A comparison of the grip force distribution in natural hands and in prosthetic hands

References

• Kyberd PJ, Evans M, Winkel S.te. An intelligent anthropomorphic hand with automatic grasp. Robotica 1998; 16: 531– 536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light CM, Chappell PH. Development of a lightweight and adaptable multiple-axis hand prosthesis. Medical Engineering and Physics 2000; 22: 679– 684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz S, Pylatiuk C. A lightweight bionic hand prosthesis. Proceedings of the ISPO World Congress. 1 – 6 July, Glasgow, UK, 2001: MO6.2.
   Google Scholar
• Doshi R, Yeh C, LeBlanc M. The design and development of a gloveless endoskeletal prosthetic hand. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 1998; 35(4): 388– 395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peizer E, Wright DW, Mason C, Pirrello T. Standards for externally powered hands. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research 10 12. Washington DC, 1969; 118–155.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman K, Ornholmer L. Functional benefit of an adaptive myoelectric prosthetic hand compared to a conventional myo- electric hand. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 1992; 16(1): 32– 37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RB, Walley M. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1983; 64: 243– 248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light CM, Chappell PH, Kyberd PJ, Ellis BS. A critical review of functionality assessment in natural and prosthetic hands. British Journal of Occupational Therapy 1999; 62(1): 7– 12.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Gruver WA. Definition and force distribution of power grasps. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 21 May, Nagoya, Japan, 1995; 2: 1373–1378.
   Google Scholar
• Richards L, Palmiter-Thomas P. Grip strength measurement: a critical review of tools, methods and clinical utility. Critical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 1996; 8(1&2): 87–109.
   Google Scholar
• Crago PE, Chizeck HJ, Neumann MR, Hambrecht FT. Sensors for use with functional neuromuscular stimulation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 1986; 33(7): 256– 268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FSRTM. International Electronics & Engineering. Luxemburg.
   Google Scholar
• Fellows GL, Freivalds A. The use of force sensing resistors in ergonomic tool design. Proceedings of the HMF 33rd annual meeting, Santa Monica, 1989; 713–717.
   Google Scholar
• Yun MH, Cannon D, Freivalds A, Thomas G. An instrumented glove for grasp specification in virtual-reality-based point-and- direct telerobotics. IEEE Transactions On Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B: Cybernetics 1997; 27(5): 835– 846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato S, Shimojo M, Seki Y, Takahashi A, Shimizu S. Measuring system for grasping. IEEE Int. Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, Tsukuba, Japan, November 11–14, 1996; 292–297.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari de Castro MC, Cliquet Jr A. An artificial grasping evaluation system for the paralyzed hand. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 2000; 38: 275– 280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rempel D, Dennerlein J, Mote CD, Armstrong T. A method of measuring fingertip loading during keyboard use. J Biomechanics 1994; 27(8): 1101– 1104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler NK, Nicol AC. Measurement of external 3-dimensional interphalangeal joint loads applied during activities of daily living. Clinical Biomechanics 1999; 14: 646– 652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westling G, Johansson RS. Factors influencing the force control during precision grip. Experimental Brain Research 1984; 53: 277– 284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radwin RG, On S, Jensen TR, Webster JG. External finger forces in submaximal five-finger pinch prehension. Ergonomics 1992; 35(3): 275– 288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sollermann C. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 1995; 29: 167– 176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser CM. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Prosthe- tics and Orthotics International 1998; 22: 216– 223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin J, Beck S, Lehmann A, et al. Sensors, identification and low level control of a flexible anthropomorphic robot hand. IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots. 1 – 3 October, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2003; CD-ROM Proceedings.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.healthcare.ottobock.com.
   Google Scholar
• Fess EE. Grip strength. In: American society of hand therapists, (eds), Clinical assessment recommendations. 2nd edn. Garner, NC, 1992; 41–45.
   Google Scholar
• Cutkosky M, Howe R. Human Grasp Choice and Robotic Grasp Analysis. Dextrous Robot Hands. In: S. Venkataraman, T. Iberall (eds), Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag, 1990; 5–31.
   Google Scholar
• Bouzit M. Design, implementation and testing of a data glove with force feedback for virtual and real objects. PhD Thesis, Universite´ Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 1996; 54.
   Google Scholar