Introduction to the Special Issue on Psychosocial Perspectives on Amputation and Prosthetics

References

• Childress DS. Editorial. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 2002;
   Google Scholar
• 14(3): 97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Psychological adjustment and coping in adults with prosthetic limbs. Behavioral Medicine 1999; 25: 117– 124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experi- ence Scales (TAPES). Rehabilitation Psychology 2000; 45: 130– 155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb. Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2000; 24: 196– 204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: A qualitative perspective. Journal of Health Psychology 2001; 6(1): 85– 100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Allen D, MacLachlan M. Phantom limb pain and residual limb pain following lower limb amputation: A descriptive analysis. Disability and Rehabilitation 2001; 23(12): 522– 530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Evaluating a written emotional disclosure homework intervention for lower-limb amputees. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2002; 83(10): 1464– 1466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES) and quality of life in people with a lower limb amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2004; 85(5): 730– 736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond D, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial issues in the field of prosthetics and orthotics. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 2002; 14(1): 19– 22.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. (2004) Thinking through enabling technologies: Guidelines for development and implementation. In: M MacLachlan, P Gallagher (eds) Enabling Technologies: Body Image and Body Function. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2004; 259–264.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ. The change in emphasis from people to person: introduction to the special issue on Assistive Technology. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(1–3): 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Jain SS. The prosthetic imagination: Enabling and disabling the prosthesis trope. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1999; 24(1): 31– 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gow D, MacLachlan M, Aird C. Reaching with electricity: Externally powered prosthetics and embodiment. In: M MacLa- chlan, P Gallagher (eds) Enabling Technologies: Body Image and Body Function. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 2004; 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman RA. Phantom Limb Pain. New York: Plenum Press, 1997. 15 MacLachlan M. Embodiment: Clinical, Critical & Cultural Per-
   Google Scholar
• spectives. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Dudkiewicz I, Gabrielov R, Seiv-Ner I, Zelig G, Heim M. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Disability and Rehabilitation 2004; 26(1): 60– 64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin Chan S, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Saltzman CL. Physiological responses to multiple speed treadmill walking for Syme vs. transtibial amputation—a case report. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(23): 1333– 1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demet K, Martinet N, Guillemin F, Paysant J, Andre´ JM. Health related quality of life and related factors in 539 persons with amputation of upper and lower limb. Disability and Rehabilitation 2003; 25(9): 480– 487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte AS, Carroll LJ. A preliminary examination of the relation- ship between employment, pain and disability in an amputee population. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24(9): 462– 471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CD, Fox J. Body image and prosthesis satisfaction in the lower-limb amputee. Disability and Rehabilitation 2002; 24: 925 –931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenheimer C, Kerrigan AJ, Garber SL, Monga TN. Sexuality in persons with lower extremity amputations. Disability and Rehabi- litation 2000; 22: 409– 415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan BG, Condie ME. A post-discharge quality of life outcome measure for lower limb amputees: test-retest reliability and construct validity. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 858– 864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart DL. Orthotics and Prosthetics National Office Outcomes Tool (OPOT): Initial reliability and validity assessment for lower extremity prosthetics. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics 1999, 11(4): 101– 109.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn DS. Well-being following amputation: Salutary effects of positive meaning, optimism and control. Rehabilitation Psychology 1996; 41: 285– 302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk BD, Behel JM. Rehabilitation medicine and body image. In: T Cash, T Pruzinsky. Body Image. A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice. New York: The Guilford Press, 2002; 387–394.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky A. (1987). Unraveling the Mystery of Health. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.
   Google Scholar