; 32(5): 82– 88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronreif G, Dotter F, Bergmeister E, Krammer K, Hilzensauer M, Okorn I, Skant A, Orter R, Rezzonico S, Barreto B. SMILE: demonstration of a cognitively oriented solution to the improve- ment of written language competence of deaf people. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs—ICCHP’2000. 17 – 21 July, Karlsruhe, Ger- many, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Debevc M. Video supported online communities-VISIOCOM. Proceedings of the International Educational Conference on Com- puters—MIRK’02, 16 – 18 May, Piran, Slovenia, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Begoray JA. An introduction to hypermedia issues, systems and application areas. International Journal of Man – Machine studies 1990; 33: 121– 147.
   Google Scholar
• Parlangeli O, Marchigiani E, Bagnara S. Multimedia systems in distance education: effects of usability on learning. Interacting with Computers 1999; 12: 37– 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco J. An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. Educa- tional Technology 1986; 25: 7– 16.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher D. The effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction. Machine-Mediated Learning 1989; 3: 361– 385.
   Google Scholar
• Khalili A, Shashaani L. The effectivenees of computer applications: a meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 1994; 27: 8– 61.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik CC, Kulik JA, Shwalb BJ. The effectivenees of computer applications: a meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 1994; 27: 48– 61.
   Google Scholar
• Smith C, Mayes T. Telematics Applications for Education and Training: Usability Guide. ICBL, January, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Farwell RM. Speechreading: A research review. American Annals of the Deaf 1976; 121(1): 18– 22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderheiden GC. Full Visual Annotation of Auditorially Presented Information for Users Who Are Deaf: ShowSounds, Proceedings of the RESNA International Conference, 6 – 11 June, Toronto, Canada, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Druin A, Hendler J. Robots for Kids: Exploring new technologies for learning. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wood J. Can software support children’s vocabulary development? Language learning & Technology 2000; 5: 166– 201.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois M, Vial I. Multimedia design: the effects of relating multimodal information. Journal of Assisted Computer Learning 2000; 16: 157– 165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BITEMA project. URL: http://www.bitema.uni-mb.si/
   Google Scholar
• Hellstro¨ m G. Quality Measurement on Video Communication for Sign Language. Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, 12 – 16 May, Oslo, Norway, 1997: 217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft Windows Media Tools. URL: http://www.microsoft.- com/windowsmedia/
   Google Scholar
• Jeong I, Hong-Suk Na. NativeBox: Language Practice System Based on Script Captions, Proceedings of the International conference on computers in education, ICCE/SchoolNet 2001, Seoul, Korea, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• MS Producer. URL: http://www.microsoft.com/Producer 23 Helix PresenterOne. URL: http://www.real.com/
   Google Scholar
• Minoli D. Distance Learning Technology and Applications. Boston: Artech House, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ming-Chit IT, Du JS, Wang WG. Improving TCP performance over asymmetric networks. Computer Communication Review 2000; 30(3): 45– 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redmond-Pyle D, Moore A. Graphical User Interface Design and Evaluation. London: Prentice Hall, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• ISO 9241. ISO 9241: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals, Part 10, Dialogue Principles (CD), 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Kirakowski J, Corbett M. SUMI: The Software Usability Measurement Inventory. British Journal of Educational Technology 1993; 24(3): 210– 212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad R. The deaf school child: Language and cognitive function. London: Harper & Row, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell DS. Computer aided self-instruction training with impulsive deaf students and learning disabled students: A study on teaching reflective thought. Ontario: Ministry of Education, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Prokes LL. The use of media in a diagnostic prescriptive model for educating deaf multi-handicapped students. American Annals of the Deaf 1980; 125(6): 844– 848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks TJ. The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research 1988; 58(4): 438– 481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins RJ, Conklin NF, Bridgeford NJ. Classroom assessment: A key to effective education. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1986; 5(2): 5– 17.
   Google Scholar