The effect of prosthetic mass properties on the gait of transtibial amputees—a mathematical model

References

• Van der Meij W K N. No leg to stand on; historical relation between amputation surgery and prostheseology. Turnhout, Belgium: PROOST, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Beck J C, Czerniecki J. A method for optimization of above-knee prosthetic shank-foot inertial characteristics. Gait and Posture 1994; 2: 75– 84.
   Google Scholar
• Mena D, Mansour J M, Simon S R. Analysis and synthesis of human swing leg motion during gait and its clinical applications. Journal of Biomechanics 1981; 14: 823– 32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman S, Hicks R R, Jendrejczk D R. Evaluation of a prosthetic shank with variable inertial properties. Clinical Prosthetics and Orthotics 1985; 9: 23– 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C S, Mansour J M. Swing phase simulation and design of above knee prostheses. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 1986; 108: 65– 72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeer T. Dynamics and control of bipedal locomotion. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1993; 163: 277– 314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochon S, McMahon T A. Ballistic walking. Journal of Biomechanics 1980; 13: 49– 57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selles R W, et al. Effects of prosthetic mass and mass distribution on kinematics and energetics of prosthetic gait: a systematic review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 80: 1593– 9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattes S J, Martin P E, Royer T D. Walking symmetry and energy cost in persons with unilateral transtibial amputations: matching prosthetic and intact limb inertial properties. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2000; 81: 561– 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donker S F, et al. Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking. Experimental Brain Research 2002; 146: 26– 31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner H B, Barrack R L. Ankle weighting effect on gait in able- bodied adults. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1990; 71: 112– 5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson D J, Martin P E. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic adaptations in unilateral below-knee amputees during walking. Gait and Posture 1997; 6: 126– 136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piazza S J, Delp S L. The influence of muscles on knee flexion during the swing phase of gait. Journal of Biomechanics 1996; 29: 723– 33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selles R W, et al. Adaptations to lower leg mass perturbations in the swing phase of transtibial amputation subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (in press).
   Google Scholar
• Selles R W, et al. Adaptations to lower leg mass perturbations in the swing phase of transtibial amputation subjects. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Winter D A, Sienko S E. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. Journal of Biomechanics 1988; 21: 361– 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter D. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. 2nd edn. New York: Interscience, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Selles R W, et al. Lower-leg inertial properties in transtibial amputees and control subjects and their influence on the swing phase during gait. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 569– 77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeadon M R. The simulation of aerial movement – II. A mathematical inertia model of the human body. Journal of Biomechanics 1990; 23: 67– 74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma I, et al. Segment inertial parameter evaluation in two anthropometric models by application of a dynamic linked segment model. Journal of Biomechanics 1996; 29: 693– 704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillery S C, et al. The effect of changing the inertia of a trans-tibial dynamic elastic response prosthesis on the kinematics and ground reaction force patterns. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 1997; 21: 114– 23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijnappels M, Bobbert M F, Van Dieen J H. Changes in walking pattern caused by the possibility of a tripping reaction. Gait and Posture 2001; 14: 11– 8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigg B M. The free body diagram. In: B M Nigg, W Herzog, Biomechanics of the musculo-skeletal System. West Sussex, Eng- land: Wiley, 1994; 380–391.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan D C, et al. Biomechanical gait alterations independent of speed in the healthy elderly: evidence for specific limiting impairments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1998; 79: 317– 22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zatsiorsky V, Gregor R. Mechanical Power and Work in Human Movement. In: W Sparrow, Energetics of Human Activity. Leeds: Human Kinetics, 2000; 195–227.
   Google Scholar
• Winter D A, et al. Biomechanical walking pattern changes in the fit and healthy elderly. Physical Therapy 1990; 70: 340– 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Bogert A, Read L, Nigg B M. A method for inverse dynamic analysis using accelerometry. Journal of Biomechanics 1996; 29: 949– 54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appoldt F, Bennet L, Contini R. Stump-socket pressure in lower extremity prostheses. Journal of Biomechanics 1968; 1: 247– 257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams R B, et al. Triaxial force transducer for investigating stresses at the stump/socket interface. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 1992; 30: 89– 96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar